User talk:Leo1pard/Archive 5

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Bear versus bull, from its old location at User:Leo1pard/sandbox/Bear versus bull. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:00, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like someone's original research in comparing the two species, doesn't really reference articles that literally compare the two.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bear versus bull and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bear versus bull, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leo1pard! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Al Wathba, Abu Dhabi.

User:Sam Sailor while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam Sailor}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Sam Sailor 22:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sam Sailor: You're welcome. Leo1pard (talk) 08:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, when you get a chance, would you please take a look at your most recent edit at Bengal tiger? There's a ref error I can't quite figure out how to fix. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 17:14, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Leo1pard (talk) 17:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Sharjah Mosque.

User:Doomsdayer520 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Sharjah Mosque.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:48, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doomsdayer520: You're welcome. Leo1pard (talk) 17:40, 18 August 2019 (UTC); edited 17:41, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paul McClean. Since you had some involvement with the Paul McClean redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TSventon (talk) 12:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rüppell's fox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamb (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Acroterion (talk) 03:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm confident that you're not using multiple accounts, I haven't blocked you for the attempt at outing Tijkil. I have deleted the revisions, and I have profound reservations about their original username, but your accusations aren't the way to resolve the problem. Don't ever do that. I've raised the matter at ANI. Acroterion (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Acroterion Do you mean my suspicion that Tijkil is a sock-puppet of BigCat82, because of the similarities between their edits, particularly the way they managed that article and talk-page, like these? [1] [2]

Indeed, I warned Tijkil that reporting the other guy for sock-puppetry could become WP:Boomerang. Leo1pard (talk) 05:12, 10 November 2019 (UTC); edited 05:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leo1pardReally? That was in 2016, I got into this debate mid 2017, getting on wiki early 2019 being a beginner at wikipedia, that is not me, does not even sound like me. –Tijkil (talk) 08:36, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't ever attempt to reveal someone's off-wiki identity unless they've made it plain on Wikipedia. The more so if you're making defamatory accusations. Acroterion (talk) 15:00, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tiger versus lion into Lion-baiting. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:00, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa Those are mostly my words, which had been modified time and again by myself, though others did contribute. I reckon I should have mentioned that, thanks. Leo1pard (talk) 08:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC); edited 08:15, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:History of lions in Mesopotamia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bear versus bull, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]