User talk:Laurelli7

Hello, Laurelli7, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Laurelli7, I saw your post at WP:Administrative action review; it's been removed by someone because that's really not at all what that page is for. What is it you're trying to do? If you're proposing that the article in your sandbox be made an article, I think the best thing to do for a new editor is to use WP:Articles for Creation. You could move the page to Draft:AI code agents, and then follow the directions at WP:AFCREVIEW. If you have problems or questions, you can ask for me here on your talk page. If I'm not around to answer, you can also ask for help at WP:AFCHELP.

You can also move it into article space yourself, but I really recommend a new editor use AFC. It's set up for providing feedback, and can be a little less merciless than a new editor can sometimes experience in artice space.

If you were trying to do something else, you can ask for help at the WP:Teahouse. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:33, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You triggered an abuse filter (displaying a message similar to MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-badmove) because you attempted to move this page to mainspace rather than the actual draft you intended to move, which doesn't make sense. Nothing would be technically stopping you from moving the page currently at User:Laurelli7/sandbox to mainspace.

That said, the draft you wrote does not appear to be ready for mainspace, for several reasons:

• The references are formatted incorrectly and redundantly.
• The entire "Key Milestones" section is unsourced
• The entire "Future Trends and Challenges" section is unsourced and seems to be your own original research.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:34, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AI code agents and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 20:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Laurelli7! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 20:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Laurelli7/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 14:10, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AI code agent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AstrooKai (Talk) 00:20, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]