User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2015/January

This is an archive of past discussions with User:MadeYourReadThis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

How did the majority end up being redirect. According to the article's entry [1] only one user voted to blank and redirect and another (you) voted delete it. The rest in a total of four votes voted to keep it. So how can the consensus be to blank and redirect? Explain this.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep in mind that the bolded keep/delete that begin each editor's contribution to the discussion are suggestions, not votes. The discussion as a whole is taken into consideration when closing. The result was not a vote tally. I dont know, I didn't close it nor should I since I participated in the discussion.

The arguments for keep were not strong. Your argument was one is that is specifically mentioned as one not to make in a deletion discussion (other stuff exists). The other keep argument found only a passing mention of the product in a newspaper article not focused on the subject of the article, not sufficient to meet WP:GNG. Neither were sufficient to keep the article. I suspect the redirect result was a compromise. You'd need to ask the person who closed it. If you disagree, you may take it to a deletion review, there is a link at the top of the discussion.--RadioFan (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I still believe the users despite their weak arguments provided sources. I also am certain that despite not being votes, two users do not constitute consensus. Reaching clearly policy clearly supports this argument. So I am still bewildered as to why it's being considered consensus when the widespread number of editors voted to keep while only two voted to blank+redirect.--Nadirali نادرالی (talk) 19:59, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beagle 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• intact in 2014 on the surface of [[Isidis Planitia]] at {{coord|11.5265|N|90.4295|E|globe:Mars}})<ref>{{cite web|last1=Ellison|first1=Doug|title=coordinates calculated from HiRISE images|url=https:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:KFMT logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:WEJZ logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)