User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2014/January

This is an archive of past discussions with User:MadeYourReadThis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I mentioned you here, Talk:List of local councils of the Boy Scouts of America. --evrik ^(talk) 12:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Monsters in the Morning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Monsters in the Morning (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Levdr1lp / talk 09:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello RadioFan, I'd like to know why you moved the article Slim Burna discography to the main page and not let it exist alone.Alice Shedrack (talk) 01:59, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

There is no need to split discography off form the main article. The main article isn't long enough nor is the discography large enough to warrant this.--RadioFan (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

If you look at that article you will see that it is that of a living musician, I'm one of the contributing authors to the article and will continue to expand the article but please let that discography article have its own seperate page for now. Thanks.---41.206.11.71 (talk) 07:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your reponse RadioFan, I'm also a contributing author to the article and I believe the length is pretty much large and is being updated since it's that of a living musician. I'd appreciate it if you let the discography article have its seperate page for easy accessibility by readers. Thank you. Alice Shedrack (talk) 07:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Article updated, Thank you for your review RadioFan.---Kalabarian (talk) 12:45, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm not understanding how this being a living musician necessitates a dedicated discography article. As you and others continue to expand the disography section in the main article we can continue to monitor the section and overall article length and split out to a dedicated discography section then. Doing so now is premature. --RadioFan (talk) 13:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Slim Burna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Q4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

I've removed your proposed deletion of the above-noted article and have responded to some concerns on the talk page. In the future please inform the primary author(s) of the pages your propose for deletion as mentioned at WP:PROD#Nominating. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Alison Gold, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PamD 14:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, RadioFan. I happened upon the article Oza Rutvik, since it contained some ambiguous internal links. Looking at the article history, it appears to have been declined as an Article for Creation ten times, and then moved to main name space by PartheshPatel. I'm not very familiar with the AfC procedure, but it looks to me like PartheshPatel might be doing an end run. Cnilep (talk) 01:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps but there is sufficient references to 3rd party reliable sources to meet notability guidelines.--RadioFan (talk) 03:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks for your attention on this. Cnilep (talk) 23:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Songs of The Monsters in the Morning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs of The Monsters in the Morning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Levdr1lp / talk 20:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

RadioFan, I hope you're doing well! You've given feedback on my AfC draft a couple times, so I'd be glad for your input on some changes I've made. I notice your page suggests that I just resubmit instead of asking you to come back, but the last reviewer suggested I check with you before doing so. The main changes I've made since you last commented:

1. Dropped the entire partnerships section.
2. Cut down and reorganized the section on Titanium.
3. Reworded some phrases more straightforwardly: for example, replaced "the company began turning over the management of Titanium's desktop application toolkit to the community" with "Appcelerator...decided to end development of Titanium's desktop application toolkit" and replaced "Appcelerator acquired Nodeable...in order to strengthen its mobile application analytics for enterprise customers" with "Appcelerator bought Nodeable...seeking to strengthen its mobile application analytics offerings.

—N at Appcelerator (my conflict of interest) 16:06, 30 January 2014 (UTC)