User talk:Gordon Laird

--Gordon Laird (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)--Gordon Laird (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)==Methodist and United Church involvement with BC aboriginal people== By all means add whatever you can to the article on this subject. Masalai 16:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed the DRV discussion of David Lochhead as "overturn and list on AfD". Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, King of Hearts. --Gordon Laird (talk) 04:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No prob! Best, PeterSymonds | talk 13:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article UCHUG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG. This group received zero non-trivial Google news hits under full name or acronym.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Novaseminary (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC) UCHUG seems to have been completed deleted. I object to that fact and I also object to the process which was used to remove it. I believe this all happened in the month of March, 2010,which does not seem to me to be sufficient time for objections to be raised. I am raising an objection but since UCHUG and UCHUG/Talk have both been deleted this is the only place I can register my objection.Gordon Laird (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect UCHUG. Since you had some involvement with the UCHUG redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Novaseminary (talk) 22:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can find no place to discuss the deletion of UCHUG since all the discussion is now closed. Gordon Laird (talk) 23:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have AfDed UCHUG. Here is the AfD in case you'd like to comment. Novaseminary (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose the deletion of UCHUG. I am aware of the accuracy and usefulness of the information included in it. Gordon Laird (talk) 06:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]