User talk:Jibblesnark86

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sosumi.mp3, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GreenC 02:39, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jibblesnark86, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 03:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tea and cookies, they're great! I'm happy to be here!

Jibblesnark86 (talk) 05:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you are allowed to keep a list of people you think are bad editors on your userpage. I'm WP:BOLDly going to go ahead and remove that. ⫷doozy (talk▮contribs)⫸ 12:12, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But these are bad editors, factually. They have always dragged down new editors and editors who do stuff right. You could probably see some people literally scold these editors, whether or not they do things right, and they do not care. Thank you for your edits, but this is the truth. Please think on this, genuinely.

Jibblesnark86 (talk) 22:42, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sksatsuma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Although charting is one of the alternative criteria for notability, as the EP itself didn't chart, this doesn't qualify. Additionally, notability isn't inherited, ie even though the songs may be notable, that doesn't necessarily establish that the EP itself is.

Therefore this would need to be assessed against WP:GNG. I would suggest finding more indpendent, reliable sources which discuss the topic in depth (for example your Clash magazine reference would fulfil this criteria).

Reviews are often a good source for musical releases, especially for a well established and notable artist such as Capaldi.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bloom (Lewis Capaldi EP) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

sksatsuma 15:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jibblesnark86! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! sksatsuma 15:41, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I don’t know if you can help with this, but I couldn’t find any reviews that could have been in the article, but maybe I overlooked. Could you please help me find some reviews for Bloom?

Thanks,

Jibblesnark86 (talk) 18:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bloom (Lewis Capaldi EP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Meena • 09:56, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I Am (Tom Walker album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]