User talk:MSincccc

Archives

Feb 2022–April 2024 April 2024-present

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 6.

This is MSincccc's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 20 days

Hi MSincccc. Since you have removed my recent addition on his trip to Sabah based on the reason of "weak source" (from the source that is published by The Borneo Post, one of the English dailies covering the daily issues in East Malaysia), can you help me to elaborate further on the details of that trip with a stronger source that you considered (anything that you can find on the web)? Since the table itself mentions their two destinations of Kuala Lumpur and Sabah in Malaysia, but almost everything in the description details his visit to the Kuala Lumpur part in West Malaysia and not even a single one to Sabah in East Malaysia. If there is none, then it is better to remove "Sabah" since it only left readers to wonder what they are going there for. Regards.  Ṉight Ḻantern ^🏮 04:12, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the Sabah bit as the 2015 source was retrospective and vague about their activities. The rest of the section details Kuala Lumpur, so the brief, unclear Sabah mention felt trivial and potentially confusing. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 05:04, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MSincccc: The 2015 source by TBP (accessed via PressReader) did mention in its text on the first paragraph that Prince William and wife Catherine visited Sabah three years ago (in 2012). I agree with you on that part of the news that explains little details on their tour in the first link since the news topics are mostly toward the Pinakol beadwork part. While the second source is directly through the TBP official link website, describing their visit to the Danum Valley Conservation Area. I beg your pardon for asking you to help me replace the source with any UK news website since you consider both of the sources from the media in the region they visit as weak. If none, then I guess I should remove the link to Sabah and leave only Kuala Lumpur on the 13–15 September visit since it is further confusing when there is no destination described in the description regarding the Sabah region, although they did visit that particular place in that year. Thank you, and apologies for bothering you anyway. Regards.  Ṉight Ḻantern ^🏮 05:38, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve just come across a BBC News article mentioning the visit to Danum Valley, so I’ve added it to the article. Let me know if you have any further suggestions in future – they’re much appreciated. Thanks, MSincccc (talk) 07:14, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Check out my talk, - if you have little time, listen to Gilda Cruz-Romo in the final scene of Aida, if you have more read her article, and if you have still more check out my music, some sung with me in choir, some played by friends, all heard with friends. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:27, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three Ukrainian topics were on the main page today, at least at the beginning, RD and DYK, - see my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:18, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Three of "my" recent deaths bios are on the main page right now, one my story today, Gary Karr, and I loved to find his breakthrough concert in 1962 as a video. In my music today I match it with 9 other double bassists, 7 conducted by a person who's birthday is today - coincidence ;) - Thank you for reviewing the FAC! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Béatrice Uria-Monzon and her story, Julia Hagen and her no story --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:53, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Bach's day of death, I decorated my user pages in memory, with his music, and my story ends on "peace". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:03, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I previously spoke to you about cosmetic edits that do not change the page output. Edits like this one: [1] are pointless. They have no impact on the output and the bot will simply come along later and undo the edit anyway. The url-status parameter is deprecated when there is no archive-url. That is why the bot consistently removes that parameter. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

...when there is no archive-url.

Thank you, @Celia Homeford, for pointing that out. I’ve now archived the URL in that reference. It's because of you (and Keivan and a few others) that I’ve come to realise one should make revisions only when needed, not just for the sake of it. Please keep contributing as you do. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit on the Olivia Grosvenor page. Can you show me the link to the policy where we should not use minors names in their parent's pages? Thank you. GrandDukeMarcelo (talk) 09:10, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPNAME:

This is generally interpreted by the community to include the removal of names of non-notable minors from articles about their notable family members, such as when a notable individual births or sires a non-notable minor. Notability is not presumed or inherited with extremely limited exception (such as heir to a throne or similar). MSincccc (talk) 09:29, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Really helpful! GrandDukeMarcelo (talk) 09:35, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MSincccc, I hope you’re well. I’ve noticed you’ve brought a number of articles to Good Article status, and I really admire the quality and consistency of your work. I’m currently working on the Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon article and hoping to prepare it for GA nomination. I’d be really grateful if you had a moment to look over it and let me know what changes it might need to meet the criteria—whether it’s structure, citations, tone, or anything else that stands out. No pressure at all, but I’d really appreciate any guidance you’re willing to share. I’m keen to learn more about the process and improve my editorial work. Thanks so much. ItsShandog (talk) 09:28, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the offer. I’ll try and take a look when I have the proper time. At present, my hands are full. Regards. MSincccc (talk) 09:54, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thank you. Regards ItsShandog (talk) 12:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I personally agree that “a.m.” and “p.m.” with periods is correct for British English, and I’ve been applying that format across royal biographies based on MOS:TIME and ENGVAR. However, when I used it on the Elizabeth II article, it was reverted, and I was told that “am” without periods is actually preferred in UK English. I’ve now received conflicting advice and I’m genuinely confused—especially since I thought “a.m.” was the correct format for UK-based articles. I changed my own edit again to avoid conflict. ItsShandog (talk) 11:37, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]