User talk:InfiniteNexus/Archive 2024

This is an archive of past discussions with User:InfiniteNexus. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Happy new year InfiniteNexus! Please allow me to bring your attention to an edit request I posted at Talk:SoFi#Model. I would so appreciate it if you would take a look and implement my suggestions, which I hope you will agree are reasonable improvements to the SoFi article. Thanks so much. Rachelatsofi (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

 Done, and happy New Year to you as well! InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:42, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

	Happy New Year!
	Hello InfiniteNexus: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:12, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

You're only going to end up generating errors, which disambiguators will perpetually fix per WP:INTDABLINK, so we don't get swamped with false positive error reports that make the job of real disambiguation impossible. BD2412 T 01:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

@BD2412: I wasn't trying to make a point, but thank you for fixing the errors. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

I accept that you may well have been unaware of the problem. Isolating the instances of links that actually need fixing is an issue that has plagued disambiguation from the start. BD2412 T 01:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

I see. I knew that (disambiguation) was required in hatnotes, but I wasn't aware this was also the case elsewhere. Thanks for letting me know. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, this is Winter. I have recently noticed that you have reverted an edit of mine on Google. I just want to know if it was by accident or if there was a reason behind it. If there is a reason behind it please tell me and I will understand. Respond when you can. WiinterU (talk) 22:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

@WiinterU, they reverted my edit too. I'm here to see what the reason behind them reverting our edit is. @InfiniteNexus, please let me know why you reverted my edit and claimed that my explanation was unclear even though my edit summary was self-evident. ItsCheck (talk) 00:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

WiinterU's edit was reverted because they removed the stock tickers with the edit summary Traded as not needed. It is not clear what they meant by that — "not needed" says who? I double-checked {{Infobox company}} to see if the parameter was being used incorrectly, but nope, it doesn't list any situations where the parameter should not be filled out. As far as I know, this doesn't violate any policies or guidelines either (if it did, the parameter would have been removed), so this was essentially an WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT removal.

ItsCheck's edit was reverted because there is no need for an invisible comment. The cited reason was to prevent further vandalism in the future, but I have been watching this page for a long time, and this has never caused any major problems. Invisible "warnings" are only used in cases where edit-warring against consensus has been a problem or will likely be one because the statement is disputed, contentious, etc. This was already explained to you less than two weeks ago, and yet you again restore your edit with the same rationale. This goes against the spirit of WP:BRD and WP:COMMUNICATION.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:33, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus,

Would you consider leaving a redirect behind when you do a page move? If you look at User:AnomieBOT III/Broken redirects you can see some of the broken redirects left behind (I had already deleted a few more before this report was compiled). If you leave a redirect, then the Wikipedia bots will fix all of the other redirects so they aren't broken and don't need to be deleted. Thanks, that was quite an ambitious number of page moves you took on today. I hope this will be the end of any move wars on this subject matter. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:22, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

@Liz: I did leave redirects behind for all of the pages I moved today per an RM that wasn't carried out fully, except for the talk page archives since I didn't think those would cause problems. Apparently not. I moved the editnotices using the direct link on Special:MovePage which automatically unchecked "leave a redirect behind", so if that is also problematic I would suggest having whatever code controls that to be changed. Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm happy you find SearchSuite useful. (I'm looking into a fix for the bug you reported).

Since you are into useful tools, I thought you might find WP:OTS interesting.

You implied that you focus on redirects, and so, you might especially like its section on enhanced vision.

Enjoy.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   15:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

		The Socratic Barnstar
		For awesome reasoning on the talk page of an article that has made me so weary I can't bring myself to mention it. Coretheapple (talk) 17:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, and I feel your pain: these kinds of discussions can be exhausting, especially for controversial topics. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes, these I/P pages are terribly toxic, and are a kind of "old west" without rule enforcement. Glad to see a new editor ride into town. Thanks again for your good work and don't leave too soon! Coretheapple (talk) 18:53, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

I refactored the discussion you initiated to include a "discussion" section. Hope that is OK with you. I had previously initiated a discussion above and it seems more logical in the section you commenced.[1] Coretheapple (talk) 14:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. To avoid getting more messy/complicated than the discussion already is, I think can merge that single comment into the rest of the !votes. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello InfiniteNexus, noticing the edit summary This is currently sorted by relevance, I wonder if adding !---♦♦♦ This is currently sorted by relevance ♦♦♦---> could clarify this for future contributors. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 04:55, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure that would be necessary or helpful, as there have not been too many attempts to reorder the list without an explanation. But even if we were to insert a hidden note, what's with all the diamonds? InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, (and hello pop-up young Jimbo - that's Jimbo, right, or someone else?). The rotunda RM was closed soon after I had replied to your last request to give another shot at convincing you, so just wondering if my comment succeeded wonderfully and that you now agree with me. If so, and praise the Lord for miracles in flesh, time, and commonsense logic, would you give the closer a note on their talk page? If not, well, I've seen few editors change their mind in RM's, so I'm not expecting a WikiMiracle. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm not seeing how uppercasing "Rotunda" would improve the encyclopedia, and there is already consensus that the number of sources that use uppercase do not constitute a significant majority. I can't say for certain that I would have never been convinced down the line, had the RM been kept open, but not that it matters. The consensus above me seemed pretty clear.

I assume you were being sarcastic with the first two lines of your reply, but in case you weren't, no, I was not saying that at all. What I meant was that your initial nomination should have included any important/major arguments, given this isn't just a straightforward application of policy. And FYI, you can indeed modify your nom using <ins>...</ins>, just as you would to any comment.

(And yes, that's Jimbo. I hope he gave you a good scare.) InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

No, not being (whoops, young Jimbo again) sarcastic at all, I didn't know that modifications of opening statements were allowed. I thought once someone replies to a post that it cannot be changed. Thanks. I've asked the closer to reopen or to join the IAR request. IAR is needed because I know the lowercase crowd moves as a pack (I try to feed them with 'abc's') if the ngrams don't meet their threshold of 90% or so they can use that in every case, even if commonsense rears its ugly head (not referring to Jimbo, who keeps rearing his semi-smiling head over on the left). Randy Kryn (talk) 13:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I've learned something new today about poster sourcing! I had reverted the IP address because some of its other edits were ones considered disruptive edits on pages I watch, and in the absence of other context the no-summary source change seemed fishy alongside that (even with the time gap between edits meaning it was potentially a different person), but now I have new context to take forward if I see that kind of diff in the future. Thanks again for reverting me! - Purplewowies (talk) 02:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

No worries. InfiniteNexus (talk) 03:42, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi InfiniteNexus,

I hope you're well. I recently discovered your user page and was greatly inspired by your efforts to Wikipedia, particularly in the fields of film and technology. Your commitment to content quality and editorial expertise are noteworthy.

I'm contacting you to discuss the Wikipedia entry for "Oppenheimer," a project that has become a personal goal for me, driven by my sons' curiosity. They've set out to learn more about the scientists featured in the film, notably Troy Bronson's portrayal of Joseph W. Kennedy. This trip has taken us to the depths of these historical persons' lives and contributions, and I'm determined that the piece provides a thorough and accurate picture of the film and the real-life characters it depicts.

Given your knowledge of film-related issues and your talent for copyediting and content discussions, I would appreciate any input or recommendations you may have to improve the article's depth and correctness. Your contributions would be invaluable in making the article a valuable resource for those who share a similar interest.

Here's the link to the article: Draft:Troy Bronson 2024

Thank you for taking the time to assess my request, as well as for your valuable contributions to Wikipedia. I eagerly anticipate your advice, expecting to contribute positively to our shared interest in film and historical narratives.

EagleSleuth~~~~

EagleSleuth (talk) 06:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi. While I appreciate the heartfelt message, Bronson does not meet our notability guidelines for actors with only three minor roles on his résumé. I don't think he was even credited in Oppenheimer. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Moana 2?! This is gonna be G-R-R-REAT! 47.55.237.217 (talk) 23:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Well, it's exciting for sure, but I would temper my expectations. Like the new Alien, this is basically a made-for-TV movie that Disney decided to send to theaters at the last minute (presumably to alleviate the looming content drought). InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Gemini (Google) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ItsCheck (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

What? InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

The disambiguation pages you tagged do not meet CSD. They will be denied. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi @InfiniteNexus. There's recent discussion about production company/distributor. Feel free to comments. Regards. 2402:1980:849E:9A74:0:0:0:1 (talk) 03:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm watching that page and am aware of that discussion. If you are the IP involved in the dispute, I would recommend responding to Darkwarrioblake's comment; WP:COMMUNICATION is required. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I've submitted a request here to update the Wheely entry on the company's behalf. I'd like to think the suggestion is non-controversial but I do not edit in the main space because of my COI. Might you be able to take a look, since you've helped with previous requests?

Thanks for your consideration, Inkian Jason (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

I did get your ping the other day but have been rather busy lately. I'll try to get to your edit request as soon as I can. InfiniteNexus (talk) 19:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Avatar: The Way of Water. Look at this. The side bar says 20th Century. Release says "Walt Disney under 20th". That is how we do this. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 23:45, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

That doesn't mean we need to append a lengthy explanatory footnote on every 20th Century film. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Oh, heck no. I just put that there so I could double check the proper method. I love how vigilant you were to edit this. You are EN POINTE!!! Less than two minutes you were right on my case. ToNeverFindTheMets (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but if you have further objections, please follow the recommendations outlined at WP:BRD and discuss on the article talk page, not here on a user talk page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey do you edit on Fandom as well because if you do could you make a few edits for me Max the Media Fan (talk) 04:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Chances are unlikely and most editors aren't fans of others asking them to make edits on their behalf. I know Infinite doesn't. Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:37, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

But I really love to edit Fandom and I need help on my behalf. Like you can create a new Disney wiki for me Max the Media Fan (talk) 04:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Sounds like you need to ask someone over on Fandom about that, not here on Wikipedia. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Fine I’ll try Max the Media Fan (talk) 21:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

No, I have never edited on Fandom, so I'm afraid I can't assist you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:12, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Ok 😞 Max the Media Fan (talk) 00:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pixel Fold 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pixelbook".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avengers: Quantum Encounter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

This one can go. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I already fixed all the issues that was in the past, can you please explain which errors you are referring to? thanks GrowTHC (talk) 10:32, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Regarding the flags, please see Grayfell comment at 21:47, 9 January 2024‎ in the talk page, he mentioned to remove the flags. GrowTHC (talk) 10:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

It took me quite a while to clean up the table; if you have specific concerns, you are more than welcome to discuss, but you shouldn't revert all of my changes just because you don't like it. The previous table had several issues, including the confusing and unencyclopedic "category" column that was copy-and-pasted from Similarweb and possibly violates WP:NOTGUIDE, the inappropriately adjusted font size, multiple incorrect links, etc. I also cleaned up the fat table header, added a sticker header, added a column, used the correct templates for "N/A" and increase/decrease, corrected capitalization errors, cleaned up the formatting, etc. Do you have any specific concerns with any of these changes? As for the flags, they shouldn't violate MOS:FLAGS as they are being used to identify the country of origin, but that's debatable and I'm amenable — if more users object, we can disuss on the talk page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Hey,

please verify sources before you revert the work of others. Source 22 of the Google Tensor article cites the same refs I've used to make my edits and they have been approved by the article's unofficial watchdog. Your argument is also invalid because all codenames for example are the result of "leaks" but I'd rather call that code investigation. These codenames can be found in the factory images of the corresponding Pixel devices and can be verified but not really referenced for Wikipedia. If you find a better source to reference this information please feel free to add it but simply deleting everything that doesn't fit your liking isn't how Wikipedia operates as it's a community effort.
RM12 (talk) 12:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

@RM12: You are not assuming good faith. If you find a source in the article that references a leak by an unreliable source, it should not be there and should be removed. You can remove it yourself or bring it up on the talk page. Galaxy Club is a self-described blog and is therefore not reliable. The second source you added references Reddit, which is obviously unreliable. Two wrongs don't make a right, and no editor is perfect. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:14, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Yes it's pretty hard for me to assume good faith in this case because all the code names are results of leaks. The source for Cloudripper cites Twitter and that's not any better than Reddit. The people who leaked this information found those in the code of android though giving it a high probability of being correct.

I would personally argue to lower the bar for reliability because a leak isn't inherently unreliable. It has to be proven that it's false. All articles used as sources are subjectively judging the reliability of the information they obtain just like you and I am so they aren't inherently more reliable. Though Galaxy Club describes themselves as blog doesn't mean they are unreliable either.

But I'm actually fine with the corrections you made. Sorry for the harsh phrasing. RM12 (talk) 11:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Then let's just remove all of the codenames. Now that I think about it, they seem trivial anyway and not really of encyclopedic significance. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Avengers: Code Red. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I didn't submit this draft. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi. You've removed from the Dune 2 film page a direct disambiguation link to the video game, leaving only the general disambiguation page.

I think the game deserves a direct link: * It's practically the same name – most people likely call the movie "Dune 2" and not "part 2". * The game is notable, being the forefather of modern RTS games (<-- mentioned in the 2nd intro sentence). * Not much downside to including it in the disambiguation line. galenIgh 16:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

The video game is not titled Dune: Part Two, so there is no risk of confusion with the film. Dune 2 is a disambiguation page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

I call them both "Dune 2" and I can't be the only one. The Dune II game article included an Template:about link to the movie. No harm in having the reverse. It's a useful shortcut, and the usage is consistent with many other articles. galenIgh 00:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

I call them both "Dune 2" and I can't be the only one. Yes, which is why both the film and the video game are listed on the Dune 2 disambiguation page. But again, the crux of the matter is that the video game's title does not contain the word "part", so there is no risk of confusion. In other words, readers are unlikely to be looking for the video game (titled Dune II) if they went through the trouble of adding the word "part" to their search query and spelling out the Roman numeral. On the other hand, since Dune: Part Two is often referred to as Dune 2 in common parlance, so a hatnote pointing to the film is reasonable. InfiniteNexus (talk) 04:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

It's both convenient and harmless to have that hatnote in the film's page. But I'm not going to dwell on this if you're so strongly opposed. galenIgh 14:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) § AI for WP guidelines/ policies. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 07:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for your support for a MoS change, saying: "Infoboxes are generally beneficial and should be included if there is enough information." - Bach music for Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Originally, I did find a video that showed the character using Nova/Mae. However, now there is another video by the film's creator that explicitly has the character state her name is Mae, at the 50 second mark, and I am merely updating the page. I uploaded the video as a reference, I specifically stated the second she said her name is Mae at the 50 second mark, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKFioDLCyRA, and I stated that the new information confirms it. At this point, it is not me that is creating disruptive editing for adding inaccurate information, but you for refusing to accept that you were wrong and are continuing to insert outdated information. I will put it back the way it was that explicitly states her name is Mae, because that is the most accurate information, and if you cannot accept that, that is on you, but since this video is uploaded by the film's creator, it is all too likely will accept this, so please accept that her name is now confirmed to be Mae and just leave it. 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:A4BE:B154:27E9:39FD (talk) 17:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

We have the actual scene from the film in which the ape characters name her "Nova". The other video (which has apparently been taken down for unknown reasons, but not before I watched it earlier), has the same characters saying her name is "Mae". Based on this, and the fact that a third video labels her character as "Nova / Mae", indicates (presumably) that the character is given the name "Nova" by the apes until her real name, "Mae", is revealed. When a character has two alternative names, we list both on Wikipedia.

You are continuing to edit-war. Your edit has already been reverted by multiple users over the past few months. This behavior is disruptive; please stop and discuss on the talk page if you disagree. You do not WP:OWN the article and cannot act against the clear consensus of the community. If you revert again, you will be blocked for edit-warring. Please do not do so. Thank you.

InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring

You have consistently edit warred on the Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes and have been adamant on restoring false and outdated information and disregarding when clear sources have been given to you. If you do not cease with this readding of false information, I will be forced to get the admins involved. Please drop the false information. 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:A4BE:B154:27E9:39FD (talk) 18:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey InfiniteNexus, would you mind creating an editnotice for Talk:Suno AI? It's been receiving a lot of spam the last few days from IPs trying to generate songs by posting on the talk page. Thanks! Jamedeus (talk) 00:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I had come to this user talk intending to make the same request. –Gluonz ^{talk contribs} 12:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

@Jamedeus and Gluonz: Done. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paris Has Fallen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Untitled Tomb Raider film".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi InfiniteNexus. I found you on the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Companies/Participants list, and hope because of your interest in companies you won't mind having a look at an edit request I posted here. The request is to replace the existing Wiki article with a draft that you can find here. The draft improves the readability (the current article sounds like a poor translation), sourcing and content. I appreciate your input and help. Agne for ASG (talk) 19:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Google.com subdomains indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Your opinion on this issue is requested

You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views.
𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 06:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. I had a feeling this would happen after the URL change. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Big Tech rivalries".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "King Kong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi InfiniteNexus can you move article Watchmen (film) to Watchmen (2009 film)? because there is an animated film adaptation will be release in august 2024 Draft:Watchmen (2024 film) Venom5122 (talk) 06:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) That 2009 film's title should only be changed if the animated film uses that title and only if the latter's draft is moved with the same title. The animated film draft also does not seem ready for a move to the mainspace yet as it is unclear if final animation or voice recording has begun., and that draft is by all standards a stub. I will also note that the August release date traces to Blu-ray.com (an unreliable source not affiliated with the actual company, and that listing has changed this date), so it is unknown when it will actually release. Trailblazer101 (talk) 15:12, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

@Venom5122: I've been away for the past few weeks, so apologies for the late reply. As Trail stated, the page will only be moved if the upcoming film is confirmed to have the same title (Watchmen) and has been moved to the mainspace. Please come back if and when that happens. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Society of Explorers and Adventurers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

The redirect Fire and Ash has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 16 § Fire and Ash until a consensus is reached. ScarletViolet tc 11:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alien: Romulus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Walt Disney Studios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

 Fixed InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Please look in the mirror. After not reading the responses and the sources fully (that's why I asked that normal question), you are the one alleging that I "falsely claimed" and accused someone (you?) with my "speculation/misinformation" edit summary (which was about the notes and the reception section edit, but you took it personally) while writing that I do not understand the topic ("who may not have fully understood — such as yourself"). And I definitely don't have any sentences questioning "your intelligence". So instead of attacking and creating scenarios every time you see me (it's not helping to make any progress), you can defend your argument by focusing on providing valid reasons that do not oppose MOS:FILMPLOT (and WP:SYNTH, etc.). ภץאคгöร 13:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

@Nyxaros: I don't want to go off on this tangent for too long, but "attack" is a strong word and I didn't "attack" you. It's true that your behavior has been known to be hostile; you must understand that we're all here to improve the encyclopedia and that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. When I said that you didn't "understand", I meant you didn't understand the plot point, which was a testament to the fact that these explanatory footnotes will be helpful. I wasn't insinuating your lack of knowledge in "the topic".

Now, let's refocus on the substance of the argument, which comprised 90% of my latest comment, but of course you chose to focus on the 10% (so your comment here is quite ironic). You can defend your argument by focusing on providing valid reasons that do not oppose MOS:FILMPLOT (and WP:SYNTH, etc.) I did — several times. SYNTH doesn't have anything to do with this, though. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Is that why you are still trying to make snide comments like "your behavior is known to be hostile"? You have been commenting on me since you opened the discussion. So, leaving aside your personal grievance against me that nobody cares about (and your opinion that "I didn't understand"), you should also learn what WP:SYNTH is: To, in this case persistently, make a claim that is not explicitly mentioned in the source, for example an Engineer's face. ภץאคгöร 16:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

While I'm disturbed by this continued hostility, again, I'm not going to continue with this back-and-forth. The Engineers example you gave was not SYNTH, which means combining sources to reach an OR conclusion; at most, it was an inaccurate summary of the sources — the reason for this is that the original text wasn't even summarizing the sources; it was citing the film itself, per PLOTCITE. If you see the film, you can clearly see that the hybrid has a face resembling an Engineer, but whatever. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus,

There is no need to create this category talk page because the category page, Category:Microsoft templates, was deleted years ago. I've run into this situation with other editors who created unneeded category talk pages for deleted categories and whatever tool you are using that says creating a page like this is necessary, has a bug. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

@Liz: Sorry, that was my bad. I meant to edit Category talk:Microsoft-related templates and accidentally ended up at the wrong page. Thanks for letting me know and fixing my mistake. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

In the revision https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gemini_(language_model)&diff=prev&oldid=1240044180, you removed the statement about Oppo and Xiaomi integrating Gemini, claiming they are not notable. But why is the content about Samsung retained? 内存溢出的猫 (talk) 02:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Reliable, secondary sources are needed to demonstrate notability; simply citing primary sources on the announcement does not indicate that the information is noteworthy, or else we would need to include every minor update to Gemini. In any case, we do not need to mention every company that integrates Gemini into their products — Oppo and Xiaomi were neither the first to do so, nor are they highly prominent players in the smartphone industry, nor is this partnership particularly impactful or extraordinary, so this information is unlikely to interest most readers. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Chromecast. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 108.44.167.147 (talk) 17:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

This page has not been nominated for deletion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

on Google pixel 9 was android 15 178.36.4.86 (talk) 10:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

It was not. [2] [3] This is discussed in the article under § Software. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi InfiniteNexus, I proposed a page restructure for CoStar Group, a real estate analytics company that also owns online marketplaces. As you are involved in WP:Companies, I would appreciate your help in reorganizing the page. Thank you very much, Hbensur (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hbensur: Reviewed and  Implemented, see comments on the talk page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:57, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

They use the same processor, and 90/120 Hz is not a requirement. As an example, the iPhone 16 (non-Pro) has a 60 Hz display. VitAlv13 (talk) 11:46, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Because they are clearly marketed as such, and you can easily find various sources labeling it as such. The lower price point alone makes the A-series definitively "mid-range", which is the encyclopedic/formal term for "cheaper/more affordable/lite version" and the most common descriptor used to describe the A-series. The A-series is the mid-range counterpart of the Pixel and Pixel Pro, which are the flagship models. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

And is the iPhone 16 (non-Pro) the mid-range version of the iPhone? And the iPhone even has a worse processor. (A18 VS A18 Pro) VitAlv13 (talk) 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

No one calls it it a mid-range device. The iPhone equivalent to the Pixel A-series (e.g. Pixel 8a) is the iPhone SE. The base-model iPhone (e.g. iPhone 16) is equivalent to the base-model Pixel (e.g. Pixel 9); the pro-model iPhone (e.g. iPhone 16 Pro) is equivalent to the pro-model Pixel (e.g. Pixel 9 Pro). WP:GREATWRONGS; we simply document what sources use, and frankly, it would be ludicrous to try to prove that sources say otherwise. I'll also just say that specs alone are not the only determinant of "mid-range"; the vast price difference (well, it's shrunk in recent years, but there's still a difference, and they continue to market and launch the phones separately) is a pretty clear indicator. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi InfiniteNexus, thank you for your help in restructuring the CoStar Group article. I appreciated your comment about the Criticisms section, and proposed a suggestion for how to merge the content into the article. If you have some time to look it over and update accordingly, I think it would further improve the article. Thank you! Hbensur (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done – I've cleaned up the entire article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Can you please provide an explanation as to why you replaced A Minecraft Movie poster.png with its JPG version? I specifically decided not to perform the non-free reduction in the JPG format because of the inherent generational loss. The width of 220 pixels was intentional too, as thumbnails are displayed at that size by default, so there will be no additional scaling necessary; I am well aware that, by doing so, the size falls below the 0.1 megapixels convention, but there’s nothing inherenly bad about this — ultimately, according to the content guideline, images “should be rescaled as small as possible to still be useful as identified by their rationale, and no larger”, which I believe to be the case with the PNG version. —Rossel44 (talk) 07:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

The JPG file already existed, so it should have been overwritten rather than replaced with a new file in order to retain the version history. The standard file format for film posters is JPG, and I don't think there's any noticeable difference in quality in terms of compression. Furthermore, 220 × 326 is too small; the largest possible size is 259 × 384. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

You’re claiming a size of 220 × 326 pixels to be “too small”, but, as I stated, that’s the size the image will be displayed at by default; even if a higher resolution version is uploaded, the image will be scaled down to this width at content delivery. Due to JPEG compression artifacts and the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem, this will result in lower visual quality despite the higher initial resolution. Furthermore, we do not need to utilize the largest possible size, but rather one that is “as small as possible to still be useful as identified by their rationale”, as per the guidelines for non-free content. I would have overwritten the existing file if the file formats were compatible; ultimately, however, the version history is of less importance than the content (in this case, the image) itself, else the template PNG version available and its note for non-free images would be superfluous. Lastly, regarding the file format, I’d like to cite from COM:FT: “(…), if the original file is in JPEG, it generally makes no sense to convert it to PNG: converting a lossy compression into a ‘lossless’ format doesn't buy you anything since the ‘loss’ already occurred in the original, and doing so will only increase the file size (any edits, however, should probably be saved as PNG as well as JPEG). An exception is high resolution JPEGs that have no visible compression artifacts. Conversion to PNG will avoid the thumbnails having additional compression artifacts.” That is the case here. —Rossel44 (talk) 08:30, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

That isn't the norm on most film articles, and there's probably a reason to it. As mentioned, given the small size of the image, there is practically no noticeable difference between the JPG and PNG, so it doesn't really matter. For what it's worth, when I zoom into the infobox thumbnail and compare the live article with this version, the JPG image looks sharper, especially with the text. Since the original file was in JPG format, and there are no noticeable "compression artifacts" or other difference in quality, I don't see a reason to go out of our way to replace the existing JPG file with a PNG. Re-reading the cited portion of COM:FT, it seems they are referring to high-resolution JPGs, whereas this is a low-resolution JPG that happened to have been resized from a high-resolution JPG. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, InfiniteNexus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "MCU: The Reign of Marvel Studios".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:45, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. Do you mind if I transclude your Marvel and DC release guides onto one of my subpages? Rockfang (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Go ahead. InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)