This is an archive of past discussions with User:IndianBio. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Knew You Were Trouble, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All Access (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi, Ya it's fine to revert my edit.But, I want to ask you that can't you be polite and calm.You always talk to me like I'm a terrorist and want to kill me.Im saying this because I'm learning edit by edit and had did some good job on Chopra and her award list article. pls don't be so rude to me and it left me broken and depressed all the time.We can't be friends, we could be.Pks1142 (talk) 04:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
I have noticed that you are improving from the last two days. If you check the talk page of Priyanka Chopra, I had just mentioned that "Pks is really improving" and I'm liking it. I do apologize if my above notification depressed you, it wasn't my intention. If you don't understand something or why something else gets removed, you are absolutely free to ping me and badger me till you get clarifications. Again, I can see that you are improving. But take it one step at a time. You will do good. :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]04:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your words but I want to say that we should work collaborately on Any articles, so that it benefit the article a lot and I want to ask if can make an FL of List of Chopra awaards as we need more of those FL tooPks1142 (talk) 05:12, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey Pks, I just logged in today. Yes, I think we can surely make Chopra's award list a FL. Let's copy it into a sandbox and start developing. She's a current actress so sources won;t be difficult to find at all. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]10:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
ur fav colour is blue right? how about the UN flag patone colur? u like it? and do u want a fact box of u like celebrities have? General (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
HEy it looks good. I don't know much about coding and stuff, so you are free to do anything, just use lighter shades of blue and violet. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]05:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey bio, u can edit the userboses and infobox... after that we can customise the final look. because the length matters. :) General (talk) 15:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
In My City: Remixes
Hey, how you are doing? Well I have to say that it's not necessary to include release of remixes in release history because, if you see other song articles, they hasn't adopted the same. Bcoc release history is only for the official song not its remixes. Another thing, those remixes aren't named us remixes because, those will be also released in all over world. We had included the Indian cd single bcoz cd was only released in India not in other parts but those remixes will be available all over world. See other songs track listings and release history for more help. If you want to show its release date you can create a whole section for remix. Thank you Pks1142 (talk) 09:07, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
I would advice you to check Featured articles like "4 Minutes" and "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on it)" where remixes are part of the release history section and are deveiced based on the countru of availability. And untill and unless iTunes releases them in all over the world, if you can provide the links, they are still catering to US only. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]09:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Sure you can but I had already started the work, but pls do bcoz I need your help regarding the reliable sources.pls provide me those sources.Pks1142 (talk) 14:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Hey Pks, I have watchlisted the sandbox and will start working on it formatting, referencing, honing it to perfection. If you want to add any link, I would suggest that you add the content in the talk page of the sandbox so that we don't edit conflict while saving the content. You understood right? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]14:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi IndianBio, Howzz you doing User:Giants2008 told me to take this list for PEER REVIEW. It will help for its further improvisation. Please contribute as much you can. Thanka you.(Pks1142 (talk) 09:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC))
I was gonna post on your talk page. Tonight I will be working on your sandbox, so can I request you to not work on it at that time and add your sources in the talk page of teh sandbox itself? That way we can avoid edit conflicts and have timelines for our edits. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]09:04, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Pks, I'm afraid I haven't started working on the list yet. Give me today, I will come up with some formatting. And yes, I will help you surely. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]09:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, I am aware of the Peer review, although I think its a bit premature to open it since edits for expansion are still going on. I myself will be contributing to the list. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]12:16, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Restored (stylized as "I Knew You Were Trouble.")
I restored this because if this is really an encyclopedia then why deny people the knowledge of knowing that? That does not seem like a good encyclopedia to me over a rule that really does not exist anyway. 184.58.3.213 (talk) 18:53, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
As someone stated on the talk page here: "Well it's on all official track listings, it's on the offical single cover, and it's listed with the period by digital music retailers... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qpally (talk • contribs) 22:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)" So my question is why is it wrong to let people know it is stylized with (.) period? 184.58.3.213 (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
I'd also like to point out that I find it interesting you are changing it on two pages but not the album page when it has it with the stylized (.) and now that I mentioned it I am sure you are going to go onto this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_%28Taylor_Swift_album%29 and change it cause you do not think it should be there. Do you not think it is wise to let people decide if it should be on there before you remove it? I was told that is how Wikipedia runs. You bring it up and let others vote on if it should be changed or not. 184.58.3.213 (talk) 19:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
You have failed to provide any concrete reasoning for your addition. The period has been removed as per WP:COMMONNAME, as it does not allow stylizations. I have commented more on the talk page and thanks for bringing the album also to my attention. I have removed it from there also. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]05:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
How about copyright infringement? Changing the title in anyway is copyright infringement without written person from the copyright holder. Try that. That is what it is, not to mention this site is the biggest copyright infringer on the entire internet with thousands of illegal downloads/distribution of copyrighted images, music, etc. without the permission of the copyright holder is illegal. The fair use claims that are on each image, music, etc. is pretty much void once illegal downloading/distribution is available. Should Wikipedia add changing the title of a song from its proper and advertised name that is copyrighted to its list of offenses? And block me and say I am threatening legal action cause I'm not and I will just change my IP address so I will get around the block. There is a difference in setting straight the record and making people aware of what copyright infringement is and saying "I am going to seek legal action for copyright infringement." (and I am not saying that just posting that there to make reference). BIG difference. 184.58.3.213 (talk) 07:18, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
You keep on saying the same things over and over again, but you are forgetting that Wikipedia follows its core wikipolicies and won't budge from it. As I see, you are a sockpuppet of a banned user, I have nothing more to say of this. And yes, I don't care for these empty threats from you or from Taylor's management also. If you can, take it up with admins, please don't disturb me. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]05:57, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Howzz you? Well, For the last couple of days, I was working on Chopra filmography. When I saw Jennifer Lopez filmography. I was working day and night on my Sandbox 4. Would would you please take a look, as I think a page for filmography is needed strongly. Take a look and tell me. Lot of work is left on the page.Pks1142 (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, but Gleekvampire, Bollyjeff and Greenparakeet are against this filmography page. But, its ok may be near future. Happy new year.—PKS:1142·(TALK)19:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Torreslfchero (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
May 2013 bring lots of happiness and perhaps a change for the better here on Wikipedia. I believe we've only spoken once (I think?), but you should have a great start to the new year nonetheless. —WP:PENGUIN·[ TALK ]03:18, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey Wikipedia Penguin, many many Happy New Year to you too. :) I think we have spoken briefly somewhere, can't recall that now though but I wish you well and hope all your endeavors come to fruition in this new year. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]04:25, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year....IB. Well, I reverted your edit from chopras list as I had faced those edit questions on flc. I don't want so face it again. I think the list is complete and had no further issues. It need to be stable. Meanwhile, I need your help on In My City article. We should star working on that and lets try to take it to GA. Maybe, any other article suggested by you.—PKS:1142·(TALK)17:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
HNY, however, I really did not understand why you removed and reverted my edit. It had bettered the lead and also made the prose flow logically. AT present its just a bunch of lines thrown together. I did not see any issues like that pointed in the PR. Well, suit yourself if you want to work on your way, I won't interfere. As for "In My City", nopes, the article is still incomplete without the news from Chopra's camp regarding its single release and music video in US. Won't pass GA. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]06:22, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey Indian Bio, please tell me what to do as i started the peer review for the list for its improvement but nobody is giving their views. User:Dharm is saying that nothing gonna happened. What i supposed to do. pls tell.Pks1142 (talk) 06:38, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
I think this has a better chance at faring at FLC rather than the Madhuri Dixit award list since Chopra is more of a current artist. Don't worry, the list is always an {{incomplete list}}, continue editing. I will chip in with the FLC changes once you stop your edits, to avoid edit conflicts. Dharm is right though, it still needs lotsa work for FLC. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]07:48, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi IndianBio, Howzz You amd I must say you are doing a good job on Artistry section. Hope you will make it a lot better for inclusion in the article.Green Parakeet (talk) 08:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Are you going to finish this, or have you given up on it? It looks pretty good, except that the last paragraph relies on only one source. BollyJeff|talk20:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey Bolly, I will of course finish this. I have been really caught up in real life work, give me this weekend and I will sort it out. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]06:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
PKS:1142 passed me this link, which I already added to the article. It may be useful in the artistry section too. She says that she is always looking for different roles and new challenges.
It looks pretty good I guess. I am not exactly sure what you are trying to accomplish here, and neither is PKS:1142 judging by what he wrote on my talk page; you may want to have a look at the section called Reply. The stuff about Aitraaz and the quote, well that's to a great extent the director and writer telling her what to say ya know, not her. You could say a little more about her picking of roles, like how she is not afraid to go for unglamorous roles like in Kaminey and Barfi. Also, bollywood.com is probably not gonna be considered a reliable source. Just try to get it in ASAP and reconcile any duplicate refs, because we are next in line on the GOCE list. BollyJeff|talk02:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Do you think the deluxe edition cover is significantly different to justify the inclusion of it on the article?HotHat (talk) 04:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
For the first one, its fine... for the second one, it definitely fails NFCC. So the covers are fine in These Simple Truth, but remove the extra one from Albertine. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]06:40, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Chopra Artistry
Hi, its been few days working on it. Due to conflicting edits with IndianBio, I continued the section in my sandbox My sandbox. Well, Indianbio loved the section. We need one more day to finish. Its getting awesome, take a look and say what you think. ( one reference for aitraaz is taken from your sandbox- "Bollywood and Globalization").—PKS:1142·(TALK)09:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Happy belated New Year IndianBio. Ya I looked to that section and it was good. You and pks did a good job. I think pks has already added that section and is looking effective. He has used your 1 reference from your sandbox. Good work guys.Green Parakeet (talk) 17:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Hahah, no reason for me to be offended. I said that in good humour. But also, as we are in the public domain, we should probably be careful about the language we use. No hard feelings. Infact, I really appreciate your enthusiasm. Cheers. :) --smarojit(buzz me)04:23, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
The first two paragraphs of the "Acting style" sub-section are excellent (minus some minor prose issues that can be sorted out), and so much better than what it is now. The third paragraph, however, didn't really have the same impact. IMO, one line talking about her inspirations is enough; and rather should be placed in the next "Influences" sub section. Why don't you go forward and remove the fan craft from the article and add this? I support you. --smarojit(buzz me)04:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I don't see any reason or content that is remotely about the analysis of Chopra's career, movie strategies, role picking etc. This is a re-hash of the main biography portions, albeit with different sources. This is NOT what the section was supposed to be. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]11:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Hey there. Just to point out, 2013 is present. So there is no need to write 2013–present. Also, the Super Bowl halftime show doesn't need to be in the section's heading. Unless it was extremely memorable like Michael Jackson, or controversial like Janet Jackson, it's just unneeded. (check out Madonna: her halftime was the most-watched of all time, yet it still hasn't been included in the section's heading). Thanks, Arre13:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
FYKI, "most watched of all time" does not equal to "memorable". And we do not need to have a nipple slip to make something memorable. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 04:47, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Arr for explaining your point. Jivesh I did not understand yours though. Madonna's Super bowl was indeed great as I had seen from the YouTube video. I have yet to watch Knowles' though I'm sure it was equally great. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]05:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
Jivesh, I never said Madonna's being most-watched was memorable. I said it was the most watched, but it doesn't make it notable enough to be included on a heading in her article. You prove my point. Knowles was great too but nothing shocking or notable occurred. Arre06:29, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
I loved Knowles' one actually. Madonna's was awe-inspiring and gave me tingles, however, Knowles was very funny with her moves and I thoroughly enjoyed it including that "End of Time" song. :) —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]12:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks Jorn, even I was also surprised that so much information is available in Google books itself. Little pieces of info which I was neglecting previously, but when I opened the page, it really meant something. I hope to work with you on your I'm Breathless page also. Just 1 week ago I have seen the movie Dick Tracy and really liked Madonna in it. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]03:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I usually search in Google books first because there is much information, reviews, charts... I haven't found the O'Brien book available there, where is it? lol. I don't like editing old albums, but I'm Breathless is an exception, I'll do "Vogue" then. I just have watched Who's That Girl and Swept Away, on this last one her acting, her hair etc are a shit. 11JornTalk04:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
The O'Brien book which I used was a 2008 version. I haven't listened to any song from I'm Breathless except "Vogue" which is a favorite Madonna song of mine. Others include "Frozen", "Like a Prayer" and "Like a Virgin". I will download the album and check it out since I love Jazz music. I have heard of Madonna's terrible acting in Swept Away and people have dissuaded me seriously from watching it, lol. Do you think I can join the Wikiproject? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]05:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
I personally love I'm Breathless, there is only a few songs I don't like. And of course you can join the wikiproject, you are an amazing editor. 11JornTalk13:39, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Well thanks for the nice words Jorn. Lemme see if I'm enough invested in her although I have been working on her Book. Wikipedia still does not entice me completely and all these rules are so difficult such that sometimes my creativeness goes blank. Would love to join the project eventually after I can develop something on my own. What do you reckon? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]13:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Ohh, I guess I will give it a shot. Was disappointed with the song she performed at the Super Bowl though. :) I will help you with I'm Breathless and the songs from "American Life" then. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]15:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Not only did I not want this, but I specifically told him not to do it. I am so mad now!! What can you do with such a pain in the @$$ editor? BollyJeff|talk16:14, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Your swipe at PKS right in the FAC page did not help. See this comment from one of the people solicited: "I looked at the FAC and saw immediate conflict there. That needs to be resolved if you expect serious reviewers to spend their time there.--Wehwalt". I would ask that you keep all negativity and conversations with PKS off of the review page. Thank you. BollyJeff|talk18:23, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Oh ok. And even the O'Brien book also does not have anything about the background of the song. :( Guess it will remain like that then, except that alternate cover, ugh. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]16:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Hey Jorn, would you believe it I was just listening to this album now and "Nobody Knows Me" was playing? Brrr, well tell me what kinda help you need? Shall I add content like I did for "Nothing Fails"? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]15:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Lol. Everything. I saw some interesting content in O'Brien's book but I can't access them... Can you help me with that and critical reception etc? 11JornTalk15:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Okies sure. I will add everything from O'Brien and all. Just it won't be possible today. I will do it tomorrow, also I think the chart performance and live performances can be expanded. That LePenn thing really caused quite a stir. Don't worry, I will take care of it. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ]15:38, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}