User talk:Haploidavey

Please leave messages regarding articles on article talk pages. This page is for more personal stuff (friendly messages and queries, that sort of thing). Haploidavey (talk) 07:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phew![1] NebY (talk) 16:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @Haploidavey

Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across your edit at Amphitheatre (Xtools).

Requesting you to visit Draft:Rabindra Rangshala (tentatively planned to release as stub) and help it's copy edit if the topic would interest you. Bookku (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From your edit message, no primaries as yet, and none offered as evidence in secondary. Do we really need them[?]. I'll explain for a moment what I think of the topic because I'm pushing for it. Using primary sources in classics is fraught with problems. But they are at the same time absolutely vital. There are a number of factors to balance:

• Laymen aren't really equipped to interpret primary sources like scholars are
• Wikipedia isn't the place for original research and even credentialed scholars must here justify what they say with external publications
• Wikipedia has multiple audiences, however, which include experts that may want to know what the relevant primary sources are: this is important for research – experts especially want to read those primary sources and draw their own conclusions – and credibility

The way I think those factors should be balanced is by parallel citation. We can't use the primary sources themselves for us to draw conclusions with (WP:PRIMARY). But we can cite reliable secondary sources which use those primary sources to draw conclusions. When we do so, however, because just pointing to that secondary source isn't very helpful at a glance, the best affordance I think is to note the secondary source's citation to the primary source when it is available and relevant. Ifly6 (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you a griffin's claw full of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec21}} to your friends' talk pages.

★Trekker (talk) 09:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Haploidavey: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, P Aculeius (talk) 14:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P Aculeius (talk) 14:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]