Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to PKS 1424−418, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.
The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.
Hi Lithopsian. Thank you for your work on Mu Boötis. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for taking the time to write the article! Have a blessed week ahead!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
That's an odd one. Although it presents itself as a journal, the "papers" are only abstracts for presentations made at the "meeting". It looks like it should really be covered by cite conference; although there is a journal, conference abstracts are often published in things that look a lot like journals. The doi should come out, it is near-useless for actually locating the relevant abstract and it will keep getting tagged with doi-access=free and then the url will look redundant (Citation Bot might even take the url out, depending on which way the wind is blowing). The bibcode links directly to (a copy of) the abstract and that page links directly to the real abstract. NASA ADS doesn't link directly to a pdf download, but then there isn't anything to download beyond the abstract. The downside is that the template doesn't wikilink the title for bibcodes, only for dois. Using an explicit url is a bit of a last resort because of linkrot, but it is probably the only way to get the title linked to the abstract if that's your goal.
As an extra, the OCLC and ISSN links are probably even less help than the doi so they should probably come out too. That would make it doubly or triply obvious what to click on to see the crucial information. I notice that this article uses OCLC and ISSN extensively but they are not very helpful for cite journal, linking only to a generic page for the journal rather than something that would be useful in a reference.
