This is an archive of past discussions with User:JGHowes. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
There's no pagination, as such. Just numbered timetables that sometimes spread across two sheets. The Staten Island Rwy is number 89. JGHowes talk23:17, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.
Members of the Bot Approvals Group (BAG) are now subject to an activity requirement. After two years without any bot-related activity (e.g. operating a bot, posting on a bot-related talk page), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice.
Technical news
Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
{{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.
Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.
Technical news
A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.
A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
I am an employee of Dulaney Valley Memorial Gardens and see that you contributed the cemetery's previous logo in 2008. Our logo changed several years ago and I wanted to see if and how the new logo could appear on the Wikipedia page. I appreciate your time and any insight you might provide. Thank you.
Chep517 (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Following discussions at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and Wikipedia talk:Administrators, an earlier change to the restoration of adminship policy was reverted. If requested, bureaucrats will not restore administrator permissions removed due to inactivity if there have been five years without a logged administrator action; this "five year rule" does not apply to permissions removed voluntarily.
Technical news
A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.
Arbitration
The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
paid-en-wpwikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
checkuser-en-wpwikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Please see meta:Community health initiative/User reporting system consultation 2019 to provide your input on this idea.
Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.
Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account.
What do I need to do?
Only to follow the instructions in this message.
Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.
How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.
Arbitration
In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.
The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.
Miscellaneous
The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
Louis XIV of France – a monarch of the House of Bourbon who reigned as King of France. He did say, "Every time I appoint someone to a vacant position, I make a hundred unhappy and one ungrateful."
Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC), Mary was found guilty of plotting to assassinate Elizabeth I of England in 1586, and was beheaded the following year.
Elizabeth I of England – The Virgin Queen, Elizabeth was the last of the five monarchs of the House of Tudor who ushered in the Elizabethan Era, reversed re-establishment of Roman Catholicism by her half-sister.
" There are three urgent and indeed great problems that we face not only in the United States of America but all over the world today. That is the problem of racism, the problem of poverty and the problem of war."
Saint Fin Barre's Cathedral is a Gothic Revival three-spire cathedral in the city of Cork, Ireland. It belongs to the Church of Ireland and was completed in 1879. The cathedral is located on the south side of the River Lee, on ground that has been a place of worship since the 7th century, and is dedicated to Finbarr of Cork, patron saint of the city. It was once in the Diocese of Cork; it is now one of the three cathedrals in the Church of Ireland Diocese of Cork, Cloyne and Ross, in the ecclesiastical province of Dublin. Christian use of the site dates back to a 7th-century AD monastery, which according to legend was founded by Finbarr of Cork. The entrances contain the figures of over a dozen biblical figures, capped by a tympanum showing a Resurrection scene.
(more...)
Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here Delivered: 10:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.
Miscellaneous
In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop Fram. This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.
Mary, Queen of Scots – arrested for Reigning While Catholic (RWC), Mary was found guilty of plotting to assassinate Elizabeth I of England in 1586, and was beheaded the following year.
Bob Dylan – American singer-songwriter, author, and visual artist.
" Take care of all your memories. For you cannot relive them."
Elizabeth I of England – The Virgin Queen, Elizabeth was the last of the five monarchs of the House of Tudor who ushered in the Elizabethan Era, reversed re-establishment of Roman Catholicism by her half-sister.
Eric and Leslie Ludy were 21 and 16 respectively when they first met, English professors suggest that older singles are unlikely to gather hope from their story.
When God Writes Your Love Story: The Ultimate Approach to Guy/Girl Relationships is a 1999 book by Eric and Leslie Ludy, an American married couple. After becoming a bestseller on the Christian book market, the book was republished in 2004 and then revised and expanded in 2009. It tells the story of the authors' first meeting, courtship, and marriage. The authors advise single people not to be physically or emotionally intimate with others, but to wait for the spouse that God has planned for them.
The book is divided into five sections and sixteen chapters. Each chapter is written from the perspective of one of the two authors; nine are by Eric, while Leslie wrote seven, as well as the introduction. The Ludys argue that one's love life should be both guided by and subordinate to one's relationship with God. Leslie writes that God offers new beginnings to formerly unchaste or sexually abused individuals.
(more...)
Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here.
Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity • Get answers to questions about Christianity here Discuss any of the above stories here • For submissions contact the Newsroom • Unsubscribe here Delivered: 12:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.
Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.
A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.
Thanks for your comments and especially your article edits re:South Florida Council.
Also, that's really you? Not only do you have a lovely head of hair, but YOURE FLYING A PLANE! That's my dream, right, to one day fly one of those planes. It'll never happen. So, July at Maxwell--guess what, we're four weeks into the (football) season and it's still 100... Drmies (talk) 16:29, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!02:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.
Technical news
As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.
I was involved in the AfD for Wesley Weber. It was closed as no consensus due to "BLP1E concerns expressed by others". I write to you because I think that it was clearly shown that BLP1E did not apply. One of the editors defending it changed the !vote to keep and the other one did not answer. It was shown that none of the 3 conditions of BLP1E applied, and the policy requires for all three to be met before it can be used as a valid reason. The editor that finally changed the !vote stated himself that the 1st was not met. When I showed that that was reason enough to not meet the policy there was no argument by him or by any of the other editors. The original delete !votes that did not change ignored the requests by myself and the relisting admin to answer again after the changes.
I know that no consensus and keep have the same practical effects, but I just want to make sure that I have not misinterpreted WP:BLP1E. If there are no policy based reasons for its deletion I think it would be positive for the AfD to reflect it. I had to put in a lot of work to save the article, I would like to avoid having to invest more time in the future on this, as I suspect that the blanking by various IPs that brought the article to my attention and the nomination by a new account were aimed at removing sourced information about the subject. If I'm right, I expect that they will try again in the future. Regards, --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
In closing a contentious AfD such as this one, where opinion is almost evenly divided, one must carefully consider the arguments presented by both sides in applying Wikipedia's policies. All three criteria of BLP1E must be met to justify deletion. The significance of his counterfeiting scheme is indicated by the persistence of coverage by reliable sources, thereby vitiating point #3 of BLP1E. But there was a lack of consensus about this and, indeed, a slight majority favored deletion of the bio on notability grounds. As you know, the archived AfD discussion has been linked on the article's talk page for future editors to consider. The best way to forestall a 2nd deletion nomination is to continue to improve the article as you have already started to do. JGHowes talk13:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick response, the early !votes were made before the major improvements and most of them did not respond to the requests. I think there is a clear consensus that WP:SIGCOV is met. As far as WP:BLP1E, the issue is not only that even though point 3 seems to be met, there were still editors not fully convinced. The key point is that BLP1E was used as an argument by the same person that stated that point one was not met since the subject received coverage for more than one event (reliable sources covered his trading without license and various other cannabis related events) using only point 3. If point one is not met, BLP1E can not be used as an argument (the policy clearly states that all three conditions must be met). I asked the editor directly about that point, and after consulting an admin, changed the !vote to keep. So I think that shows that consensus was reached on that point and there was no remaining policy based arguments against keeping it. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion I think a !vote by editors that chose not continue the discussion after receiving pings and a message notifying them that their issues had been addressed by my changes, should not be used as an indication of no consensus. For these reasons, if you have the time I would really appreciate it if you could review the article (including edits before the AfD) as well as the discussion to see if what I said makes sense.
Thanks for the New Year's wishes. You, too! Because the article was not deleted, I see no reason at this point for it to be reopened and relisted at AfD. JGHowes talk17:30, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I agree that the final result is fine, My request was not for the AfD to be reopened, I am asking mainly for my own understanding. I believe that none of the arguments for deleting were valid after the improvements and clarifications I made, as I tried to show in the AfD, and that once the article was improved and initial concerns were addressed, there was no reply by pinged delete !votes. Just wanted to know if you agree, even if changing the close is not needed, or if I am missing something here. If I am wrong, I would like to know why (and learn something in the process) to not make the same mistakes in the future as I had to invest a lot of time to save that article, thinking it was important to our project. Best regards. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Crystallizedcarbon, no, I don't think you were "wrong". Because many of the editors who participated earlier in the discussion did not update their comments to reflect the article changes, a "no consensus" was appropriate under the circumstances. JGHowes talk19:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Homerfan12's persistent non-free file uploading is more of a disruptive nature, as opposed to pure "vandalism". Nonetheless, I wanted to give him a Final warning that if there's another instance, a lengthy block is certain. Please ping me if he repeats. JGHowes talk20:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Paid editing
I am not being paid nor am I paying anyone to contribute this page to Wikipedia. Absolutely nobody is being paid. The photographer Lisa Gizara is a friend. She informed me that the page was being held back due to possible payments...I assure you this is false.
It appears that the subject is the only actor without a Wikipedia page link in a variety of films and television project including the upcoming Bombshell film which has garnered much attention as this actor plays a well-known role.
Can we please finally post the page. I've addressed the proper issues that caused the initial rejection. And added further proper legitimate, highly respected references to confirm its validity.TC2018 (talk) 21:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for contacting me. Lisa Gizara had indicated in her email to us (our Ticket:2019101910004639) that you have a close connection to the subject, Michael Buie. Although our confidentiality rules prevent me from being more specific here, it was sufficient to raise a conflict of interest concern. But that is not the reason why Draft:Michael Buie has not been approved yet — it is simply awaiting our normal review process for new articles. In general, Wikipedia bios about actors need to meet this guideline: WP:NACTOR, verified by published articles in reliable, secondary sources. For example, reviews about an actor in Variety, New York Times, etc., and profiles in People magazine, and so forth. [update]-> To help, I've now done some editing on the draft myself, such as formatting references, using our Manual of Style, etc.
You should respond on your talk page giving an explanation as to why the statement about paid editing is incorrect, or comply with the requirements for paid editing mentioned there. JGHowes talk22:03, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Dilla Massacre AfD
Hello. I am writing in regard to the AfD for the Dilla Massacre article that you have recently closed due to lack of consensus. I am requesting for the AfD to be relisted for a longer period of time in order to reach consensus. The reason being is that the keep editors have not brought forth policy-based arguments that support the article. On the other hand, many of the delete editors have noted that the page does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, this is evident in lack of significant coverage in reliable sources (e.g. [3], [4], [5], [6]), as outlined by editors in the discussion). Furthermore, I have also illustrated in the AfD how the sources used in the article do not support the article’s notability. And lastly, many of the sources used are not scholarly and fail to meet WP:RS. Relisting the AfD for a longer period of time would allow additional contributions by editors and would help reach consensus one way or another. Koodbuur (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Koodbuur, thanks for writing about this AfD. In evaluating this deletion discussion, it appeared that the concern about notability was sufficiently addressed by the significant coverage of the violent incidents during the specific time period and area, even after discounting the questionable ones cited. It was also evident that the specific phrase "Dilla massacre" was the premise, in part, for some of the deletion commentators. But, objections to an article's title are insufficient grounds for deletion. As I pointed out in my closing comment, Wikipedia processes for Moving/Renaming should be considered and discussed on the article's Talk page. Of course, you have the option of appealing to DRV. JGHowes talk22:29, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. I just want to clarify that although some sources do mention a battle between SNM rebels and pro-government forces, the subject of a massacre is neither supported in reliable sources nor has received significant coverage. A simple name change will not work if the subject of a massacre itself is not covered by reliable sources. My rationale behind the AfD is that the content of the article (i.e. massacre) is not supported by reputable sources, and not simply an issue of the title of the article which could be remedied with a name change as you have proposed. Koodbuur (talk) 23:00, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
I understand your reasoning, but as closing admin I also had to consider the strong disagreement of some of the other AfD participants that the massacre is neither supported in reliable sources nor has received significant coverage. Hence, a no consensus outcome seemed appropriate in light of the divergence of opinion among the participants. JGHowes talk13:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Michael Buie Wiki Page
TC2018 has been banned from Wikipedia after the amendments JGHowes made to the page assuming that you are a paid contributor...which is NOT true. We do not know each other...
Is there anything you can do to post the page?...it's obvious, as this actor is the only one without a page in 4 major projects.
As explained above and on TC2018's talk page, the draft article was not accepted by the experienced reviewer, Theroadislong, because more significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject needs to be found in published secondary sources. JGHowes talk03:03, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
Dolly Parton - an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music.
Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: " I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
Being a Ghost Story of Christmas, commonly known as A Christmas Carol, is a novella by Charles Dickens, first published in London by Chapman & Hall in 1843 and illustrated by John Leech. The book is divided into five chapters, which Dickens titled "staves". A Christmas Carol recounts the story of Ebenezer Scrooge, an elderly miser who is visited by the ghost of his former business partner Jacob Marley and the spirits of Christmas Past, Present and Yet to Come. After their visits, Scrooge is transformed into a kinder, gentler man. (more...)
Bible Verse
“
Be kindly affectionate to one another with brotherly love, in honor giving preference to one another.
”
Romans 12:10 New King James Version (NKJV)
Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.
Quotes
" I will honour Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year."
Charles Dickens – British novelist, journalist, editor, illustrator and social critic.
Happy Holidays!
The end of the year is a time of year for remembrance. We take stock of where we came from, and have a moment to think about where we are going...
At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling.
May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.
I am wondering what is going on here "Deletion log 13:50 JGHowes talk contribs changed visibility of 2 revisions on page RevSpace: username hidden (alt account request)" which was for an edit that undid an edit of my. So naturally it makes me wonder what you mean by "alt account request". Graywalls (talk) 13:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for contacting me, Graywalls. An editor was mistakenly logged in with their alternate username when they made those edits. Having inadvertently disclosed it, they requested that their alternate username be hidden from the edit summary. JGHowes talk13:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
the "alternate" hasn't been participating in any of the AfD discussion "alongside" right? that is why I was a bit concerned. Graywalls (talk) 15:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
When the REVDEL request was made (I'm one of the admins listed at CAT:RFRD), I was satisfied after questioning that the request pertained to an unrelated and potentially embarrassing privacy issue (their username is still visible to admins, btw); "alternate" has not participated in the AfD, you may be sure. JGHowes talk15:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Peace Dove
Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ―Buster7☎ 15:02, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Good luck
豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはJGHowesたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！ フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE! ミラP04:26, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Now done! Thank you. The problem was the sfn format was that there should be one p instead of two; which is the all the fault of somebody who should know better:(:(.--A.S. Brown (talk) 00:15, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Would you consider your decision? Mr. Fuentes has now received even more media attention and passes WP:BIO. MTV did an entire documentary and I've seen some run-ins with more mainstream conservatives (Jonah Goldberg, Ben Shapiro, Donald Trump Jr.). If not, I plan to submit to deletion review.
A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted rather than reasonably construed.
Dolly Parton – an American singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist, record producer, actress, author, businesswoman, and humanitarian, known primarily for her work in country music.
Quotations related to Dolly Parton at Wikiquote: "I just depend on a lot of prayer and meditation. I believe that without God I am nobody, but that with God, I can do anything."
Nominated by StalinsunnykvjСретение Господне ("The Meeting of the Lord"), a depiction of Simeon recognising Jesus at the Temple, from a fifteenth-century Novgorodskye School Russian icon.
A Song for Simeon, is a 37-line poem written in 1928 by American-English poet T. S. Eliot (1888–1965). It is one of five poems that Eliot contributed to the Ariel poems series of 38 pamphlets by several authors published by Faber and Gwyer. "A Song for Simeon" was the sixteenth in the series and included an illustration by avant garde artist Edward McKnight Kauffer. The poem's narrative echoes the text of the Nunc dimittis, a liturgical prayer for Compline from the Gospel passage. Eliot introduces literary allusions to earlier writers Lancelot Andrewes, Dante Alighieri and St. John of the Cross. Critics have debated whether Eliot's depiction of Simeon is a negative portrayal of a Jewish figure and evidence of anti-Semitism on Eliot's part.
(more...)
Bible Verse
“
May He grant you according to your heart’s desire, And fulfill all your purpose.
”
Psalm 20:4 New King James Version (NKJV)
Help wanted
We're looking for writers to contribute to Ichthus. Do you have a project or an issue that you'd like to highlight? Post your inquiries or submission here.
Quotes
"Faith lived in the incognito is one which is located outside the criticism coming from society, from politics, from history, for the very reason that it has itself the vocation to be a source of criticism. It is faith (lived in the incognito) which triggers the issues for the others, which causes everything seemingly established to be placed in doubt, which drives a wedge into the world of false assurances." ~ Jacques Ellul
At this special time of year, we give thanks for editors like you who have made our Mission easier and our lives more fulfilling. May your New Year be all that you hope for, and may it be sprinkled with love and friendship.
On 17 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Michael Buie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Michael Buie practised Fox News anchor Bret Baier's speaking style for his role in the film Bombshell, they had never talked to each other until after filming had finished? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Michael Buie. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Michael Buie), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.
Technical news
Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [7]
Arbitration
Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.
Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.
Technical news
Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.
Looking at the delete votes, all (except 1) concern "no references". This was true initially, but then work was done to improve the sourcing (a lot), after which everyone went with Keep (except 1). The question is why the delete votes carried weight once the sourcing was so dramatically improved. The Delete vote that wasn't RS-based, "not suitable for an article" is an assertion without explanation/rationale, but also showing by this stage there was no more debate regarding sourcing. What did you see in the delete votes that gave you pause and thus a no consensus? -- GreenC03:12, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
As you no doubt know, the practical effect of a "No consensus" close is the same as a "Keep". Some of the delete opinions cited other concerns besides sourcing, e.g., did it merit a separate article as a subsidiary of AVIC. Also, I considered that none of the delete voters changed their minds even after the improvements to sourcing were made. With a 5–5 tie !vote, I could not very well conclude that there was a consensus to Keep. Thanks for asking. JGHowes talk04:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
NC defaults K, but we weigh on argument strength not counting. A fair close would take into account there was a major change in the article during the AfD, and the delete rationales were accurate when cast: "Lack of WP:RS", "no references at all", "little mention of Jincheng in media..my (admittedly cursory) research", "No place for unsourced articles". But then the article changed significantly. Are you saying that the vote "No place for unsourced articles" is still valid? That "no references at all" is still accurate? They had the option to come back and change their vote rationale, but didn't do so, that is their loss. The one other vote "doesn't merit a separate article" is an opinion, but weak because there is no guideline or policy cited to explain what "merit" means in this context.
I'd like to see Keep because it has some (minor) consequence: 1. For those who voted Keep their AfD statistics are improved, and statistics are often used both for egotistical reasons and for admins judging potentially disruptive AfD voting behavior. 2. NC sends a signal to future AfD attempts because it can be encouragement to try and delete again ie. a close call try again. -- GreenC02:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Sigh. Reason fails. No I don't that. Just keep in mind that when articles change radically during an AfD, so does the validity of those votes cast when the article was in an earlier condition. -- GreenC13:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Following the banning of an editor by the WMF last year, the Arbitration Committee resolved to hold a Arbcom RfC regarding on-wiki harassment. A draft RfC has been posted at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Anti-harassment RfC (Draft) and not open to comments from the community yet. Interested editors can comment on the RfC itself on its talk page.
Miscellaneous
The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Orphaned non-free image File:Boys Life Oct2007.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Boys Life Oct2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
I don't think it's fair to include Billy Graham's article in a series called Conservatism in the United States. Franklin Graham, sure. As conservative as Billy Graham's theology was, I don't think it's appropriate to claim as a force in conservative political movement. He deliberately ministered to politicians along the spectrum of political thought. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjacton (talk • contribs) 03:09, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
In looking over the article's recent history, I see that BlueShirtz added the {{Conservatism in the United States}} template on July 10, 2019, without explanation or discussion. Nor does the article itself provide any cites of reliable sources for this claim, other than a passing mention that the "conservative Hearst newspapers" supported Graham's LA crusade back in the 1940s. In fact, one could argue that he was progressive for his time, insisting that crusades in the South be integrated, for example. I urge you to open a discussion about the suitability of this on the article's talk page. JGHowes talk04:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
The Wikimedia Foundation announced that they will develop a universal code of conduct for all WMF projects. There is an open local discussion regarding the same.
Arbitration
A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.
May I ask what permission is needed for the File:Navarre_Beach_Skyline.jpg photo on the Navarre Florida Wikipedia page? Apparently it said is was copyright, however I was granted permission from the owner of the photo.
We cannot accept forwarded or third party permissions. The copyright owner is evidently "Aeriel Memories Photography" (because their watermark is on the photo) and they must email us directly, see for details. — JGHowes talk03:40, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
The Medicine case was closed, with a remedy authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for all discussions about pharmaceutical drug prices and pricing and for edits adding, changing, or removing pharmaceutical drug prices or pricing from articles.
Hi JGHowes -- I came across a thread you started on the Zak Smith page and didn't want to resurrect it since it looks to be about three months stale, however, I share your discomfort with the sources being used and have commented on it here on the page of a recently blocked editor who is claiming to be the subject of the BLP. I'm not entirely sure what the solution is here, but this seems to be an endemic problem with BLPs of roleplay game designers. Chetsford (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Chetsford, I quite agree. For such highly negative BLP content, I'm very skeptical that the refs cited meet our minimum RS requirements and am inclined towards removal of the questionable content. JGHowes talk18:17, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
On 9 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Truman Taylor, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that President Ronald Reagan once phoned television host Truman Taylor(pictured) on the air to praise his "creative" Job-A-Thon show? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Truman Taylor. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Truman Taylor), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I really like your photos of Harpers Ferry and the Potomac and Shenendoah rivers that is on the Harpers Ferry wiki page. Would you be willing to upload a higher resolution version? It is only 413 × 320 pixels, which is a bit small for today's monitors. Thanks. Lorax (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
I'm glad you enjoyed it. That was taken with an Instamatic camera while I was flying a Cessna airplane, and years later scanned from a 4"x3" print, so it's far from today's high-resolution digital photos. I'll have to root around in my boxes of old photos to see if a better scan is possible. JGHowes talk19:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:AGO logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thanks, evrik, for the DYK nom. I usually run out the clock to near the end of the 7-day grace period before I self-nom, so I'm glad you beat me to it., Actually, the hook you've provided is probably going to be the most interesting in the end, but I'll help with the cite and alt hooks. JGHowes talk19:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Leinster Rugby logo 2019.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Leinster Rugby logo 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Concerning the recent AfD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Laurel_Schwulst, there have been 5 delete votes versus 6 keep votes. If excluding IP votes and single-purpose accounts, gives 4 delete and 3 keep.
I know AfD is not a poll, but even when considering the discussion, the keep votes seem to involve more detail than the delete ones.
In such circumstance, do you mind if I ask why the AfD was closed as "delete" rather than "no consensus"?
Hi Walwal20, thanks for contacting me about this recent AfD. As far as a !vote tally goes, while an overall 6-6 result would superficially justify a "no consensus", there were SPA and IP drop-ins, as you noted. Presumably, some off-wiki canvassing took place when the AfD was re-listed. There were really 3 keep !votes with substantive comments, such as yours, and 5 for delete (counting the nom). I felt that the comments for deletion were better grounded in our customary GNG and CREATIVE guidelines. Listing in a course syllabus, for example, is not the same as critical commentary in peer-reviewed academic journals, nor do the other cited sources appear to meet the criterion for reliable secondary sources with editorial oversight independent of the subject. Finally, the history of the article and its drafts indicates that despite best efforts, better sourcing is simply not to be found at this time. JGHowes talk13:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you recently closed Miami New Drama as a Keep. The requirements as per WP:NCORP are for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. I engaged on the AfD page and provided an analysis of the references, nobody took issue with anything specific beyond a vague "you're making stuff up" rebuttal. Nobody provided any links to references that they believed may meet the criteria either. Can you take another look at the AfD and provide me with your reasoning as to why you believe the arguments put forward to Keep the article justify your decision? Thank you! HighKing++ 15:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Good morning, HighKing, Thanks for contacting me re this recent AfD close as Keep. Although your comments were appropriately based on whether the subject meets NCORP, it was clear by a 2-1 margin that the consensus is that it is adjudged to have enough sigcov from reliable secondary sources, such as NBC News. This consensus was maintained even after the AfD was re-listed and the Delete arguments were presented at length. JGHowes talk16:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Good evening :-) and thank you for the explanation. I agree that one editor pushed back on my analysis of the NBC article and even if you were to accept that reference as good (it's not, it is based on an interview and fails WP:ORGIND. also has very little information on the company, fails CORPDEPTH), NCORP guidelines say that multiple references are required. I agree though that the AfD had been opened for a considerable period and had not attracted much in the way of Delete !votes, but it isn't a !vote counting exercise (so a 2-1 margin is entirely irrelevant) and none of the Keep !voters made *any* convincing arguments wrt NCORP guidelines and were often incorrect in their reasoning wrt to our NCORP guidelines. On the evidence, I believe a "No Consensus" close it more appropriate and accurate? It makes a difference should this article ever hit AfD again. HighKing++ 18:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
I came to add some information to the page relating to Flory, Dade County, Missouri, only to find it had been deleted. I have discovered new source material from a local newspaper, freely available from the State Historical Society via newspapers.com. What needs to be done to un-delete the page? Or should I just start a new one? Jmac64755 (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Robert McClenon, there are different ways to accomplish this. One method would be for me to re-delete the existing mainspace article, then you could move the draft to mainspace once you're satisfied that it meets requirements (in glancing at the draft quickly, I see that a lot of MoS and disambg links need to be fixed, ref formating, etc.). Another way would be for Jmac64755 as creator to copy/paste his new content and refs from the draft to the existing mainspace article. I would then re-open/"relist" the AfD for further discussion. Thanks for all your work at draft review. JGHowes talk23:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
My preference, since there is still work that needs to be done on the draft, is to restore the article and update it, which avoids the need for a history merge, and preserves what little there was of the article. History merges should be avoided when possible. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Sacramento Northern Railway
I've managed to find some free images of SN operations - see here, here, and here - so I don't think we can justify a fair use image. However, it's a very nice image, and it's entirely possible that it does actually qualify as public domain. Is there a copyright notice on the magazine? If there is, what's the title and author of the article? If it doesn't appear in renewal records for 1977 and 1978, then it can safely be assumed to be PD. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you would consider relisting this discussion? Over at WikiProject Chess there is a feeling that there are enough offline sources to meet GNG. I think the debate could benefit from some more input. Thanks, -- P-K3 (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
Thank you for the barnstar. I am still spending time on wikipedia almost every day. I gave up being at admin, as I was not sure at the age of 81 that I could fully trust my own judgement, so thought I would leave admin'ing to younger folks. --Bduke (talk) 20:57, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Masey McLain
On 2 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Masey McLain, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American actress Masey McLain's feature film debut in I'm Not Ashamed was praised by critic Jordan Hoffman, who said of her acting future, "the sky is the limit"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Masey McLain. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Masey McLain), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello, you recently deleted my page about the company With Clarity. I was not finished with it, but can you explain why you think it was a misuse of the page, and why it reads like advertising? Any comments for improvement would be highly appreciated.
Also, can I please retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement? I would like another chance at this.
Hello, Tle017. An editor tagged it for speedy deletion because it appeared to be an advertisement written by someone with a close connection to the subject, which is not what user pages are for. As mentioned on your talk page, guidelines and helpful hints for development of a new article are found at WP:DEVELOP. You might want to consider using Wikipedia's Article Creation Wizard, see Your first article. Commons pitfalls to avoid are WP:COI and WP:PROMO. Hope this helps! JGHowes talk18:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Thank you very much for creating this article! This was something that hit an aquantaince of mine, and I noticed there was no information about it on Wikipedia. Looks great! I may not be able to offer an article in exchange, but I think you will be very happy, as a Commons admin, that I am very close to be able to solve T160229. Cheers and have a nice day! JCrespo (WMF) (talk) 09:26, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Harriet Lee (singer)
On 4 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Harriet Lee (singer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Golden Age of Radio singer Harriet Lee had her own television show in 1931? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Harriet Lee (singer)), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
On 10 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ryuk (ransomware), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that cybercriminals using Ryuk malware took in more than $61 million in ransom payments between 2018 and 2019, according to the FBI? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ryuk (ransomware). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ryuk (ransomware)), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hi there, JGHowes. I have noticed that two of your last three new articles have been biographies of women. If you intend to continue along these lines, you might be interested in becoming a member of wp:Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. With all your experience and your diversified interests, it would be great to have you as a member.--Ipigott (talk) 10:56, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
I actually checked it out later and promoted it to C. Thanks for all your efforts. I'm glad to see you added the WIR 2020 banner but to be an official member of Women in Red, you need to register on the wp:Women in Red page via "Join the project" on the top right.--Ipigott (talk) 08:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Sure, Eagles247, indeed this was a close call because your valid points are well-grounded in policy. On the other hand, while OTHERSTUFF and ILIKEIT arguments are unpersuasive, the consensus about this AfD seemed to be that the ongoing, continued coverage about it in reliable independent sources, especially the recently-added SI and WaPo cites, barely pushed it over the GNG goal line when it was 4th-and-5, if you will. JGHowes talk19:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Majestic Radios
On 19 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Majestic Radios, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Majestic Radios(model pictured) were so highly regarded in 1929 that the Graf Zeppelin's navigator bought one when his airship landed in the U.S. to take back to Germany? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Majestic Radios. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Majestic Radios), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Congratulations! With 16,514 views, your Majestic Radios hook is one of the most viewed hooks for the month of December. Accordingly, it has been included at DYKSTATS December. Keep up the good work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
@Davidgoodheart: I just took a look at this AfD and right now, I'd have to close it as "no consensus". Not only are the !votes almost evenly divided, but on both sides the reasons given are "weak". I think this AfD needs to run for another week or so. Seven days is just the minimum, many run longer than that and are even re-listed to gain a better consensus. Some of the users who often participate in WP:BAND AfD's have yet to be heard from. JGHowes talk01:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
You can get an approximate translation from the Estonian article by going to the left side panel: under "Teistes keeltes" (other languages), click on "English". If the box is empty, type in English. For a further "how-to" guide, see WP:RFT. JGHowes talk21:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
Wishing you a joyful Christmas and a happy New year. We would like to use this occasion for giving thanks for editors like you for your works on editing, maintaining and expanding this encyclopedia. May the glorious message of peace and love fill you with joy during this wonderful season.
One Voice at Christmas-a 2016 Christmas album by the Welsh singer Aled Jones and produced by Classic FM.
"Christmas is not a time nor a season, but a state of mind. To cherish peace and goodwill, to be plenteous in mercy, is to have the real spirit of Christmas!"
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frederick Swann you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A.T.S. in Texas -- A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 01:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Frederick Swann you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Frederick Swann for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A.T.S. in Texas -- A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 02:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
_(5247428631).jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}