User talk:JGHowes/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions with User:JGHowes. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Administrator changes Hammersoft Andres • Brion VIBBER • Rkitko • Thatcher

CheckUser changes Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek • Primefac Oversight changes Barkeep49 • BDD • CaptainEek Joe Roe

Guideline and policy news

• Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.

Technical news

• You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.

Arbitration

• By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason).
• Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.

On 13 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Julie V. Iovine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wall Street Journal architecture columnist Julie V. Iovine caused an uproar when she wrote that Yale University had a reputation for being a "gay school" in 1987? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Julie V. Iovine. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Julie V. Iovine), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:03, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Susan Estes at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Joofjoof (talk) 07:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

On 18 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Clark Mayden, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Clark Mayden's images of African Americans were extolled by James Baldwin as capturing the "majesty of black life" by portraying people who are "weary but not cast down"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Clark Mayden. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Clark Mayden), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Adding Mayden to that category led me to this beautiful article. They must have had some great nights here. No Swan So Fine (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

On 20 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frederick Swann, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that virtuoso organist Frederick Swann was seen weekly on television by an estimated audience of 20 million viewers in 165 countries? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frederick Swann. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frederick Swann), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/220.120.78.242 for other nonsense drafts by User accounts suspected of sockpuppetry. David notMD (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

On 27 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Susan Estes, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Susan Estes is the first woman to have her own company in the historically male bond-trading business in the U.S.? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Susan Estes. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Susan Estes), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Administrator changes Hog Farm Mattflaschen • Nandesuka • Savidan • Wangi

CheckUser changes Berean Hunter • Xeno Oversight changes Someguy1221 • Xeno

Arbitration

• The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!

On 4 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Richard Leibert, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Radio City Music Hall organist Richard Leibert eloped twice with the daughter of a U.S. congressman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Richard Leibert. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Richard Leibert), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Ernest T. Campbell at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Vaticidalprophet (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

On 8 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rudy Atwood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that gospel pianist Rudy Atwood, heard on Old Fashioned Revival Hour radio broadcasts of the 1930s to the 1960s, attributed his hymn arrangements to the influence of J. S. Bach? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rudy Atwood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rudy Atwood), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

WP:MOSNICKNAME applies - Rudy is a standard shortening for Rudolph - similar to William/Bill. As such the "Rudy" aspect should not be in the main name. GiantSnowman 17:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@GiantSnowman: have you looked at MOS:NICKNAME as I referenced in the edit summary? Please note, that differs from WP:MOSNICKNAME: per MOS:NICKNAME, Rudolph "Rudy" Atwood is correct as that was always his stage name.  JGHowes  ^talk 18:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Then the article should be located at Rudolph "Rudy" Atwood. GiantSnowman 18:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

You are simply wrong by conflating article title with Lead sentence in the case of celebrities using a stage name. Else, will you be moving Featured Article Magic Johnson to Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr., etal.? JGHowes 2:10 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Well no, because Magic is not short for Earvin, is it? This is why we have an article about Steve Buscemi and not Steven "Steve" Buscemi etc. GiantSnowman 19:53, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi JGHowes, I'm having an honestly quite frustrating time communicating with Dr. Tseng re: this ticket. I have uploaded the images here, here, and here. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

I will look into this tomorrow morning. It's 11pm where I am and I'm turning in now  JGHowes  ^talk 03:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@HickoryOughtShirt?4: Good morning, I've again communicated with her via OTRS email. Generally speaking, the holder of a photograph's copyright is the person who took the photograph, rather than a person who appears in it. These three Commons files have been annotated accordingly. They will be deleted on February 25 if the licensing remains in doubt. —  JGHowes  ^talk 12:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The photo of her taking the vaccine should be OK though. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

On 14 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ernest T. Campbell, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the church led by Ernest T. Campbell sponsored Marina Oswald, the widow of Lee Harvey Oswald, to study at the University of Michigan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest T. Campbell. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ernest T. Campbell), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ernest T. Campbell you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

"Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:RMcD/sandbox. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges."

You wrote this on my talk page:

I have bolded the relevant parts

You tell me that if I wish to make test edits I should use the sandbox, that's what I did. Who is being hoaxed by stuff on my sandbox? I want no one else can see my sandbox, it should be private. Don't look at it

"If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion"."

There is no such button on my page so that's also a lie — Preceding unsigned comment added by RMcD (talk • contribs) 22:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Userpages on Wikipedia are not "private", nor may they be used to create hoaxes.  JGHowes  ^talk 23:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

First off, kudos on your work on the article for George A. Palmer, which is well done, informative and genuinely interesting.

This edit to the article for Cinnaminson Township, New Jersey added Palmer as a notable. Palmer's connection to Haddon Heights, New Jersey is much stronger, as he was pastor at a local church *AND* broadcast Morning Cheer from his home. Is serving as a clergyman at a church in a community enough to merit a listing as a notable? Alansohn (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Alansohn, it's good to hear from you! I've nom'd the article for DYK, so hopefully it'll be highlighted on the Main Page DYK in due course. Granted the tie to Haddon Hts is far stronger than Cinnaminson_Township, but is it an either/or situation? Because Palmer started his ministry at the church in Cinnaminson and that's where he's buried, I thought it appropriate. But I have no strong feelings on the matter, so if you feel otherwise and want to revert, go ahead.  JGHowes  ^talk 20:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

On 19 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Frank Thewlis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the English clergyman Frank Thewlis was related to Prime Minister Harold Wilson and wore a red handkerchief in his jacket pocket when preaching to show his support for Wilson's Labour Party? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Frank Thewlis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Frank Thewlis), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Ernest T. Campbell you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ernest T. Campbell for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Titanic International Society you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello - I'm a new Wikipedia user. I created my first article over the weekend titled "Blue Chair Bay Rum". I had accidentally posted it on my user page, and had it deleted. But there is still a redirect on my user page from that. I just received a message from you about a speedy deletion nomination. Was this for my Blue Chair Bay article, or for the speedy deletion tag that is still showing on my user page from my previous mistake? I'm confused about this. There is a notice on the Blue Chair Bay Rum article itself stating it reads as an advertisement. To me, it doesn't read as biased at all. In fact, I found lots of other info I could've included but didn't for that very reason. Hopefully someone can make some suggestions and not just delete the entire thing, because it is not an advertisement in any way. MakeLifeGood (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@MakeLifeGood: First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! I do not find any redirects to/from your user page, nor have I sent you any messages. I do see a message on your user talk page about a speedy deletion nomination from Poppified: is that what you're referring to? But it appears to be erroneous, because: (a) there's no Speedy Deletion tag on the Blue Chair Bay Rum article and (b) the reason given "G7 - author requests deletion" is false, since Poppified is not this article's creator, nor have you as author requested its deletion.

Creating your first article can be a daunting experience, and it helps to read Wikipedia's help pages and style guides, as well as looking at other articles, such as Bacardi Rum, for examples. We strongly recommend that new users take advantage of the AFC process, where your draft can be reviewed by more experienced editors to avoid common pitfalls.

The "advertisement" tag was added because the article needs to be edited for neutral tone, and not read like an advertisement. For example, "Chesney worked with legendary master blender..." citing Forbes.com which is not a reliable source. Likewise, "The new product caught the attention of fans and critics, becoming the fastest growing new spirits launch by a new company in the history of liquor", citing Connecticut Lifestyles which is not a reliable source meeting our standards.  JGHowes  ^talk 22:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@JGHowes: Thank you for your response! I read thru everything before writing my first article, but obviously there are just a few dots to connect still. I read thru several brands before creating. I would have thought Forbes was a worthy & highly regarded source myself! I already went in earlier and removed the word "legendary", even though he is a well known distiller in the industry. The Forbes article actually talked about Blue Chair Bay bringing him out of retirement to work with them, as he worked with Malibu before. When researching, I came across multiple articles to reference Mike Booth, including the company's (Blue Chair Bay's) website. Should I cite it instead? I remember reading that we need to be careful about citing company websites too much. Same for the other fact about it being "the fastest growing new spirits launch by a new company in the history of liquor." This is stated on the brand's website, and in quite a few articles. Is it better to reference the brand's site? MakeLifeGood (talk) 00:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello JGHowes ; about notification of G7 tag on MakeLifeGood talk page. Actually the article the user created was blanked on the same day of created by the creator so I tagged it for G7 blanked.Then article was deleted from main space.And after that he created the same article which I didn't tagged for speedy deletion.ThanksPoppified ^talk 01:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

@JGHowes: :@Poppified:  ; Is there something different I need to do to correct the speedy deletion issue? Or is it actually resolved? MakeLifeGood (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

@MakeLifeGood: That article already been deleted.After the deletion you created the new one. So there is no problem to be resolved with that article now.That article will remain in the mainsapce.Happy EditingPoppified ^talk 02:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

As Poppified says, the above-discussed speedy deletion is resolved. That's not to say someone else won't nominate it for regular deletion in the future at AFD.

Forbes, the published magazine, is a reliable source, but Forbes.com is not — the reason being the latter accepts user-contributed content that does not have adequate independent, editorial oversight. There's a chart that lists what is and is not a reliable source, here: WP:RSP. And using a company's own website as a source is limited to just basic facts, e.g., who is a company's CEO, where headquartered, etc., but not what a company says about itself and its products, since that's hardly neutral and lacks editorial oversight independent of the subject. The detailed guideline used to evaluate notability for companies, by the way, is here: WP:NCORP. —  JGHowes  ^talk 02:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

TJMSmith

Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes

AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

• A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
• A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect.
• A request for comment asks if sysops may place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions?
• There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.

Technical news

• When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
• When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
• There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

• By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people. Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions.
• The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.

Miscellaneous

• Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.

Thanks for uploading File:Fred Trump in 1977.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

On 3 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article George A. Palmer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that George A. Palmer continued his live Morning Cheer radio broadcast from his house while it was on fire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/George A. Palmer. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, George A. Palmer), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harriet Lee (singer) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Harriet Lee (singer) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Harriet Lee (singer) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 18:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Titanic International Society you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Titanic International Society for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HickoryOughtShirt?4 -- HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Harriet Lee (singer) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Harriet Lee (singer) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z1720 -- Z1720 (talk) 22:22, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Majestic Radios you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

On 15 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wilbur Nelson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wilbur Nelson was known as the "singing evangelist" because he both sang and preached at his services? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wilbur Nelson. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wilbur Nelson), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for creating Lorin Whitney, a topic long overdue for an article and which had been on my to-do list. It's a lovely piece, succinct, informative, and very well sourced. Bravo! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@78.26:, you're very welcome. It was on my to-do list as well, along with creating Dick Leibert and getting Fred Swann to GA. I'll be nominating Lorin Whitney for DYK in the next day or so.  JGHowes  ^talk 02:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

And ah, yes, Rudy Atwood also! That was created while I was on a bit of hiatus (which I'm not fully recovered from..) Another nice piece of work that is now formerly on my to-do list! 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Majestic Radios you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Majestic Radios for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 12:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

The article Majestic Radios you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Majestic Radios for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wasted Time R -- Wasted Time R (talk) 22:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

On 21 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Millie Dienert, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Millie Dienert was called the "first lady of prayer" for her work on behalf of evangelist Billy Graham? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Millie Dienert. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Millie Dienert), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 42, January – February 2021

• New partnerships: PNAS, De Gruyter, Nomos
• 1Lib1Ref
• Library Card

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:27, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

On 22 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John-Michael Caprio, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when John-Michael Caprio became the director of music at the Roman Catholic St. Patrick's Cathedral, he ordered that the choir's robes be replaced because they looked "too Protestant"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John-Michael Caprio. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John-Michael Caprio), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Rt Rana. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 16:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, can you please expand on your close of this AfD? WP:NSPORT is an SNG which presumes/requires the GNG to be met, that article clearly does not (in spite of the sources in the article, which are all statistical and don't count per WP:SPORTCRIT), and the keep !voters did not back up their "passes GNG". Thanks! SportingFlyer T·C 01:17, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi SportingFlyer, always happy to elaborate when it's a close call. In this XfD, there appeared to be a narrow consensus to keep, some contending that WP:NCRIC was met and others on procedural grounds, due to the short interval since the last XfD. While WP:RENOM is just an essay, it's been my observation that objections are more likely to arise if there's a substantial deviation. Perhaps a WP:DRV after last month's XfD was closed, or requesting the closing admin to undelete and relist due to minimal participation, would have been a better approach.  JGHowes  ^talk 01:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the response, I appreciate it. The problem I'm having is that there's been some sports AfDs closed recently which don't reflect the guidance at WP:NSPORTS that the SNG only predicts the GNG and that WP:GNG must be met for sports articles - this one's a little strange since it was renominated pretty quickly, but I don't know how to make any stronger of an argument than "fails WP:GNG." SportingFlyer T·C 12:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

• Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
• Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

• When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
• Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

• A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.

On 5 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Perry F. Rockwood, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Canadian preacher Perry F. Rockwood criticized the Presbyterian church in 1947, he was ordered to recant and burn his sermons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Perry F. Rockwood. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Perry F. Rockwood), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

On 6 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lorin Whitney, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that organist Lorin Whitney worked nights at a Lockheed Aircraft plant during World War II, while performing on a coast-to-coast radio program after his shift ended in the morning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lorin Whitney. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lorin Whitney), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting | April 2021 Things to watch for: New: Newest articles Alert: Article alerts Continuing: To do Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications

--evrik ^(talk) 17:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Scouting | May 2021 Notes for May: Please go and "watch" this page: Article alerts. You will quickly see if any issues arise. Here is a list of other pages to watch as well: Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Watch Congratulations to our Barnstar awardees! Interested in coordinating a zoom meeting? Please let us know. Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications

--evrik ^(talk) 20:45, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

Administrator changes

Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

Interface administrator changes

Ragesoss

Guideline and policy news

• Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
• The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.

Technical news

• The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

Arbitration

• The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 43, March – April 2021

• New Library Card designs
• 1Lib1Ref May

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

		The 50 DYK Medal
		Congratulation Grimes2 (talk) 13:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Greetings. I actually don't think we've ever interacted before, so thanks for all you do. Question on this AfD, while I agree if you simply count the !votes, it's 5-3 to keep, if you count the votes based on policy alone, it's 3-0. Since WP:BCAST is simply an essay, and is not a policy/guideline. WP:SNG says "Editors are cautioned that these WikiProject notability guidance pages should be treated as essays and do not establish new notability standards, lacking the weight of broad consensus of the general and subject-specific notability guidelines in various discussions" Can I ask your thoughts? The reason I'm curious is that other recent SNG's (e.g. NFOOTY, NCRIC) have recently started to be re-evaluated and to no longer trump GNG. Thanks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:04, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, User:onel5969, you're welcome, and thanks for your many fine contributions, especially in the area of broadcasting. In this AfD, your stated reason for deletion was: "Does not meet WP:BCAST". Thus, the case for deletion was argued on that basis by the participants. As closing admin, I had to evaluate the strength of arguments accordingly and it seemed that there was a narrow consensus that BCAST was met (albeit, very marginally, I would add). To rule on grounds other than the reason given for deletion and the ensuing discussion would undoubtedly be construed as an improper admin "supervote". —  JGHowes  ^talk 22:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

JGHowes, thank you. My bad then, I should have included GNG in the original rationale. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:42, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Sorry to bug you. But I think this should go to an RFC to firmly establish whether or not the SNG should be policy and trump GNG. I've only done a few RFC's, and never about something like this. Where would I begin one? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Well, I suppose the RFC could pose the question re WP:NMEDIA: should it still be considered WP:SUPPLEMENTAL or now an accepted community-vetted guideline?  JGHowes  ^talk 01:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

JGHowes, despite the spurious personal attack, without any basis in reality below, I don't think that an RFC in the specialty would be appropriate. Perhaps at some page regarding notability, like the talk page for GNG? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

@Onel5969: What you are suggesting could be considered FORUMSHOPPING. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Neutralhomer, no, what I'm suggesting is a neutral court, without prejudice. You've already shown your animus. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:07, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Right. Love the $2 words, by the way. I can understand those, ya know. A "neutral court" was the AfD. Decision made and ruled on by The Honorable "Judge" JGHowes. What you are doing is looking for a "higher court". Which is FORUMSHOPPING. Things didn't go your way, you didn't get the response you wanted, so you are looking for someone else (ie: "higher court"). By the way, JGHowes, is an admin. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, it should be noted, One15969 is keeping logs for their CSDs, PRODs, and XfDs. This appears, to me at least, to be a numbers game to them. As in how many deletions they can get. Their contribs are just solid deletion requests and bugging editors when they don't get their way.

The AfD in question (of KWDC-LP), which became about the notability of NMEDIA itself at the end, was a Keep. That "Keep" gave NMEDIA (or BCAST) renewed precedence-setting consensus, more than it already had. NMEDIA has never been used as a "trump" of GNG, but as a recommendation. We have also used BCASTOUTCOMES in conjuction with NMEDIA/BCAST. Both of these are used within N and GNG and in conjuction with.

I will repeat again, neither NMEDIA/BCAST nor BCASTOUTCOMES have ever been used to "trump" GNG. They are used as a recommendation for how N and GNG should be used and have been used for the past 15+ years.

Again, though, I believe One15969's "efforts" are disingenuous and the user is only out to up their delete count. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 01:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

Administrator changes

Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless

Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news

• Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
• Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.

Technical news

• Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration

• After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.

Hi. Could you explain the process you applied when closing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdalen Berns (2nd nomination)? I'm curious, as the closing statement seems to be a bit short. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 23:55, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Sure. For the most part, those in favor of keeping the article based their case for notability on the few secondary sources that, in their view, are sufficiently reliable. Although RSP is clearly an issue debated at length in this AfD, there was an almost 3 to 1 definitive consensus to keep, even after discounting those keep !votes found to be wanting because they weren't based on a clear understanding of our policies, or other extraneous arguments that carry little or no weight at AfD. For these reasons, I concluded that another "no consensus" close or Delete close was untenable, and that a Relist would likely accomplish the same outcome. —  JGHowes  ^talk 01:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

I believe that statement, modified to suit the environment, should form part of the close. I also came here to ask for your full rationale. Note that I was the nominator, but only in a technical sense, and have chosen not to have an opinion on the article itself. I am not arguing with your close, just asking that the full rationale be for ever associated with the discussion Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 07:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

 Done  JGHowes  ^talk 11:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I think that is now justice being seen to be done. To me it is an excellent closing rationale. It will never please everyone, but that is the way of things. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 11:37, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		For performing a difficult AfD closure in a highly charged environment where emotions have run high. Sorting out the wheat from the chaff will have been hard FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 11:41, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, just getting in touch as I have seen you work as an uninvolved admin in AfD's, if I'm talking to the wrong person, apologies. I opened a deletion discussion for this article, due to lack of WP:SIGCOV, another user then assured me that such exists in a book I have no access to and I have no reason to doubt them. Therefore I wish to withdraw the AfD, is that possible? All the best. Boynamedsue (talk) 04:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I see you've already stated your intent to withdraw the AfD nom based on AGF. Just strike-thru your opening deletion statement with an edit summary, "Deletion nom withdrawn", and I've Closed the AfD accordingly.  JGHowes  ^talk 12:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Many thanks, all the best. Boynamedsue (talk) 16:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

On 29 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Paul Fiset, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Paul Fiset's research led to the development of the first successful vaccine against Q fever (bacteria pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Paul Fiset. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Paul Fiset), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Administrator changes Trialpears AGK • Eliz81 • Mulad • ThaddeusB • Vianello • Who Lacrimosus → Ikuzaf Interface administrator changes Ragesoss

CheckUser changes AGK • DGG Oversighter changes AGK

Guideline and policy news

• Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
• An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news

• IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration

• The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.

WikiProject Scouting | July 2021 Things to watch for: New: Newest articles Alert: Article alerts Continuing: To do Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage | Help us plan future events Become a member | Opt-out of notifications

--evrik ^(talk) 17:32, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:AltPressMagCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 45, May – June 2021

• Library design improvements continue
• New partnerships
• 1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Administrator changes BusterD Kees08 • Nickshanks • Protonk • Schissel • Ultraexactzz • Wknight94

CheckUser changes TheresNoTime Oversighter changes TheresNoTime ST47

Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

Technical news

• Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

Arbitration

• Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.

Miscellaneous

• You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Wishing JGHowes a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:19, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Good afternoon, I write you because this user has violated Wikipedia's TOS for a second time. Below I share a link to the first copyright warning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Vgy7ujm#Copyright_violation

I attempted to delete his contribution at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_hosting_services#Site_traffic since the only source of the table is https://www.alexa.com/

Which gives no permission to re-distribute its content in any form. https://www.alexa.com/help/terms

After just 9 hours of my deletion, he reverted the edit.

Please deal with this guy as he seems to not care/understand the legal issues of copyright.

Best, Francisco Ferioli Marco (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC).

https://franciscoferiolimarco.neocities.org/ Francisco Ferioli Marco (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

• After looking this over, I do not believe that a compilation of data referencing various Alexa webpages as the cited sources is a copyright violation. Should you disagree, you could post your concern at WP:CP for other admins to weigh in.  JGHowes  ^talk 17:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

Administrator changes

Jake Wartenberg

Emperor • Viridian Bovary

Ashleyyoursmile → Viridian Bovary

Guideline and policy news

• Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
• A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
• A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
• A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.

Technical news

• The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

Arbitration

• A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.

Miscellaneous

• The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 46, July – August 2021

• Library design improvements deployed
• New collections available in English and German
• Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)