User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2015/December

This is an archive of past discussions with User:MadeYourReadThis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

That is, the redirect exists. But we don't want that redirect. We want an actual article. See also note on the submission. HeatIsCool (talk) 01:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

It redirects to a section in the Interstate 84 article, you may improve that section. --RadioFan (talk) 01:43, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

That's true. However, official policy suggests that for highways in North America that pass through more than two territories should be given separate articles. HeatIsCool (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Can you please check  ? What can I do to improve 'Draft:CBSE expression series ?--Aryan ( है?) 10:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry but I'm just not seeing how this could meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The subject needs to be widely covered in 3rd party reliable sources. The references you have provided do not demonstrate this.--RadioFan (talk) 13:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:15, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2015, I hope you have a Merry Christmas and hope your day is full of the true spirit of the day. Plus, good food, good family and good times. :) Have a Great Day! :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:25, 25 December 2015 (UTC) Spread the joy of Christmas by adding {{subst:User:Neutralhomer/MerryChristmas}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

.mil is entirely USGov-PD, so anything from it is not copyvio DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

The article Reaching for the Stars (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:03, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Is it ok now?--Aryan ( है?) 03:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, no. You've provided a lot of footnotes but I'm just not seeing any reliable sources in there.--RadioFan (talk) 03:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)