User talk:Fun81

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Moravsky, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Moravsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, The Floor (Australian Game Show), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:35, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Floor (Australian Game Show). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 05:36, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CF-501 Falcon was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

More citations are needed, mostly from independent sources. If you could find articles that talk about the show that would be great.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Floor (Australian Game Show) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 01:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot sucker.... because nothing is ever reliable enough hereeeeee Fun81 (talk) 00:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fun81, While I don't appreciate being called a "sucker", I understand your frustration. However verifiability is one of the core principals of Wikipedia.

The biggest problem I see is the Format and Duels sections are completely lacking references. Additionally, for the Duels section see WP:NOTSTAT, while the winners can be included over detail with no sources is bad. Best, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 01:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fun81! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 01:21, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the American page and tell me how it's any different. Fun81 (talk) 21:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are 56 references, with multiple references in the season tables compared to 9. If you feel like my decline is unreasonable, you can resubmit it. I won't review it again. Also please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Best, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 00:22, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Over half of those come from ratings. Fun81 (talk) 23:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]