User talk:G S Palmer/Archive 5

This is an archive of past discussions with User:G S Palmer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi, thanks for the message. I do not see why you deleted the page Dropidas, great-grandfather of Critias, and perhaps brother of Solon. There was useful information in the page alone that is not contained anywhere in the the Plato page. Anyone searching for Dropidas will find no useful information by being redirected to Plato. Please explain your reasoning for clarification. Best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScythianRider (talk • contribs) 03:39, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

@ScythianRider: as it was, the article didn't seem to establish why he was notable. He may be, but you have to remember that notability is not inherited. If you think he truly does merit an article of his own, I suggest starting a draft (which will need sources, possibly from Google Books?) and submitting the draft for peer review via the articles for creation process. This will provide you with more detailed feedback to help you improve the article. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 03:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I had included references. Was including a second when you deleted the page. Both were found on google books. The information was valid, as Dropidas is the messenger of large chunks of passages which Critias then passes on to Plato. The passages were referenced down to the page, with the citation provided. I appreciate your advice, however, I believe the page was deleted prematurely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScythianRider (talk • contribs) 03:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

@ScythianRider: the content was not, in fact, deleted, which means that you can still recover the material you had previously written to start your draft. It can be found in the page history, specifically in this revision. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brighton Avenue (Allston, Massachusetts), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Watertown and Brookline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

 Fixed. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

On 11 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tachiraptor, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the 200-million-year-old Tachiraptor is a new type of dinosaur discovered in Venezuela? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tachiraptor. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

note: I have given you this (as opposed to the DYK bot) as your name appeared to be incorrectly written in the {{DYKmake}} template. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your guidance. රාජු (talk) 04:09, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

My problem was corrected by somebody as follows.

[if you are trying to link the article about a topic in English to its translation in other languages' Wikipedias, the way to do that is through Wikidata. See Wikipedia:Wikidata. I have set up the link which connects si:දර්ශනය to Philosophy already. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)]

@රාජු: sorry for not leaving you a more personalized note. I didn't realize you were trying to link the English and Sinhalese versions of the page. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:30, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

are bored ?, if you search the internet you will find information.--McVeigh / talk 14:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

@McVeigh: I try not to be. However, information does not automatically equal notability. If this round of AfDs come out as "delete", I may nominate some more of your articles. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:31, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Well, do what you want. I clearly as references, but you do not think anything !. then do what you want.--McVeigh / talk 14:40, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

hi, i started to create a page of a notable musician, Shakila Ahmed and it was tagged under speedy deletion. i did not realise while creating a page it can be read by people. i thought i had to get it published first! there are plenty of published material on the singer as a credible personality, deserving a wiki page. i would welcome any suggestion how to go about making the page happen. meanwhile, should i retry with sandbox? thank u! TumharaishqTumharaishq (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tumharaishq. The page was visible for anyone to see as soon as you hit "save page" (you could have kept working on it without publishing if you had hit "show preview" instead) and I found it via the new pages log. If the subject of your article meets the notability criteria, creating an article in your sandbox and submitting it for review through the articles for creation process would be the best way to go. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 18:13, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

thank u. will go the sandbox way! tumharaishqTumharaishq (talk) 20:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

On 13 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Torreón massacre, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mexico never paid China the $3 million indemnity it agreed to after the deaths of 300 Chinese immigrants in the 1911 Torreón massacre? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Torreón massacre. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mike V • Talk 19:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Congratulations for promoting Torreón massacre to the Main Page. I enjoyed reading it and learned a lot. Thanks and keep up the good work! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 22:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello G S Palmer, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Native youth Sexual health network, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: See CBC source. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 23:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)A

I have asked that the redirection of Blue Northern to Bill Cowsill be reconsidered and I am asking that the speedy deletion also be reconsidered. The cited profile of the band in canadianbands.com, plus other citations readily searchable, should indicate that this band was more than notable for its Cowsill association, paraticularly in terms of its recording and label history, plus Juno Award nomination, not yet discussed. The page was in the process of development, and so indicated. Please give me time to develop this further.

Dreadarthur (talk) 05:00, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

@Dreadarthur: Fine, but I have serious doubts as to its notability. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:31, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi i made an article please don't let anyone delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel2alan (talk • contribs) 21:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

On 24 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Verlorenvlei redfin, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Verlorenvlei redfin, having lost one of its two habitats, now faces threats from agriculture and invasive species? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Verlorenvlei redfin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 00:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! Yoninah (talk) 14:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I was not the nominator of this DYK nomination. I only fixed the template. Just now, I received the DYK credit message, which I have removed. --Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 00:37, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

@Vigyani: sorry, I forgot to check if the DYK nom templates were correct. I saw that you had fixed the visible author credit, so I automatically assumed you had fixed that also. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:10, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

I don't think having the displaytitle on talk pages is necessary. I would rather not encourage its proliferation because I don't think it should become a characteristic of talk pages and ultimately lead editors to think that they need to devote time to adding this attribute everywhere. If you want to make this widespread, I would suggest having a discussion at WT:FILM to see if others agree. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:17, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

@Erik: I don't see it as a big deal. I don't go around adding it to talk pages: if I create a page, I include it, and if I am already editing a page, then sometimes I will add one. I'm not asking anyone else to do it, nor am I pushing for it to become common practice (after all, we don't need more bureaucracy). I fail to see how any harm is being done by my adding it to a few talk pages in passing. Thanks, G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 17:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

That's fine, but my concern is that someone will take that approach and run with it. It is purely aesthetic, so any actual effort to make it widespread may result in a backlash consensus to remove it from all talk pages so there is no confusion about whether or not to be applying that cosmetic feature. Maybe this won't happen, but I guess we will see. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:35, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

I created that sidebar as a replacement for the list of contents, so perhaps it should be on the left, I guess.

Anyway, thanks for your contributions. Care to write a little more in the first paragraph? I'm out of ideas Tetra quark (talk) 00:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

I have recommenced the Blue Northern page. I can't complete it in one period. I hope that what is here demonstrates, at least to this point, that the band is more than as referenced to Billy Cowsill.

Dreadarthur (talk) 06:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello G S Palmer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Aleksander Korab, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 23:24, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bard the Bowman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boris Sokolov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Torreón massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceradon -- Ceradon (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to say that I'm not trying to step on you or something. I just really don't think that's a good representative picture (being accurate only to Book 4), and also, it's tiny - it doesn't really enlarge any, which is a bit of a minus. So that's where I'm coming from. BUT! I'm not trying to kick it out - I tagged you on purpose on the fair use orphaning, so you'd know. And now knowing that you really want it in there, I've added more to the caption (for context) and adjusted the position (to make it more illustrative of Book 4, from which it came) with the intent to make having both photos in the article supportable as fair use. I hope that works for you. Solarbird (talk) 07:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

My bad! Commented on wrong talk page, sorry. Solarbird (talk) 07:58, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia clearly states that all edits must be verifiable by legitimate sources. Just so there isn't an edit war, should you find sources that clearly show the creators confirming the claims, then you're welcome to add it back in. Until then, it is NOT fact and shouldn't be added just because a fan of the show thinks it to be fact. (Dubcity4 (talk) 20:32, 7 January 2015 (UTC))

@Dubcity4: I've been editing Wikipedia for well over a year now, so I am well versed in most of the important policies. This entire debate has already been settled on Talk:Korra - for specific sources see Talk:Korra#The_Big_List_of_Korra-Asami_Relationship_Sources, which was put together by multiple editors, myself not included. While you may not think that that was the implied ending of the show, I assure you that you are almost certainly alone in that belief. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 20:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

I've been editing wikipedia for years now, and your 'justification' for the edit just isn't how editing works. The only thing confirmed by the creators of the show, Michael DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko, is that Asami and Korra are dating at the season finale (and I've left anything mentioning this on there). It has nothing to do with what I think is the implied ending of the show or how you or any of the editors interpret the ending. As I said earlier, wikipedia edits must be verified by legitimate sources. In terms of the story or how the story should be interpreted, only the creators can verify anything story related. The current references to their tumblr pages do not confirm any of the statements or claims made before my edit, hence why the edit was made. Should you find any sources (interviews, their tumblr page, behind the scenes commentaries) where the creators specifically confirm any particular details, feel free to add them in. As long as you include the references with your edit. (Dubcity4 (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC))

@Dubcity4: My comment was not meant to touch on the length of your editing career. However, I would appreciate it if you didn't cite policies I already know at me as if I were a newbie. I hope you find the current version more to your liking. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 21:11, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

My apologies (I didn't mean it that way). And no, the current edit still fails to meet wikipedia editing guidelines. I'll be more clear with the problems I have with it. 1)It has never been confirmed that Korra and Asami are bi by the creators (Yes, I read through all previous references). Also, there is nothing in those sources to suggest that Korra and Asami are the first major LGBT characters in a western cartoon. The only thing confirmed is that they're are dating. Any other interpretations are just the interpretations of fans. (Dubcity4 (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC))

@Dubcity4: whatever, I'll let you duke it out with those more passionate about the subject than I. However, it was confirmed (by Bryan Konietzko and Mike DiMartino, the creators) that the couple were, well, a couple. Now for the claim that they are the first LGBT couple to be represented in Western animation. The USA Today source says, and I quote: "We just had the first lesbian (bisexual?) couple on a Nickelodeon animated series." The IBT source calls the show "the first ever children's show to have projected a lesbian relationship". And the Vanity Fair source says "sure, there are shows that are more explicit and progressive when depicting same-sex couples. But those are adult shows. [...] American kids’ shows have a long way to go before L.G.B.T. story lines are considered a matter of course. And none of those examples above quite match Korra and Asami’s climactic spirit portal moment." Forgive me, but I fail to see how this doesn't support the claims in the article. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 21:33, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

The ibtimes says that "This is PROBABLY the first ever children's show to have projected a lesbian relationship and fans have mixed reactions about the shocking twist.". 'Probably' isn't the same as a confirmed fact and therefore cannot be used as a verifiable source. The claim here is that the Legend of Korra is the first western animation to feature major characters that are LGBT. This isn't true as Paranorman and the Simpsons did it before the Legend of Korra. Also, being a couple doesn't confirm that they're bisexual. (Dubcity4 (talk) 21:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC))

@Dubcity4: if you want to discuss the matter further, please continue at Talk:Asami Sato#First major acknowledged LGBT couple in western children's animation, a thread I opened to centralize this discussion. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 21:55, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

@Dubcity4: also, I presume you are aware of WP:3RR - you are in danger of violating that rule. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 21:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you have been notificated, but I pinged you on the wikiproject cosmology talk page saying that I've added the banner on several article talk pages now. I guess we just have to wait for the alerts now Tetra quark (talk) 16:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

@Tetra quark: yes, I noticed. Thanks! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 17:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Torreón massacre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Torreón massacre for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. ceradon (talk • contribs) 02:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

@Ceradon: thanks for making my first experience with the GA process a pleasant one! Happy editing! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 12:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks to you as well. Cheers, --ceradon (talk • contribs) 00:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Emilio Madero

added a link pointing to Chihuahua

Trigonopterus dimorphus

added a link pointing to Gestalt

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

I think you have done the wrong move by redirecting 'Tehsils of Ganderbal district' to Ganderbal. You should have redirected it to Ganderbal district. thanks Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 15:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

@Owais Khursheed:  Fixed: [1]. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

I truly thought I was removing that piece of trivia... my bad. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 13:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

@Edokter: Well, it happens to everybody - I know I've done it more than once. Sorry for the late reply - somehow I missed the notification for your message. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 18:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, my (and many other users) edits to this Doctor Who page over the past few days have been continuously reverted. It was confirmed last week by Doctor Who Magazine that Block One of filming consisted of episodes 3 and 4 (I happen to have the magazine myself and know this to be true). This information was fully sourced and nobody seemed to have a problem with it being included in the page. Yet on Wednesday, it was confirmed that Toby Whithouse, Daniel O'Hara and Derek Ritchie would be respectively writing, directing and producing this production block. We know (as stated by the BBC) that the episodes in Block One are written by Whithouse. We know that Block One is episodes 3 and 4 from DWM. Therefore Toby Whithouse is writing episodes 3 and 4. Is there something that I've missed or does this make complete sense? --86.134.246.132 (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

@86.134.246.132: sorry, it doesn't work that way - that's synthesis. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 17:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Alright I suppose this does make sense, thanks. Although surely both things cancel each other out? By this WP:SYNTH thing we can have either piece of information in the production box. It would still be correct if Whithouse, O'Hara and Ritchie were included in the Block 1 row without the note of "Episode 3 and 4", and yet it would still be correct if the info was reversed (i.e if "Episode 3 and 4" were listed without mentioning the production staff) as it is at this current moment in time. --86.134.246.132 (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_with_fraudulent_diplomas

In ref to recent deletion of yours. Just prerspective. --Bep (talk) 01:33, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Well, it's fairly well sourced, in comparison to your article. And going around Wikipedia drawing comparisons to your article won't bring it back. (P.S. — it wasn't really "my" deletion — the whole purpose of AfD is to let the community weight in.) G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	You're quite prolific with your templates today, thank you! It's a housekeeping item that many have missed. Your efforts are appreciated. Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 21:44, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

I just noticed you moved Zaheer (The Legend of Korra) to Zaheer, but I couldn't find a link to any sort of discussion. Was there something I missed? Luthien22 (talk) 22:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

@Luthien22: nope. I didn't think the move was controversial. Since there isn't anything/anyone else called Zaheer, the disambiguation was unnecessary. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

@G S Palmer: I thought originally the page name Zaheer went to some Budhist monk instead of the LOK page? (Maybe I'm misremembering?) Luthien22 (talk) 15:09, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

@Luthien22: It doesn't appear so - the page didn't exist before I moved the article to that title, and it had only been deleted once, back in 2009 (log), before LOK was first broadcast. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 15:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

@G S Palmer: Okey dokey. Luthien22 (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks G. Capo (talk) 22:51, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sundicators, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UVA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

On 24 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Cunningham (architect), which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that one of John Cunningham's buildings was featured in the BBC television series Restoration? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Cunningham (architect). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 02:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi GSP! Just dropping in from vacation since I got feedback on the Cashel pic(s) I wanted to use. The one thats there currently may not be PD, despite the date it was taken. See User_talk:Moonriddengirl#Image_Copyright_Question for more. Perhaps its best to remove it until the copyright issue is sorted? I'd hate for a violation to be on the main page, even inadvertently. Thanks! Crow^Caw 02:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

@Crow: sure thing. If you wanted, you could replace it with this picture, cropped from the wanted poster, making it definitely PD. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 12:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Since you participated in the discussion at WT:Wikiproject Doctor Who, you may wish to post at Talk:Doctor#Proposed redirect. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 04:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks. I'll try to weight in at some point. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoosier cavefish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cave fish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 14:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

On 29 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Emilio Madero, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Emilio Madero saved Pancho Villa from execution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Emilio Madero. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boston Society for Medical Improvement you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rationalobserver -- Rationalobserver (talk) 19:41, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Moffatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Moffatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardOSmith (talk • contribs) 19:23, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks RichardOSmith, I have !voted there. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 00:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Boston Society for Medical Improvement you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boston Society for Medical Improvement for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rationalobserver -- Rationalobserver (talk) 17:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judith Grimes (The Walking Dead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shane Walsh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

 Fixed. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 22:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

On 13 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hoosier cavefish, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Hoosier cavefish has an anus behind its head? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hoosier cavefish. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello there.

I am a new WikiMafia, but I have already decided to stop, since I realize to help Is better.

I Created a fake page please remove it. I will not troll anymore.

I am sorry, and please dont ban me.

FranceLordiusMaz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FranceLordiusMaz (talk • contribs) 21:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

@FranceLordiusMaz: the page will be deleted shortly by an administrator as long as the speedy deletion tag isn't removed.

Creating one hoax article isn't enough for a ban or a block, so don't worry about it. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 21:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Why on earth did you delete a page I spent time crating without even taking the time of investigating that it was about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandrujuncu (talk • contribs) 08:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

There are way to many trolls trying to argue against policy. Keep them separate to avoid messes. 172.56.8.170 (talk) 16:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I would avoid calling the commentators in those sections trolls, if I were you, per WP:NPA. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:33, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I have combined the three sections into one, as they are all emanating from the busybody IP, and once he's blocked the sections can be closed all at once. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 16:43, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks: you beat me to it, Baseball Bugs. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

On 27 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Telmatobius ventriflavum, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Telmatobius ventriflavum. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 12:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

I am trying to post a message, but everytime I look at it there's someone else's post mixed with it. I'm not sure what is going on. BeginnerW (talk) 16:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

@BeginnerW: I think I see what the problem was. If I'm understanding you, I think this edit of mine may have fixed the problem. Does it? G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:36, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

It is a huge sockpuppet report-but I have no clue who started it is the problem. But I also tagged Dao Ranaldo as well. Wgolf (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

@Wgolf: I noticed that a few similar pages had been G5ed, but I figured it would be simpler to just tag for A7, since I didn't really feel like making a SPI report. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 02:23, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi GS Palmer. I understand that my recent entry on Ibrahim Halawa has been deleted due to the article being unsuitable. I only started the article today and that is why I was so short and not up to standards. Ive already contacted the facebook group for Ibrahim to try and get more volunteers to help create the article in more detail. I think that him and his case are noteworthy enough to deserve a Wikipedia entry. His case is related to the "Al Jazeera 3" journalist who where in prison in Egypt, although he is not one of those 3. One of those 3, which he shared a cell with, Peter Greste, already has his own entry. This case has already been covered by major UK news outlets such as; the BCC http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31155557 The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2015/jan/02/why-a-retrial-could-be-the-best-outcome-for-the-al-jazeera-three The Independent http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/ibrahim-halawa-irish-teenager-faces-execution-in-egypt-after-attending-prodemocracy-rally-10081009.html Channel 4 News http://blogs.channel4.com/alex-thomsons-view/fears-irish-teenager-ibrahim-halawa-bars-egypt/9311 And Irelands paper of record The Irish Times http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/africa/peter-greste-deportation-renews-hope-for-ibrahim-halawa-1.2087470 as well as the Irish state broadcaster RTÉ http://www.rte.ie/news/2015/0426/696814-ibrahim-halawa/ and the Amnesty International campaign which I linked to in the article http://www.amnesty.ie/content/egypt-court-try-494-people-over-protests I think the national broadcaster of two countries pull several major newspapers, a direct connection to a widely cover international event and an Amnesty International campaign qualifies as a person of note. If there is no other reason not to can I go ahead and reactivate the article and begin work on it or would you prefer that I, and other volunteers, start work on it in my sandbox until it is more up to standards? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultan42 (talk • contribs) 06:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Ultan42: The issue here is not a lack of coverage, as you have clearly demonstrated, but rather something else. The real problem (in my eyes) is that he is notable only for a single event. In cases such as this, it is usually preferable not to have a Wikipedia article on the subject. However, if you still want to make an article about him, then you should definitely begin by drafting in your sandbox, and then submit the draft for review via the articles for creation process. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

This is an archive of past discussions with User:G S Palmer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.