User talk:HawkAussie/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions with User:HawkAussie. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

The ninth archived talk page that I have had from August 2020-21.

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Fiji at the 1976 Summer Olympics has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi HawkAussie/Archive 9,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Hello Hawk, I just noticed that you have removed a lot of matches from the India national football team results. I understand the list article is not in a good shape. But I am working on the project to get it in the refined shape. But your removal just make it difficult on my part to compile the statisctics and records for various other articles and lists. I am presently working on this specific project, investigating various old matches to find out goalscorer, official or unofficial matches and etc. I am a Rsssf member (you can check deysubrata.civil), and work closely with the AIFF for stats and records. The mathces that you've removed are not all unofficial, I tagged them as unofficial as scrutiny is ongoing on these matches. My request will be if you please undo the materials to article so that it would be easier on my part and reduce my work load instead of navigating multiple pages. Secondly, I've seen you've created this article, India national football team results (unofficial matches), where those matches are included. So, once all those matches are srutinised (which may take few months), whatever unofficial matches be there, will be removed as already the match info is there in the article you've created. And when you split the article to create that "unofficial matches article" you should have opened a discussion where this thing could have been resolved instead of here (and also you did not mention any attribution to the original authors). Hope you restore those materials for now. Thank you. Drat8sub (talk) 14:58, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@Drat8sub: The reason why I moved those unofficial matches is due to the facts that they seemed to be unofficial throughout that period of time that is why I went ahead and created the separate page for all of the unofficial matches. In some way it's like the Australian matches against Rhodesia in 1950 or Soviet Union in 1975 where only one side of that coin is an official match and the other isn't. The problem is quite simply you have friendlies that is against another national team and matches against club teams in the same section and not really separated per say.

For now I will revert it back to what it was with the redirect of the unofficial results going to this article. HawkAussie (talk) 00:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for cooperation. You are correct, a lot of matches were against clubs or state sides. No doubt on that, I will segregate everything, it will take a few month to complete the compilation. And one thing you can do now, here in India national football team results (unofficial matches), you will find there are Olympic Qualifiers from 1960 to 1984. Remove them. They are all official I have removed the tag from the original page. Thank you. I will let you know on the unofficial matches article with time as I proceed with other matches. Drat8sub (talk) 05:56, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fiji at the 1976 Summer Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

The article Fiji at the 1976 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fiji at the 1976 Summer Olympics for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:01, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

• Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
• HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
• Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The article Fiji at the 1976 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fiji at the 1976 Summer Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 FC Istiklol season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 FC Istiklol season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 07:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm confused as to how this article doesn't meet WP:NSEASONS. This is the top league in Botswana, with 5-figure attendance. It must be at least semi professional. Normally I'd just remove the prod, but perhaps I'm missing something? Nfitz (talk) 01:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Nfitz: The article also fails WP:GNG in general. HawkAussie (talk) 08:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The article 1994 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF–OFC play-off) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1994 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF–OFC play-off) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 01:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

October GAN Backlog Drive As you have taken part in previous GAN Backlog drives, or are a prolific GAN reviewer, you might be interested to know that the October 2020 GAN Backlog Drive starts on October 1, and will continue until the end of the month.

-- Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1926 VFL Grand Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Argus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

The article 1994 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF–OFC play-off) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1994 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF–OFC play-off) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 20:02, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the4 Guild of Copy Editors of the article 1987 Football League Second Division play-off Final has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were Hog Farm (submissions), HaEr48 (submissions), Harrias (submissions) and Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

• Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
• Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
• Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
• MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
• The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
• Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
• Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Croatian national handball team results, which you proposed for deletion. WP:BIAS. Instead, I have started a deletion discussion at Talk:Croatian national handball team results, which you may comment on. I have explained my reasons for doing so there. Thanks! Malo95 (talk) 07:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

@Malo95: Compared to the Croatia women's national junior handball team, this is just a list of results with the sources being very limited as one of the sources only show the links to the latest tournaments and not to all of them. The bottom resource doesn't show any matches from Croatia which doesn't show all of the matches on this list. HawkAussie (talk) 07:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

HI HawkAussie/Archive 9,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Good evening, I removed the PRODs for now as I don't believe that there has been enough consensus yet on these types of articles. In my opinion, they do violate WP:NOTSTATS but only one AfD has taken place on this topic and it resulted in a 'keep' but the consensus wasn't strong. I'm going to raise it at WP:FOOTY but I wouldn't object to an AfD as the Estonia one was a while ago. Spiderone 20:24, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Please check what I wrote on the articles you proposed for deletion. Thanks for understanding! Dante4786 (talk) 07:26, 22 December 2020 (UTC) Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

	Merry Christmas HawkAussie
	Hi HawkAussie, just wishing you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a happy New Year. Thanks for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year. Here's to 2021 being a bit brighter for all!    –Kosack (talk) 15:31, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

As a fellow editor of Australian articles on Wikipedia through The 5000 Challenge, I wanted to let you know that there will be an Australia/New Zealand Online Community Celebration of Wikipedia's 20th Birthday on Friday 15 January 2021 from 7.00–8.30pm AEDT (6.30pm SA, 6pm QLD, 5.30pm NT, 4pm WA). If interested, please register to receive the link.--Oronsay (talk) 21:18, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, first I want to thanks for your edits on Football at the 2014 Asian Games – Women but since I think those templates are unnecessary (because we can simply merge them with the main page) I nominated them for deletion here. Mohsen1248 (talk) 21:33, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

@Mohsen1248: That is fine, I was only doing that while trying to follow the format of the Olympics with those templates. I have also added another comment in the delete template itself. HawkAussie (talk) 05:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I know and I appreciate it, I usually don't enjoy nominating anything for deletion because I respect your time and what you did, but as you know Olympic is a different monster, the use of templates for the AG pages is very limited. we can keep them in the sport's page and then show that section in the XXX at the 2014 Asian Games page. take a look at this and how it was used. Mohsen1248 (talk) 12:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Mohsen1248: I understand that area now as Olympics is that type of monsters that you shouldn't mess with unless you understand what you are doing. HawkAussie (talk) 12:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi HawkAussie, my work on play-off finals has finally made it back to the very first "edition" and I was hoping you'd still be up for helping get it pushed up to at least WP:GA standard. Check out how it's going! Anything you'd like to contribute with would be really great! Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 16:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm going to make a stab at getting the article up to GAN quality this afternoon, hope you're ok with that, and feel free to join in. I'll make sure you're recognised as co-nom in anything I propose it for (or indeed, feel free to nominate it at GAN/FAC in due course whenever you like). Cheers. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:42, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: That is fine, as you have access to more resources than I have on me. I will check in if their is any other sources that I spot. HawkAussie (talk) 08:47, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Abishe (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2025 and tomorrow will be 2026. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2026. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Asian Games football game reference templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:29, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Asian Games football group standings templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for speedy nominating many of those hoax footy articles I found in Stale userspace drafts. With your help, a lot of those hoaxes are now gone. Keep up the great work! :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:16, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Asian Games football convenience templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:56, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi HawkAussie, in regards to that Northern Ireland match, I'd probably exclude it from the list and explain the absence with a note or in the text. Wales will have had numerous cancelled fixtures over the years, there's no real value in including them I would say. As long as the discrepancy in the 81 Home Championship is explained somewhere, that would be fine I think. Kosack (talk) 08:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Asian Games convenience templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Australia at the 1936 Winter Olympics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Australia at the 1936 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Australia at the 1936 Winter Olympics for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

		The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to HawkAussie for expanding and promoting the good article 1994 FIFA World Cup qualification (CONCACAF–OFC play-off) during the fourth year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Australia at the 1936 Winter Olympics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Australia at the 1936 Winter Olympics for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, HawkAussie. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 1993–94 Australia Tri-Nation Series at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 09:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

On 21 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Australian Open, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

• Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
• Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
• Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
• Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
• The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
• Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
• Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
• Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
• Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding this revert and your edit summary "It's already in the Australia national soccer team template".

I don't understand. Of course it is. It's also in the Men's national football team results (OFC) template. This will be true by necessity anytime any page has more than one navbox. Any template that doesn't, should be removed from the page. --DB1729 (talk) 11:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

If you meant the Australia national football team results template is merely a subset of the Australia national soccer team template, this is not true. The majority of the links within Template:Australia national football team results are not in Template:Australia national soccer team. Reverting now. --DB1729 (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

@DB1729: Yes that is because most of them are yearly which isn't really helpful for the normal person compared to most other national pages that are in decade format. HawkAussie (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

But where is the page for decades 2000s and 2010s results? The Template:Australia national soccer team template links Australia national soccer team results (2000–2019), which is a redirect to 2000 Australia national soccer team season. It seems Template:Australia national football team results goes to yearly format during this period because there is no decade format results page(s) for those years. --DB1729 (talk) 11:01, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

@DB1729: I did create that but apparatenly it was reverted back to the yearly format due to having important information deleted which could have easily been put into the History of the Australia national soccer team page. HawkAussie (talk) 11:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Well it looks like currently Template:Australia national soccer team is need of a fix then. We don't want an apparent link to two decades of results redirecting to a single year, right? Should we add the single years 2000 through 2019 results to that template? --DB1729 (talk) 11:17, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

@DB1729: Or maybe I don't know merge those yearly pages and move the prose over to the history page. HawkAussie (talk) 08:57, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I would be ok with that. --DB1729 (talk) 10:00, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

For your comments at the ANI thread - they were very much appreciated. Take care. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: Your welcome as I don't understand the reasoning to only target you when there are others out there. HawkAussie (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Im new to wikipedia, can u suggeste how to create my page and how to publish an article Prasanna Supriya (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

@Prasanna Supriya: Firstly welcome to Wikipedia, to answer your enquiry about how to create an article, I would suggest going from the WP:AFC (Articles for creation) as you are new and not have much experience. Also the Help:Your first article is also a good read to try and avoid having issues.

Also personally I would try and have experience in editing articles before creating an article just so you have experience at using the tools of Wikipedia. HawkAussie (talk) 11:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article South African cricket team in Australia in 1993–94 has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Please read the article over carefully to make sure I have not changed the meaning anywhere. I know little to nothing about cricket. If you go into Edit mode you'll be able to see two sentences I have masked as I was unsure of the meaning of both. Otherwise, the article looks in good shape. Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

• The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
• Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
• Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
• Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
• Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
• Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
• Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

• The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
• Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
• Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
• Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
• BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

STOP. you are literally being a net negative contributor as you dont know how it works. User:37.186.85.58

Excuse me, but I am literally watching the event live right now. HawkAussie (talk) 07:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)