User talk:LunaHasArrived

Welcome!

Hi LunaHasArrived! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Sweet6970 (talk) 14:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prior accounts

Have you used any other account on Wikipedia? BilledMammal (talk) 22:40, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, may I ask why you think I would have LunaHasArrived (talk) 03:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion therapy

Since both are "therapy" related to transgender topic, isn't it OK to have a template:distinguish there? --by Huhu9001 (talk) at 03:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This conversation is probably best had at the conversion therapy talk page. LunaHasArrived (talk) 07:56, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Turban

RE: your comments about Turban, rereading the thread you are absolutely correct, that was your suggestion and I apologise unreservedly for implying otherwise. It was a good suggestion, and I could blame any number of reasons why I made the mistake today but honestly I just remembered it as part of the discussion and didn't check the entire conversation in sufficient detail when posting here today. I'll strike that part of my response. I've asked the admin for permission to reply there too and I'll post this apology there too if I can. Void if removed (talk) 21:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. We all make mistakes and I can see why one would slip through here (although obviously it Is the worst time for one to happen). I will say from my point of view that there is no need for the apology elsewhere.LunaHasArrived (talk) 21:45, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A request

You are aware that gensex is a contentious topic. Please do not make insulting and inflammatory comments, as you did here [1]. Sweet6970 (talk) 17:26, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry but how is that an insulting or inflammatory comment? pauliesnug ^{(message / contribs)} 22:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Transgender health care misinformation on Wikipedia and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, Raladic (talk) 00:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Diffs

AFAIUI That is not counting required information. You need to exclude the diffs I am replying to and ignore non-diff/offsite links given for context and repetitions.

I'm pretty sure these are the diffs I have added:

[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] Void if removed (talk) 08:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck it through anyway as the horse has long bolted from the stable. Would be useful to have a precise definition of "diff" somewhere though. LunaHasArrived (talk) 08:29, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Transgender healthcare and people arbitration case opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 11, 2025 at 23:59 UTC, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transgender healthcare and people/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 06:39, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]