User talk:Kyelerw1

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyesnore was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to provide citations to secondary sources that provide substantial coverage about the subject in question.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cleffy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyesnore ^talk💬 06:02, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kyelerw1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eyesnore talk💬 06:02, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the reason it was declined. I'll continue updating until more reliable sources come out! Kyelerw1 (talk) 06:55, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions and enthusiasm! It's great to see.

I want to let you know I had to flag a number of images you had uploaded to Commons for deletion. The reason is that they are a copyright violation. Any images you add to the platform need to be under an open license. You can read more at Commons Licensing, but the gist is, just because an image is out on the internet does not mean it is available for us to use. It's also not OK to upload an image you don't own, but tick the box saying you do own it. If you didn't take the photo yourself with a camera, you almost certainly don't own it.

Sometimes album artwork is uploaded to Wikipedia itself (not commons) under a fair-use rationale, but this is a different process to the normal way of uploading photos. To re-upload them under fair use, go to the File Upload Wizard and choose "Upload a non-free file". Fair use is likely to apply to album artwork, but not to photos of the artist.

I've had a look at your drafts for Lil Darkie and Cleffy and notability is the big problem:

1. Firstly, Cleffy simply does not appear to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article. This may be an example of an article being written WP:TOOSOON.
2. For the Lil Darkie article, again, notability is really marginal. Establishing notability requires significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The Countere magazine article is one good source for establishing notability, but we really need two more of a similar calibre. They need to be in-depth and published by someone independent of the artist. If you can find some more detailed recent coverage, notability can probably be established.

The Lil Darkie article does still have a lot of style problems though:

1. There are a lot of quotes from interviews. I recommend deleting all of them.
2. The article has a lot of what we call original research. Everything in an article, particularly about a living person, needs to be referenced to a reliable source. It is really important that the sources basically directly say what you have put in the article (though be careful not to plagiarise). If you are relying on your own knowledge, or for the reader to read multiple sources and "put two and two together" to reach a conclusion, that is original research and won't be accepted.
3. More inline citations. If you're looking for a rule of thumb, every sentence in the article, no matter how trivial, should be followed by a citation to a source.
4. Quoting song lyrics is usually not considered encyclopedic, and should be avoided. I recommend deleting all of them.
5. The discography section is formatted incorrectly. You probably need to take a look at other articles for musicians and see how they've formatted their discographies there.

You're on the right track here, so I hope you stick around and keep editing. A good place to start would be finding existing articles on topics you find interesting and making constructive edits to those, so you can get a feel for what a good article looks like.

Happy editing! David Palmer//cloventt ^(talk) 01:37, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll take any advice I can get. I'll double check everything moving forward! Kyelerw1 (talk) 06:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Some prose issues on this one. E.g.: "Darkie is proud of his Indian heritage and shows that through his cartoon character.", "The song is on his SoundCloud." Please update to use encyclopedic tone throughout.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lil Darkie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 17:06, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
8		Sydney Youth Orchestra (talk)	Add sources
5		House of Astarac (talk)	Add sources
1,609		Lithium-ion battery (talk)	Add sources
638		VH1 (talk)	Add sources
1,007		Tetrapod (talk)	Add sources
778		Clash Royale (talk)	Add sources
77		Wengie (talk)	Cleanup
64		Supermetrics (talk)	Cleanup
408		Firefox version history (talk)	Cleanup
507		Linus Media Group (talk)	Expand
6		Tourism in Åland (talk)	Expand
630		Anti-Indian sentiment (talk)	Expand
158		Video games in China (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
106		Sleipnir (web browser) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
155		Digital Markets Act (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3,169		Firefox (talk)	Merge
1,232		Mark Rober (talk)	Merge
61		Causes of income inequality in the United States (talk)	Merge
194		Disney Interactive Studios (talk)	Wikify
3		Collegiate Aerial Robotics Demonstration (talk)	Wikify
1,696		Ubisoft (talk)	Wikify
19		Ten Square Games (talk)	Orphan
9		Hoolai Games (talk)	Orphan
2		Alden Todd (talk)	Orphan
4		Jean-Pierre Liégeois (talk)	Stub
27,406		Henry's pocket (talk)	Stub
14		Video games in Norway (talk)	Stub
70		Samsung Gear (talk)	Stub
143		Hay Day (talk)	Stub
50		WhoSampled (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:30, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,090		Right to repair (talk)	Add sources
3		Livingston Robotics Club (talk)	Add sources
8		FIRST Res-Q (talk)	Add sources
113		Squad Busters (talk)	Add sources
104		HomePod Mini (talk)	Add sources
3		Beach Cities Robotics (talk)	Add sources
38		Intel Quark (talk)	Cleanup
1,543		One UI (talk)	Cleanup
174		Maxthon (talk)	Cleanup
642		Clash of Clans (talk)	Expand
4,171		Spotify (talk)	Expand
69		For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (talk)	Expand
32		Altamont Pass wind farm (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
60		Exposure Notification (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
84		Internet Explorer 9 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
227		Chinese sausage (talk)	Merge
75		Modoc people (talk)	Merge
6		Iris junonia (talk)	Merge
63		Kajabi (talk)	Wikify
141		React Media (talk)	Wikify
29		Ancient monument (talk)	Wikify
5		Compagnie Centrale de Réassurance (talk)	Orphan
2		Ali Raymer (talk)	Orphan
2		Chang Darreh (talk)	Orphan
162		DistroKid (talk)	Stub
7		Digital Fair Repair Act (talk)	Stub
8		Cannibal Cuisine (talk)	Stub
164		Odin (firmware flashing software) (talk)	Stub
58		TheRadBrad (talk)	Stub
50		Huya Live (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:33, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]