Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

User talk:LuNaCy

AfC notification: Draft:Matt Walsh (pundit) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Matt Walsh (pundit). Thanks! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Walsh (pundit) (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mhawk10 were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm seeing quite a few low-quality sources in the article. This is a biography of a living person. I have very little doubt that Matt Walsh is notable, but the article needs to be cleaned up to be brought into the mainspace. The use of future tense to describe perpetual behaviors of Walsh is generally informal, while there seems to be quite a bit of spin in the way many of the sources are used. In general, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV command that we write what our sources say, no more and no less. We do not that we look at our sources, analyze them, and then write something that is different than they claim (original research/synthesis) nor do we present article subjects in a way that the tone of the reliable sources don't actually support (POV spinning). This needs substantial work.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Mhawk10 (talk) 04:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, LuNaCy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited California's 10th State Assembly district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephanie Nguyen. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited California's 19th State Assembly district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Mateo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya