Archives: Archive March - June 2025
Questions about editing for me can go here.
Hi Floating Orb! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Learn more about editing
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
Get help at the Teahouse
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Volunteer at the Task Center
Happy editing! Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Marmalade you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 19:43, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article Marmalade you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Marmalade for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Moorman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Bakhtar40 (talk) 08:37, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article Marmalade you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Marmalade for comments about the article, and Talk:Marmalade/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:10, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, this GAN has been running for quite a few weeks now, and it's moving very slowly. One week is the typical expected duration. I'll be away from my desk from the 17th so it'd be nice to get it closed out before then. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How does my signature look now? Floating Orb 01:17, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, just a courtesy message to notify you in case you haven't seen the Wikipedia:The World Destubathon contest update in the last few days that we've decided to run the full month until the 16th of July. For those who have been too busy to contribute, we would love some help in reaching 4000 articles by Wednesday night! At present we're about 480 articles short!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:35, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for being so harsh in the review. Looking on the bright side, it's actually better to get it over with quickly than to have a review drag on for months. My recommendation would be to put this on a shelf for a couple of months, at which point you will be eligible for a WP:TWL account which will give you access to a vast array of additional research tools that will help you improve the article. Once you've done that, bring it to WP:Peer review for another look, and in particular make sure to link it into {{FAC peer review sidebar}} so it'll get special attention from people who are used to doing FAC reviews and will be able to give you better feedback. RoySmith (talk) 12:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Research Gate citations fail and flag red (bad ref) on a WP:RS-detector I use. Better to search the title for a) PubMed from which you can derive a PMID or PMC value to use in the citation (PMC is a full article function), or b) the URL of the original publisher, such as this source for the Liu ref in the marmalade article. Good luck! Zefr (talk) 18:59, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Marmalade has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Launchballer 22:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]