User talk:MadeYourReadThis/Archives/2013/September

This is an archive of past discussions with User:MadeYourReadThis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for uploading File:The Winchester Star logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Any objection to moving Harry Harrison to Harry Harrison (disambiguation) and turning Harry Harrison into a redirect to Harry Harrison (writer)? Of the 3 Harry Harrisons, the writer is clear and away the most well-known. By far most of the top-10 "Google searches" are to him and he has far more incoming Wikilinks than the others.

I'm asking you for your opinion because you were the one that move Harry Harrison to Harry Harrison (writer) earlier this year an the person who turned the resulting redirect into a disambiguation page.

By the way, I fixed up the 10-15 articles that had incoming wikilinks to Harry Harrison. They all point to the writer now. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:03, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

The article on the writer does receive the most traffic but all articles are receiving traffic daily. The current naming seems reasonable to me.--RadioFan (talk) 04:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

I will put it up for a formal community discussion later and post a note here when I do. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 04:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Before I put it up for discussion, I would invite you to reconsider based on traffic and the guidelines in Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Is there a primary topic?. According to http://stats.grok.se/, in July 2013, the writer had 4233 views, the radio person had 555 views, and the cartoonist had 89 views. I checked some other months and got similar results. If you are okay with moving it and do not think others will raise serious objections, I will ask an administrator to do it as a non-controversial move. If you object or you think others will object, I will open a discussion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:08, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Opera Village Africa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Leutha (talk) 21:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Have the issues you raised in Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Appcelerator been addressed enough to allow accepting the submission? Do you see other serious issues? I'm asking DGG the same question. If both of you say "okay" I will probably accept it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:WFGWam.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:56, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Pearmund Cellars logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 00:58, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:WIDI logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:12, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

You are aware that this is in Wikipedia space and not article space, thus meaning it's not an article, so "lacks third party coverage" is irrelevant? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Which is why it's filed under "miscellany for deletion". Lacking any 3rd party coverage is an observation. Thanks for your concern.--RadioFan (talk) 01:51, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I would recommend you to just take a look at Wikipedia talk:Rutvik Oza. Oza is a filmfare award winning writer for Udaan (see http://www.movieplus.com/article-details/anurag-kashyap-redefining-indian-cinema-615/ and http://ibnlive.in.com/photogallery/14375-8.html). He has also penned hit movies including Satyagraha (see http://www.thehindu.com/features/cinema/cinema-reviews/satyagraha-food-for-thought-for-fastfood-generation/article5079201.ece and http://in.bookmyshow.com/entertainment/satyagraha-film-review/25490). So, I wish you could look into the matter yet again. Thank you! PartheshPatel (talk) 13:07, 29 September 2013 (IST)