User talk:KTC/Archive 12

This is an archive of past discussions with User:KTC. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	I hereby award you this for your efforts regarding Freedom of Panorama 2015 banner. -- A Certain White Cat chi? 16:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Might I propose the addition of European Economic Area members as well? They cannot vote but they are afflicted by the decisions. So that would include Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and possibly Switzerland. Also perhaps European Union Customs Union countries Andorra, Monaco, San Marino, and Turkey which may be afflicted indirectly as well. -- A Certain White Cat ^chi? 13:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

@とある白い猫: I'm not going to expand it personally, but I see the global campaign behind this is adapting the existing banner (instead of creating another one like they were going to do) and is showing it to more languages. You may want to ask them over at meta. -- KTC (talk) 16:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk User:Penwhale via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on this list and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.

On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia Anne Johnston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Anne Johnston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

You're awesome. Keilana|Parlez ici 18:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi. You are invited to comment at RfC for BARC - a community desysoping process. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:38, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for my removal of your comment. I had some trouble actually being able to save my edit at all, which may explain why I never received an edit conflict. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 15:46, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

No worries. :-) -- KTC (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

A request for arbitration has been filed relating to you. --ceradon (talk • edits) 01:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Evidence. Please add your evidence by September 8, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello!

First, on behalf of WikiProject X, thank you for trying out the WikiProject X pilot projects. I would like to get some anonymous feedback from you on your experience using the new WikiProject layout and tools. This way, we will know what we did right, and if we did something horribly wrong, we can try to fix it. This feedback won't be associated with your username, so please be completely honest. We are determined to improve the experience of Wikipedians, and your feedback helps us with that. (You are also welcome to leave non-anonymous feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject X.)

Please complete the survey here. The survey has two parts: the first part asks for your username, while the second part contains the survey questions. These two parts are stored separately, so your username will not be associated with your feedback. There are only nine questions and it should not take very long to complete. Once you complete the survey I will leave a handwritten note on your talk page as a token of my appreciation.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Harej (talk) 17:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Just sending a reminder to complete the survey linked above. (This is the only reminder I'll send, I promise.) Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. Thank you!!! Harej (talk) 22:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

On behalf of myself and both Ravensfire and Oshwah thank you for blocking 207.62.246.202!!! --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:44, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Indeed - thanks! F5 was gonna get worn out but Oshwah was always faster on the draw. Ravensfire (talk) 21:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

I am concerned that will will simply see this again in a week: [1] --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Agreed here. That guy was persistent - thanks to all of you for helping with reverting the damage :-) ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Also, he's now making edits on his talk page that are most certainly not appropriate. It might be time to revoke that as well, KTC. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Already done by Favonian. -- KTC (talk) 21:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Perfect, thanks again. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi KTC, I took the liberty of removing three notability tags you placed on some women's football clubs. WP:FOOTYN, a widely held consensus on the notability of clubs states that they are notable if they have played in a national competition. I also moved Exeter City Ladies Football Club back to Exeter City L.F.C. as LFC / WFC is the common article title format. Though I would let you know as I messed up the WL in the edit summary. Fenix down (talk) 15:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Do you think Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 September 22#Wikipedia:PIMP was inappropriately publicized? All of the !votes were keep before it was mentioned at Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-09-23/Op-ed in the Discuss this story comments section; after which a flood of delete !votes came in. Just curious about your opinion of the matter as the closing administrator. Regards,—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 15:19, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Please_don.27t_close_too_early it may be ready to close. NE Ent 21:37, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Its been seven days so I have hatted everything else - just awaiting closure. The extended repetitive conversations were just getting on my wick. Shame it couldnt have been sent to a sub-page on the first day since it was clearly going to end up being a behemoth. Only in death does duty end (talk) 09:24, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

@KTC: Thanks for the well-done close. BMK (talk) 03:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi KTC. A decision has been proposed in the Palestine-Israel articles 3 arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 20:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC) (via MediaWiki message delivery (talk))

You are invited! Join us remotely! World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015 Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you! Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your work in relisting AfD discussions, which helps to keep matters in order. North America1000 07:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

In the past few days you deleted the article titled "Philosothon'. The reason given for this was a lack of notability however there was ample additional secondary sources added to the article following the nomination. This included several ABC National Radio programs specifically about the event, several Newspaper articles, professional journal articles and independent university and school references. Having looked at several similar Wikipedia articles this article has many, many more independent references than most of them; See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Mathematics_Competition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_Bowl https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Philosophy_Olympiad

In terms of it being promotional this was not a problem when it was originally published eight years ago. The article also includes a section devoted to criticisms of the Philosothon. Finally this article could be modified if an editor had bothered to make some positive and constructive suggestions...Can I ask you to restore this article so it can be further edited .Sydney59 (talk) 15:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Why Does the page Chandu Yelga (CSY) was deleted...? It has all Cite sources truly and proved by networking sites and Chandu Yelga (CSY) is the article about notable person who is a Indian Computer Programmer.

So, please i am requesting you to replace the deleted article as soon as possible...

James zyan (talk) 05:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1. All anonymous IP editors and accounts with less than 500 edits and 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition may be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of Pending Changes, and appropriate edit filters.
2. Uninvolved administrators are encouraged to monitor the articles covered by discretionary sanctions in the original Palestine-Israel case to ensure compliance. To assist in this, administrators are reminded that:

• Accounts with a clear shared agenda may be blocked if they violate the sockpuppetry policy or other applicable policy;
• Accounts whose primary purpose is disruption, violating the policy on biographies of living persons, or making personal attacks may be blocked indefinitely;
• There are special provisions in place to deal with editors who violate the BLP policy;
• Administrators may act on clear BLP violations with page protections, blocks, or warnings even if they have edited the article themselves or are otherwise involved;
• Discretionary sanctions permit full and semi-page protections, including use of pending changes where warranted, and – once an editor has become aware of sanctions for the topic – any other appropriate remedy may be issued without further warning.

For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 16:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Please userfy both page and talk page this is notable, I will add some sources and restore when ready. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 10:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi there,

I apologise for not being very experienced on Wikipedia, but I wondered if I could appeal against the deletion of this page.

It was created in good faith and gives an insight into an important UK ski company, giving a history of an ongoing legal debate with French ski authorities. This search will demonstrate the degree of coverage: https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=le%20ski%20esf%20court%20case

One of the points of creating it was to have an independent reference point in relation to this debate.

As far as I can see the creator was involved in unacceptable practices, but I hope that you will agree that the page he created has relevance to the general public and reinstate it.

Again, apologies for not being more Wikipedia-savvy. This guy was recommended by someone I don't know particularly well.

Hoping you will be able to help

Regards

Iain (26/11/15)

Iainmski (talk) 17:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Please contact [email protected] for any help regarding this article. -- KTC (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for not only your contributions to AFD and helping with the backlogs but also for deleting the radio stations I nominated (It's nice to see an admin to just delete the stations instead of constantly relisting the AFDs! so thank you - it's much appreciated :)) Thanks and Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 00:37, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Li Keqiang 2012 cropped.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Who is this person? They are damning the fate of humanity by censoring crimes in a most perverse way. They have deleted the article regarding "White Pixelization", the practice of hiding the ethnicity of criminals in Europe by painting them white. This prevents the public from understanding the issues. This person is supporting the genocide of the European people by supporting the protection of criminals. Why hide the truth if it cannot stand up to scrutiny?

If you disagree with the closure of the deletion discussion. Wikipedia:Deletion review is what you want. Regards -- KTC (talk) 21:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

I've compiled a list of sources mainly from Germany so I'll be able to rewrite and fully source the article this weekend. I will give until next Friday (19th) for you to reconsider the deletion on the basis I will rewrite and fully reference the article with official sources, mainly the 12.1 Press Code section 5 which deals with keeping the identities of perpetrators completely anonymous from any profiling, including racial profiling. After Friday I'll be putting in an undeletion request to userfy the page so I can completely rewrite it. Projectmayhem666 (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello KTC

How are you.

First i wanted to commend you on your page that i found very informative. I was wondering what happen to your page called Sex_with_reference_to_the_Quran

It was an interesting page. Is there any chance it can be recovered? or with your permission i would be willing to post some ( a portion of it ) under my Wiki account.

anyway i had a time trying to find out

Take care ..

Dave — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanniSalim (talk • contribs) 03:14, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi KTC,

I happened to see this page is deleted Association_of_Scientists,_Developers_and_Faculties. They have now moved as International Organization and they have updated their web address after various public announcements.

Also they publish the books in the name of "ASDF International".

I think this article can be reconsidered for publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhurvignesh83 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Join us!
	Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - a Year of Science initiative Hosts: Women in Red, Women Scientists Sponsor: WikiEdu April-December 2016 #wikiwomeninred #yearofscience #contentgap

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

You might be interested to know that the Wikimedia Cuteness Association has been nominated for deletion at Meta. Thryduulf (talk) 08:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

I just want to ask why you delete the page "Ergun Kocak"? Is there any chance I request to retrieve and edit it?

Thank you and hope to hear from you soon.

Mpsdoctor (talk) 03:15, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:KTC. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15