User talk:Jnestorius/2020

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sexual Assault Resource Service. Since you had some involvement with the Sexual Assault Resource Service redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Widefox; talk 11:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Odd that you should move the article without a word of explanation at the talk page? Is there another law of Poynings? What about WP:COMMON NAME? --Red King (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope the current Poynings' Law and children explains. jnestorius^(talk) 19:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Open-sex sailing at the Summer Olympics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I'm very appreciative that I am mentioned as a source in this article. I publish a newsletter called WHEN WE WERE IN IRELAND. Newsletter no. 10 (2019) has a good amount of newly researched items on the Magazine and the Walker family who ran it. I would like to send you a free copy of this newsletter, if you will kindly let me know your address. Is there another researcher that you think might like a free copy? Louis D. Melnick, 530 Michigan Ave., Evanston, Illinois 60202 USA, [email protected].66.158.65.78 (talk) 20:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(Above entry was Special:Diff/901532337 added to User talk:Jnestorius/2017; moved here when User talk:Jnestorius/2020 was created) jnestorius^(talk) 16:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the English Wikipedia Manual of Style and article titles policy. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Immanent (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The referendum did look reasonably imminent last year, as they'd gone as far as establishing a referendum commission. Good work though now moving the 39th back to its old title and rearranging the text within! That would probably have been the obvious thing for me to do after noting in the text that it had lapsed. —Iveagh Gardens (talk) 09:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They used to wait till the bill had passed all Dáil and Seanad stages before establishing the commission, but people complained there was not enough time for it to operate. So now instead we have abortive commissions when bills lapse. jnestorius^(talk) 10:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it did happen this year, with Varadkar adding Mary Seery Kearney to the Labour Panel.[1]. -Iveagh Gardens (talk) 13:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noice, thanks! I see a nominee was rejected as well. Updated accordingly. jnestorius^(talk) 14:00, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I remembering noticing that quirk on date they were announced! A nice bit of trivia to know it hadn't happened since 1938! -Iveagh Gardens (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't quote me on that. I know it happened in 1938 because some of the opposition boycotted the nomination process. My assumption that it could not happen under normal circumstances was obviously incorrect — unless we blame COVID-19 for the 2020 instance? jnestorius^(talk) 14:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Gender verification in sports, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jnestoroius

I was very surprised by your nomination at WP:Articles for deletion/Saoirse McHugh. The assertions in your nomination are wildly at variance with the facts I found, which ii posted in a long comment.[2] Please will you consider withdrawing the nomination? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imminence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imminence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sleeping heroes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Guaranteed Irish logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your edits there. Just wondering why you deleted all the Logainm citations. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced them with https://www.logainm.ie/en/s?txt=in:844&cat=BF which lists all the names. jnestorius^(talk) 09:11, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While it's shorter, its also less precise or involves scrolling in Logainm if you're looking for a particular townland. Not convinced that the contraction is an improvement. Have you used it elsewhere? Laurel Lodged (talk) 09:17, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think scrolling through one page is more convenient than opening 34 pages. I don't know what you mean by "less precise". jnestorius^(talk) 10:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Skian. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 19#Skian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liverpool F.C. 2005–06 UEFA Champions League qualification is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 2005–06 UEFA Champions League qualification until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – PeeJay 09:49, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:International Triathlon Union world championships has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Barkeep^Chat 17:00, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]