User talk:Go4thProsper

I welcome any suggestions on BLP edits or updates that are needed or should be considered. I especially focus on women politicians who are out of office, but not exclusively. All suggestions welcome!

John T. Watkins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jared Y. Sanders Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Rarick, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:47, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Go4thProsper, I see in Oct 2020, you add the {COI}tag on the Wiki item "GenScript Biotech", it shows that " This article needs additional citations for verification". Since I have already provided the supporting citation on where marked the "citation needed", can I remove the {COI}tag and {citation needed} tag? GenYouth (talk) 07:39, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the article in question and it appears the maintenance banner I added three years ago has been removed, but has been replaced by a more thorough and detailed banner. The issues raised in that banner do not appear to have been resolved. I would not support removing that banner. Go4thProsper (talk) 23:56, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if the "banner" you mentioned is the items listed on the top of the website, which called "This article has multiple issues".

Actually I agree with the comments that wikipedia item_GenScript Biotech have few unsolved issues now. BUT what I mean is that I have already add the support citation link for those "citation needed" part. Can I JUST remove one issue（This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2020)） list in the banner？ GenYouth (talk) 03:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to remove the total banner, I only think if I can remove one item in it. GenYouth (talk) 03:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be inappropriate for you as a WP:COI editor to remove any part of the message. You are doing the right thing by alerting the independent editors community about your concerns and point of view, but you’ll have to first achieve community consensus that the message should be modified, then find an editor willing to make the change recommended by the group. Go4thProsper (talk) 00:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Ray Madden. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to National Memorial Park. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

National Memorial Park, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca ^{talk to me!} 23:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Go4thProsper, Glad to see that you’re a Hoosier. I am a former Buckeye from right on the Indiana border. I have a question for you about the proposed merger of ‘Baldwin’ and ‘Baldwin in France’. Don’t you think the Baldwin in France article (which has more than 1800 words) would overload the ‘Baldwin’ article, which is massive at over 11,000 words? Thus, the combined article would be around 12,500 words. This puts it nearly in the zone where WP guidance on Article Length ( see WP:LENGTH) states that such an article ‘almost certainly should be divided or trimmed’. The current ‘Baldwin’ article is already in the zone, described in WP:LENGTH, as ‘probably should be divided or trimmed’. That is the reason I wrote a separate article to begin with. Would you be so kind as to retract your suggestion? Dr Dobeaucoup (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Big win for us in women’s bball last night! To your question, yes that is a very real concern; however “merge” in my mind does not mean every word must remain. I actually think the Baldwin bio article is much too long already and should itself be trimmed. But that’s no reason not to merge. Baldwin is an important figure for sure, but not so much that his 62 years merit multiple articles, each of which are arguably much too long. Other editors are encouraged to weigh in and disagree, but in my opinion the articles should be merged and the overall product cut back in word count. Go4thProsper (talk) 21:46, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Go4thProsper. Not too long ago you implemented an edit request I posted on behalf of Jeffrey Leiden of Vertex Pharmaceuticals. I am hoping you would like to look over my most recent edit request found here: Talk:Jeffrey_Leiden#Updates. The edits are simple and straightforward. I would really appreciate it if you did. Thanks again for your help with this and your past help.JohnDatVertex (talk) 15:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this notice and I will take a look, although I can’t guarantee to make the edits. Go4thProsper (talk) 15:22, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Go4thProsper. This is a gentle reminder if it's convenient for you to take a look at my edit request as I mentioned above. I would be really appreciative if you could get to it before too long. Thanks again, JohnDatVertex (talk) 17:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks for implementing the last of the four bullet points in my edit request. Are you planning to implement the other three bullet points? It would be great if you could, but if you don’t have time, or don’t want to, please let me know. Thanks again, JohnDatVertex (talk) 16:01, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not plan to make the other edits, but do not oppose if other editors make them. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Cox (New Jersey politician), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Lambert and Revolutionary War.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please render this as in the title here, unlinked. Not 20th Century American politician. Tony (talk) 05:07, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Tony. You are correct. Thank you. Go4thProsper (talk) 01:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve noticed that you’re frequently participating in active AFDs and voting too quickly. For example, you’ve cast four votes in just three minutes and eight votes within 14 minutes. This seems suspicious because it takes longer to properly evaluate the articles.

Are you familiar with the guidelines for participating in Afds? I want to inform you that if you’re randomly voting on Afds without any evaluation, it’s best to stop.

Zuck28 (talk) 20:16, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]