User talk:IndianBio/Archive 26

This is an archive of past discussions with User:IndianBio. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Since you are an avid editor of Adele-related articles, just wanted to inform you about the GA nomination of "All I Ask". Fell free to make any rectifications you want, pre-review. Thanks.--MaranoFan (talk) 07:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

I need some neutral editors at [1].--MaranoFan (talk) 01:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sooner or Later (Madonna song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 04:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Wow, Rihanna just earned her 14th number-one single in the US, surpassing the King of Pop. I am so happy. Do you like the song? -- Frankie _talk 07:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Frankie _talk 07:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

I love Work, yes, I love the video ,she's so crazy. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

I would say, too sexy as well :P. — Tom^(T2ME) 11:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, IndianBio. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Who are you? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) 177.133.209.174 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is from Curitiba, Brazil if that helps IB -- samtar ^whisper 10:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, but why is a random IP sending me mail? And where do I check it? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

The email that you provided when you created this account :)  — Calvin999 10:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

I checked that, but I did not receive any email :S Confusing and I think I will notify an administrator. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Junk folder? Yeah I would too.  — Calvin999 11:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

WAIIIIIT LMAOOO I DID! I'm sorry IB!!! I thought I was logged on my account, I hate when this happens :/ I sent u an email! GagaNutella^talk 15:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

GagaNutella LMAO but I still did not get it. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Damn. I will send again. GagaNutella^talk 15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, you have removed all of the incoming links to Maverick Records, leaving in the edit summary a justification that the article has been redirected and as such the links are no longer necessary. I see that you have done this for several hundred articles, I presume using some sort of script. However, persons interested in knowing something about Maverick Records can still find relevant information about the label by looking at the article for the parent company (and I'm not entirely sure why it was redirected; was there an AfD about this or something? Maverick's a rather important record label!). So having Maverick Records linked in music articles is still an important arrangement. Can you please undo the link removal using the same script? I don't use any automated tools, and so it would be very cumbersome for me to sit and undo all your edits manually; I don't have that many hours to devote to this over the weekend, and I presume the automation makes the task rather simple. Chubbles (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi IndianBio. Please revert the removal of these wikilinks to Maverick Records. They are valid links according to our guidelines about redirects and wikilinks, and are useful to readers. Thanks very much, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Look, it's going to take me a huge amount of time to undo all of this by hand...can't you just fix the links using Twinkle again? Chubbles (talk) 09:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

No, Twinkle doesnot have it, and if you talk about reverts I will do it in my own time. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

I've undone about 40 of them, but there were several hundred, and it would be appreciated if you could do some of the fixing... Chubbles (talk) 21:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. You reverted my edit of Madonna's "Rescue Me" after I added the UK cover of the single. Your reason for its removal was that 'Extra covers are not allowed unless there are strong rationale behind it'. Is that a Wikipedia policy or your own ideal? I see plenty of other alternative covers on album and single articles. The reason I added it was that there's a mention in the "Rescue Me" article of the very different UK cover, a photograph shot by Jean-Baptiste Mondino, so I thought it was notable to include in the article, and readers may wonder what that cover looked like seeing it had been mentioned. Anyway, you seem to be in charge of the Madonna articles so I guess what you says goes. --Geach (talk) 13:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Geach, if you see the line present in the article, it is WP:OR, original research from whoever added it. Also a separate image needs strong rationale per WP:NFCC#3a, WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8 policies of Wikipedia. Also, I can see from Official UK Charts governing body that the release was with the same cover art. That is an absolute reliable source rather than what is present now. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 13:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Oh well, I can't argue against that. By the way, as a UK resident I actually have both versions of "Rescue Me" in my record collection - the 7" vinyl has the 'UK cover' and my CD version (made in Germany) has the 'normal' cover. I think some more research needs to be done into it because different covers for "Rescue Me" do exist out there! --Geach (talk) 13:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Why don't you work on this iconic song of Madonna instead of the EDM dud? I think it's one of Madonna's best and is personally my favorite of her work. I would have worked on it myself but I have never contributed to a song article so I'm not sure. Anyway, I hope you do have a plan for this song and I'll try to be of a lil bit of help. -- Frankie _talk 14:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

@FrB.TG: I'm kinda in a mellow mood nowadays, so is actually working on the Madonna ballad articles like "You'll See". Have you heard it? If not you should. I have "Vogue" on my mind shortly though. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

The article GHV2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:GHV2 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 17:00, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joan of Arc (Madonna song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Joan of Arc (Madonna song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Joan of Arc (Madonna song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article This Used to Be My Playground you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 00:40, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Just out of curiosity, why did you remove the image of the "BedTime Story" interlude from the article? :/ It was a good illustration. --Chrishm21 (talk) 20:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Its nominated for deletion as its not free per Commons:Freedom of panorama. You cannot take a picture of a video backdrop during a tour and upload it as free. The image just had Madonna's backdrop video only and hence I nominated it. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 20:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

I see. Well that's too bad :/ it was a nice image --Chrishm21 (talk) 20:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

What's your professional opinion on linking the artist's Wikipedia page from the chronology section on albums? Do you know what I'm talking about? I mentioned this issue on This Is What the Truth Feels Like, because my edit keep getting reverted, and now some IP user has removed the links from all the articles I mentioned in the said post. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 23:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC).

Yes I saw that IP doing the same in the Madonna articles also. I'm fine either way tbh. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, IndianBio. I'm just posting to let you know that List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for March 28. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Wow thanks. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 16:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Now that 'You'll See' and 'This used to be my Playground' are on their way to becoming GA, the only tracks missing for the 'Something To Remember' good/featured Topic are 'Rain', 'Take a Bow' and 'I Want You'! :-D Would you like to collaborate on those??

--Chrishm21 (talk) 19:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Take a Bow should be the first target. :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 19:41, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

OK! :D want some help? hehehe --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I will ask you once I have a draft ready okay? :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 19:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Sure no prob! I'll still work on a sandbox with only the critical reviews and the live performances and covers if that's OK--Chrishm21 (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Absolutely. :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 20:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

;) --Chrishm21 (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Joan of Arc (Madonna song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joan of Arc (Madonna song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Congrats! Great work. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:38, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, on the Ray of Light page it says it was released Feb 22, whereas Frozen (the first single) was released Feb 23 so I tried to edit that but got blocked (as I wasn't logged in) and it has sold over 20 million copies believe me I know

Theladyisgaga (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

I see you have raised her US certifications by 18.5 million, but I was only able to locate 12.5 million certified units of update. Am I missing something? Here is her file, btw in case you want to go over it. I'm asking this because your calculation and my calculation are off by 6 million certified units.--Harout72 (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm not able to access the link from here, I will check once I'm back home, and yeah I updated it through what RIAA has now for the Top Artist Tallies. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:45, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Harout72 I rechecked it again, my update was correct and somehow you must have missed listing certifications in your document. The singles certifications amount to 59 million and the albums amount to 6.5 million. There is no video or mastertones. So total is then 65.5 million. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

For some reason I missed the 3x Plat. for "Telephone" and for the "Edge of Glory". Thanks for correcting me.--Harout72 (talk) 14:23, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You added a quote to "Teeth", but I am not sure where this came from. Is the following text part of the actual quote, or is it supposed to be commentary? ("The oral theme is found in the lyrics with the use of words such as "fangs", "bite" and "mouth".") ---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:35, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh let me go and see it again. Might not be part of the quote :( —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:46, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! I know you did not think "Teeth" is notable enough for an article, but I appreciate your contributions to the article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:10, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

And thanks to you also Another Believer for tolerating the tantrum I threw about it. Thanks for your patience with me and seeing my good contributions. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:12, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Born This Way The Fame Monster is super close to being a good topic, assuming "Teeth" is promoted soon. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

You mean The Fame Monster lol. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hah! Yes, I just came back to your talk page to correct myself, but you beat me to the punch! :P ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:31, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, here is FilBenLeafBoy. You have sent me a warning message. I want to let you know that I haven't re-uploaded high resolution images that had been deleted from other users. I didn't know how high the resolution of the images was as I uploaded them from my tablet which doesn't show me their resolution. I tried to replace one with a low resolution version, and I stopped uploading new images. If the message was for the images I previously uploaded I'm sorry, I didn't mean to do something against Wikipedia. ^{(^_^)FilBenLeafBoy(^_^)}(Let's TALK!) 22:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article You'll See you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 02:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Applause (Lady Gaga song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 09:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Madonna: Tears of a Clown you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 21:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Madonna: Tears of a Clown you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Madonna: Tears of a Clown for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 01:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, IndianBio. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 09:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

 — Calvin999 09:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Applause (Lady Gaga song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Applause (Lady Gaga song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 15:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, IndianBio. You have new messages at Talk:Madonna: Tears of a Clown/GA1.
Message added 22:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Replied to your queries there. Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Madonna: Tears of a Clown you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Madonna: Tears of a Clown for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 23:01, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Madonna: Tears of a Clown you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Madonna: Tears of a Clown for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

The article Applause (Lady Gaga song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Applause (Lady Gaga song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MaranoFan -- MaranoFan (talk) 12:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, IndianBio. Til It Happens to You, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 03:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:01, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey, sorry for reverting your corrections to Planes, Trains and Eric, and thanks for linking me to the sockpuppet investigation. I looked at the text of the references before reverting you, but I should have noticed that the links didn't go to what the text said they went to. Mea culpa! Cheers, IagoQnsi (talk) 19:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

The article This Used to Be My Playground you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:This Used to Be My Playground for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 01:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for working on WikiProject Gwen Stefani and for your many, many other quality contributions to Wikipedia! --Another Believer (Talk) 23:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeahhhhhhhh. :D —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 23:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent contributions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Gwen Stefani! Your recent creations of categories will be used and are very much appreciated! Carbrera (talk) 00:27, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks and great work as well! —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Congrats on your Applause GA. Your effort on Gaga's related articles is amazing and I love your edits. Keep going!!! GagaNutellatalk 15:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

The article This Used to Be My Playground you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:This Used to Be My Playground for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello, IndianBio. Applause (Lady Gaga song), an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 16:30, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

On 28 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Til It Happens to You, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lady Gaga's "Til It Happens to You", which highlights sexual assault, was nominated for the Grammy Award for Best Song Written for Visual Media and Academy Award for Best Original Song? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Til It Happens to You. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

The article Unapologetic Bitch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Unapologetic Bitch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Azealia911 -- Azealia911 (talk) 23:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

The article You'll See you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:You'll See for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Madonna: Tears of a Clown at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 97198 (talk) 05:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

The article You'll See you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:You'll See for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Hey! I just nominated Kalki Koechlin for WP:FA, I would appreciate if you took a look and shared your views! Numerounovedant (talk) 07:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

I noticed your edit summary referred to Nielsen SoundScan as a COPYVIO source. What do you mean by this? Do you mean that we are not allowed to post sales data directly from Nielsen SoundScan because of copyright issues? If so, then what other alternative sources are there for sales data? Maestro2016 (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Maestro2016 hi, the thing is that Nielsen SoundScan never published hard sales for any track/albums, and the only time they publish is the year end sales report, that too rounded number. I'm not sure from where you got that link but that's for registered users like record companies, managers, artists etc. It is not something that is disclosed publicly and that's where it fails WP:COPYVIO. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:58, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

I've found a dump of the leaked data here. Would it be a good idea to cite that source instead? Maestro2016 (talk) 15:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Definitely not, perfect example of WP:COPYVIO. This is not a published data. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

I am sorry if I did anything wrong, IndianBio. I was just trying to fix BARE URLS in the citation from Wikipedia:Cleanup#2016_posts and I wasn't intending to do any disruptive edits at all. If I made any substantive edits on the content, it was a mistake -- I am pretty new. Rimsroot (talk) 12:34, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, could you review this list which I intent to nominate for FL. I had submitted it for peer review and received some comments from a user. He suggested me to call for more reviews from other users.--Inside the Valley (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Good luck with the FL, but not really my cup of tea, don't like him. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

That's OK. Thanks for the reply. --Inside the Valley (talk) 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

I think an article for Madonna's "Mother and Father" (from American Life) is in order, as it was released as a promo in certain territories. What do you think? --Chrishm21 (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

I agree Chrishm21, can you create a draft? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Sure thing! I'll begin working on it right away! :D --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

I began. Think you can take over for a while, I'm beginning exams this week and won't be able to come till at least sunday. I also believe there should be created an article for "Candy Shop" from Hard Candy. Cheers! :) --Chrishm21 (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm concentrating on "Take a Bow" now and then this one maybe. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 16:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

How are we doing on "Take a Bow" and "Mother and Father"? How should I Help you with those? --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Why did he go?  — Calvin999 18:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Calvin999 what do you mean? FrBTG is still editing from Special:Contributions/FrB.TG. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 18:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh I saw his page get deleted by admin by self-request.  — Calvin999 18:26, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Can you archive the Billboard boxscore URL on [I Am Tour (Leona Lewis)]] and The Sweet Sweet Fantasy Tour please? They are the same URL. I still don't know how to archive but these need to be before they disappear!  — Calvin999 11:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Calvin999 here you go. :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Can you keep a look out there for more Leona/Mariah/Adele ones from Fri-Tues as I will be away.  — Calvin999 12:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm already and watching Mariah tonight. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 12:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm going tonight too! I mean if Billboard boxscore adds any more for those singers from this Friday to next Tuesday could you add and archive them? As I won't be able to.  — Calvin999 12:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm just wondering why you removed my imgur reference links on "Gambler"? These were scans of the printed top 50 charts from those weeks, not an email reference from ARIA. I don't see what is wrong with linking these references.Nqr9 (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Please see WP:RS Nqr9, I'm not sure how you are adding imgur.com which is not even remotely reliable. You can link to the scans by using {{cite journal}} if those are in magazines, but you cannot use imgur.com urls. I am actually surprised that website is not blacklisted. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 10:47, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

The weekly charts were available free as one sheet of paper in Australian record stores, see ARIA Charts with reference to the printed top 50 chart being available in stores. Also see this blog entry (yes, I know that blogs are not necessarily a reliable source, but this post lists the same chart as one that I posted) - http://chartbeat.blogspot.com.au/2015/10/30-years-ago-this-week-october-27-1985.html , and also this auction listing shows that these printed charts exist - http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/RARE-Vintage-Original-Aussie-Top-50-Aria-Chart-24th-Nov-1985-BARBRA-STREISAND-/121837603313?hash=item1c5e1649f1%3Ag%3AlSEAAOSwo6lWOAQU&nma=true&si=vbflBVQYfJ6kP9GptZMJhaf02xg%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2557 . These printed charts do not appear in a journal.

According to which specific wikipedia guide are scans of text uploaded to imgur not regarded as reliable? I have not altered the text in any way. Furthermore, I don't think it's good faith to assume that the scans I have uploaded are not reliable, without a reasonable suspicion or evidence that they are not.

I have seen in your revisions to my edits adding references for Australian Madonna peaks that you have added page numbers to the Gavin Ryan book that I have cited - yet the book (neither in print nor the digital edition) has page numbers, and I assume you are not in possession of the book. This is bad editing practice. Then you have asked if I could remove the fictitious page numbers you have added to the citations, after I pointed out that the page numbers do not exist.Nqr9 (talk) 11:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Nqr9, you can go ahead and ask in WP:RSN about adding links like imgur.com, but please do not add them in articles. What proof is there that you have not altered a content and uploaded in imgur or any website like that? It borders on WP:OR and WP:SPS when one cannot go back to the governing bodies from the links. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 11:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Hope you can use the sandbox I created for "Take a Bow"'s critical reception. :) --Chrishm21 (talk) 02:24, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Indian. I have a question. Is this a source good?. I saw that was used on Thriller, but I'm not sure. Chrishonduras (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Definitely not @Chrishonduras:. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 21:57, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Did you get it?  — Calvin999 15:32, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I thought I replied? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 15:32, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Not hadn't anything.  — Calvin999 15:34, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

You'll have to re-send or post here :)  — Calvin999 09:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

I did!!!!!! Ugh, so annoying these stuff are :( Well I would like to copy edit and increase the lead a bit and then do the nomination. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 09:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Lol I never got anything. Okay.  — Calvin999 09:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

We should work on Rebel Heart Tour article, as it's literally the only one (aside from the Radio 1 controversy) that needs to be done in order to create a Good topic for Rebel Heart P: I also believe an article for the song Rebel Heart is in order, as it was one of the most critically acclaimed songs from the album as well as one of the leaked demos.--Chrishm21 (talk) 19:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I will probably finish off the article today. But Chrishm21 can I request you to not add random images to the article please? The images, although free, I believe should be present there to enhance the section and aid in reader's understanding. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 19:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

I understand. I was just trying to help, I won't do it anymore :) just tell me what I can help you with. --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Being a regular contributor of Spanish wikipedia (I'm latin american myself :) ), since we can't use audio files and such, we tend to overdo it with the pictures on the different sections hehe. Again, I apologize. I also wanted to ask if it was Ok or appropriate if we could do for the tour articles what is done for others such as The Monster Ball Tour and the Femme Fatale Tour, use double image templates and add more than one pic? --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Let me get started on the article. Hope you won't edit now since we can edit conflict. And its okay I know you try to help and I like it always :) I wasn't being negative on your contributions. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 19:25, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

So it's OK if i do the double image template?? --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:27, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Please not now. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 19:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

OK No prob :) --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)