User talk:Ianmacm

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by if there are more than 1.

DRN

Daisy bell edit

Why do you elimined that edit ? Elpro72 (talk) 08:18, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that it is this edit], I explained that the reasons were WP:SONGCOVER and WP:SONGTRIVIA. The article Daisy Bell has a history of attracting unsourced entries. Specifically, WP:SONGTRIVIA says its use should be integrated in the article, preferably with some context as described by reliable sources, rather than e.g. "It was in Episode 15 of The Example TV Show". It is a common misunderstanding to add this type of material, as a Wikipedia article about a song is not intended to be an exhaustive list of places where it appears. There must be some sourcing.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 08:37, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is a sourcing for you ? Tell me and i will find Elpro72 (talk) 08:43, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is reliable secondary sourcing. As I've said, it is a common mistake in Wikipedia song articles to say things like "it was in episode X of television show Y". Even if this is true, there is no sourcing discussing why it is notable.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 09:55, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good point , but the video have 19 millon of views , i don't know if that counts Elpro72 (talk) 18:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube videos are not ideal sources on Wikipedia, because they may have copyright problems. There is a good video here which has the entire song on which the Nebbed video is based. However, it still comes back the need for secondary sources discussing the notability, rather than simply saying that it is on YouTube.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 20:28, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i understand , but i don't belive others understand this Elpro72 (talk) 21:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It does not. I think there is a chance of other source covering it, but be prepared not to have it. Techie3 (talk) 20:28, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]