User talk:GlassCobra/Archive 24

This is an archive of past discussions with User:GlassCobra. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30 Archive 31: October 6, 2011 - April 16, 2012 Archive 32: April 16, 2012 - November 12, 2012 Archive 33: November 12, 2012 - April 29, 2013 Archive 34: May 6, 2013 - January 4, 2014 Archive 35: January 4, 2014 - June 18, 2014 Archive 36: June 28, 2014 - January 16, 2015 Archive 37: January 22, 2015 - August 6, 2015 Archive 38: August 11, 2015 - March 19, 2016 Archive 39: March 27, 2016 - March 3, 2017 Archive 40: March 7, 2017 - July 10, 2018 Archive 41: July 28, 2018 - December 17, 2019 Archive 42: December 27, 2019 - April 18, 2021 Archive 43: April 25, 2021 - June 26, 2022

May 2, 2009 - September 13, 2009

Hello there. I remembered you from my previous RfA, where you had expressed some concerns and felt that you would be unable to support. I wondered if you could comment on my current editor review, as I feel it would be best to see if those who hadn't thought of me as highly of me five months ago now think I have improved. NuclearWarfare _(Talk) ^{(How am I doing?)} 20:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday May 17th, Columbia University area Last: 03/29/2009 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, establish a membership process for the chapter, review the upcoming Wiki-Conference New York 2009 (planned for ~100 people at NYU this summer) and future projects like Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Coffee#Update on Chet. لennavecia 01:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I am contacting you because I wanted to ask for your help. I have modified my entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A%C3%A7a%C3%AD_Palm#Acai_scams I carefully read your opinion and I think I have made some improvements. I would really appreciate your help with this. Dugu —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dugut (talk • contribs) 13:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

GlassCobra, Gaia Octavia Agrippa has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk | _Sign 20:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Why do you think its notable to add the mid-year walk totals of Kevin Youkilis to his bio? I don't think it is notable. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 05:34, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello? I don't believe I've heard back from you on this. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:31, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I really want to become an administrator, but I have only been on for three months. I don't know how I would become one because there are so many people that are requesting to become administrators, but I really appreciate the help. Cheers! --GandalftheWise : Talk Page 19:02, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

GlassCobra, GandalftheWise has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm curious as to why you think A7 applies to this article. A7 seems to explicitly exclude software. seresin ( ¡? )  05:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

GlassCobra, My RFA passed today at 75/2/1 and I wanted to give you special thanks, not only for nominating me, but for seeking me out, encouraging me, and supporting me through the process. Cheers! --Rosiestep (talk) 23:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in my recent RfA, which was unable pass with a final tally of (45/39/9). I plan on addressing the concerns raised and working to improve in the next several months. Hopefully, if/when I have another RfA I will win your support. Special thanks go to MBisanz, GT5162, and MC10 for nominating me. Thanks again, -download ׀ sign! 01:23, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I just wanted to know a couple things. First, how long were you on Wikipedia before you became an admin. how many edits did you have? How long did it take to have your request answered? What kind of edits did you have? Is it seemed more valuable to create articles or fight vandalism? I just wanted to have an idea of what to expect if I wanted to be an administrator. I would appreciate if you could help. Thanks. GandalftheWise : Talk Page 12:28, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

A good place to find most of these answers is GlassCobra's RfA itself: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GlassCobra.  Frank  |  talk  12:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Frank, but the standards have changed quite a lot since I became an admin. When I ran, 4 or 5000 edits was considered okay, and six months was good enough as well. Now, anything less than a year and 10000 edits could be looked upon as insufficient. GlassCobra 14:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

It's maybe not as stringent as all that, but you're right, the community does seem to have changed in this regard. Still...pointing a potential RfA candidate to an RfA seemed a logical thing to do :-)  Frank  |  talk  15:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello,

I recently tried to add a page called Teachers Without Borders under the username Twbseattle. It was deleted, I understand, for G11, which could be promotional use of a company. I would just like to elaborate here.

At this link, you will see that Teachers Without Borders is referenced: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meedan#Funding_and_Research_Partnerships

I was trying to add a page to this link, so that the article on Meedan would be more complete.

I could understand how you might view the page as promotion, especially as I had not had time to add references or external links. While trying to add references, I came across the note that the page had been "quickly deleted."

I changed my username, reflecting the policy that usernames should not promote individual organizations. Rather, they should represent individuals.

Please let me know if you will reconsider deleting the Teachers Without Borders wikipedia page. If you will not recover the page, just let me know.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacharylamel (talk • contribs) 23:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't care a lot, but I'm curious why you are reverting edits that don't appear to be vandalism without even giving a reason. 68.123.224.214 (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Someone has been coming in for several days now and changing the summary of the events of Bugz's death in direct contradiction to the information already there, which is taken specifically from the source provided, an article from the Rolling Stone. Further, he or she persists on changing the genre of Bugz' music to Rap instead of Hip-hop, without any discussion. GlassCobra 12:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Regarding this comment [1], Poisoning the well is not a "derogatory term", but is a logical fallacy where adverse information about a target is pre-emptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say. In the article in question, a number of sources are being discredited by characterizing them as "Arab" and "liberal".

Factsontheground (talk) 08:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

My RfA Thank you for participating in my "RecFA", which passed with a final tally of 153/39/22. There were issues raised regarding my adminship that I intend to cogitate upon, but I am grateful for the very many supportive comments I received and for the efforts of certain editors (Ceoil, Noroton and Lar especially) in responding to some issues. I wish to note how humbled I was when I read Buster7's support comment, although a fair majority gave me great pleasure. I would also note those whose opposes or neutral were based in process concerns and who otherwise commented kindly in regard to my record. I recognise that the process itself was unusual, and the format was generally considered questionable - and I accept that I was mistaken in my perception of how it would be received - but I am particularly grateful for those whose opposes and neutrals were based in perceptions of how I was not performing to the standards expected of an administrator. As much as the support I received, those comments are hopefully going to allow me to be a better contributor to the project. Thank you. Very much. LessHeard vanU (talk) 18:46, 24 May 2009 (UTC) ~~~~~

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:35, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I've nominated Kevin Youkilis to be a Featured Article. Since you may have interest, you may wish to contribute your view as to whether it should be a FA. Also, I think we may have some work to do on the in-line citations ... perhaps you may want to help with those as well? The discussion of the FA comment process can be found at [2], and the page that you can go in through to leave comments is the article's talk page at [3]. Same holds for Ryan Braun. Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

I would like to thank you for coming out and participating in my Request for Adminship, which closed unsuccessfully at (48/8/6) based on my withdrawal. I withdrew because in my opinion I need to focus on problems with my content contributions before I can proceed with expanding my responsibilities. Overall I feel that the RfA has improved me as an editor and in turn some articles which in my eyes is successful. Thank you again for your support. Cheers and happy editing.--kelapstick (talk) 18:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I mean GA/FA/FLC and the like. I don't really include DYK partly because it's so easy to rack up large amounts of them, interactions with other users can be very limited, and I'm a quality vs. quantity guy myself. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 13:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Colds7ream/RfA

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Some may call this canvassing but as I've used you as an example, please see this discussion. Thanks. - ALLST✰R▼^echo _{wuz here} 00:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Bullzeye and the_undertow will be there, too. MZMcBride and east718 possibly as well. لennavecia 16:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Um ... it's not a haiku, but still, see Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Anonymous Dissident, support !vote no. 152. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I noticed you handling a few of the problems around the Jay Sean articles. One to keep an eye out for is this one to Down (Jay Sean song). Not even close to true: one forum reported that it was the most added track for airplay one week, and fans started to put down that it was the number 1 on the "US Airplay Chart". I've had to pull it out about about 12 times now, and have already gotten one editor and a couple of his socking IPs blocked for repeated insertions. Various Turkish IPs keep inserting it now, and I'm not sure if it's a vandal or a clueless fan behind that one. The original falsifier was in Norway, so it's hard to see them as related.—Kww(talk) 21:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Dear fellow Wikipedia, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not!  :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 17:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Spells in Harry Potter. Things are heating up again :). Malinaccier (talk) 05:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 09:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:20, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi,

I'm fairly new to wikipedia, so apologies if I'm doing anything wrong. I wanted to find out more about the FTSE4Good Index, and thought wikipedia would have something. When I have a look, looks like you deleted a page that was once there, citing copyright reasons. I'm a bit confused by this. Surely if FTSE4Good falls foul of wikipedia's copyright policy, then so does FTSE 100, FTSE Allshare, etc..., and those pages should be deleted too? Thanks to clarify.

194.153.106.254 (talk) 10:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello there, thanks for the message. When a page is deleted for copyright reasons, it doesn't mean that the topic itself violates a copyright, but that the text of the article is usually a copy-and-paste job from a website that has not licensed its content to be used on a free site like ours. In this page's case, someone had just copied and pasted part of the FTSE.com website and tried to make it an article, which we cannot accept. If you'd like, you can create an account and re-make the article so that it conforms to our standards. Make sure to check out pages like Wikipedia:Your first article for tips and help. Good luck! GlassCobra 12:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey man, my artice, Horse Drama, got deleted very quickly. Could you email a copy of it to me so I can admire my handiwork? That'd be really really awesome.

Gorilla Hand (talk) 00:51, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

If you continue to be actively associated with WP:CHICAGO, please change the date at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members to August 2009. For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tay Dizm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tay Dizm (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Your status has been changed to inactive at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members since you did not respond to our confirmation of active status request. If this is an error please come update your status. Also feel free to come vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday September 13th, Columbia University area Last: 07/25/2009 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference New York, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Takes Manhattan and Wikipedia at the Library, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 16:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --A Nobody^{My talk} 02:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Why did you remove the blpunsourced tag from the Appearances section of Nicki Minaj? Am I going to have to put a fact tag on every line? Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

But there are sources in the article, just none for that section. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I can do that. Thanks. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Just a note, if you search for "st cummin" on Google Books, there are 206 hits, some of them quite usable for verification purposes. It's also likely that there are variations in spelling, as "cummin" is likely an anglicization of a gaelic name (for example, "st cuimin" gets 177 hits). On an unrelated matter, there's a DRV of a discussion you were involved in here. Regards,  Skomorokh  17:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello Skomorokh, good to hear from you. I had indeed checked Google Books before placing the PROD. However, my concern stems from the Saint Cummin article mentioning that he is the first of that name; thus, we can't be sure if the Cummin (or Cuimin) referred to in the books is the one that the article is about. Anyway, thanks for bringing the DRV to my attention. :) I'm not sure why Niteshift did not notify the participants of the AfD, since there weren't many, and especially me, since I'm the creator of the article. GlassCobra 18:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

No worries, it seems there's at least three saints of this name, and the coverage isn't enough to convince me to remove the PROD either. I'll probably chip in at the DRV, so see you over there :) Adios,  Skomorokh  18:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC)