Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Zfort Group. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Any further disruptive editing at the Teahouse or any other help venue will result in a block. I hope that's clear. If you are not willing to or capable of offering accurate advice in a calm and friendly way, then please remain silent. Cullen328 (talk) 08:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is a rapidly emerging consensus at ANI that your draft moves are problematic but you have continued to move drafts while the discussion was ongoing. Thus, I have partially blocked you from editing the draft namespace for the time being. The instructions on what to do if you disagree are below.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
1. State your reason for believing your block was incorrect or for requesting reconsideration. It is not enough if you just say that the block was "wrong" or "unfair", or another user violated a policy first. You must explain why it was wrong to block you, or why it should be reversed.
I do not believe any of my edits contravened Wikipedia rules.
If any did, please show a diff and a reason.
2. Address the blocking administrator's concerns about your conduct (the reason given for your block). As explained above, you have been informed about the reason for your block. You must address this reason in your request. This means that you must either explain why the block reason is incorrect or not applicable to your conduct, or you must convince the reviewing administrator that you won't do it again.
"your draft moves are problematic" is not a valid reason for a block. Moving drafts to live space is not a crime. As far as I am aware, there is no policy prohibiting my actions.
3. Give evidence. If you state that you did or did not do something, or that the blocking administrator is missing something important, please provide brief details and a link in the form of a differential edit ("diff") if possible, or other evidence showing that you don't (or didn't) do what the block reason states.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Getting Started
Tips
