User talk:JGHowes/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions with User:JGHowes. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

January 2010–Dec. 2010

On January 8, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Frederick Brocklander, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, JGHowes/Archive 4! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards. If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 18:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

[original message] "Hi, Eliot456. Just a heads-up that these images you uploaded to Commons have been tagged for deletion in seven days because they lack the required source/author/license information. If you are the photographer and need assistance with licensing them, just let me know. I'm a Wikipedia administrator and will be happy to help. If these images are copyrighted by someone else, however, you should know that only the copyright holder can license them."

Hey, Thanks for the note, i am the photographer, and i would like to do what you said to get them "verified" maybe you could get me a link to a help page that has directions. I saw on your page that you play organ. That is a talent that i very much respect! I am in the process of learning piano and i'm kind of advanced now and am looking to get organ lessons in the near future! I'm very excited! My enthusiasm for organ has led me to desire to get some nice pictures of the Ruffatti Organ from Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church on the wiki page. Thanks! Eliot —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliot456 (talk • contribs) 06:01, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

I've replied on your talk page at Commons here.  JGHowes  ^talk 06:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

a good article on the history of plywood is at: http://www.apawood.org/level_b.cfm?content=srv_med_new_bkgd_plycen 173.202.212.97 (talk) 16:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

I think it would be better for the protection to cover the whole month, due to the nature of the IP edits. Enigma^msg 05:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Agree, I've changed it back to your original block setting. Seemed to be an edit (block?) conflict, as I didn't see your blockprotection when I set mine.  JGHowes  ^talk 05:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Protection conflict. Unlike with edit conflicts, all changes go through if different admins are adjusting the protection at the same time. :) Thanks, Enigma^msg 05:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm up too late, meant "semi-protect" not "block"  JGHowes  ^talk 06:06, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Warrenton Presbyterian Church (Warrenton, Virginia), please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wpcva.org/about/history.aspx. As a copyright violation, Warrenton Presbyterian Church (Warrenton, Virginia) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Warrenton Presbyterian Church (Warrenton, Virginia) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Warrenton Presbyterian Church (Warrenton, Virginia) and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Warrenton Presbyterian Church (Warrenton, Virginia) with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Warrenton Presbyterian Church (Warrenton, Virginia).

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Abductive (reasoning) 23:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Please note, I did not create or originate any content in question – I simply moved it from Warrenton Presbyterian Church over a redirect to disambiguate a church of the same name in South Carolina, as noted in my edit summary of 15 July 2007. The content in question was contributed by Teketcham2 (talk · contribs) in January 2007. JGHowes  ^talk 04:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi. My name is Brittany Renae Duck/Thomas. Danny was my uncle and I was wondering what all you knew about him. If you could send me and email back asap it would be much appreciated. My email is [email protected]. Thank you for your time. Sincerly, Brittany. —Preceding tunsigned comment added by 65.79.79.45 (talk) 15:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I did not know Dan Thomas, the ballplayer, personally. I just gathered the information from published sources such as newspaper articles. Do you have a family photo of him you'd like to donate to Wikipedia?  JGHowes  ^talk 16:44, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Fernance B. Perry at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! DustFormsWords (talk) 00:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

 Fixed  JGHowes  ^talk 00:50, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Baltimore and Ohio #25: The William Mason 4-4-0 built in 1856, most recently used in the movie Wild Wild West. Baltimore and Ohio #217: Built in 1969 at Mt. Clare, a 4-6-0 camelback locomotive based on Ross Winans' design. Baltimore and Ohio #545: The A.J. Cromwell, a 2-8-0 "Consolidation" built in 1888.

Just a minor problem, that doesn't seem correct. I don't know how to change the current text.

Sidebar. I worked at the Museum of Science & Industry in Chicago (1946-1947) maintaining the "Q" gauge Model Railroad (30'x 60') exhibit on week-ends. I was in High School and graduated in January of 1947. Attended IIT for one semester and then starting installing central office telephone equipment for Western Electric Installation, for 4.5 years. The Railroad was 1/4" scale which is narrower than "O" gauge. The car bodies were "O" gauge, but the car trucks and engines all had to be machined to the narrower gauge. I was also a member of a 17/64" Model Rairoad Club that used "O" gauge trucks and tracks, but built over size cars to conform to the scale of the rail gauge. They had a fairly large train layout that they operated in a unused train station on Lake Street west of Chicago. Don't remember the exact address. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.57.113.114 (talk) 21:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for catching that typo. Yes, Camelback #217 was built in 1869. Was interested to read of your work experience at the Museum of Science & Industry's model railroad exhibit. My dad worked for Western Electric for many years, at the Baltimore Point Breeze plant.  JGHowes  ^talk 01:18, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

On April 17, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fernance B. Perry, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

The article currently does not convey the general attitudes towards the administrative power (i.e. the UK), whereas other British Overseas Territories, such as Gibraltar, Turks and Caicos islands and the Falkland Islands mention what the attitudes in the territories are towards the UK. From your experience, how do the people in Bermuda feel about being classified as British? Is there an article on this issue that we can cite? Thanks. --RaviC (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

The government of Bermuda's ruling party, the PLP, is officially pro-independence and some people are vehemently anti-British. However, polls show that the majority of the population favours the status quo. When Queen Elizabeth visited Bermuda last November, Her Majesty was very warmly welcomed island-wide. The Royal Gazette has reported the poll results and the independence debate.  JGHowes  ^talk 12:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

• You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
  
• Please be advised that planning is now underway (see here) for DC Meetup #10. --NBahn (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

On June 1, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Raymond V. Haysbert, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 13:20, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 06:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Jim. R, him say he start article about you. — JoJo • Talk • 14:19, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Check your mail. ;0-) — Rlevse • Talk • 01:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Moved this pic to commons too. — Rlevse • Talk • 19:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Put your Sacred Classics pic in the category too. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:18, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Noted. Thanks for the heads up.  JGHowes  ^talk 22:35, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Ck wiki mail and give my sandbox one last good look over. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Might this be better as a disambig? There's at least two relevant pages it might link on to: Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America and Boy_Scout#Uniforms - there may be others too. Etrigan (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I found an existing redirect, Boy scout uniform, already pointing to Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America. Because that's incorrectly lower case, I added the properly capitalized Boy Scout uniform (per WP:SCOUTMOS) redirect as a fix to eliminate redlinks. A disambig may not be needed, because the term "Boy Scout" is no longer used by most member organizations of Scout (Scout Movement) anyway outside of the U.S. Perhaps a hatnote at Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America would be helpful, informing the reader that information about Scout uniforms worldwide is found in the articles pertaining to each country's Scout movement, or maybe a list article of Scout uniforms by country could be proposed at WP:SCOUT.  JGHowes  ^talk 17:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Any of the above would be tbetter, IMO. The redirect I feel is insufficiently international in scope given the nature of the organisation as a whole. However, I'll let someone else more involved pick that up. Etrigan (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I've asked the Scouting Project coordinator to chime in here.  JGHowes  ^talk 18:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Boy Scout uniform and the like should really redirect to Scouting, which touches on the subject. Uniform and insignia of the Boy Scouts of America is pretty clear that is is about the BSA, so no hatnote is needed. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 21:33, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

James G. Howes is scheduled to be the lead DYK article, with photo, at 8pm Eastern US time, 1am 22 Jun UTC. Let's give it lots of views! Way to go User:JGHowes!! See current version of Template:Did_you_know/Queue and Template:Did you know/Queue/3 for more info. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm grateful for all the attention and your work in creating the article. Wow!  JGHowes  ^talk 14:56, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

No problem, it was fun and interesting! — Rlevse • Talk • 21:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

HOO YAH! It's there. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Check User:Rlevse/files#DYK_listings, you had 3.8K views, a little shy of the 5k needed to be listed on the stats pages, but still VERY GOOD! — Rlevse • Talk • 02:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Considering that mine have gotten no more than a few hundred in the past, that is indeed quite good! Juliancolton (talk) 11:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

;-) — Rlevse • Talk • 12:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

New article and DYK if you care to help improve. I wanted to get it up on July 4th! — Rlevse • Talk • 21:38, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Bermuda shorts.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Bermuda shorts.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

 Fixed  JGHowes  ^talk

New article and DYK if you care to help improve. Up on July 6th, anniversary of the court ruling! — Rlevse • Talk • 00:48, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

i just noticed an edit you did on 'people from baltimore',removing the lead guitarist of some garage band, and it moved me to register an opinion thus: wikipedia needs to raise its standard for notability generally. i can't really imagine that anyone other than relatives are much interested in female slovenian triple jumpers whose best finish was 11th in the 1961 european championship. that i just made up, but i have seen many of that ilk.just sayin'.Toyokuni3 (talk) 18:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia does have guidelines regarding garage band members (who are not individually notable, see WP:BAND) and amateur athletes (see WP:ATHLETE), so when you see such non-notable, unsourced entries on a list and they're not linked to any article to verify notability, they should be removed on sight.  JGHowes  ^talk 18:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

New article on a Scouter, psychiatrist, and author. Very interesting. Pls help improve. Up for DYK too. — Rlevse • Talk • 15:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

A while back you asked about {{infobox person}}. There is work on incorporating modules so that other infoboxes can be added as sub templates. See the example at User:Thumperward/Priestley where {{infobox scientist}}, {{infobox clergy}} and {{infobox philosopher}} are used as modules. I would expect {{infobox military person}} to be added at some point. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 14:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

That's good, it will provide a cleaner layout for bios when multiple infoboxes are called for, such as a military person also notable in another field of endeavor.  JGHowes  ^talk 17:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey, just in case you missed it, there is an oppurtunity to get a free dinner this Tuesday August 11 and a chance to meet and hang out talk about Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy and WP:GLAM/SI. Sorry that this is so late in the game, I was hoping the e-mail would be a better form of contact for active members (if you want to get on the e-mail list send me an User e-mail ). Hope that you can attend, User:Sadads (talk)12:03, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

An off-wiki discussion is taking place concerning DC Meetup #12. Watch this page for announcements.
—NBahn (talk) 04:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

P.S. You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #12 on Saturday, October 23, 6pm at Bertucci's in Foggy Bottom. Special guests at this meetup will include Wikimedia CTO Danese Cooper, other Wikimedia technical staff and volunteer developers who will be in DC for Hack-A-Ton DC. Please RSVP on the meetup page.

You can remove your name from the Washington DC Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #13 on Wednesday, November 17, from 7 to 9 pm, location to be determined (but near a Metro station in DC).

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can join the mailing list.

You can remove your name from future notifications of Washington DC Meetups by editing this page: Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.
BrownBot (talk) 13:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Belleview-Biltmore Hotel.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

I've added the source call number at the State of Florida archives and its PD status - and moved file to Commons.  JGHowes  ^talk 01:42, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Belleview.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

I've added the source call number at the State of Florida archives and its PD status - and moved file to Commons.  JGHowes  ^talk 01:43, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Bermuda Rwy.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Kelly, under UK Crown copyright rules, works of government have a basic term of protection of 50 years from date of commercial publication. File:Bermuda Rwy.jpg was commercially published prior to 1948 by Her Majesty's Bermuda government, an overseas territory of the UK. As a Crown artistic work other than engravings and photographs created prior to 30 June 1957, it had a copyright term of 50 years from creation. Therefore, its copyright expired in 1998, if not before, and it is a free image in the public domain since then.

Further information concerning United Kingdom rules pertaining to public domain images and Crown copyright expiration can be found at Wikimedia Commons, Country-specific laws (United Kingdom). I'll move this file to Commons with the appropriate {{PD-UKGov}} tag.  JGHowes  ^talk 20:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)()