User talk:Flod logic

Nice job translating Tokke (lake). I edited it for style. There were almost no actual errors in translation, but the writing was a little too subjective in places. I replaced words like "we" and "you," and changed a couple words that were a little too poetic for Wikipedia standards.

You are a very valuable Wikipedia member. Particularly interested in workers' history? Keep up the good work. Punkmorten 22:39, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I proofread both of these and made some copyedit changes to the first. Thank you very, very much for translating these! -Yupik 08:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been proposed for deletion (by another editor).You're the last person to work on it. In practice, it will surely be deleted unless you can add some sources, such as newspaper articles about his work or reviews. Since he has presented works to the King, there must be news stories. It doesnt matter for the moment if they are in Norwegian. If you can add a source or two, please feel free to remove the proposed deletion tag. DGG 02:51, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fri Flyt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hoppyginko (talk) 22:09, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated History of disruptive technology within communications, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of disruptive technology within communications. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ZimZalaBim ^talk 05:19, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stine Mari Langstrand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rettetast (talk) 14:14, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Flod logic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 250 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Petter Schjerven - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	I noticed you making the edits to the Division of Labour article to keep the spelling style consistent. Just wanted to say thanks for your efforts; that's not something I would've caught, and looking at previous versions, the inconsistencies would've bugged me! EducatedRedneck (talk) 18:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Pingstmissionens Utvecklingssamarbete, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:45, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Agnes Beckdal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you applied the lang template to many proper names, is this now policy? It seems to me that this should only be true if, for example, a place name has a different form in English vs.the native language, such as Cologne/Köln. Peter Flass (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I could be wrong but am under the impression that foreign words and at least proper names like Magdalenenkapelle, Hospitalstiftung, etc. should be tagged so screen readers can pronounce them correctly and any foreign characters can be correctly displayed. I had applied it to Basonevillare since it was defined afterwards like a foreign word, and the following few names since they were used as words in an example. Looking at it again, it probably makes more sense to leave the template off the city names, so I removed those tags. Thanks for letting me know. Still learning! flod logic (talk) 09:02, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You raise a good point about pronunciation. Peter Flass (talk) 14:36, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whenever I check the Moss page history, I can see your work. Thanks for all the typo fixing! Rusalkii (talk) 21:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pingstmissionens Utvecklingssamarbete, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating Carl Ploug.

User:Kavyansh.Singh, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, nice work with Carl Ploug article, but I see that it is mostly cited to just one book. If possible, try to add more sources/citations. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kavyansh.Singh}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pingstmissionens Utvecklingssamarbete".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agnes Beckdal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating the article on city physicians, a much needed addition of great quality! Yakikaki (talk) 12:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flod logic. I noticed your question on the welding article. The source only says Grison as the language. I added Swiss just to let the reader know where in the world we're talking about. However, all the languages the source uses are ancient, so it's most likely Raetic or possibly Celtic; something pre-Romansh. I hope that helps. Zaereth (talk) 09:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just tagged it as miscellaneous and put an invisible comment after it in case someone comes up with something more specific down the line. Thanks! flod logic (talk) 09:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flod logic! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Pimecrolimus, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

regarding this edit - I suggest that single quotes are not appropriate, because those usages are not simple glosses as mentioned in MOS:DOUBLE and described in Gloss_(annotation)#In_linguistics. The are not simple inline translations, per the examples in Gloss_(annotation) - they are either fully described in text ("The name is derived from the word jarrak, which means 'language' in Kija") or standalone table entries, so ought be in double quotes or no quotes at all. Mitch Ames (talk) 02:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I see now that it makes sense to take them out of the table since it's not running text. Like SMcCandlish here, though, I'm under the impression that "'Simple glosses' just means 'as distinguished from interlinear glosses' (gloss tables)" (whether fully described like your example, or like jarrak 'language'), so should be used in all cases in running text. Unfortunately, it doesn't look like "simple gloss" is actually defined in the MOS. flod logic (talk) 10:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DOUBLE links "Simple glosses" to Gloss (annotation)#In linguistics, so I think we can reasonably assume that the examples in that section of the article denote the intended meaning. In any case Gloss (annotation) defines a gloss as "a brief notation" - which is not the same as text that is an intrinsic part of the sentence, like "which means 'language' in Kija". In this case I expect a simple gloss would be:

The name is derived from the word jarrak 'language'.

Mitch Ames (talk) 13:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating Läsare.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating Nordic Bible Museum.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating Nyevangelism.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:30, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating George Scott (missionary).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the good article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating Maranata movement.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Flod logic, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating Peter Lorenz Sellergren.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic

Thank you for creating Conventicle Act (Denmark–Norway).

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 23:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I’m sorry, but the sourcing here isn’t helping the subject meet our General Notability Guidelines. All the sources here are primary and/or only mention the subject in passing.

We need *significant* in-depth coverage (that is independent of the subject - meaning no promotional pieces, government websites, event websites, social media, press releases, paid coverage) in notable major media outlets or by notable publishers about Rune Arnhoff. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Rune Arnhoff specifically; books or peer-reviewed white papers written ABOUT Rune Arnhoff; television and radio features ABOUT Rune Arnhoff.

So also see WP:RS for additional guidance on what reliable secondary sources.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it might not be the right time (WP:TOOSOON) for Rune Arnhoff to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rune Arnhoff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 04:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flod logic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 04:39, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Buidhe has nominated Swedish emigration to the United States for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when going through foreign-language terms, do you think that instead of simply removing lang-en, you could add the English translation to the lang-xx template using the proper lit parameter? Just like this, e.g.: German: Willkommen, lit. 'Welcome'. Thanks — kashmīrī ^TALK 11:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly can when appropriate (sometimes lang-en is used to give the standard English name for something as opposed to a gloss). I wasn't aware that it was a parameter of lang-xx so I tried it out now – for some reason it seems that sometimes it is ignored (check out the lang-ms on 3 Suara). Do you know if all lang-xx templates are supposed to have this parameter? Thanks! flod logic (talk) 11:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I believe all of lang-xx templates support this parameter. However, it's not the same with lang|xx which you used on 3 Suara. — kashmīrī ^TALK 21:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Thanks! flod logic (talk) 22:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subdivisions of the Nordic countries, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subdivisions of the Nordic countries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Freedom of religion in Finland has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andreas Landmark, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you foir creating Fogd. It does, however, leave me with a few questions. In Denmark. the byfoged and herredsfoged represented the king, whereas the ridefogedwas an intermediary between a local landholderd as the peasants (copyholdera) on his estate. And then there was/is the landfoged, Strandfoged and the Kongens Foged. But no official title simply called the "foged". So from a Danish perspective, foged was not as much an official title as it was a group of official titles. From a Danish perspective, I therefore think it would åerhaps be more useful to have separate articles about these offices (Byfoged has existed as a stub since 2012). Did Norway and Sweden not have any destinctions? Another thing is that, in Denmark, the byfoged and Herredsfoged acted as judges at the Byting/Herredsting. Was this not the case in Norway and Sweden? It would perhaps be useful to introduce subsections about the indicidual Nordic countries to be able to to go into more detail and highlight national differences.Ramblersen2 (talk) 13:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your comment. I thought I would create it since there are probably enough articles using that term alone for someone's profession to warrant an article.

I'm not an expert on the topic but from what I understand the situation was similar throughout Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, probably partly due to the shared history. It is used as its own term for an office in all three languages but there were several sub-types of fogder, so it also encompasses a group of titles as you say.

The article on Fogd from Norsk historisk leksikon treats fogd as worth an article of its own but also links to the different types as you mentioned.

Ordet brukes dels om sysselmennene, dels om slottshøvedsmennene og dels om gjaldkerene (se byfogd). Denne vaklende begrepsbruken holdt seg et stykke ut over 1400-tallet. Fortsatt kunne slottshøvedsmenn og lensherrer omtales som fogder ca. 1450, men senest fra ca. 1420 var det blitt vanlig å kalle de mennene som hjalp lensherrene i forvaltningen av lenet for fogder. Det er disse lensforvaltningstjenerne vi regner som de egentlige fogder, og som denne artikkelen skal handle om. (Se ellers strandfogd, havnefogd, fjellfogd, stodderfogd om fogder med mer spesialiserte gjøremål.)

Thanks for mentioning Byfoged too, somehow I missed that article. From what I can tell they served a similar role everywhere.

Good idea about subsections. What do you think about having one longer, more comprehensive article rather than multiple separate articles, especially given the overlap between countries and terms? There could be subsections for individual countries/terms when more detail is needed. I see the Danish article at da:Fogde has a list of different types at the bottom, although some are still red links and the articles themselves are pretty short. Maybe it would make sense to combine them all into one article here on English Wikipedia. flod logic (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit that I still think that the byfoged/herredsfoged and ridefoged were rather different offices. And I could wprry that having one long article with several different types and four different countries, each with their historical evolution, could easily end up very messy since we will either have to go with type-based or country-based subsections. But if that is the solution you prefer and you think it will work, let's by all means go with it. It is certainly much better with one well-written and informative article like the one you have started than a bunch of useless stubs (crf. the Bugoged one).Ramblersen2 (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ridefoged especially. I'm not entirely set on one article as the solution but it is one way to organize it until we have enough information to fill out separate articles. Thanks for fixing my mistake in the beginning of the article. Feel free to add more info! flod logic (talk) 07:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Målfrid Grude Flekkøy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Allen Ludden's Gallery, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I just added some proposed edits on the talk page, hope you get a chance to take a peek. Cheers, PaulWicks (talk) 08:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page William South (photographer), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:38, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page C. Northcote Parkinson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Women in music, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Michigan Women's Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 23:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Flod logic! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:51, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Hello Flod logic!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Infantry Dreddmoto (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kinh Do Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thủ Đức District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings @Flod logic

Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across your edit at Culture war .

Requesting your visit to Tashabbuh (still a draft in my userspace) and help expand the topic areas if you find topic interesting.

The draft article may also need time to time copy editing support too in upcoming future, requesting you also to watch list the article if copy edit support is possible.

Wish you very happy Wikipedia editing.

Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 05:07, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]