User talk:Ma'az/Archives/2018/January

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ma'az. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines for academics, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arif Butt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Maaz Butt180, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 03:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Muhammad Arif Butt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 03:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Customs Public School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Customs Public School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:14, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Muhammad Zarrar Arif, from its old location at User:Maooz180/sandbox/Muhammad Zarrar Arif. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 16:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Customs Public School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 16:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Muslim Model High School, Lahore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 17:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Muhammad Zarrar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 17:53, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Zarrar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Zarrar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 05:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Salama Abu Hashim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 19:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Maooz180. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!  sami  ^talk 20:24, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you Sir (Samee) :) Maooz180 (talk) 20:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Ihya'e Ulum-ed'Deen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 00:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Maqasid al Falasifa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 00:38, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

On Legal theory of Muslim Jurisprudence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 11:58, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

The Moderation in Belief, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 19:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samee was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nusaybah bint Ka'ab instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umm Ammara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Umm Ammara, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 sami  ^talk 18:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Umm Haram, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 15:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Zihar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 sami  ^talk 14:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not disregard the "In use" tag - it means that I am busy working on the article, and it is therefore premature to affix tags re references. Thank you Paul venter (talk) 14:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

• Cheers :). I only tagged to ask for more references. It was just to help you with the article. I didn't use XFD or CSD. Ma'az (talk) 15:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ma'az. Don't place inappropriate tags such as {{lead too short}} on stub articles as you did here. 1 2 3 The appropriate length of the lead section depends on the total length of the article. Happy editing!  samee  ^talk 00:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• Got it sir :) 13:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

• I will add on to this: please don't also add {{merge}} tags to SIAs unless you're willing to provide a reason for the proposal on a Talk page, particularly on one of the pages you tagged. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 18:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
• Understood.  M A A Z   T A L K  00:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Ma'az, thanks for creating FRAXD!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as uncategorised.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• Yes. I've added categories to the article now. Thank you for help :).  M A A Z   T A L K  10:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Customs Public School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Customs Public School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 12:21, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Model High School, Lahore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Model High School, Lahore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 12:23, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Model High School, Pattoki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

• Yes. I thought it will automatically redirect to Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Lahore. Thank you for the help :) . I've corrected the mistake.  M A A Z   T A L K  10:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	You're welcome! (on the behalf of DPL bot).  samee  talk 11:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Why did you tag the article for BLP sources and refimprove? Seraphim System ^(talk) 10:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

• These tags can be removed by you or any other user after mentioning more references.  M A A Z   T A L K  10:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

I asked you why you added them in the first place. Everything in the article is sourced reliably, none of the content requires multiple sources. Unless you can justify adding this template I am planning to remove it.Seraphim System ^(talk) 10:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

• Respected user! you are a senior wikipedian, so you can remove the tag if you like; but I only placed it because WP:GNG guidelines and also WP:ACADEMIC demand multiple sources.  M A A Z   T A L K  10:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

OK, it is not a BLP issue then, but you are concerned about notability. Wayne LaFave is probably one of the most highly cited academics in American law. His treatise has thousands of cites, many of them to court decisions. If that is the only issue, I will remove the template. Seraphim System ^(talk) 10:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

• Yes. Please site more references and you can remove the tag yourself.  M A A Z   T A L K  10:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Google Scholar can be a little dodgy, but for future reference, a named professor emeritus with 6000+ cites passes WP:NPROF unambiguously. I have removed the template.Seraphim System ^(talk) 11:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

According to WP:GNG, it is mentioned that: Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability.  M A A Z   T A L K  11:55, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Alex Shih (talk) 03:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

	1000+ edits barnstar
	I congratulate you on crossing 1000 edit-mark. Keep up the good work. Cheers :)  samee  talk 12:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you :)  M A A Z   T A L K  13:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi I just wanted to tell you that the Pakistan Army page is being targetted by Indian users who keep adding Indian sources and claims to the 1965 war section. The problem is Indian army page contains no Pakistani sources or claims on the 1965 war so why should we tolerate their claims on our page? Please look out for user Adamberger80 he is a Indian nationalist who is biased against Pakistan and removes Pakistani claims with idiotic claims that only Pakistani losses should be stated not Indian. Hranday8 (talk) 09:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

• Thank you for your comment. Anybody can edit on a page, considering there is no violation of Wikipedia guidelines.  M A A Z   T A L K  17:50, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ma'az, I really dont think it is helpful, putting a ref improve on a brand new article. Wait until it is finished, then put a tag. I only 30 minutes ago. scope_creep (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

• Understood.  M A A Z   T A L K  19:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Toli Pir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hilltop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

• Removed the wikilink.  M A A Z   T A L K  14:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Read WP:ALTACCN, you've to notify checkuser about your alt-account(s). Störm (talk) 14:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Störm was this message really intended for me? If so, which alternative accounts?  M A A Z   T A L K  14:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Ma'az You seems to be experienced editor who is or was editing before this account. It will be useful if you disclose the account(s). My job was to inform you. Thanks. Störm (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Störm I have been here for more than 2 months and I study Wikipedia guidelines. As an experienced editor, you should assume good faith.  M A A Z   T A L K  14:53, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

You may want to review this behavioral guideline. See the 4th point:

• A newcomer may save a tentative first draft to see if they are even allowed to start an article, with plans to expand it if there is no backlash. If, within a few minutes, the article is plastered with cleanup tags, assessed as "stub" or even suggested for deletion, they may give up. It is better to wait a few days to see how a harmless article evolves than to rush to criticise.

Thanks, Aymatth2 (talk) 03:20, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I will definitely consider this on drafts and new pages.  M A A Z   T A L K  18:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

I suggest you to get yourself acquainted with the WP:DP and WP:N before nominating any article for deletion. It will help you. --Saqib (talk) 09:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

I have used XFD before. You never patronized me before for nominating any article (including those articles where you yourself contributed). So, is this a consistent objective statement on your side or just an emotional reaction because your article was nominated.  M A A Z   T A L K  09:59, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

I don't think I have ever contributed to an article - which you under your current account - nominated for deletion. Have you been using another account in the past? And by the way, I am not getting emotional over this AfD nom. In the past, a couple of articles created by me were sent for deletion discussion but I don't remember If have ever reacted emotionally. In fact I never bothered to comment on those AfDs at all once I perceived that my creations holds bare notability or fails to qualify for standalone pages. Who would suggest to delete his own creation? I will defend Samina Khan with rational instead of bombarding the nomination page with sources and unnecessary remarks. --Saqib (talk) 12:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

• There's nothing wrong with mentioning WP:RS in the discussion. References are the backbone of Wikipedia articles. Reasoning and Referencing both work together for notability.  M A A Z   T A L K  17:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
• Your contribution here when I used XFD: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Usman_Dar  M A A Z   T A L K  18:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

I don't remember If I ever had contributed to that page. --Saqib (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

I was talking about your contribution in AFD.  M A A Z   T A L K  18:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

I know you're excited but please stop cluttering the articles with unnecessary tags. If you think any article is orphan then introduce links to it. Don't add and run away. Störm (talk) 16:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

• If this is so wrong then why do we have templates like "unsourced", "refimprove" etc. I hope you won't get "excited" too as you are new to AWB.  M A A Z   T A L K  17:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Ma'az,

There is widespread consensus among experienced editors that elected provincial or state legislators in any country are notable, as long as that fact is verifiable, even with primary sources. Instead of nominating such articles for deletion, my recommendation is that you work to improve such articles and their references, since the result will be a better encyclopedia. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 00:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Would you kindly explain why you unnecessary tagging pages? Sardar Zahoor Ahmad has enough amount of RS and everything is inline cited. --Saqib (talk) 17:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Muhammad Arif Butt, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 17:21, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ma'az reported by User:Saqib (Result: ). Thank you. Saqib (talk) 17:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Ma'am. The report has been closed with a warning to you. You are risking a block if you make any further reverts of Muhammad Arif Butt unless you have received a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:37, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I can confirm that you're using two accounts simultaneously. Currently, you're not involved in any suspicious behaviour but this can be troublesome for you. If you're trying to keep your record clean by using this new account then leave your previous account and opt for WP:CLEANSTART. This way you can achieve whatever you want to (i.e. Adminship) on WP. Störm (talk) 12:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Can you please explain why you cluttering pages with redundant tags in a huff? The said page has been already linked with at least three pages, but despite that you tagged it as underlinked. The next time you misuse AWB, I am afraid I'll report it. --Saqib (talk) 10:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

• You added the material after I placed the AWB tag. Before you added the material there was just one wikilink. This is deceptive and wrong. Please don't intimidate me.  M A A Z   T A L K  17:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)