User talk:LukeSurl/archive13

Hello. You raised a PROD on this article a few months ago and may be interested in this AFD. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:13, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Daily Grind-17Sep06.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Image of a unnotable topic that has since been deleted. No obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Puppet Heap Wiki. Since you had some involvement with the Puppet Heap Wiki redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 02:09, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You said in chess variants you can help me recreate the three-check chess article. I looked at the original and I think we can use part of that but I want to add more. I think I can enlist a few three-check players to come and help. That's all, thanks! Geekpotato24 (talk) 17:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that again. A semi-literate piece of nonsense pointedly aimed at me is way off the mark. The gibbering nonsense posted is nothing to do with the article's development, as is fairly clear to anyone who isn't trying to score points. Leave it off the talk page and don't be disruptive by supporting trolls. - SchroCat (talk) 09:06, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you think it's a good stp to ignore this and edit war? That speaks volumes of your approach, which is not about article development, but point scoring. - SchroCat (talk) 09:16, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And next time, read TPO: "Comments that are plainly irrelevant are subject to archival or removal." Trolling falls into that bracket - SchroCat (talk) 09:18, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those comments are relevant. They are clearly about the content of the article, specially regarding how Colston should be described. They are not well worded, but I do not consider them trolling. Deleting these comments is not warrented. Again, as per WP:TPO you should stop if there is any objection. and I, another editor am objecting. Such a policy isn't neutered if you disagree with both other editors involved. --LukeSurl ^{t c} 09:25, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck me! You think Colston's toenails and the "Confederate cause" are relevant?? See WP:TALK#USE which means I'm within the guidelines to archive or delete. Your decision to edit war on reposting semi-literate trolling is dubious. - SchroCat (talk) 09:29, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Start and Restart of Play (association football) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Start and Restart of Play (association football) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Prisencolin (talk) 19:35, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 12 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 2020, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the statue A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 2020 was inspired by a raised fist at a Black Lives Matter protest? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 2020. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, A Surge of Power (Jen Reid) 2020), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]