User talk:Historynerd361

Hello, I saw your contributions and would want to invite you to a draft I am working on, Draft:Aramean people. If you would be willing to help, I'd appreciate it. Wlaak (talk) 17:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes of course. I can gladly offer help. Historynerd361 (talk) 19:31, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I have noticed your contributions to what is considered within the scope of Wikiproject:Aram (Suryoye) and would like to invite you to it. You could add your name very easily to the list of members here.

And thank you for the huge contributions you have given to the Aramean people draft. Wlaak (talk) 12:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murat Kurşun - draft and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Historynerd361! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject seems notable enough (a few more sources would be welcome) but the discography section is unsourced. Please fix that issue.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Murat Kurşun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NeoGaze (talk) 15:52, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Historynerd361, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leaving you this warning as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wlaak. Please see WP:CANVASS, and keep in mind that your editing is in a topic that is now designated as contentious: WP:GS/ACAS. Thank you. -- asilvering (talk) 18:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harpoot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syriac. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Surayeproject3 (talk) 11:17, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:GS/KURD, articles about Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed require extended confirmed as well. Your account is not currently extended confirmed, so you should edit in other topic areas until you reach that threshold. Thank you. Surayeproject3 (talk) 11:18, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks for the info.

King regards Historynerd361 (talk) 18:26, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mugsalot (talk) 15:40, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How/where have I disrupted progress toward improving an article? Historynerd361 (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Historynerd361 Your edits from earlier today at Neo-Aramaic languages constitute another violation of the ECP policy of WP:GS/KURD, as you have added the term "Kurdistan" to the article body [1]. Moreover, the changed text is directly word for word from the cited source which would've been a WP:CV if it weren't for my manual revert just now. This is just a second warning regarding the sanctions. Surayeproject3 (talk) 20:39, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand there is a concern about my edit and its compliance with the WP:GS/KURD sanctions. I have reviewed these sanctions, which apply to "all edits about, and all pages relating to, Kurds or Kurdistan." I believe my edit was on-topic because the Neo-Aramaic languages article is a linguistic topic, concerning a distinct language family. While speakers are geographically present in Kurdistan, as mentioned in the source, the article's subject is not Kurds or Kurdistan itself. A linguistic article about a related but distinct ethnic and linguistic group does not fall under this umbrella.

My edit was intended to correct a citation issue. The version you reverted to contains several claims that are not supported by the provided sources. see 1 2 3

- Claim 1: ''Neo-Aramaic speakers is significantly smaller, and newer generations of Assyrians generally are not acquiring the full language..’’ The source doesn't use that ethnic terminology.

- Claim 2: "those of Assyria and Babylonia retaining an Akkadian grammatical influence.”

- Claim 3: "evolving in the Neo-Assyrian kingdom of Osroene, which came to be known as Classical Syriac.”

The cited source does not appear to contain these statements. My edit was an attempt to align the text with what the source actually says. I acknowledge that in my edit, I may have made an error in [e.g., not using direct quotation marks where needed], and I am happy to correct that. Historynerd361 (talk) 21:35, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]