User talk:Maineshepp

Lore Alford Rogers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 04:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maineshepp, could you please edit the references on the article so that it is clear how they are relevant to the context? Please make sure you read WP:VERIFIABILITY. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 04:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Maineshepp, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 03:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am trying to edit "Nina E. Allender" with a reference to a new book. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_E._Allender

I tried to add a section, Other sources, and then the reference Frishman, Ronny (2020). Nina Allender Suffrage Cartoonist. Fairfield, CA:: Dragonfeather Books. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-949290-47-9.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)</ref> }} I had a name for the reference (Frishman), but Wikipedia said it had not been used in references. No luck with numerous attempts, so I made no edits.

Sorry, my skills have gotten rusty! Maineshepp (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have a response to your Teahouse question "Finding image of a notable person", from ~Eric F 74.60.29.141 (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(You can delete this message)

Lou Rogers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 01:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HiYour article Charles Edward Barns appeared in the new articles section on WikiProject Wisconsin. The article is well research. I noticed Caleb Barns was mentioned. I was using the same source- the Proceedings of State Bar of Wisconsin for a different Wisconsin legislator. Therefore, I started an article about Caleb P. Barns who served in the Wisconsin State Assembly. You may want to look at it and even add to the article. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-the Charles Edward Barns article appeared in the new articles section on WikiProject Wisconsin. I am not sure how it was released. Please feel free to add materials to the Caleb Barns article. Thanks-RFD (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I check the Wisconsin Blue Books about Caleb Barns. After Wisconsin was admitted to the union in 1848, the first Wisconsin Blue Book came out in 1853. In 1860 the next Wisconsin Blue Book was published and after that it was published on a regular basis. I added a citation about the members of the Wisconsin Legislature 1848-1999 and Caleb Barns' surname was spelled: Barnes. I am going try to track down the records for the 1850&1855 Wisconsin Legislatures to see how Caleb Barns spelt his last name. When Wisconsin was admitted to the union-the Wisconsin Senate was elected for 2 years & the Assembly was elected every year. This was changed to 4 and 2 years respectively in the 1880s by constitutional amendment and has been the same since. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gerald Evan Williams has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or bio notability, certainly not MILBIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I have had a further look at the article and have asked for a few extra pairs of eyes and opinions from the MILHIST community at WT:MILHIST before I submit the article for WP:AfD. I suggest you look in on the comments over the next few days to see what other MILHIST editors are thinking. The issue is not about whether the good Colonel is deserving, he was obviously a brave man. Wikipedia doesn't determine notablity based on who is deserving, it bases inclusion on notability guidelines. It may be that the Colonel meets them, but ultimately the community will decide. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 12:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Irene A. Bradford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Basket _Feudalist 10:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caleb P. Barns, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican and Whig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-I am looking at the Wisconsin Blue Book 2007-2008 right now. That Wisconsin Blue Book has a feature article about the Wisconsin State Legislature. It was has a table of the people who served in the Wisconsin Legislature 1847-2007. On pg. 212 Caleb Barns was listed as serving in the Wisconsin State Assembly 1850 and 1855. Until 1882, the Wisconsin Senators were elected 2 years and the Wisconsin Assembly once every year. In 1881-1882, a series of constitutional amedments were ratified that change the terms of office and the year the Wisconsin constitutional officers were elected. The Wisconsin Senatewas change to 4 years; the Wisconsin Assembly 2 years. It is the same today. It was not until 1970 that the Wisconsin Governor was elected for 4 years. Until then it was 2 years for the governor and other Wisconsin costitutional officers. Caleb Barns served 2 one year terms in the Wisconsin State Assembly in 1850 and 1855-the electoral system that was in effect at the time. Many thanks-RFD (talk) 20:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caleb_P._Barns

Uploaded and linked image (permission email was sent). Can't remove [[file: |frameless|alt=]] code. Maineshepp (talk) 23:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it with this edit. In infoboxes the "image=" parameter is just the file name, without any additional code or even the "File:" prefix. Huon (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caleb P. Barns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopal Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

	Teahouse First Birthday Badge
	Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Irene A. Bradford.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Irene A. Bradford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:31, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irene A. Bradford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irene A. Bradford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maineshepp. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

^King Jakob _C2 19:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maineshepp. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Tito Dutta (contact) 03:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Nina E. Allender, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 22:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Woman's Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anne Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Great work on the Nina E. Allender. Thanks for your great efforts to improve Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 09:11, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I thought I was signed in when I edited Bungay. Instead my IP address was shown. I clicked undo and then resubmitted my additions. The IP address still is there. Can it be removed?Maineshepp (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it sure can; I've removed it for you. In the future, should this kind of thing happen again, the quickest way to get a response is to contact the oversight team through the email form; just let them know that you accidentally edited while logged out, giving them the name of the article (direct links to the edits themselves is also helpful), and they can take care of it for you. Cheers! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 22:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Do you know what collection this photo of Lou Rogers is from? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lou_Rogers_1910s.jpg

Thank you, Aweissmeyer (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, This is from our family collection. Do you need more information?

Maineshepp (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to connect via email to learn more about this collection for research purposes. Is there an address I could contact you at? Feel free to email me at [email protected]. Thank you! Aweissmeyer (talk) 22:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello fellow WikiProject Maine members!
I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on! There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others. Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia. Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again. Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices. Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings. I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page! We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) at 17:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC). To remove yourself from this list, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/members, remove the WikiProject's userbox/category from your user page (rarely used for mass mailings), or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.[reply]

	Hello fellow WikiProject Maine members!
I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on! There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others. Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia. Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again. Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices. Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings. I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page! We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) at 17:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC). To remove yourself from this list, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/members, remove the WikiProject's userbox/category from your user page (rarely used for mass mailings), or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...I didn't realize I wasn't signed it. I went to remove and redo it, but someone already corrected what I added, so I can't change it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lillian_M._N._Stevens

Thanks

Maineshepp (talk) 21:04, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted to the state before you made your logged-out entry, and rev-deleted it so that your IP does not show in the history. Now you can log in and make the change again. Make sure to include "http://" in the URL, which was the change another user made here after your edit. JohnCD (talk) 21:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I added a new section, and the heading and 2-col formatting of references disappeared.

Also, when citing news articles, which category is for the newspaper's title?

Lillian_M._N._Stevens

Maineshepp (talk) 14:27, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was a misformatted reference. I've corrected it. Also, it's better to use a Wikilink rather than a URL when mentioning an encyclopedia page in your comments. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 14:51, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Staff names are public information, but logos are usually copyrighted, so they'd have to upload the logo - and make it copyright-free. See if they have a publicity person and if so let him/her know about the page. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 23:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in the 20,000 Challenge, aiming for 20,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maineshepp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maineshepp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maineshepp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am trying to edit "Nina E. Allender" with a reference to a new book. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nina_E._Allender I tried to add a section, "Other sources," and then the reference Frishman, Ronny (2020). Nina Allender Suffrage Cartoonist. Fairfield, CA:: Dragonfeather Books. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-949290-47-9

I had a name for the reference (Frishman), but Wikipedia said it had not been used in references. No luck with numerous attempts, so I made no edits.

Sorry, my skills have gotten rusty! Maineshepp (talk) 15:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)