This is an archive of past discussions with User:Koavf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Category:Afrkikaans-language media, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Safiel (talk) 05:55, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
I got to spend a lunchtime with Oliver Sacks at and American Chemical Society tradeshow. My trick was to hang out with his wrangler during the book signing, and when the break came she introduced me to him, and he invited me to walk around the show with them during the lunch break. It was a great hour. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Can you explain why any of "Category:X-language websites" or the "Category:X-language media" you created to categorize them, are appropriate? — Arthur Rubin(talk)22:34, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
They may be appropriate schemes, in general, but that doesn't mean categories that should be empty should necessarily be created. A quick scan shows about 79 of the websites categories have only one entry, most of which are probably DMOZ. Furthermore, Category:English-language websites would be unmanageable if maintenance were attempted, as most articles in Category:Websites [and subcategories] should be in it. Category:English-language media makes a little more sense, but not much. — Arthur Rubin(talk)22:59, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Not really, but I don't know where to check for or propose such standards. The question of whether DMOZ should be in the -language websites categories is a matter for the DMOZ editors (sorry, I mean editors of the articleDMOZ, not editors of DMOZ), even if guidelines for the categories are established. — Arthur Rubin(talk)23:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
I'm going to have to take off shortly. (In fact, I should already have gone.) I won't take any further action for at least 8 hours, and I will check for projects. In general, though, "English-language X" is a questionable category on en.Wikipedia, as most X will be English-language, unless it were a specific category such as Category:English-language media about Russia (which probably doesn't exist.) — Arthur Rubin(talk)23:12, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Go Fund Yourself, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Start-up. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No-carbohydrate diet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Oh my god, Koavf! Justin Anthony Knapp, I love you so much! You look SO hot! You turn me on SO badly! I want to be with you! I’d do anything for you… You seem like a very nice person who would take good care of me :)
I love you ;) I want to do naughty things with you, my sweet Koavf, you are just too KOAVFTASTIC and KOAVFILICIOUS ;)
You are my chosen one ;)
xoxoxo
Samantha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koavf's GF (talk • contribs) 03:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Offering: Live at Temple University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Paris Concert. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi Justin, I'm Marius, an admin from Wikispecies. You participated recently in a WS discussion concerning a user named Stho002, who happens to also be an admin there. His harassment continued since than and he practically forced me to abandon editing there altogether. The problem is that all the admins at WS are scientifically-inclined persons, who don't care about policing and about enforcing the rules, so it's impossible to obtain support from them. See please the latest discussion [1] where everyone justifies my position, yet no action or measure to deter Stho002 is being taken.
Let me stress the point that Stho002 has a very negative history at enwiki, where he was blocked several times on similar offences. please see this. Also, Stho002 monopolizes WS, which is a low-volume wiki by editing 8 hours a day, 365 days a year, without interruption. By this he reached a position where he practically manages WS according to his whims.
Can you please advise me what to do next? Is there a possibility of applying to a higher authority to look into this and sort out this issue? Many thanks, Mariusm (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
@Mariusm: First off, I'm happy to help as long as you understand that I don't have any technical abilities from the community (such as admin or bureaucrat) that would let me do anything you can't do and that I'm not somehow associated with the Wikimedia Foundation, so I don't have any kind of authority or legal expertise or somesuch. Problems like this are more-or-less tailored for stewards. They have bureaucrat abilities across (almost?) all WMF wikis. There are very few of them and they generally only intervene in the case of small wikis which have no admins or few active editors and get overrun by bullish users, hoaxes, spam, etc. This is probably your best bet if you feel like all options have been exhausted on species. That project has several bureaucrats who can block someone and furthermore change his user rights (so that if the community is in agreement that species:User:Stho002 is a problem user, he can be effectively stopped on that wiki). Have you spoken with any of them? Do you think they are receptive? I don't want to come across as someone with a horse in this race as I don't really know Stho002 nor do I do a lot on Wikispecies but it's clear that there are several users who are at the end of their rope interacting with him. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯08:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi Koavf, I'm Allen that I'm looking at your user page. I see with the delete template on your user namespace, but can I (or you) remove it because this page needs to stay undeleted with the last version of yours. George, don't request to delete his user namespace. --Allen(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)08:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
@68.57.233.34: Every article needs to have an adequate lead section and that includes some discussion of every further section in the body of the text. I've noticed that a number of comics and film articles are extremely brief. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯16:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
Why aren't you an admin yet? I would've thought you'd have made an RfA by now, why haven't you made one yet? You'd be a great admin :) -Fimatic (talk) 02:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
@Fimatic: I've never applied nor had anyone else apply me until a few months ago when a new user out of nowhere nominated me. It didn't go well but I think that's mostly due to the nominator and nomination rather than the nominatee. I'd be happy to do it and I've used the tools on other Wikimedia projects and unrelated MediaWiki sites as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯03:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
@Fimatic: So am I! I really don't understand why it was so harsh--honestly, what is the big fear of letting me block users or delete pages? I got several messages on my talk and e-mail expressing support and saying something like, "Had I noticed this earlier, I would have said something" or "If you get nominated again, I'll support you" which was actually very nice. I have lots of user rights here and I don't think there's anyone who sees that as a problem. Oh well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯03:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Do you realize how silly it is to have both a hatnote and a redirect going to different places. Imagine someone pointing to the right with their left index finger and to the left with their right index finger.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
I too am confident that an article will be created for the episode. However, I do not believe that the page should both point to the person and the episode. Why doesn't it just redirect to the alternate spelling of the person? That article should mention the episode.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Jonathanas Hillas (aka Jonathan Hill alias Lord Hill, newly-appointed EU Commissioner)
Hello Justin
Dunno whether you might be able to help? My friend Lithuanian friend Tina and I have been having probs with Lithuanian Wiki insofar as they keep deleting the appended article about Jonathan Hill, one of the new European Commissioners taking office on 1 November. Lithuania's new EuroCommissioner is Vytenis Andriukaitis and since Wikipedia no doubt would prefer to be represented well in all languages, including Lithuanian (www.elections2014.eu includes info about all the new EU Commissioners in case of interest), why has Lithuanian Wiki so far rejected this article?
Much obliged if you could advise what could be done for an article about Jonathan Hill to be uploaded on lt.wikipedia.org. Looking forward to hearing - many thanks. MMabelina (talk) 11:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
@Mabelina: I'd be happy to help but you know my Lithuanian skills are non-existent... Have you spoken directly with the admin who deleted it? Have you posted to the Village Pump there? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯16:41, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 3rd (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pascual Perez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Orphaned non-free image File:Aimee Mann - Red Vines.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Aimee Mann - Red Vines.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
url={{Allmusic|class=artist|id=p44727|pure_url=yes}}|title=allmusic ((( Hootie & the Blowfish > Charts & Awards > Billboard Albums )))|publisher=[[Allmusic]]|accessdate=2010-07-18}}</ref>
url={{Allmusic|class=artist|id=p44727|pure_url=yes}}|title=allmusic ((( Hootie & the Blowfish > Charts & Awards > Billboard Singles )))|publisher=[[Allmusic]]|accessdate=2010-07-18}}</ref>
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Abscam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
Kelly]] [R-FL], [[Raymond Lederer]] [D-PA], [[Michael Myers (politician)|Michael "Ozzie" Myers]] [D-PA), [[Frank Thompson]] [D-NJ], and [[John M. Murphy]] [D-NY]) were convicted of [[bribery]] and [[Conspiracy (crime)|conspiracy]] in separate trials in 1981.
Hi, am just wondering how you managed to get the box to show different colours. Cannot figure out how to get it to work for the Delhi Metro template I'm upgrading. Template: Delhi Metro box. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
Shit, how do you get through all of the comments on your page? If that was my talk page; by 2020 I'd have been able to read it all and replied! Rihanna-RiRi-fan (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments. I am in the process of trying to figure out who DNSEver is and why they have the authority to shut down the wikilivres.ca website. I have never done business with these people.
Categorization is not exempt from WP:V, WP:NOR and WP:BLP, and neither are you. Please explain where on pagan rock or pagan metal is the reliable source supporting your claims that Moonsorrow's albums are "religious" or that all "pagan metal is religious music". The former article is completely unsourced and both clearly contradict your views on the matter. Prolog (talk) 16:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
@Prolog: I know that I'm not exempt from those: why are you telling me this? I have provided several citations where band members say that their music is spiritual. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯17:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Koavf! Thanks for creating the category for Latin music albums by artist nationality. Just one major thing that bothers me about the category is how it's not clear on what it means by "Latin music". See, Latin music just redirects to Latin American music, but Billboard and the Latin Recording Academy's definition of a Latin music album is any album that contains at least 50% recorded in Spanish or Portuguese (for Brazilian music) so that includes albums by artists from Spain. So if it's alright with you, I'm linking the "more information" to Latin music (genre). Cheers! Erick (talk) 23:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Regarding your edits to Stoya ([2][3]): the Guardian page does not include her actual name, and Sunday World doesn't look like a reliable source for BLP information. Trivialist (talk) 11:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
@Trivialist: I've also included a third source now and I don't know why you're saying that Sunday World is unreliable. Is it more or less reliable than "Rog's Reviews" from two words later in the sentence? This is well-sourced information. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯18:45, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
For something like birthplace, I don't have a problem with something like Rog's Reviews, but I think a more reliable source is necessary before including the real name of someone who hasn't actively publicized her real name. In any event, the Guardian page doesn't actually contain her full name, and technically, the Awl article just uses the name as a tag, but doesn't say that it's her real name. Sunday World still seems a bit tabloidy to use, but I'm not familiar with the publication, so I concede that I could be wrong about it. Trivialist (talk) 23:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
@Trivialist: She can't be too picky about hiding her name if she freely uses her personal name in publications like The Guardian and a contraction of her surname as her stage name. Several sources reproduced this for several years. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯23:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
But, unless my browser is truncating words, the name listed on the Guardian page is not the same as the name listed in the Wikipedia article, so it doesn't seem like a valid source. Trivialist (talk) 23:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
My point was, according to the Guardian page you referenced, her name was "Jessica Stoya," which is not what you were claiming. (Sorry for the delay; missed your ping.) Trivialist (talk) 22:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
There's another reason why she's not hiding that name. It's because it's not her actual name. Stoyanodivich is her maternal grandmother's maiden name. Her last name through her father is a bit more mundane. You can figure out what it is if you look up the US trademark database. Remember WP:BLPPRIMARY though. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
It seems that you have been editing Microsoft-related articles, so why don't you consider joining WikiProject Microsoft, not to be confused with WikiProject Microsoft Windows. WikiProject Microsoft is a group of editors who are willing to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Microsoft, its technologies, Web-based sites and applications, its important people, and share interests regarding Microsoft. This WikiProject is in the process of being revived and is welcoming any and all editors who are willing to help out with the process. Add your name to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants and/or add the userbox {{User WikiProject Microsoft}}. Thanks! STJMLCC (talk) 18:09, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Just a reminder, the Film project does not cover biography articles. Therefore, please do not add the {{WikiProject Film}} banner to articles about actors, directors and filmmakers. Those articles are covered by adding |filmbio-work-group=yes to {{WikiProject Biography}} instead. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 21:09, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Just thought I'd let you know I've expanded the Franklin D. Roosevelt lede to address your concern about lack of mentioning his pre-presidency. I also added a sentence about him dying in office, and I removed the tag. pbp18:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Koavf, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015.
Happy editing, JudeccaXIII (talk) 22:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Hello Koavf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing, The Herald : here I am11:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
Its sorted now. Basically two albums said the cover art was "Just Your Average Second On This Planet" 1997-1998 but plainly didn't use the same picture. Turns out the artwork is comprised of several pictures, each of which has its own name, for example "Just Your Average Second On This Planet" 1997-1998 (Discotheque). All the best: RichFarmbrough, 12:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC).
@Cavarrone: I remember that WP:AWB's settings add the {{orphan}} tag to articles with less than four incoming links in the main namespace per a recommendation at WP:ORPHAN. If you don't want me to tag it, I don't mind. Alternately, if you think it's a bug in AWB, I'd recommend registering it as a bug. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯09:11, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Per WP:ORPHAN, orphan tag should be added "if it satisfies the orphan criteria", ie "It is recommended to only place the Orphan tag if the article has zero incoming links from other articles." (stress not mine). I don't know nor I don't care about AWB, adding improper tags is disruptive. Cavarrone09:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
@Cavarrone: I'm not suggesting that you do or must care about AWB as such but I am suggesting that if you care about articles being improperly tagged with {{Orphan}}, then a fix to that program will cut who knows how many off at the pass. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯09:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Maybe so, but why do so? If a template exists called "character" and the first parameter of the template is called "character's name", that is clearly an important parameter. I am not saying it is critical to the point that omitting it would break the template, I am saying it is important, as in "self-documenting". What on earth are you accomplishing by your mass edit? Prhartcom (talk) 18:48, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
I'll bet there is an easier and better way to do this. What is really causing this "redundant" category? Probably not the quite reasonable inclusion of the important "name" parameter in templates used by a thousand articles, but probably a single line of code dealing with "name" in Template:Infobox comics character, Template:Infobox comics creator, and probably others. Can we change the code of the templates to prevent them from causing the article to be added to that category? For example, perhaps the code should be checking for the presence of parenthesis in the name, i.e. "Tintin (character)"? Prhartcom (talk) 19:50, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
@Prhartcom: I'm still not sure why name is especially important... The template generates a name at the top of the infobox anyway. I agree that if the name of the thing being discussed wasn't mentioned that would be odd to say the least but it is mentioned. I don't see why we would want to add extra code for something that can be generated on the fly. In the case of things like "Tintin (character)" then name is quite useful for making it clear that his proper name is simply "Tintin". In the case of "Batman" why do we need to say, "name=Batman"? I just don't see what I'm missing here. For what it's worth, I'm also taking out some junk styling parameters as well. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯19:54, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Here is all that I am asking: What is really causing the redundancy, which causes the articles to be added to the redundancy category? We know that the template is designed to take the "name" parameter and place it at the top of the Infobox. We know that the template is also designed to take the article name and place it at the top of the Infobox. Perhaps the template is doing both unnecessarily, causing a redundancy, and may only need an "if" statement so that it will do one or the other? I don't know. I should read the code. I'm just saying that, if something like that is happening, it would be better to fix the template rather than fix all the articles, which are including a very reasonable parameter that you are busy deleting ("name" is a reasonable parameter in a template called "character" or "creator", don't you agree, therefore shouldn't we try to keep it?) If I am missing something please let me know. Prhartcom (talk) 20:09, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
@Prhartcom: We could also have fields for infobox=yes and lang=English and format=HTML all of which could be very important for many purposes but which aren't necessary in the infobox itself. There are times when name can be useful (the only one that comes to mind is disambiguation) but there's no reason to include more code than is necessary. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯20:55, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm getting no indication from you that you are following what I am saying. Likewise, I don't really understand you. I wish we could communicate. Please refrain from your mass edit until I can find someone that can analyze and understand the templates (I tried; I cannot). Prhartcom (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Seasonal Greetings!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!
Hello Koavf, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015.
Happy editing, →Enock4seth(talk)21:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
A page you previously contributed to, Joe Williams (jazz singer), had many prior revisions deleted due to copyright issues. For details please see Talk:Joe Williams (jazz singer). Your prior version may be temporarily restored upon request if you need it for reference to re-incorporate constructive edits that do not make use of the copyright infringing material. Please feel free to leave me a talk message if you need this done. Happy editing, — xaosfluxTalk22:29, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Dear Koavf, HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions! From a fellow editor, --FWiW Bzuk (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
The Beatles Invite
Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.
Other :Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.
If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log.
Disambiguation link notification for January 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saudi Arabia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knopf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi there, these tags on redirects seem kind of strange to me. I see some of the "see also" links in the election articles are circular redirs to the same article. Is this part of a greater work in progress? Generally WP:ORE tags redirects very sparingly, for the most part keeping them only on redirs that have a chance to become standalone articles. I see the need for a full set of Oregon election articles in time, but I suspect no one in our project will get around to that for a while. In any case, would you be so kind as to class these as redirs? I'm also going to mention this on the project page in case anyone is interested in taking this on. Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 02:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
@Valfontis: No problem. I didn't make any of that tree but I did notice that at least a few redirected to general United States elections. I did not see anything about the "See also" sections looping back to themselves... I'm working on a little task but I can get to those in a day or two. If you think it's urgent, I can knock it out sooner. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯02:50, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
No, not urgent at all, I'm just too lazy to fix it at the moment. Thanks for taking the time to tag things that need tagging. I try to go through and do it once in a while for the categories but you found some new ones! Cheers, Valfontis (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I have no particular objection to your putting a WP:AFRICA template on the redirect at Talk:Battle of Río de Oro if that's what you feel is right, but please do not use the roll back feature for reverting good faith edits. Per WP:ROLLBACK this feature should not be used where an edit summaryh is expected, and given that I had already stated my reasons for restoring the redirect, and my edit was not vandalism, you should not have rolled it back, and should have given some reason whyu you disagreed with what I did.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Maurice Ravel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
* [http://www.rprf.org/Rollography.html Piano Rolls] ([http://www.rprf.org/ The Reproducing Piano Roll Foundation]
