User talk:JPRiley

This is an awful lot of good work you're doing. Lockley (talk) 18:11, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, honestly. It's nice to get recognition. JPRiley (talk) 04:32, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You might find the architects mentioned here of interest. I see you have created a page for one of them http://www.torringtonhistoricalsociety.org/architectural-drawings.html Buckyboot (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on William R. Walker (architect). I'll see if I can add a bit to him. One little thing: Intro says he was from Providence, but the bio says he lived most of his life in Pawtucket. So I think that means the intro is wrong? I think the distinction is important. - Kzirkel (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I chose to say that he was a Providence architect because that is where his firm's office always was. Pawtucket was where he lived, and he would have commuted. JPRiley (talk) 18:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing this article. I did the individual pages on father & son but it didn't occur to me to create a separate page for the firm.Alafarge (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JP,

I plan on writing about Saratoga Springs' Universal Preservation Hall, and I see that you've edited the article in regards to the building's architecture. I'm interested in asking you some questions about the subject if you have the time and inclination.

Thanks,

Coleman Colemanakey (talk) 17:09, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right here is fine, I'm happy to help. JPRiley (talk) 19:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To echo the first comment on this page, great work. Just a few things, though. Most importantly, the expansion of coverage of Alaska is quite extensive for not even acknowledging Edwin Butler Crittenden. Is there something I'm missing? I wouldn't consider him to be as notable as Linn Forrest, but certainly a lot more notable than most Alaska-based architects, including many of those you've been writing about. Also, a number of the years you list in the Manley & Mayer article appear to conform to when construction began, not when the building was completed. Is this supposed to reflect when design occurred? If so, this should be clarified, because to the uninitiated, those years may contradict other available information about those buildings. The Municipality of Anchorage has its property records online, which may help, including offering information about the Commerce and Simpson buildings. Denali Elementary, along with Nordale Elementary, were torn down and replaced with new buildings a little over a decade ago. I'm not sure what "Woodland Park Elementary School (Old)" refers to. I know for sure that it hasn't been a school in a long time: it's currently the state headquarters and main Anchorage facility for the Boys & Girls Club. I'm not sure whether they're in the 1954 building, as it could have been torn down and rebuilt following the earthquake or possibly later. Also, the "North Terminal" at Anchorage International confused me. There was only one terminal when I first lived in Anchorage in the late 1970s, though it was obviously built in several disjointed segments. The pre-1970s portions were demolished in the 1990s/2000s reconstruction projects. "North Terminal" typically refers to the current terminal where international arrivals/departures take place, also frequently known by its original name, the "Satellite Terminal". That was built in the early or mid 1980s. Speaking of the 1980s, the statement "A number of their Anchorage buildings were demolished during the population boom of the 1980s" may need tweaking. Those years didn't see a population boom so much as it did a building boom, as there were multiple waves of in/outmigration throughout the 1970s and 1980s. Anchorage's real population boom occurred when the military bases were built and for a number of years afterward. Things crashed hard a few years after the early 80s building boom and many folks left. Anna MacKinnon's husband has been heard recently on political advertising talking about people leaving the keys behind in their houses and leaving town in droves, a statement not quite as hyperbolic as it may appear on the surface (Extreme Conditions by John Strohmeyer can back this up, for one). Anyway, most of the demolition was on account of major investments by oil-related interests plus "Project 80s", a major public works campaign conducted by the MOA during the Sullivan and Knowles administrations. I spent my earlier years in Anchorage living in the neighborhood along I Street between 6th and 9th avenues. That neighborhood pretty much disappeared in one fell swoop in 1983 to make way for the ARCO Tower, the Hunt Building and associated parking. Finally, I've been scanning publications which have fallen out of copyright in recent weeks and have period photos of a number of these buildings. The folks on Commons have proven to be of zero help for what to do about the burden that is Upload Wizard, but I think I might have figured out on my own that there's a more palatable interface. Now I just have to find the time it would take to crop and upload what's getting to be a rather substantial queue. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 07:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto on the nice work part! I got an alert about the Manley & Mayer article because it connected to the Linn A. Forrest one, which I had started. I put in a reciprocal note there to the one you wrote, i.e. inferred that L.A.F. had Manley & Mayer as associates on the 1959 building, and copied your source to there, but without access / without consulting it. Could you possibly please check what I added there for accuracy? And if you had time it would be great if you'd add more. Either way, thanks, and keep up the good work! --doncram 00:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Having dug a little deeper, it appears that the Manley & Mayer (1959) version of the project was a no-go: I found a reference in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner from the groundgreaking (1962, apparently), that only lists Forrest's office as designers, as does Hoagland's book. I'll fix that on both pages. JPRiley (talk) 00:50, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice article on Miller & Beal. Until now, I had no idea that Wells Junior High School apparently has at least two identical siblings: the schools in Cape Elizabeth and Tewksbury. Do you know if there are (or were) any other schools that used the same design? 64.185.129.173 (talk) 20:01, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Cape Elizabeth and Tewksbury schools are the only ones I've found, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were others scattered around the state.JPRiley (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Morris B. Payne, JPRiley!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Looks good. I've added a few more sources.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you for your valuable contribution! Vzeebjtf (talk) 00:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JPRiley: Impressive work. Your attribution of 24 Emerson Road, Jamestown, RI to Bevins cites "American Architect and Building News", 14 August, 1897. I have read that issue and do not see a Bevins or Jamestown reference. "Historic and Architectural Resources of Jamestown, Rhode Island" cites a possible attribution of the house to Creighton Withers, which seems more likely stylistically than Bevins. Can you help on this attribution? Thanks for all you have done. James Buttrick68.109.23.49 (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On page xvi, fourth item under "houses". Best, JPRiley (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you telp me the source for this change? I am working on Draft:Frank O. Weary. Also seems.to be spelled Alvord.. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The named partners in Weary & Alford were Edwin Delos Weary and William Hedley Alford, as per directories and other sources, especially the article "Weary & Alford in New Quarters," Bankers Monthly, July 1919, 36. That source notes that Weary was an Akron native, and Frank Orlando Weary, Smith-Weary Chronology: Chronological Story of an Old Line Patriotic Pioneer, All-American Family With a Historic Published Record Extending Back Two Full Centuries (Akron, OH: 1921): 17. indicates that Frank O. and Edwin D. were brothers - and Frank O. had no involvement in Weary & Alford. Eiford and Alvord are both typos and refer to Alford. Best,JPRiley (talk) 21:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great!!! Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Excellent work. Thank you for creating a page that has a true historical value. Hatchens (talk) 05:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William M. Butterfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport, Vermont. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George F. Loring, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodlawn Cemetery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilfred E. Mansur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brewer High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, JPRiley. I see you have Chase R. Whitcher under construction and was wondering if you might be so kind and notify me once you're done, because I might just want to steal your work and cobble a stub together at the de:wp. I'm not certain if such would stand the trial of deletion hell (that's a de:wp thing), but I've The Balsams on my might-do-it-perhaps-even-sometimes-soon-list, and Whitcher appears to be responsible for one of the more significant buildings there. Regards, --G-41614 (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it makes more sense for me to finish it up and publish it, and then you come in and add the info you have. Doing it the way you describe sounds like it could cause problems and I'd like to avoid that. In that case I can still let you know when it is out in the world. Not sure on a timeline but I am trying to finish up some of my WIPs so hopefully soon? But who's to say. Best, JPRiley (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was waiting for it to be reviewed to let you know this, but it hasn't been yet. Chase R. Whitcher is in mainspace now. I added a little more about the Balsams than I had last you saw. Best, JPRiley (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sorry, took me a while to get back to you. Most of the time I get geo-blocked or something like that when I try to edit en:wp. --G-41614 (talk) 12:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And another apology - I got nothing to add to your work, unfortunately. If I had, I would have added it once you moved your article to the mainspace just like you suggested. Now that you did, I might, at some point in the future, given time etc., use the sources you so kindly researched and provided and do an article at the german-language Wikipedia. Or just have yours imported and translate it. Suffice to say should I ever find anything suitable to add, I shall do so. --G-41614 (talk) 12:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John W. Priest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley,

I just deleted the User pages you tagged for speedy deletion and stumbled into all of the work you've done on Wikipedia on the subject of architects and architecture. Thank you so much for your contributions! We have a surplus of editors working on some subjects like military history and politics while subjects like the ones you focus can really be impacted by a few competent and experienced editors who really are well-informed about their fields.

My only question after looking at all of your articles you've created on your User page is that there don't seem to be many female architects listed. I'm sure they were excluded from the profession a hundred years ago but there must be some from the 20th century, no? They must have some interesting lives worth reading about. Thanks again for all of the work you do for the project! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recognition, I always appreciate it! I do what I can. I do have a few in-progress articles about woman architects, though I agree I've not done much. I know there has been a concerted effort on wikipedia to make sure notable women have been represented, and I find that as this point most of the time I come across a potentially notable woman architect from the 19th/20th centuries, someone has already gotten to that task.

Of those that I do have in progress, Eleanor Larrabee was I think notable for both her architectural and preservation work, and Genevieve Lacey was a member of the notable Lacey family of architects, though I am not sure of her own notability, as I can find barely any information on her besides her vague involvement in the family firm. There are a few others in my own geographical area, like Frances Henley and Maude Darling-Parlin, that I'd like to fill out as well, as they are pretty thin currently. Adeline C. Kelley, a Bridgeport CT architect, might also be a candidate for an article if I can find more about her (I have very little). It is interesting that many of these early women architects, like Lacey, Darling and Kelley all came into architecture through their families. Women who were able to start practices on their own like Julia Morgan and Josephine Wright Chapman seem much rarer.

Best, JPRiley (talk) 18:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pierce & Bickford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barre, Vermont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on John P. Thomas. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Willard P. Adden. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Waldron Faulkner. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Arthur G. Odell Jr.. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Robert L. Durham. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article! I hope that you will write more articles, and hopefully you have a blessed day today!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Robert F. Hastings. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more, have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on S. Scott Ferebee Jr.. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Eric T. Huddleston. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on John A. Carter (architect). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating this article. Hopefully you will write more in the future!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Koehler & Isaak. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating this article. Hopefully you will write more in the future!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Irving B. Haynes. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for creating this article. I hope and encourage you to make more articles! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Frederick V. Murphy. User:Ppt91, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you writing this really interesting article on a notable American architect! I thought these sources could be useful: Murphy, John C. “Frederick V. Murphy: The Catholic Architect as Eclectic Designer and University Professor,” U.S. Catholic Historian 15, no. 1 (1997): 91–104 (which I do not believe is mentioned) and Loeffler, Jane C., The architecture of diplomacy: building America's embassies, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1998 (which could be helpful to talk briefly about the Apostolic Nunciature building in Washington D.C.; I know there is a whole article on it, though it felt like saying a bit more on it being modeled after an Italian Renaissance palace could be a great thing to add in this article specifically). Let me know if I can be of any more help and thanks for great work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ppt91^talk 19:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi– I agree about the usefulness of these sources. When I was originally putting the draft together back in Nov/Dec I did come across a couple of relevant articles in Catholic Historian but (incorrectly) thought I did not have JSTOR access to did not use them. I now know I can get to them through the Boston Public Library, so I think I will go back and see what would be useful to add.

Thanks, JPRiley (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JPRiley, I am a grandson of Clair W. Ditchy. I'm very excited to see this Wikipedia entry. I thank you very much and know the recognition for my grandfather is well deserved. Clair W. Ditchy's only surviving child, Lanie, has extensive archives of the life and work of her father Clair W. Ditchy. I also have photos that might be of interest in building a more comprehensive historical record of the life and work of Clair W. Ditchy. Is a continued dialogue on this topic one that you and Kj cheetham would welcome? Very sincerely, jcgannon Jcgannon (talk) 20:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi– I would welcome this but it is important to remain within the limits of the Wikipedia No original research policy, which does not allow the addition of any material for which there is no published source. However, some things like lists of works/publications/talks etc. for which there are likely other sources (somewhere) would be welcome. In particular I was missing any projects at all from the last decade of his life, and I always like to include a picture to go along with the name, which can be difficult when considering copyright, for example. Outside of replying here, I can be contacted through the "Email this user" option on the right.

Best, JPRiley (talk) 01:12, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Louis de Moll. User:Ppt91, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article on a notable American architect!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ppt91^talk 16:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Elmer E. Botsai is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 07:12, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Robert M. Lawrence, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Onel5969, I have to say I don't really understand what was wrong with this article when it was published. I believe that the facts of the article reasonably indicate notablility: service as president of the AIA, which governs standards for architectural practice, and of NAAB, which governs education, as well as a long-running practice which produced a number of notable buildings. I did not realize that the tag you added to the article when you reviewed it indicated a timed event, and I focused on other in-progress drafts. Nonetheless I will take a look and add some new sources, I have some ideas for ones that can be added. I have created many articles with no issue- after I make these changes am I obligated to use the AfC system?

Best, JPRiley (talk) 02:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, you are not obligated to use AfC. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hewitt & Emerson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BArch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you included Clarendon Street Baptist Church as a work of Abel C. Martin sourced to "The New Rowe Street Church", Boston Daily Advertiser, November 2 1868, which I can't check. I found two sources saying the architect was Samuel J. F. Thayer, any idea which is correct?

• Smith, Margaret Supplee; Card, Richard O. (2004). "Tour 2. Boston's South End". In Petronella, Mary Melvin (ed.). Victorian Boston Today: Twelve Walking Tours. Boston: Northeastern University Press. pp. 20–21.
• Naomi Miller,; Keith N. Morgan (1990). Boston Architecture, 1975-1990. Prestel. p. 177.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link)

TSventon (talk) 20:53, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @TSventon, The church was originally designed while Martin and Thayer were working as partners. However, it looks like it was finished after they split up, and the later attributions to Thayer alone are probably because he would have completed it without Martin. I think I will go back and revise the lists of works on Martin and Thayer's own pages, which are not totally clear on the attribution of works done by the partnership. I would say, perhaps, "designed by Martin & Thayer, completed by Samuel J. F. Thayer."

Best, JPRiley (talk) 20:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JPRiley, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you for letting me know! JPRiley (talk) JPRiley (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JPRiley. Thank you for your work on Harris M. Stephenson. Another editor, Dclemens1971, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Great work on this article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 16:08, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amos P. Cutting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newport, Vermont.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourtellotte & Hummel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BArch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you recently revamped the page, you might enjoy deep diving into that architectural firms largest/most elaborate residence Belton Court . The home has 55,000sqft of livable are with another 20k of basement & attic space. If you have any questions about the home I can elaborate in detail ( I have been studying the home and its original inhabitants for 6 years now! BC1927 (talk) 22:06, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll admit I'm pretty pessimistic about Belton Court. My impression is that it's taken the town two years just to convince the developers to keep the stable wing. I feel that it doesn't have much of a future without some institutional occupant. I'd love if they would at least keep the Middle Highway side- the original house is probably the largest Arts & Crafts style building ever built in RI, and my rough understanding of the floor plan would indicate that that would preserve the library in the newer section as well. If I had a question it would be- did the architects and Peck plan, from the start, to build the whole house as it is? Or was expansion necessitated by his later political ambitions? JPRiley (talk) JPRiley (talk) 15:36, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The house is sadly doomed as things stand now, it would take divine intervention to save the home. Belton Courts massive addition was due to Fredericks growing art & book collections + political ambitions. as it stands now the water tower and service wing would be the only parts standing, but we shall see. ( I have been studying the home and its original owners for around 6 years now) BC1927 (talk) 07:18, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also found out that a good portion of Martin & Halls original blueprints still exist from 1927/28 with a few elevations, but anyway lmk if you are interested in chatting further. BC1927 (talk) 07:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JPRiley, I saw that you made a draftdrafts for a new articlenew articles at User:JPRiley/Mills and User:JPRiley/HEMcClure. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable. But in this case, you haven't edited your draft for a long time. If you wish to improve the draft yourself, please do. Otherwise, you may consider donating it to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts (a participant can help). Thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 00:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have a lot of drafts I've been ignoring. I'll go through them and see which I can complete and move to main space and which to have deleted. I'll also look into that WikiProject and see if I have any drafts that I have no more interest in but which may still be worth completing. JPRiley (talk) JPRiley (talk) 19:41, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize and around $340 (£250) worth of prizes for Architecture articles, both global and for the UK and Ireland. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looping me into this- destubbing is something I've meant to spend time with in the past but never kept with. Prize or no prize this is a pretty good incentive. JPRiley (talk) JPRiley (talk) 13:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Israel T. Almy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The proposer created this article 10 years ago and no longer finds its subject notable. It has had the notability tag for its entire existence. None of Almy's buildings have been determined to be architecturally or historically significant, or are likely to be.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a courtesy message to notify you in case you haven't seen the Wikipedia:The World Destubathon contest update in the last few days that we've decided to run the full month until the 16th of July. For those who have been too busy to contribute, we would love some help in reaching 4000 articles by Wednesday night! At present we're about 480 articles short!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:48, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	For your contributions on topic during Wikipedia:The World Destubathon which led to you being awarded an Editor of the Week. Much appreciate the work that you contributed and hope you had fun editing! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:14, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	World Destubathon Barnstar
	Much appreciate your effort in the World Destubathon! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:55, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Indiana Barnstar
		For your destubbing of Miller & Yeager during The World Destubathon. Great work! Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 07:14, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]