User talk:Ktkvtsh
If I have declined a draft you created or submitted to AfC, and you want to ask me to re-review it, please DO NOT – I feel like it's much fairer when a draft goes back to the pool of fresh eyes for re-review. If you have come to say that you've made changes and want me to take a look, you are more than welcome to. I'd appreciate it if you would please use a hyperlink to link to the page you are mentioning, so that I don't have to search for it.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC) Heusdens super coupeHi, I went into my article to update my references. In the article in my sandbox, I have 5 of them in there. But when I click to edit them because the location in the FAA website has changed there are NO references in there? Now I know why you declined my article the reference's are gone??? what happened to them? all five are gone? I will reinstall them. I am also have trouble uploading photos to the article. Thank you for your help Mark Coupemanwi (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Asking for feedback based on a declined articleHi User:Ktkvtsh, thanks for taking the time to review the submission Draft:Flowbox (software). I’m not asking for a re-review; I’ll resubmit to AfC after edits. I’m stuck because the feedback I have recieved conflicts: some (like you) flagged a marketing tone, while others said the tone seems fine but the sources lack significant, independent coverage. If you have a moment for quick pointers, could you indicate: • specific lines or phrases that read promotional; and • any sources that fail or meet WP:SIGCOV / WP:ORG. Or even advice on if it would be better to reduce the draft to a stub even if that may result in my most notable sources not being completely relevant or usable, I am a bit lost on what direction I should take to improve my article for resubmission COI note: I’m connected to the subject and am seeking neutral pointers only before resubmitting. Thanks for your help. FactThread (talk) 07:58, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
FarhadhguranHello, and thank you for reviewing the draft. Yes, I am the subject of the article, and I would like to openly declare a conflict of interest (COI). I understand the importance of neutrality and reliable sourcing under WP:BLP, and I have tried to ensure that the draft does not contain promotional language. Each sentence is supported by an independent, reliable source. If there are still parts that appear promotional, I would greatly appreciate if you could please point them out so I can rephrase or provide stronger sources. My aim is to follow Wikipedia’s standards and to create a neutral, well-sourced article. Thank you for your time and guidance. Best regards, Farguraan (talk) 06:52, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC) |