User talk:FlightTime/Archive 16

The following page is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

Do the best — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.242.97.191 (talk) 17:35, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a reliable source about the recording sessions of Led Zeppelin IV, it's the deluxe edition of Led Zeppelin IV, it shows the recording dates of all the alternate versions of songs on disc two, which go as early as the 8th of November of 1970, to as late as some time in mid-may of 1971, I'll have to double-check it though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.203.68.153 (talk) 04:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@71.203.68.153: Great, but it needs to be with your change, see here Help:Referencing for beginners, this will show how to add the reference to your claim. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Beadforlife logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Stefan2: Thank you, I must of forgot to apply it. :) Mlpearc (open channel) 19:49, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

White people can be born in Africa and FDR descended from one. Thus he was "African Born White". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.199.68.222 (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That makes them African, why does white need to be there ? Mlpearc (open channel) 02:41, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

because dome people assume all born in Africa are Black. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.199.68.222 (talk) 21:36, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly why I removed it Mlpearc (open channel) 23:36, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Look mate Billy Joel doesn't only play piano. Surely you'd know that if you went to see him that he didn't stay on the piano the entire time. he's not like Elton John. Just stop screwing things up and we'll be okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlasherOfDeath (talk • contribs) 09:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SlasherOfDeath: I've never said he didn't play anything else, that's absurd. I am going by the template MOS, have you even looked at the guideline ? Piano is his "primary instrument" any other instrument he plays is secondary to his track record/style, secondary instruments are to be brought up in prose and not the infobox. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:45, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just edited the Wiki Page about me. You have erased it after I just put it up. This page is about me and I should be able to edit it instead of allowing others to insert information about me that is incorrect or private about me. I am not a coder and don't understand all the gibberish you speak of on this page. I'd rather not have a Wiki page than one filled with things I don't want. Here's your tildes

(5carlosamezcua (talk) 04:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC))[reply]

@5carlosamezcua: First, you don't own that page and Carlos Amezcua would have a conflict of interest and should not be editing that page. There are other guidelines here. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I did The Album Appitie for destruction is a hard rock hair metal or glam metal and heavy metal album — Preceding unsigned comment added by Planetofjelly (talk • contribs) 21:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Planetofjelly: You'll need reliable sources and consensus before you make those changes. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawrencegoriel (talk • contribs) 19:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrencegoriel blocked Mlpearc (open channel) 02:46, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware adding Harry joyce site to external links was consider an advertising plug. Once I was alerted to this via warning message, I thought I hit cancel, thinking it would not,be added and cancelled, so I appologize. I thought the fact that Jimmy Page used a harry Joyce amp while performing with the Black Crowes, it would be ok. As you can probably figure, it was my first attempt adding something to wiki, so again, sorry for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harry Joyce usa (talk • contribs) 03:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Harry Joyce usa: No problem. I left you some helpful links on your talk page. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 03:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again.... Another thing I was unaware of ( username as a business) I was looking under the Guitar aplifier page and saw all the amplifier companies. So, another newbie mistake... I was just looking to create a similar page as the other amplifier companies. I guess I need to have someone more knowledgable helping me and for me to read some of the wiki info & guidelines. Do I delete my current page to avoid violation? So sorry Mlpearc

@Harry Joyce usa: Again, no problem but, please post a request for a change, if you continue to edit using your current name an Admin will end up blocking your account. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 04:03, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did reference the source when I made the original edit. I guess I'll try again... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mismanagingeditor (talk • contribs) 02:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Yes, Mismanaging mentioned his/her source in the edit summary (the NY Times obit). I'll try to help him learn to add sources in the text. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-

I've already provided citations for facts and other info that requires them on Carter's page (I work with him). Now, we're just hoping to make some ascetic changes to his article. Please let me know what specifically you think requires citations.

For the edit requests that don't require citations, I'm hoping you can just rewrite on my behalf.

Thanks! Jen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgolum (talk • contribs) 18:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Hey, I apologize for my short-tempered answer ("WP:BURO") to your suggestion that my complaint about Panewithholder be moved to AN/I from the Bureaucrats Noticeboard. I was obviously a little short on patience when I posted the reply, having nothing whatsoever to do with your reasonable suggestion. My bad, sorry. BMK (talk) 00:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: No problem, no apologies needed. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 00:22, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, appreciate it. BMK (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I left a source in my edit on 'The Endless River'. Gilmour stated in an interview, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwumke98koo 5min3sec, that the organ was recorded in 1968. Also, of the two references which can be where the article currently says 1969, one states that it was recorded in 1968. The organ *was* recorded in 1968, and has been confirmed by Gilmour. I believe you have reverted my edit in error. Nickyschlobs (talk) 04:10, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nickyschlobs: No, you put it in your edit summary, it needs to be with your edit/change. Also Youtube is not a reliable source Mlpearc (open channel) 04:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mlpearc. I have dug out the background to Caper454's frustration for myself now. But I'd still like to know why you added "Worth getting blocked again?" to your templated warning, considering their only previous block was from 2008. Heck, my own block log is longer. I'm not excusing their attacks, which I blocked them for, but I would say you were being provocative. Bishonen | talk 10:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen: I noticed the block notice on their talk while scanning for other warnings, just didn't notice how long ago the block was, I wasn't being provocative I was trying to get them to stop what they were doing. Mlpearc (open channel) 10:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a second version (a cropped version) of the image File:Michielhuisman2015.jpg as File:Michielhuisman2015 (cropped).jpg so that it would fit better in the Game of Thrones cast list where the pictures of the cast members are mostly headshots. Could you check it out, and make sure I uploaded it with the right licence? It would help alot. :-)--Sebahed (talk) 17:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sebahed: I've made some adjustments and everything looks Ok, be aware the files have been moved to commons (as they should be). The URL's have changed, the original is here > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michielhuisman2015.jpg < and the cropped version is here > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michielhuisman2015_%28cropped%29.jpg < They are still available here on Wikipedia in the normal way [[File:<filename.ext>]] Mlpearc (open channel) 19:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okey, thank you very much for your help! :D--Sebahed (talk) 20:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you're welcome. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm confused about the ticket from this file. I found ticket:2015040510015494 but you said the ticket is:2015040110025338, but I was unable to find it. Willy Weazley 00:02, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Willy Weazley: That was the ticket# of the initial contact, they sent a new mail with the actual permissions, the one you found. I fixed the file page. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For your information you little shithead I am. What I do is my business. I only stick my nose in the business of others if I have nothing better to do either you let me edit that page or I can block you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SlasherOfDeath (talk • contribs) 03:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mlpearc! That's because it was archived two days ago, see this. Shmayo (talk) 20:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just trying to understand the reversion of the edit on W. Axl Rose. His article shows a picture of him playing the piano. He is credited as playing the piano on Use Your Illusion I, II and Chinese Democracy. There is footage of him playing the piano. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DenseFog (talk • contribs) 20:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DenseFog: Nobody is saying he don't play piano but, he's not widely known for playing it, he's mostly known as a singer. Him playing to piano can be covered in the article body. See the guideline here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_musical_artist#instrument Mlpearc (open channel) 21:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So, honest question, is Michael Stipe widely known for playing the guitar (because that's what's listed under "Instruments" on his page)? If no, then the guidelines are pretty vague. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DenseFog (talk • contribs) 22:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DenseFog: I don't know that artist but, you can ask on the talk page. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any idea what the ticket number for File:Professor John M Last circa 2005.jpg might have been? You tagged it as {{OTRS received}}, but with no ticket ID. Unfortunately searching for John Last returns way too many tickets. --B (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@B: Good catch, it's VRTS ticket # 2015020710001776, I've added the ticket number to the file page. Thanx, Mlpearc (open channel) 05:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored a reference for Jeanne Crain which you deleted from Barstow, California. A fact which was sourced from a webpage does not become unsourced when the webpage disappears. See Wikipedia:Link rot for more information. Cheers,—Stepheng3 (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you think my info is wrong! Yeah you may think it is, but i actually read about this info in reliable articles. Bruce Dickinson really did have tonsil cancer, and i know i forgot that he is making a speedy recovery. Also, why is it that i vandalized the iron maiden page. No i didn't this info is right. SO NEXT TIME PLEASE LOOK FOR AN ARTICLE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.114.28.122 (talk) 00:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@75.114.28.122: I never said the information was wrong, it was unsourced, all content added to an article of a living person has to be supported by reliable sources Mlpearc (open channel) 01:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious to know why you removed my citing of the "League of Their Own" trailer from Vin Scully's page. Here is a link to the trailer, and you will see (and hear) it is exactly as I described it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkZTcofj3wU

Thank you, Michael Schlesinger aka Cadavra8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadavra8 (talk • contribs) 06:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cadavra8: YouTube is not a reliable source Mlpearc (open channel) 17:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly we have different definitions of the word "source." My source is the trailer itself. YouTube is merely the delivery service. If the trailer is as I described--and it is--I don't understand the rationale for not acknowledging it on his page.

Mike aka Cadavra8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadavra8 (talk • contribs) 18:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the information at the link I provided ? Mlpearc (open channel) 18:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. And it says a source can be the thing itself. Ipso facto, if I refer to a trailer and the source is the trailer itself, I fail to see how it can not be considered reliable. It's like shooting a man on TV and then saying, "Prove I shot him." "Well, we have it on tape." "That's not a reliable source."

Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cadavra8 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aye why you takin out my Angus Young stuff fam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiiiieieieieie (talk • contribs) 01:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hiiiieieieieie: Because articles don't hold personal opinions of the editors. All entries to pages about living persons require verifiable sources. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mlpearc: Callmemirela tagged it and reworded the season one summaries when they just should have been deleted. I tried to correct this by doing this and unblocking the article but the said editor has since reverted it. helmboy 17:06, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mlpearc,

Thanks for your input on Zathura document viewer. I wondered if instead of just deleting a citation whether you could instead please raise an issue in the talk page? I've been trying to put a bit of effort into the article and removing the citation comes across as a little unconstructive. Cryptarch (talk) 04:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cryptarch: I am the one who placed the {{citation needed}} tag on the claim, instead of removing it as unsourced. If I were the one making the claim I would start a discussion of course. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:53, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think that needs clarifying. It's true that you could have simply removed an sourced claim. However, the history clearly flags you as the person who converted a citation into an uncitation.

I think you should open up a discussion with your concerns about the citation I gave.

If you're only asserting your opinion with no opportunity for discussion, negotiation or a clear path for rectification, then how is that different to an uncited claim?

Cryptarch (talk) 05:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is the contributing editor's burden (if they wish to continue) to gain consensus when a reference is challenged, which I am, you claim that the reference is reliable, I don't think it is. You're more than welcome to start a discussion and see the consensus of other editors. Mlpearc (open channel) 05:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining. I've started a discussion here. It would be good to have your feedback on my opinion there. Cryptarch (talk) 21:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done [1]. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the source for my edit. It was already there: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/barry-manilow-marries-longtime-manager-garry-kief-201584

JayDK103 (talk) 23:52, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JayDK103: His marriage was never in question, It's the Gay categories you added, Manilow has not made any statements about his sexuality, regardless who he's married to. If you continue with this line of editing you're only going to get yourself blocked. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, fine. I got it.

JayDK103 (talk) 02:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JayDK103: Fantastic, happy editing. Mlpearc (open channel) 02:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pls see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Iraq#Need help here user Iraqi man10 again-- Moxy (talk) 18:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello member of Category:Wikipedians who use IRC! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "#wikipedia-en-help ^connect" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.
Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page.
This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)[reply]

Sorry about that its just that it seems that this album leans in a psychedelic rock direction that's why I added that. Looking at songs like "Higher and Higher", "Sun Is Still Shining", and "Out And In", I see the psychedelic side of this album but that's just me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swaggarden420 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Swaggarden420: No problem, we all have opinions about genre's but, genre changes need to be sourced and discussed. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any idea what Iraqi man10 is up to here? It seems you've encountered them before. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: I received the message above and looked through their 'tribs and made some reverts and noticed this new user which IMO is suspect and posted my concern here. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:04, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 23:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have released the license for free usage of the image. It is my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seny P Arukattu (talk • contribs) 19:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Seny P Arukattu: I have located an email sent to OTRS, which is not complete. I'm working on everything now. This would of been a lot easier if you would of told us about the mailing. I'll message in a few, once I get everything fixed. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mlpearc: I am the owner of the photograph. And initially since I have released a wrong license for the photograph I had to upload the image again with a free usage license. And the email was sent to wiki few days earlier which is completely details as per the format mentioned by wiki. I am a known fashion photographer and I own the copyright of all these images. I can release the proper license if needed. SPSeny P Arukattu^*

@Mlpearc: I have resent the mail to you with the suggested license release. And the image you have suggested for deletion in the page of Nandita Swetha is not coming in that list. The image which you have suggested for deletion is uploaded with proper free usage release. I do not understand what is the licence you want. If even after being the owner I am facing these much issues on images then how the articles will have images. SPSeny P Arukattu^*

• @Seny P Arukattu:  Done Mlpearc (open channel) 20:12, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

why I can't edit using my account after log in ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bitchecordova (talk • contribs) 04:06, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin please how can i create my own profile here like olamide my name is Ib-kay nigeria up and coming artist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newupcomingartist2015 (talk • contribs) 07:18, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that was a reliable source, it was from the press section of a national broadcaster, I think you may need help with defining that a reliable source is. Why was my addition changed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CiaraOM (talk • contribs) 23:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@CiaraOM: I didn't say anything about sources, I reverted your edit because of WP:WEIGHT. Mlpearc (open channel) 23:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Test. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:59, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am jimmy page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoneandonlyjimmypage (talk • contribs) 18:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jimmy, please follow the instructions at WP:IMPERSONATE and send OTRS proof of identification so this account will not be blocked for impersonating a well known person. Mlpearc (open channel) 18:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done FlightTime (open channel) 23:40, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So Fine was never a single don't know what your smoking. Wikipedia is supposed to be accurate not made up. Mr. Brownstone was a promo single. KPT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KT032889 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Child O Mine was released in Feb 88(that's when it hit number 1) New Rose was never a single. KPT — Preceding unsigned comment added by KT032889 (talk • contribs) 04:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was only a comment. You could have left it.
I thought it incongruous that one of the vaguest counts in the list was for the Mathematics Wiki. Please do not reply. 81.156.84.131 (talk) 23:56, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of deleting other peoples' contributions, perhaps you could do something useful. Make a new entry on the List_of_Wikis page for the site http://familypedia.wikia.com/wiki/Family_History_and_Genealogy_Wiki. That has 183,000 pages, and was what I was looking for.

81.156.84.131 (talk) 00:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are being contacted because of your participation in the proposal to create a style noticeboard. An alternate solution, the full or partial endorsement of the style Q&A currently performed at WT:MoS, is now under discussion at the Village Pump. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Barstow, California, I understand why it might be tempting to put the {{Geographic location}} template in the body of the article. And it's true that it doesn't belong in the External links section. However, WP:ORDER is clear that {{Geographic location}} is a navigation template. Navigation templates traditionally go at the bottom of the article, between external links and categories. Would you consider moving the template back?—Stepheng3 (talk) 02:39, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Mlpearc (open channel) 03:42, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being so understanding. Best regards,—Stepheng3 (talk) 04:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you join this discussion at my talk page here please? We are discussing the course of action. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:07, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm sorry for interrupting, but I just want to find someone who could help me with 1 question. In the List of best-selling music artists article it is written Barbra has sold over 145 million records worldwide (and there was talked thread of 245 million figure in the article's discussion, as I've understood finalised by temporary dissent from change included in the article informations). Meanwhile, there was running little edit war in the Barbra Streisand article (switching 145/245 in turns), finalised by semi-protect the article (permanently it is written in the article she's sold 145 million records as it was written previously in the list). And finally, this time there was re-starting edit war in the article Barbra Streisand discography, concluded by adding sources (that was already undermined in the discussion as not reliable and temporarily not suitable to add) claiming 245 million figure, next to (cited in the same statement) source that claims 145 million number. So there is now internal contradiction between informations included in the 3 different articles talking about the very same question. Pls could You help me understand which information should be used as reliable, because I want to use it (of course, I don't want to inflate or understate Streisand's sales number:) Thank You in advance for answer and greetings. :) NS _Talk 22:38, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I think my message wasn't well-understood and I've tried to explain it:) I just want to ask - is this information (about 245 million units sold) that is included (added by someone yesterday or sth) in the Barbra Streisand discography article correct and should it be unchanged? I'm asking cause there is included 145 million records figure in the Barbra Streisand article. Could You help me?:) Thank You very much. NS _Talk 20:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some time having passed, I wanted to reach out and reiterate my apology for my bad block. If there's ever anything I can do for you, let me know. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412: Not a problem, kinda consider it as a Purple Heart earned for the cause :P Mlpearc (open channel) 02:13, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps there should be a badge for that. bd2412 T 03:31, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, I might just make one up :) Mlpearc (open channel) 04:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to apologise for any edits to the Jug page that were deemed to be unconstructive, I'm new to Wikipedia and honestly thought my editing was constructive before they were reverted. The 2015 general election result link, and the link to the William Hill bet story, plus the link to Jug offering Boris Johnson the leadership of the Eccentric Party in the Sunday Times, maybe worth reconsidering ?

The Loony Party have removed the story from their website that Jug was expelled from the Loony Party and Google have removed the URL, Jug, in fact, left the party of his own free will. I'd like that link reconsidered please, thank you.

With regards to the removal of Jug's real name, this was taken because their are three Brian Borthwick's in his family, including his father and son, who don't wish to be associated by name, preferring anonimity. The link to a story about Google taking a story down under EU law, names Jug's ex-partner, Julie Diane Smith, much to her horror, and to Jug's son. I'd kindly like to ask you to remove this from the page please out of respect for their privacy. Thank you.

I hope this is helpful. {SaffieDoodlebug}

^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5]}

@SaffieDoodlebug:No problem, I was concerned only with the unconstructive part, I'm sorry I didn't realize other information was in my revert. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Black Flag does not operate as a company and thus has no official email address. I could send you the Indesign file I originally laid the page out on if you like, or you could check https://libcom.org/library/black-flag-231-mid-2010 - the PDFs of recent issues, with front page covers, have been all been released for free on that platform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saii (talk • contribs) 11:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Saii:, Sorry not sure what you're referring to. Mlpearc (open channel) 22:36, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed the situation regarding your block.

1. Tough break.
2. Congratulations, you're no longer a block virgin. :p
3. It could be worse. You could have my block log. :D

Cheers.—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 21:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyberpower678: Battle scars Mlpearc (open channel) 22:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mine are bigger, muahaha. :p—^cyberpower_Chat:Online 22:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mlpearc. I edited User:Mlpearc Phone/common.js and User:Mlpearc Public/common.js to update you to the latest version of TemplateScript. You were using a much older version called regex menu framework, so the main difference you'll see is an improved regex editor. I also updated deprecated functions and made your scripts HTTPS-compatible. Let me know if anything breaks. :) —Pathoschild 03:47, 09 August 2015 (UTC)

A reader will read "The Milky Way is the galaxy that contains our Solar System. ^{[dubious – discuss]}", and it might seem to them that the Solar System might not be in the Milky Way, which would absurd. That's the first impression they will have and it might cause some confusion. It is pointless to add that tag simply because of wording (oh, they used the word "our". Big deal). Huritisho (talk) 21:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may not have seen the full chain of events on the Roger Waters article. The opera genre has been in the article since the article was promoted to FA, and the genre was removed (without explanation or discussion) by an IP editor today. As there was no explanation or discussion of this change, I undid the change per WP:BRD. The burden is on the person making the change to build consensus, not on the person objecting to the change.--Mojo Hand (talk) 19:00, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have the simulator. The Cessna 208 Caravan is a default aircraft. The information may be unsourced (I can find a source if you need me to), but this information is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.142.156.15 (talk) 21:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying it's incorrect, it needs to be sourced. Mlpearc (open channel) 21:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Was there any discussion about the instruments played by Waters in his article that I'm not aware of ? I'm asking you this because your edit made no sense, since the instruments he plays are not subject to wikipedians' opinions, which means it's not necessary to discuss anything about it. What you could have said was "there is no source", and if this is the case, you know I'll find dozens. So, please, clarify this to me. Clausgroi (talk) 01:54, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clausgroi Not that I know of, the instrument field in the infobox is for the main instrument the artist plays, any secondary instruments should be brought up in prose. If you would like to add/remove any from the infobox you should gain consensus on the talk page. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:59, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source to confirm that information ? Without any, that's just your opinion. From experience, I reckon the "instrument" field on infoboxes is for every relevant instrument played by the musician. Sometimes, even minor (not so relevant) instruments are cited on that field in some articles. Take a look, for instance, at the infoboxes on Mike Oldfield, John Lennon and Geddy Lee. Clausgroi (talk) 03:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hai, this Indian film article Loham needs copy editing for grammer and writing style. Previously submitted for GA but failed due to language problem. See Talk:Loham. I invite you to help a hand on it.--Charles Turing (talk) 13:09, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 05:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 05:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you archived our conversation if it wasn't finished. You still haven't presented me the evidence for your claim. Let's do this: I'll give you 3 days to present it. If you can't do it, I'll assume you just made that rule up and will add "acoustic guitar and trumpet" to the instrument section on the infobox again. Clausgroi (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a claim, I just pointed you to the MOS of the instruments parameter in infoboxes, nothing more to discuss. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 17:44, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You did: "the instrument field in the infobox is for the main instrument the artist plays, any secondary instruments should be brought up in prose." That's what we call a claim. The MOS says something a little bit different: "Instruments listed in the infobox should be limited to only those that the artist is primarily known for using." Every Pink Floyd fan knows Roger also plays the acoustic guitar, even thought he plays the bass more frequently. I see no reason not to add that to the infobox. Please, participate in the discussion on the article's talk page. Clausgroi (talk) 01:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Clausgroi: I do not want to have a discussion about this, if you want to add or remove an instrument(s) you must discuss your changes on the article's talk page, changes without discussion will be reverted. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 02:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What an odd thing. I could swear I said exactly that in my last comment. Actually, I remember quite vividly politely inviting you to express your opinion there instead of here. Oh, well, I must be ageing. Clausgroi (talk) 02:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me for being factually accurate. ~ WildMIKE123

@WildMIKE123: Please see Wikipedia:No original research and Help:Referencing for beginners. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 15:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RESEARCH?! I'm pretty sure the show didn't start airing in the 1940's because neither TV or heavy metal had been invented yet! Also, pretty sure there's no November 32nd on the calendar! ~ WildMIKE123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WildMIKE123 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WildMIKE123: This is an encyclopedia, we don't do

I'm pretty sure

. Cheers, Mlpearc (open channel) 20:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Am I even talking to a real person? ~ WildMIKE123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WildMIKE123 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder could you explain why you reverted me here? You say you are busy in real life, but it seems your Twinkle bot is still busy on here! Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You also templated my Talk Page and then removed the template the very next minute?? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you allow editing and then change them back. I left a fact not an opinion — Preceding unsigned comment added by The great gorrila (talk • contribs) 03:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.