User talk:KeithTyler

General Archives: 1 2 3 4
Topical archives: /Natasha Demkina - /Micronations - /John Hancock - /AMA

Hi KeithTyler,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

LOL. All these years on WP, creating new articles, fixing articles, contributing OC, creating a portal and grooming a category or two, participating in member orgs, fighting against POV, helping people in RFA, etc., and my first Barnstar is for a simple vote! Well, somewhere I also have a Most Excellent Grognard award. Anyway, thanks WP... Keith D. Tyler ¶ 08:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Carmen Lomellin, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Carmen_Lomellin.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I already hate you, MadmanBot. - Keith D. Tyler ¶

Calm down - the bots don't delete things yet. The bot-found source is CC-BY-SA 3.0 licensed anyway, so I've declined that one. I presume they got it from yours and that is public domain? Peridon (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• It's a US Department of State work, so it's {{PD-USGov}}. I presume they got it from the same source, but I've no idea. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 21:18, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The SourceWatch page is a copy of the OAS page, and the OAS page appears to be a hastily reworded version of the State Dept page. I'll let those guys worry about who violated who, but the ultimate (and my) source is PD. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 21:21, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• As for worrying about bots adding CSD tags, my experience with speedies is that they get deleted pretty speedily without a second thought (by say another speedy-seeking editor) unless you jump on it immediately. So a bot adding CSD tags seems like a bad idea -- perhaps a "possible csd" tag followed by human confirmation and applicable re- or de-tagging would be more appropriate. IMHO. FWIW. YMMV. Etc. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 21:18, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't speak for other admins, but I do check what the bots - and patrollers - say against what I see and find. The CSD tag does say 'possibly' on it, and CorenBot and Madmanbot also have a disclaimer that they're not infallible. (Likewise at UAA - DQ's bot even suggests that it should be distrusted on some filter matches.) Very often, when an admin finds something that is considered CSD material but isn't tagged, they tag it rather than deleting straight away (which they are actually allowed to do). (An exception is attack pages, of course.) I decline quite a few speedies. Sometimes, I then retag with the correct tag, or prod or AfD as appropriate. On occasions, I add references to try to save something, or rewrite. I'm not the only one that does this. I did it before becoming an admin, too. Peridon (talk) 22:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. You get some gratuitous WikiLove for all that thankless work you just did on the Washington State Senate elections, 2012. Cheers. Wikibojopayne (talk) 21:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed a "merger/move request" between List of U.S. state partition proposals and List of proposed states of the United States, because I feel there is considerable overlap. If you are interested participating in the discussion, please feel free to do so here. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 22:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:KeithTyler/Resume, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KeithTyler/Resume (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:KeithTyler/Resume during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luis Jiménez (radio host) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Jiménez (radio host) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I completed a review at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Angel (producer), and noted some suggestions. Please respond there, and we can move the nomination forward. Cheers! Flibirigit (talk) 04:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you and supported your position on the talk page. It's an embarrassment for the WP project, but not sure how to win a battle like that. I was bold and removed the wording, but was swiftly reverted. Cheers! --Kevin Murray (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mark Angel (producer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mark Angel produced the first African YouTube comedy channel to reach one million subscribers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mark Angel (producer). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mark Angel (producer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Discrimination, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Discrimination and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Discrimination during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SounderBruce 05:02, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This reversion went against the very policies that the editor linked to. Kind of insulting.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Srini Kumar, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srini Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Dod you remember where you got File:LORAN Station Malone-Cesiums-Large.jpg from? It doesn't have sourcing or an author, but you say US coast guard. Tin Eye only finds wikipedia mirrors. Thanks. Secretlondon (talk) 21:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure but pretty sure it was a USCG site. Time was you could find little side-project sites from military bases all over. No idea what the Malone base's website url was... - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 09:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional institutions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional institutions (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:25, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a friendly reminder about user page categorization.

I've noticed a user page of yours User:KeithTyler/List of Seattle Reign FC players is appearing in regular content categories. This is discouraged. See WP:DRAFTNOCAT and WP:USERNOCAT for additional information.

Usually the situation is remedied by placing a leading colon at the beginning of each of the category declarations, for example like this:

[[:Category:Washington (state) sports-related lists]]

or, by wrapping all category declarations with Template:Draft categories like so:

{{Draft categories|
{{DEFAULTSORT:Seattle Reign FC players}}
[[Category:Lists of soccer players by club in the United States]]
[[Category:Seattle Reign FC players| ]]
[[Category:Washington (state) sports-related lists]]
[[Category:Lists of women's association football players]]
[[Category:Lists of American sportswomen]]
[[Category:Association football player non-biographical articles]]
}}

Either method will disable the category function. Thank you. Cheers! --DB1729^talk 19:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Independence County, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independence County, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PersusjCP (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Drunvalo Melchizedek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drunvalo Melchizedek (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ynsfial (talk) 19:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional television stations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional television stations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional radio stations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional radio stations (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:33, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eventually, I fully expect every single article on Wikipedia to be deleted. That is the way. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 21:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Srini Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srini Kumar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 03:46, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]