Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

User talk:JCbot

Please don't add New York portal links to every article that covers a topic in New York. There's little to no relation between most of the article topics and the portal, and on some articles like CSX Transportation the number could get ridiculous (not just states, but cities, rail transport, companies, business, etc.) --NE2 20:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not; only highway articles at the moment. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:16, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And how do those links help the reader? The comment about too many boxes still applies - US 9 would get NY, U.S. roads, NYC, Albany, and possibly others (Adirondacks? Hudson Valley? Westchester?) --NE2 20:17, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Portal. An article that covers multiple topics would only have the single most relevant topic; therefore, US 9 would get a link to the NY portal, which encompasses everything. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:19, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That page doesn't seem to say anything about restricting linked portals to the "most relevant" (which one might argue is U.S. roads, not New York). It also recommends that portals be placed on the talk page, with the article page as a secondary choice. --NE2 20:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure I understand your objections. This bot was approved by the BAG, so they saw no issues with this specific task. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That's just proof that BAG is out-of-touch with the community My objections are that these boxes usually add nothing to the article except clutter. --NE2 21:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Then that's a discussion for portals in general, not this task specifically. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But has there been a discussion for portals in general that adding these boxes to all articles is a good thing? --NE2 22:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, but I do know that it's been standard practice for several years. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not by bot, as far as I can tell. It's also been my standard practice to revert thses; for instance someone went and put "companies portal" boxes on many articles. I removed them and they haven't been added back. --NE2 22:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bug

Quick bug there, resolved now. Sorry. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:47, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot massage text color

Why did the bot used the white as the color for the text? It is simply unreadible!!! I had to highlight the message to read it! --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 14:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm? It used regular text as far as I can tell. –Juliancolton | Talk 14:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing it. :) Might be a leakout from the above message in my talk page. --Tyw7  (Talk • Contributions) 14:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bots

I am just wondering, how do I make a bot?Pzoxicuvybtnrm 03:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pzoxicuvybtnrm (talkcontribs)

Information related to User talk:JCbot

User, User interface, User (computing), End user, User profile, User identifier, Power user, User innovation, User-centered design, Graphical user interface, User interface design, Linux user group, User story, User experience, User-generated content, Multi-user software, User-Agent header, User agent, Organic user interface, User research, Users' group, End-user development, User experience design, Registered user, User advocacy, User review, Macintosh User Group, 10-foot user interface, Intelligent user interface, Roaming user profile, Voice user interface, Tangible user interface, User-mode Linux, User illusion, Single-user mode, Sinclair User, Zooming user interface, User (nomarch), The Micro User, User requirements document, User fee

User assistance, User Friendly, User interface markup language, Text-based user interface, User guide, User interface management system, User space and kernel space, Fast user switching, Amstrad Computer User, User intent, User-defined function, IBM Common User Access, Active users, Closed user group, Adaptive user interface, End-user license agreement, Natural user interface, User–network interface, User model, User Account Control, Toolkits for user innovation, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Object-oriented user interface, Acorn User, Apple User Group Connection, User error, Lazy user model, User information, User interface modeling, User-Mode Driver Framework, User-subjective approach, Atari ST User, CheckUser, Attentive user interface, Unique user, User environment management, User activity monitoring, Console user interface, Principles of user interface design, HUD User, Windows USER, Persona (user experience), End-user computing, Z User Group, Linux User and Developer, History of the graphical user interface, Multi-user MIMO, Web User, First-time user experience, Multi-user dungeon

User, User interface, User (computing), End user, User profile, User identifier, Power user, User innovation, User-centered design, Graphical user interface, User interface design, Linux user group, User story, User experience, User-generated content, Multi-user software, User-Agent header, User agent, Organic user interface, User research, Users' group, End-user development, User experience design, Registered user, User advocacy, User review, Macintosh User Group, 10-foot user interface, Intelligent user interface, Roaming user profile, Voice user interface, Tangible user interface, User-mode Linux, User illusion, Single-user mode, Sinclair User, Zooming user interface, User (nomarch), The Micro User, User requirements document, User fee, User assistance, User Friendly, User interface markup language, Text-based user interface, User guide, User interface management system, User space and kernel space, Fast user switching, Amstrad Computer User, User intent, User-defined function, IBM Common User Access, Active users, Closed user group, Adaptive user interface, End-user license agreement, Natural user interface, User–network interface, User model, User Account Control, Toolkits for user innovation, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Object-oriented user interface, Acorn User, Apple User Group Connection, User error, Lazy user model, User information, User interface modeling, User-Mode Driver Framework, User-subjective approach, Atari ST User, CheckUser, Attentive user interface, Unique user, User environment management, User activity monitoring, Console user interface, Principles of user interface design, HUD User, Windows USER, Persona (user experience), End-user computing, Z User Group, Linux User and Developer, History of the graphical user interface, Multi-user MIMO, Web User, First-time user experience, Multi-user dungeon, Natural-language user interface, Lead user, Concurrent user, Average revenue per user, Reference and User Services Quarterly, Healthy user bias, List of graphical user interface elements, MPEG user data, Vector-based graphical user interface, Browser user interface, User-Managed Access, Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction, User System Interaction, Water user board, Multilingual User Interface, Conversational user interface, User behavior analytics, Touch user interface, Per-user unitary rate control, Bicycle user group, Graphical user interface builder, Context-sensitive user interface, User virtualization, End-user certificate, German Unix User Group, 3D human–computer interaction, Association of Personal Computer User Groups, Magic User Interface, Aqua (user interface), User account policy, Esri International User Conference, User provisioning software, User journey, User modeling, Telephone User Part, User interface style sheet language, User charge, J.F. Schouten School for User System Interaction, Eric von Hippel, Atari User, User (telecommunications), Road user charges (New Zealand), Ubuntu User, User onboarding, Commodore User, UserLAnd Technologies, Linux Users' Group of Davis, Reactive user interface, Oracle User Group, Interaction technique, Dragon User, Cursor (user interface), Notice Advisory to Navstar Users, Dynamic/Dialup Users List, User pays, COMMON (user group), User analysis, Future User, Computer user satisfaction, Electron User

Prefix: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Portal di Ensiklopedia Dunia

Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya