User talk:Frap/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Frap. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

An article that you have been involved in editing, Goldmember, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldmember. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:FileZilla icon.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

I reverted your addition to weight training - the strength training article has the basic principles of hypertrophy and muscle strength and endurance increases, and also has a terminology section. Basic principles should go there, having a terminology section in the WT article creates a need for a discussion of the principles and common modes of weight training, leading to a huge duplication of content between ST and WT which isn't really needed. WT should have information specific to gravity-based training while ST covers all aspects that are common to weight training, isometric training, resistance training, bodybuilding, powerlifting, etc.

Also, your talk page is pretty long, have you considered archiving? Long pages take longer to load up for people on slow servers. If you paste the following onto your page, it'll archive automatically anything older than 7 days. Very convenient. Paste it at the very top of the page (without the nowiki tags) and it'll take care of everything for you. WLU (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

{{User:MiszaBot/config|maxarchivesize = 250K|counter = 1|algo = old(7d)|archive = User talk:Frap/Archive %(counter)d}}

Thank you for uploading Image:MRU.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

An editor has nominated List of computer hardware manufacturers, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of computer hardware manufacturers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Examplewebsite.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Any particular reason you added a link to freenode's #gnome rather than gimpnet's? Marnanel (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BFQ, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Budget_Fair_Queuing_IO_Scheduler. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Zypper, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wikieditor 222    22:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I've removed the tag, as it's clearly not patent nonsense. Wikieditor: please contact me if you have any questions. --Rory096 22:46, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Frap,

I've seen you've started an article on Phoronix Test Suite. I'd like to ask you'd want to start an article on Inquisitor, a hardware testing platform that has the similar structure as Phoronix has, but different aims: it aims to do hardware stress testing. Also, it's somewhat more mature than Phoronix's and would release final version 3.0 soon. Would this project qualify for an article in Wikipedia? --GreyCat (talk) 23:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Virtual girlfriend, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual girlfriend. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ——Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Wanna know my story?}/ _{Share yours with me!} 23:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

The article Blacknet has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Harrop mark, you will be blocked from editing. Vandalizing user pages is still vandalism. Quadrius^Contribs 14:58, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but you're mistaken. I did page blank an userpage, but it was not vandalizing. -- Frap (talk) 15:07, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for my clumsy editing. Not vandalism-- just a mistake. Sorry.--GreenSpigot (talk) 04:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I would like to know how the notability of MOHA Chat can be established. IMHO, MOHA Chat is a notable open source chat application written in PHP. Mohanjith (talk) 16:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

FYI, the project has been around since January, 2007. See Sourceforge stats for MOHA Chat. It has more than 23,000 downloads. You are correct about low number of Google hits. Do you still think the project is not notable? Thank you for your time. Mohanjith (talk) 17:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I have removed the notability tag. Mohanjith (talk) 18:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:FileZilla icon.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

You added valuable information to the article California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. In it you use two references, "Eskridge" and "Shilts". Could you please add some more information about them, like title, ISBN, publisher. Perhaps consider using the cite book template. Debresser (talk) 12:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I don't have them. I copied it from the article Black_Cat_Bar#Police_harassment. -- Frap (talk) 13:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

That's enough information for me. I'll fix it. Thanks. Debresser (talk) 13:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Comparison of CPU architectures, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

To little context to make article usable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 16:58, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Just so you know for the future, if you have an article that correctly starts with a lowercase letter you can force the software to display the title as such by adding {{lowercase}} to the top of the article. Hope this helps. ~ mazca ^t|c 20:55, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stjerm, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable software

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jfire (talk) 05:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article OFono, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unremarkable software product.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bonewah (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

The Hercules project considers itself open source, not free software. Please discuss on the article's talk page before adding anything relating to free software to the article. Thanks. -- Jay Maynard (talk) 13:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article POHMELFS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Does not indicate encyclopedic notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-04t09:18z 09:18, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated POHMELFS, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POHMELFS (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-05t20:19z 20:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

The article IOzone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pontificalibus (talk) 12:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

I've removed the prod template from this article. It certainly seems notable to me and I've added a few sources to get someone started. --Tothwolf (talk) 14:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Right, that was typo, sorry. Fixed. Trasz (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC).

I have nominated Spacewalk (software), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spacewalk (software). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hostmask. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hostmask. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

As the history for this template suggests, the image was removed after deliberation. Indeed, you should have been aware of this, as you've made this edit and been reverted for it previously. Please don't add this image to any more FOSS templates. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to check the edit history. I've also totally forgotten about having made such an edit prior, as I make too many edits for my poor memory to remember. -- Frap (talk)

Hi, please confirm here that you are the user who is requesting an usurpation on it.wiki. Bye! --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 15:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I confirm. -- Frap (talk)

it.wiki username Frap is now available for your global account. Ciao, Ary29 (talk) 06:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, linking to a disamb article is not good, but linking to the wrong one is worse. --79.136.120.5 (talk) 20:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated VoltDB, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VoltDB. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Timneu22 · talk 15:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated GNUFI, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNUFI. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated List of computer standards, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of computer standards. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Todd Vierling (talk) 16:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure you meant well, but User:Jeh/3GB_Barrier is a work page, or draft, of mine. It is not meant for public editing. If you had a suggestion you should have put a note on my primary talk page.

Yes, I feel that this applies even to such trivial changes as the ones you made. No harm done here, but the whole point of user-specific work pages is that the user can work on them free of any possibility of conflicting edits. Thank you for your understanding. Jeh (talk) 10:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Alright. You can keep your article private/secret by having the category commented out. -- Frap (talk) 10:30, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Dermalogica requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. elektrikSHOOS 17:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Do you use a Mono version of AWB in Linux? -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

No, I do not. I was curious about it, so I downloaded it, ran the binary, it crashed on start up. ---- Frap (talk) 14:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

So the bug occurred in the Mono version of AWB that you tried to use in Windows? -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

The bug occurred on Ubuntu 10.04 with Wine 1.2 with Mono 2.6. -- Frap (talk) 14:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

A discussion has begun about whether the article CloudStack, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CloudStack until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 00:35, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Can you share your thoughts regarding the infobox? Okay, I put it there and I'm a newbie and still trying to learn how to do things right, so maybe it was just dumb in the first place. Do you have pointers to the guidelines on pictures like that? Personally, I'm quite visual and find that a well thought-out picture helps me take in information, e.g., in this case, the very basic context of character windows on a desktop where you type commands. Are you open to reconsidering? Msnicki (talk) 00:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

The Infobox_software template is for articles about software applications, i.e. implementations. Unix shells is not a software, but a type of software. I agree that images are good for articles and find that well thought-out images helps me take in information. The software_infobox template is unsuitable. But adding just the image might be appropriate. However, even then the screenshot will be of the terminal emulator, and not so much of a Unix shell. -- Frap (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

I think you are right about the kind of box; that's a good suggestion and I'll fix that, if that would work for you. But did you look at the image close-up? I tried to show (and point out in the comment) the differing styles of tcsh and sh, not just several windows with junk in them. I tried to put some thought into it. Please take another look and let me know what you think. Regards, Msnicki (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

It is a good intention to show and point out the differing styles. Since the Aqua interface in Mac OS X is copyrighted/proprietary/owned, it might be more suitable to take such a screenshot in a free environment. (Wikipedia:Copyrights, Wikipedia:Non-free content) -- Frap (talk) 03:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

If you're up for creating one, no objections, but this one already exists and it comes with a rationale that should be acceptable. I first used it on the C shell page, where I actually go into detail on the examples it shows. If you're okay on this, I'll restore the image but with just a file box with a thumbnail, not an infobox. Does that work for you? Msnicki (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good. Do so. -- Frap (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. This was very pleasant. You were right. The infobox wasn't the best way to do it. Cheers! Msnicki (talk) 04:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Scene description language, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/55/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3351&pf=1.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

The article EXOFS is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXOFS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pnm (talk) 04:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Acalamari 15:45, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I see that you tagged Category:3D Scenegraph APIs for renaming, but never nominate it at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 December 27. The tag has been removed. If you still want it renamed, feel free to tag it with a {{subst:cfr|3D scenegraph APIs}}, and add a nomination for it at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 7. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Frap (talk) 12:40, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I've just reverted your move of Machine-to-Machine to Machine-to-machine because the capitalisation is common usage. I've noticed several other edits you'd made recently, mostly involving hyphenation, where you've departed from common usage. Please check carefully before making such changes. andy (talk) 09:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

I followed WP:MOS#Article_titles which says that words in article titles should not be capitalized. Also used same naming convention as in Peer-to-peer and Friend-to-friend. -- Frap (talk) 09:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

• It's not as simple as that. Wikipedia:Article_titles states: "The initial letter of a title is almost always capitalized; subsequent words in a title are not, unless they are part of a proper name, and so would be capitalized in running text". Proper noun explains that "capitalizing common nouns is considered formally incorrect outside of sentence-initial or title case contexts". Since the conventional abbreviation is M2M I think this counts as a legitimate use of title case. andy (talk) 09:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Well the conventional abbreviation of peer-to-peer is P2P (not P2p or p2p), yet its peer-to-peer, not Peer-to-Peer. -- Frap (talk) 10:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing the headings! I wrote that a long time ago when I was a newbie!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I see that you moved Electrically powered spacecraft propulsion to "Electrically-powered spacecraft propulsion" in February. WP:HYPHEN states that "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb", and this is in accordance with the great majority of published style guides. I have moved the article hack to its unhyphenated title. There were 56 links to the hyphenated title, and 112 links to the unhyphenated title (exactly twice as many). I hope this doesn't rock your boat too much. Happy editing! Chris the speller ^yack 16:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

As far as I am concerned WP:MOS (WP:HYPHEN) should be followed (as was and is my intention), but it seems I might have made a mistake. I don't know which title is correct, but if i was in error, then thanks for fixing it. Amount of links is irrelevant to me, I just want it to be correct. -- Frap (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

I tried clicking on the two external links that you added... but my browser doesn't seem to do anything with them... it just gives a blank screen for me. Do you have any thoughts on what can be done (either at the Wikipedia article end, or else to my browser) to get it to work? Thanks in advance for any thoughts. TheAMmollusc (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

The links works fine for me in Chromium and Firefox (without addons) for me. But I noticed that the links does not work for me when using NoScript/AdBlock extension. -- Frap (talk) 14:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Frap. How do you do?

It seems you are on crusade to change every instance of x64 to x86-64. I do not mind your doing it; though I feel this is just a color of the bike shed issue. However, I just advise you not to do it: Soon, someone will propose that x86-64 is not in use at all but x64 is wide use, so the article should be renamed x64.

Fleet Command (talk) 10:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

It would be nice if you could make a quad-core image of File:Dual Core Generic.svg for the multi-core processor article. -- Frap (talk) 13:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure what that would add -- it would be the same diagram with four cpus and caches instead of 2. I think that the two core diagram illustrates the concept more clearly. Dennis (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

There are many ways to quad-core. Example one die with 4 cores or 2 dies with 2 cores. -- Frap (talk) 22:11, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi Frap, do you think you could use edit summaries more of the time? A simple c/e (copy edit) would do for edits like this - it only takes a second but saves others time as they won't have to bother checking the diff. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 19:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

I try to, but sometimes I slip... -- Frap (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The article Boot image has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced inhabitant of the zoo consisting of disk and partition stubs

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 89.204.153.138 (talk) 00:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Likewise Open is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Likewise Open until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 23:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

The article Bootchart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software. No independent references. Tagged for notability since November 2008.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi. Letting you know that Web app has been nominated for deletion (or redirection to Web application) because the contents attempt to duplicate the already existing and industry-accepted term Rich Internet application. Please share your thoughts here:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Web_app -Object404 (talk) 02:20, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

The article Infosuicide has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sign so far of "reliable sources" using this neologism; see also Wikipedia:NOTNEO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CWC 12:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Are you aware of List of vegetable oils? Waitak (talk) 04:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

I am unsure if I were aware of that article when I created the article as it was quite awhile ago. The article I created deals specially with seed oils. Not all vegetable oils are seed oils, however the article could be merged into the vegetable oils article under its own header. -- Frap (talk) 17:21, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure how well it would work to put it under its own header. The majority of the oils in the list are seed oils, after all. I haven't counted the number of entries, but I'm sure there are well over 100 there. All of the ones in seed oils are already in list of vegetable oils. Waitak (talk) 17:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, when I created the article I wanted to explicitly collect all seed oils into one place. Frap (talk) 18:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Sure, that's a perfectly reasonable thing to do. Sorry, didn't mean that to come across as a criticism. Waitak (talk) 18:39, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to explain why I reverted your changes to List of vegetable oils. In short:

• All of the oils that you added are already in the list, with comprehensive entries and references.
• Many if not most of the other entries in List of vegetable oils are seed oils. Having a separate section for a small selection of seed oils isn't needed.
• The organizing principle for the article, as stated in the lead-in, is by use. Having a separate section for just seed oils, particularly when so many of the other oils that are categorized by use are also seed oils, doesn't work with the way the article is currently organized.

Waitak (talk) 18:26, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

A quick addendum: Eyeballing the list, 88 of the approximately 125 existing entries in the list are seed oils. Waitak (talk) 18:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I don't know if you're the principle author of the Open Source Business Models article, but you have certainly contributed extensively. I'm in a similar situation with a related article "Commercial Open Source Applications," and it *might* be worth the effort to merge the two.

I don't have a lot of time to put into this, but if you think it's a good idea please contact me at davofanmail at the comcast.net domain.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davodavo (talk • contribs) 21:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Differentiated services, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IP header (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Please note that Wikipedia's style specifies: "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary) unless part of a larger compound (a slowly-but-surely strategy)." See WP:HYPHEN, sub-subsection 3, bullet point 4. Please do not carry out wholesale addition of hyphens in such cases. Chris the speller ^yack 15:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Admittedly, I am not always sure when to use a hyphen and not to. -- Frap (talk) 16:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Then it would be fine to take your best shot at hyphenation in material that you add, but it's probably better to leave the hyphenation alone in existing text unless you feel that you understand Wikipedia's style. Happy editing! Chris the speller ^yack 14:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello Frap, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Owl (software), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You cannot CSD an article because it is a conflict of interest. You may but tags on the article, but you can't nominate it for speedy deletion for that reason. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Electric Catfish 22:04, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I've completed your nomination of the Citizens of Humanity article. The debate may be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizens of Humanity, and I've added it to the AFD log. The only rationale I could find was your edit summary that read, in its entirety, "Advertisement". Good enough as far as it goes, but it might be helpful if you could comment at the AFD and expand your reasoning. You might want to highlight not only the flaws of the article, but why they are not repairable through editing. Lack of sources, notability, that sort of thing. Please let me know if I can be of assistance. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 15:01, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello Frap. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Promise Technology, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Promise Technology) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 14:50, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

You enter the references wrong in Samarium hexaboride. {{cite arxiv}} has no url= parameter, also the eprint parameter does not include cond-mat, it is just the number. I fixed it, that way the bots can fill in the rest.

I copied the text snippet from the Samarium article. But I see you fixed that, thanks. :) -- Frap (talk) 12:13, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Frap. I noticed from your userboxen that you're interested in programming. I thought you might want to know that the Wikimedia open source community welcomes you to get developer access so you can contribute code, critique others' commits, and generally get a better sense of how this place works on a technical level.

Also, the Wikimedia Foundation is hiring programmers, in case you know anyone who's looking. Remote work is often feasible.

Best, Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager (talk) 05:55, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Hey Frap,

Could you explain why the neutrality of the Overview section of the Article on MediaTek is disputed? In particular, I would like to know what is it that you find that is not conforming to Wikipedia's policy on Neutrality.

Thanks, S.Prasanna Venkatesh (talk) 03:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

I assume you are an employee of MediaTek, so you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia in the first place as it is a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is not for PR or marketing. Articles should follow an encyclopedic tone, and MediaTek does not. It reads like an advertisement. Articles should be written in a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, MediaTek is not. Phrases such as "market leader and a pioneer in cutting-edge SoC system" and "tender offer" is a give away. Articles which does not adhere to the principles of Wikipedia risk being deleted. -- Frap (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments. I am not an employee of that Company, but do work in a company that does business with MediaTek indirectly. The phrases you have mentioned are from the Company's Website--> may be they do sound like a PR campaign..But the tender offer is not something that I had edited.

Of course, I totally acknowledge the fact that articles should be neutral, given the fact I myself am a heavy user of Wikipedia and I would definitely agree that this article should be neutral as well, given the fact that I don't have any personal interest in this company. Would deleting these words make this article a better one that conforms to Wiki's standards? This is my first contribution to Wikipedia and I chose to write about MediaTek because there was hardly any info on that Company and your guidance will help me become a better contributor.

Thanks, S.Prasanna Venkatesh (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Well, I suggest you read WP:NPOV and Wikipedia:Writing better articles, and also Wikipedia:Avoid_peacock_terms#Puffery. -- Frap (talk) 20:46, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Oh, and don't write stuff like "provides innovative chip integration system solutions". -- Frap (talk) 21:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Just enough operating system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello Frap, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Eloquera to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Legoktm (talk) 09:03, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello Frap, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Eloquera database to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Legoktm (talk) 09:04, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Frap (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Hair serum, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Hair serum" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kyoto Cabinet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nspluginwrapper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nspluginwrapper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Psychonaut (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Business models for open-source software, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plugin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks friendly bot! I've rectified this mistake! -- Frap (talk) 11:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VMware Workstation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Frap. I have recently nominated Oil cleansing method, an article on which you have worked, for deletion. I request your input here. Thanks! - Sweet Nightmares 05:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Your upload of File:AQuoSA.svg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bit-perfect is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bit-perfect until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Львівське (говорити) 20:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Return early has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 89.204.135.221 (talk) 02:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Tekram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to have evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 23:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of exorcists may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Joseph de Tonquedec]] (1868–1962))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article POHMELFS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/POHMELFS (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Frap, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of computer hardware manufacturers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SilverStone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

The article FleetDB has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

The article SMAU has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:NOTABILITY; has been tagged for notability for over six years and its Italian version is also tagged for lack of reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Micromax Mobile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tablet. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

The article Nspluginwrapper has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sign of notability for this software.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nspluginwrapper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nspluginwrapper (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 09:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Areca (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Areca (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lakun.patra (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, can you update SVG? see your File_talk:Blackbox.svg --Krauss (talk) 22:14, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

I generated the image using Graphviz, the source code for the image is attached in the file info. I seldom use Graphviz, so I don't know if it is possible to make 3D shapes, or how to attach the words 'stimulus' and 'response' under the lines. -- Frap (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article AJAX.OOP) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. ansh666 06:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Coreboot logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Drum kit illustration edit.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CAIF is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAIF until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 16:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on GA.MA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SwisterTwister talk 08:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on SMC Networks, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SwisterTwister talk 18:01, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

The article Chieftec has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Tagged for notability since June 2009.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~Kvng (talk) 04:50, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

In this edit you changed a cat, leaving it with a cat suggesting it is free. Open-source does not necessarily mean free, and this software does not appear to be free. Am I missing something?--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:24, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

"Free" here refers to free software which is free as in freedom, not as in free beer. The license of the software is the GNU General Public License (GPL) which is a free software license. -- Frap (talk) 20:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I guarantee that others will read it differently, so I wish there were a better term, to avoid confusion.--S Philbrick(Talk) 23:00, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chieftec is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chieftec until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savonneux (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The article Hair serum has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 20:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PhysicsFS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhysicsFS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WubTheCaptain (talk • contribs) 15:35, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

The article Hair serum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no indication that the subject exists as such.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 18:29, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hair serum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hair serum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adam9007 (talk) 21:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Frap. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, you have previously contributed to the article Solidity. An editor has nominated Solidity to be merged with Ethereum. If you would like to comment, please visit the Solidity talk page discussion located at Talk:Solidity. Your comments are welcome. Thank you Jtbobwaysf (talk) 15:56, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Frap,

I read your contribution on the LSM-Tree page. We are working on a survey and reflection paper of the LSM-Tree after 30 years of its introduction. We are reviewing the various implementations and interacting with the corresponding engineers that applied this algorithm in their systems including Google, Facebook, Oracle, RocksDB and others. We like the comments you made on the Wiki article and wonder if we can send you a few questions and learn from your insights. Thank you in advance for your help.

Edwardgem (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Supermicro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   19:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

I know you are the creator of Comparison of instruction set architectures, I made some changes to it, would you please give some suggestions? Thank you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.53.114.7 (talk) 11:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Janagewen, and note the remarks in WP:EVASION regarding making edits on behalf of blocked users. Thanks. Murph9000 (talk) 12:03, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

The article Compressed magnetic flux generator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mz7 (talk) 07:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Frap. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Splashtop Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ Splashtop Remote (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Djm-leighpark (talk) 06:13, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Frap. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

I noticed you've done some work on AccessApps. I'm just letting you know that I've proposed that this article be deleted.CircleGirl (talk) 03:08, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S+core is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S+core until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 99Electrons (talk) 06:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Shell Icon Overlay Identifiers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dropbox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Berberine. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 13:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

I did and do not consider it an inappropriate link. The link is to an article that provides factual information along with cited sources. The article is of high quality and of encyclopedia value. Oh, and with your "rv interference with categories" you removed two categories, but I did not add any categories, I just sorted them alphabetically. -- Frap (talk) 16:16, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

That link and author are not a WP:SECONDARY source, make exaggerated false health claims or inferences, and nowhere near qualify as WP:MEDRS. Be skeptical about blogs by "Dr" somebody, who almost always is not an accurate encyclopedic source. See WP:WHYMEDRS. Zefr (talk) 17:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Frap for reviewing my Genozip article. I wrote the article and I am the author of Genozip, an open source project I developed as part of a PhD. I duly declared a Conflict of Interest, and wrote the article closely following the rules and restrictions detailed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Plain_and_simple_conflict_of_interest_guide . The article was reviewed and approved by a Wikipedia reviewer here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DoubleGrazing . Please kindly consider removing the template messages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Divon lan (talk • contribs) 10:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't think it is notable, it only existed since last year, only have one contributor. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for things notable, not for people to promote their own products. Genozip is not open source software, it is proprietary commercial software where the source code is available. The Open Source Initiative (OSI), Free Software Foundation (FSF) and the Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) do not consider it as open source. It is not open source according to the The Open Source Definition. --Frap (talk) 10:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The article Arn – The Kingdom at Road's End has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:07, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://doomwiki.org/wiki/John_Romero, which is not released under a compatible license. CC BY-SA 4.0 International is not a compatible license. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 14:08, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

I did not get the article from the DoomWiki, I wrote it down from the YouTube video. The original content is from an interview with GameSpy at https://web.archive.org/web/20080830035843/http://archive.gamespy.com/articles/december03/doom/romero/index.shtml -- Frap (talk)

Right. That page is also copyright. "Copyright 1996-2009, IGN Entertainment, Inc." So we're not allowed to copy from there either.— Diannaa (talk) 16:09, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Would it be fair use to put the contents in a {{Quote|...}} template and cite him as the author? -- Frap (talk) 11:19, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Quotations should be used only when absolutely necessary. Is there any way you can put it in your own words instead?— Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Necroplasm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necroplasm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Jontesta (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Template:Latest stable software release/Ardour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SQL compliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQL compliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Promise Technology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promise Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

331dot (talk) 08:36, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Good page, good sir, good page

Professor Information (talk) 00:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veejay (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veejay (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Card enclosure is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Card enclosure until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 18:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

The article CPU shim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

did a quick search and could not find many cites apart from adverts

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! I noticed you created this page in the main space without any references. It’d be great if you can add references when you create a new article since everything needs to be verifiable. NM 23:31, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

The article Integrated fluidic circuit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not wiktionary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Merge window is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merge window until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ZimZalaBim ^talk 14:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

The article Scene description language has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can’t find any sources that discuss more than one scene description language in-depth, so this fails WP: NLIST.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scene description language is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scene description language until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HyperAccelerated (talk) 13:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

I don't appreciate this COI tag off Cangjie programming language. It's a unfair tag, as I have brush up the content for more neutrality tone. Poppodoms (talk) 14:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

I don't appreciate this label as a wiki contributor, please remove it. I do research as a enthusiast, not even connected to Huawei nor have relations with the corporation itself. Remove it or else, I will get other wiki mods challenge it. Thank you. You have within 24 hours to respond

Poppodoms (talk) 14:56, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

it has been resolved. 87.75.41.208 (talk) 15:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

thank you very much. I don't get "payment" from any org, I do my independent research. The discrimination and racism needs to stop Poppodoms (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ThorVG, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Compatibility.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deterministic simulation testing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deterministic simulation testing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StereoFolic (talk) 01:38, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Database seeding, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database seeding until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello Frap, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Open4D, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Notability is not a valid CSD criterion. Use WP:AFD if you think it needs deletion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 20:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, BitCraft Online, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraxmoira was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BitCraft Online and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Some parts of the article are unsourced. Adding sources and including one more indepth review from a reliable source can help establish notability. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Frap! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:46, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vrxces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hey, some constructive advice - the approach taken to BitCraft Online is not ideal and is improperly sourced to create the illusion of a well-sourced article. Each sentence is a short snippet copypasted verbatim from a random part of a different source. There's no synthesis or summary of sources at all. Many of the sentences don't really describe the subject matter, focusing on unclear or inessential parts of their source - such as talking about "write-ahead logging", or what other games reviewers compared it to. It has the appearance of churning these sources into gAI to ask for a key point and stringing that together into an article. I really appreciate you have done some work here but you need to be able to properly describe the content of the game and its reception to substantiate notability and create encyclopedic sourcing. Check out the manual of style for pointers.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BitCraft Online and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I come cross you recently framed Vastav AI with valid changes, can you again check if everything is fine?

Also you supports free open source stuffs , really great 👍🏻

Thank you. Ismadexbypeople (talk) 07:58, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

(Article speedied, user GLOCKed) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Boeing F-47. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 22:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

I noticed your edit on Boeing F-47. In your edit, you wrote "Boeing F-47 Trumpster" yet no secondary sources called it that and you didn't cite a source (you don't really need one in the lead). May you explain where you got this name from? Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 22:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello there @Frap!. I saw your recent contributions to the first article I created MakeCode, and I wanna say thank you! Also, I found out that you and I are basically interested in the same subject, technology and computing. Would you mind becoming a wikifriend with me? Vinizex94 (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Sure! Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for creating articles and improving Wikipedia! I noticed that one of the GitHub link points a 404 though. -- Frap (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the warm welcome, User:Frap. Glad to connect with a fellow tech enthusiast here. 🙌

Ah—got it now. When you mentioned the GitHub link returning a 404, you meant it's pointing to a non-existent or broken page. I’ll take a look and fix it or replace it with a working link if I can find one. Appreciate you catching that!

And yes, I’d be happy to be wikifriends—always great to build with others who love tech and computing too. See you around the namespace! Vinizex94 (talk) 12:56, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you sincerely for your contributions! :) x RozuRozu • teacups 20:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

You've been working so hard. Here, pet this cute fella'

Vinizex94🌍 06:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! Frap (talk) 11:41, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Frap! Your additions to MoonBit (programming language) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

• Note - I messed up. The above message is totally not applicable. -- Whpq (talk) 21:34, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

I think there has been a misunderstanding. I didn't create the MoonBit article, but I did edit the article but my edits had little to do with text of the article and more to do with infobox, categories, formatting, style, portals, templates, etc. Frap (talk) 21:17, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Oops. You are right. I misread the history. I apologize for my mistake. -- Whpq (talk) 21:33, 13 June 2025 (UTC)