User talk:Koavf/Archive058

User talk:Koavf archives

001 81 topics (2005-03-05/2006-03-07) 63 kb 002 56 topics (2006-03-07/2006-08-08) 44 kb 003 47 topics (2006-08-08/2006-09-14) 48 kb 004 60 topics (2006-09-14/2007-06-05) 73 kb 005 48 topics (2007-06-05/2007-08-21) 80 kb 006 35 topics (2007-08-21/2007-11-30) 73 kb 007 42 topics (2007-11-30/2008-02-19) 44 kb 008 34 topics (2008-02-19/2008-03-26) 46 kb 009 38 topics (2008-03-26/2008-04-19) 38 kb 010 39 topics (2008-04-19/2008-05-31) 60 kb 011 88 topics (2008-05-31/2008-08-04) 88 kb 012 40 topics (2008-08-04/2008-09-11) 61 kb 013 46 topics (2008-09-11/2009-04-13) 47 kb 014 60 topics (2009-04-13/2009-09-29) 50 kb 015 37 topics (2009-09-29/2009-11-21) 46 kb 016 22 topics (2009-11-21/2010-01-04) 22 kb 017 49 topics (2010-01-04/2010-02-18) 54 kb 018 63 topics (2010-02-18/2010-03-23) 63 kb 019 44 topics (2010-03-23/2010-05-02) 48 kb 020 46 topics (2010-05-02/2010-06-28) 56 kb 021 46 topics (2010-06-28/2010-09-01) 71 kb 022 54 topics (2010-09-01/2010-10-14) 43 kb 023 49 topics (2010-10-14/2010-11-26) 43 kb 024 54 topics (2010-11-26/2011-01-22) 37 kb 025 61 topics (2011-01-22/2011-06-08) 37 kb 026 43 topics (2011-06-08/2011-07-12) 39 kb 027 44 topics (2011-07-12/2011-08-15) 48 kb 028 44 topics (2011-08-15/2011-10-08) 42 kb 030 73 topics (2011-11-25/2012-02-17) 62 kb 031 47 topics (2012-02-17/2012-03-14) 74 kb 032 40 topics (2012-03-14/2012-04-15) 39 kb 033 41 topics (2012-04-15/2012-05-01) 43 kb 034 42 topics (2012-05-01/2012-05-30) 38 kb 035 58 topics (2012-05-30/2012-07-27) 73 kb 036 44 topics (2012-07-27/2012-09-03) 87 kb 037 41 topics (2012-09-03/2012-10-26) 61 kb 038 47 topics (2012-10-26/2012-12-01) 111 kb 039 56 topics (2012-12-01/2013-02-05) 78 kb 040 63 topics (2013-02-05/2013-05-14) 69 kb 041 71 topics (2013-05-14/2013-09-04) 135 kb 042 81 topics (2013-09-04/2014-01-09) 109 kb 043 53 topics (2014-01-09/2014-05-15) 69 kb 044 62 topics (2014-05-15/2014-09-17) 92 kb 045 123 topics (2014-09-17/2015-05-16) 156 kb 046 66 topics (2014-05-16/2015-11-11) 73 kb 047 91 topics (2015-11-11/2016-09-30) 113 kb 048 43 topics (2016-09-30/2017-01-09) 74 kb 049 67 topics (2017-01-09/2017-07-21) 96 kb 050 35 topics (2017-07-21/2017-09-11) 75 kb 051 50 topics (2017-09-11/2017-11-25) 83 kb 052 82 topics (2017-11-25/2018-06-13) 106 kb 053 99 topics (2018-06-13/2019-01-01) 219 kb 054 124 topics (2019-01-11/2019-09-23) 240 kb 055 89 topics (2019-09-23/2020-02-04) 190 kb 056 105 topics (2020-02-04/2020-06-20) 253 kb 057 61 topics (2020-06-20/2020-09-11) 158 kb 058 372 topics (2020-09-11/2022-09-10) 596 kb 059 71 topics (2022-09-10/2023-01-05) 98 kb 060 93 topics (2023-01-05/2023-06-05) 113 kb 061 156 topics (2023-06-05/2024-01-10) 262 kb Current discussion

Just as a heads up... the tennis performance charts are pretty locked by consensus guidelines as to formatting. Changing Naomi Osaka's chart made it quite different than all other charts so I changed it back per Tennis Project guidelines. Cheers. Fyunck(click) (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fyunck(click), See MOS:TABLECAPTION. All tables must have captions, please do not remove accessibility features of the site. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not must. You also have to see that this table has a section title all its own... that is its caption. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fyunck(click), No, it isn't: table captions are part of the table. And yes, must: "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about". It seems like you are confused here. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:44, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I read it all and it is not "must" when you have a section titled the same. You seem to have left out the next sentence where it ... "is recommended as a best practice". We already have it right in the section header so its not needed to repeat it. It would look silly. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fyunck(click), Yes, it is. "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about" is very clear and there was recently an RfC on this. It doesn't say "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about unless there are section titles" or "All data tables need a table caption that succinctly describes what the table is about, except for tennis articles". The blind deserve accessibility about this tennis player as much as any other topic on Wikipedia. Why are you fighting me on this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, no it's not. Goodbye. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fyunck(click), Yes, it is. Why are you fighting me on this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Oomph! compilation albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, can you check out my edits on {{Template:Eminem}}, I think I messed up a lil'. ALso, between me 'n you, check out my previous edits if they're alright. Trust u. Peace ♥ L to the K (talk)

@L to the K: Happy to help and happy to have you helping me, brother. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:09, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When you remove opening small tags, please remember to remove the closing tags as well. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95, Yeah, that seems like a really good idea. Thanks for cleaning up after me. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Progressive rock albums by Tunisian artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nifelheim compilation albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:43, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Vanished (album). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 21#Vanished (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Articles containing Sakha-language text requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

A tag has been placed on Category:Spook the Horse albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 As someone who has frequently edited the Arrowverse article in the past, you may be interested in participating in the newly created Arrowverse task force‎. -- /Alex/₂₁ 03:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alex 21, I think I'll pass but thanks for the invitation. Have a good one and stay safe. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justin

there are three pages on Ahmed Mansur but somehow one editor fixed it name but it is not yet patrolled could you kindly check? or the Wikipedia takes 90 days? the page is old btw. Ahmed_Mansur_(film_director) --39.34.149.145 (talk) 07:23, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:DeVotchKa live albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Neue Deutsche Härte compilation albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nifelheim live albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Post-rock albums by Brazilian artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your constant reverts to The Early Years 1965–1972: if you consider an article to have "bad HTML" as you put it, please consider improving the article, not simply deleting information. – Dyolf87 (talk) 08:00, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dyolf87, Can you give me an example of information that I removed that was properly sourced? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Justin. Look, about your latest 3RR violation ([1][2][3][4]) — honestly, I'm a bit at a loss at what to do at this point. Newyorkbrad, BrownHairedGirl, perhaps you'd like to weigh in...? El_C 20:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El C, It was really just two instances (with two reverts), I reverted myself, this is stale, and my self-reverted was itself reverted by another user. There is no systemic problem here as I reached out to the user on his talk page, the article talk page, and at a noticeboard asking for input (hence my self-revert was reverted). What is the problem here? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:50, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El C, Put alternately, had I clicked on the "restore this version" script twice it would have been the same effect as pressing "(undo)" four times. Are you telling me that the former would have been acceptable and the latter wouldn't? It's literally the exact same thing: see the page history. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@El C: Under the rule that consecutive edits count as one for revert-rule purposes, there was no violation here. More importantly, when Koavf realized that he was becoming embroiled in a revert cycle, he stepped back from it and posted to request others' input on the disputed material. Isn't that exactly what both you and I, in admittedly different ways, have encouraged him to do? Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. I have misread the diffs. Sorry Justin — I hope you will accept my apologies for this error and any distress it may have caused. El_C 00:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

El C, I've always respected your judgement and interest in making the project better. Thanks for the unnecessary apology, C. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, as always, for being gracious, Justin. El_C 00:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see this has been resolved, and that everyone has kissed and made up. That's great.

But since I was pinged here and invited to weigh in, may I just gently note that El_C on 3RR patrol wrt Justin isn't a great look at this stage, even if the complaint had not been based on a misinterpretation of events. I am sure that the intentions are all good, but from some angles this looks a bit analogous to an overzealous traffic cop following a "usual suspect" to see if they make a minor error in their driving. I am sure that is not El C's intent, and that the misinterpretation was a thoroughly good faith human error of the sort we all make from time to time in assessing a complex series of diffs ... but I think a reduction in the levels of scrutiny would be beneficial to all involved.

Hope this helps. Best wishes to all. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Underlying point understood and taken to heart. Thanks for being gentle. El_C 05:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user was rejected for adminship by the community and is not a Wikipedia administrator. As such, this user does not have the ability to make blocks, delete articles, suppress edits, or protect pages. Note that this user has been rejected for adminship more than once. Refer to this user's most recent linked request for adminship for more information. Per WP:RfA, Requests for adminship (RfA) is the process by which the Wikipedia community decides who will become administrators (also known as admins or sysops), who are users with access to additional technical features that aid in maintenance. Among other functions, administrators are responsible for blocking users from editing, controlling page protection, and deleting pages.

Sorry, but I'm not convinced that "American non-profit organization" gives anyone a clue as to what this organisation is. Doug Weller talk 13:52, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller, Okay. I don't know what you want me to say in response in to this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I thought you might have a suggestion for something that gives a clearer idea of what it is. Doug Weller talk 18:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller, Seems fine per WP:HOWTOSD and it's 32 characters long whereas the limit is 40. If you have a better one, I'm all ears. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to U.S. advocacy organization. 40 characters is good but not a limit set in stone, but I presume you agree with that. Doug Weller talk 15:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Rock albums by Tunisian artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mexican Drug War has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 04:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that on your userpage, the images on the top left and bottom right cross into the MediaWiki interface. Per WP:SMI, formatting which disrupt the MediaWiki interface, for example by preventing important links or controls from being easily seen may be removed or remedied by any user. On the desktop site, File:Banksy - Rat Photographer.jpg is displayed under and obscures the "Main page" link. It would be preferable if you could remedy this yourself. Thanks --17jiangz1 (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17jiangz1, Nope. Don't talk to me about this topic. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Koavf: Why is that so?--17jiangz1 (talk) 19:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17jiangz1, It doesn't matter why: I told you to stop posting here about this topic. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem to not want to discuss with me, I have raised this to ANI. Thank you. --17jiangz1 (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Living in a Ghost Town you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:02, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, Thanks, Kyle. This reminds me that I should pay this forward. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very glad to have reminded you, maybe we'll be able to get this to GA status as quickly as today once I have completed the review? --K. Peake 09:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake, Stern but fair. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:05, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Living in a Ghost Town you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Living in a Ghost Town for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:42, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Live dark cabaret albums requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Whitesnake remix albums has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JJPMaster (talk) 16:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Albums produced by Manny Lehman (disc jockey) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians interested in the Algeria national football team has been proposed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 8#Category:Wikipedians who like Cocotama. – Fayenatic London 11:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Many thanks for your edits / fixes to my recent changes to the Coltrane Offering page. I hope you don't mind a quick question. I've made a number of edits over the past ten months (for ex. October Revolution in Jazz) and nearly all of them use the inline form of referencing. Can you please tell me why the use of inline references was incorrect in the Offering page, as per your comment ? Again, thank you for your time and help.Helen Puffer Thwait (talk) 11:44, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Puffer Thwait, No worries, Helen, and again, thanks for your work. It's incorrect there because a different style is used on the page. See WP:CITEVAR. Since there was an established way of doing things, it's not appropriate to change it without some strong consensus. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it! Many thanks for taking the time to clarify this. Stay well! Helen Puffer Thwait (talk) 16:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Helen Puffer Thwait You too! Thanks for your great work around here and let me know if there's anything that I can do for you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]