User talk:FULBERT/Archive 37

This is an archive of past discussions with User:FULBERT. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Criticism of Twelver Shia Islam on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi FULBERT,

I added citations into two articles this week. I revised one sentence and added a citation into the article Customer_satisfaction. Also, in the article of Influencer marketing, I revised a sentence and added a citation in it to improve its creditability.

This is the link to diff 1: Customer satisfaction: Difference between revisions

This is the link to diff 2: Influencer marketing: Difference between revisions

Cathy0602 (talk) 02:02, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Cathy0602, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, I assigned the articles to myself right now. Please check it again. Thank you! --Cathy0602 (talk) 21:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

In week 3, I learned how to add the citation for an article. The article I chose is Games and culture. Because it was a peer-reviewed journal, I expanded its area that is more related to video games and cultures. I add a book that talks about how video games relate to society and cultures on this article.

The diff link: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Games_and_Culture&type=revision&diff=965058583&oldid=947172348

--Qingmei95 (talk) 04:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Qingmei95, Per the instructions, "Late assignments will not be accepted after Week 3 (6/11)." I will, however, review the newer ones you submitted. FULBERT (talk) 22:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi FULBERT,

I added citations into two articles this week. I changed one sentence and added one citation into the article about Chinese noodles served with soybean sauce, and added one part of soybean sauce technical process and one citation into the article soybean sauce.

This is the link to diff 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yellow_soybean_paste&type=revision&diff=965063352&oldid=869167498

This is the link to diff 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zhajiangmian&type=revision&diff=965063884&oldid=961621213

--Qingmei95 (talk) 05:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Qingmei95, Nice additions to both. Current. FULBERT (talk) 22:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

For week 5, I have added 2 citations on 2 articles as we have done for week 4. I added more accurate information on the old version and added one citation about transmission on the article BMW m2; I added more information about Beck's theory and hopelessness theory on the article cognitive distortion

Link to Diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BMW_M2&type=revision&diff=965066405&oldid=957140538

Link to Diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cognitive_distortion&type=revision&diff=965068441&oldid=960968794

--Qingmei95 (talk) 06:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Qingmei95, Good additions on both of these as well. Current. FULBERT (talk) 22:55, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

For this week, I added a picture of my British shorthair cat in a particular silver coat color on the article "British shorthair cat". There are many patterns in the species of British shorthair, I noticed that this category lack the particular color of the silver coat. Therefore, I upload my cat's picture to Wikipedia. In this week, I learned how to add pictures for articles and how to translate articles to wikipedia.

The diff link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=British_Shorthair&type=revision&diff=965086647&oldid=962941425

--Qingmei95 (talk) 09:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Qingmei95, Please finish the online learning assignment for this week and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Professor,

This week I edited 2 articles related to my research topic, Buyer decision process and Sentiment analysis. I found both of them are lack of citations in introduction part, so I added two citations in them.

The differences are following: diff Buyer Decision Process, diff Sentiment Analysis

I learned that detailed research would make me know more about the topic and make every sentence we write traceable and reasonable.--Yifeng Li (talk) 19:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, I prefer you to add a sentence or two of text to explain what you mean, but you did add high quality, credible citations to these articles that both needed them. FULBERT (talk) 22:16, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, the lead in Buyer Decision Process Wikipedia cited an opinion of Herbert A. Simon, a Nobel Prize in Economics winner, without citation. Therefore I added a citation to it. For sentiment analysis, I added a citation I also used in my research which is appropriate for the Wiki.--Yifeng Li (talk) 22:58, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, I asked you to revise what you added to the these, as you added citations without any additions of text as per the assignment. Please add and reping me with diffs. FULBERT (talk) 22:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, I add some more texts in revisions, diff Buyer Decision Process, diff Sentiment Analysis.--Yifeng Li (talk) 21:32, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, Nice adds. Current. FULBERT (talk) 00:34, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Professor,

This week I edited 2 articles I'm interested in, Tag cloud and Random permutation. I found both of them are lack of citations, so I added two citations in them.

The first difference: diff Tag cloud In the lead part of tag cloud, the wiki page detailed the advantage and application of tag cloud without citation. Therefore, I added one citation to make it retrievable.

The second difference: diff Random permutation The random permutation wiki page has no citation or reference, which is inappropriate in an academic topic about a statistical methodology. Thus, I added one citation to the Statistics on random permutation part, which is related to the probability distribution of the number of fixed points of a uniformly distributed random permutation.

I learned that the workload of completing a great wiki page is immense, every contributor is deserved to respect.--Yifeng Li (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, Add explanatory text as with Week 4 and reping me when done. FULBERT (talk) 22:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, I added some more texts in revisions, diff Tag cloud, diff Random permutation.--Yifeng Li (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, The instructions state, "Be sure to provide a sentence or two to express each of your contributions in context, and demonstrate how they add to the knowledge in the article." I did not see evidence of more than a word being added. Please revise and reping me. FULBERT (talk) 22:48, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, I added some more texts in revisions, diff Tag cloud, diff Random permutation. --Yifeng Li (talk) 00:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, Nice clarifications of what you were thinking about these. Current. FULBERT (talk) 00:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

I added an image to Uzumaki Boruto:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boruto_Uzumaki Here is the difference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Boruto_Uzumaki&diff=964659455&oldid=961895084 This is one of my favorite anime characters, however, in this article more pictures are needed to give the readers a full image of him. HANZHIZOU (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

HANZHIZOU, Please finish the training assignment for this week and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:50, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, finished. HANZHIZOU (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

HANZHIZOU, Your image was already removed from another editor as it did not seem to add anything to the article. Can you find another image to add to another article (assign yourself the article first) or the like, and then ping me here again. FULBERT (talk) 00:42, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi FULBERT,

I edited two articles this week, both of them are related to my topic. I added the content and citation into the Implications on traditional advertising section of the article Social media marketing. Also, in the article of Fashion influencer, I added two sentence with a same citation, and one more other citations into the article to improve the article's content. The contents I added provide detailed information about the impacts of influencers and social media marketing model.

This is the link to diff 1: Social media marketing: Difference between revisions

This is the link to diff 2: Fashion influencer: Difference between revisions

Cathy0602 (talk) 02:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Cathy0602, Nice additions. Current. FULBERT (talk) 00:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

For week 6, I inserted an image to Macau Grand Prix. I inserted a photo of Lamborghini Gallardo GT3 in the 2010 Macau GT Cup, retrieved from Wikipedia Commons with CC BY-SA 2.0 license. I believed it provide visual on the GT cup.

Link to Diff: Grand Prix: Difference between revisions

In this assignment, I learned to find an image on Wikipedia common, and how to insert them into the article.

ANTTONNY (talk) 07:53, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

ANTTONNY, Nice image add. Current. FULBERT (talk) 00:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

My overall experience with Wikipedia was pleasant. Although the interface is a bit "old school" than what I've expected, however, the overall usability was easy and intuitive to use with clear directions and instructions.

What I did this six weeks:

2002–2004 SARS outbreak - Added citation

Macau Grand Prix - Added citation, context, and image

Nissan GT-R - Added citation and restructure sentences

Point forward - Revise minor errors and contribute to talk page

Telecommuting - Added citation and context

Virtual workplace - Added citation and context

I learned all the fundamentals for editing Wikipedia articles. Such as how to perform basic functions on editing Wikipedia, adding citations, rules on evaluating articles, assessing sources credibility, compliance with publishing materials, etc.

I always know that I could edit Wikipedia articles, and this is my first experience editing articles on Wikipedia. I was genuinely surprised by the size of the Wikipedia community and the number of people contributed. Also, I am surprised by how many flaws and gaps I found in Wikipedia. Furthermore, I am amazed by the number of viewership on all 14 of our student editors edited articles. At the moment I was writing, 552K Views. (If this number is on our social media page, we would be "viral")

Although editing and contributing to Wikipedia is extra work and can be time-consuming, however, if I have the time in the future and it is convenient for me to do so, I will try to contribute in the future.

ANTTONNY (talk) 09:01, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

ANTTONNY, Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this, and I think you really hit the area about why I do this work at all, which is for the enormous positive impact we have here, even in this one single course, based on sheer count of those who have seen stronger and more reliable articles as a result of our edits. Hope you continue with this! FULBERT (talk) 00:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

During the past 6 weeks, I added 7 citations on 7 different articles, and either make revises or add more information on it. Furthermore, I inserted an image on one article as well. My overall experience with working on Wikipedia is very impressive, I learned a lot about how to use this tool to share information with people all around the world. After I master these technics I feel proud and so pleased that I spent plenty of time learning how to use Wiki.

What I did this six weeks:

Coca-Cola - Added citation, add information

Siopao - Added citation

Cognitive distortion - Added citation and information

Yellow soybean past - add citations

Zhajiangmian - Added citation and information

Games and culture - Added citation and context

BMW M2 - Added citations and revise context

British shorthair - Insert an image

I learned all skills that be taught in this class for editing Wikipedia articles. For example, adding citations, how to identify the gaps between articles, how to find a good article to translate, how to insert pictures, and what we need to pay attention on the copyright, etc.

I knew Wikipedia is open for everybody to use and share knowledge before this class, however, I don't know how exactly it works and these rigorous and complex processes and rules that needed to be mastered before we edit or adding something on it. I think the most impressive part for me is the gaps and differences between Wikipedia in different languages. For example, there are more than 3000000 articles in English but only less than 10000 articles in Maori. It tells me that there is always space that we could work on to make it better.

I will definitely keep working on Wikipedia since it is really a fascinating job when you working on it, for my next step, I will find a good article that I can translate from Chinese into English or vice versa.

--Qingmei95 (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Qingmei95, Thanks for sharing your thoughts here, and you are right, there is a gap between what different language and cultural communities have, which allows us many opportunities to take our skills and experiences and use them to help fill these gaps. I hope you continue with this! FULBERT (talk) 00:53, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

In the past several weeks, I added several citations, comments, images to Problematic Smartphone Use, Problematic Social Media Use, Internet Addiction, Online Gaming Addiction NARUTO and BORUTO.

At the very first time, I thought it would be very difficult for me to do these things that I never did before. But I found it can be very interesting and exciting when I can finish them one by one. This is a very nice learning process for me.

I learned how to add citations and comments to these public online sources which also makes me more sensitive to those public information resources' precision.

I will definitely do more of these things in my future study since adding more details to a thing I'm interested in is very satisfying.

HANZHIZOU (talk) 13:50, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

HANZHIZOU, Thanks for adding these final thoughts, and I hope you continue trying this. Doing edits based on your area of interest is how many of us started editing Wikipedia! FULBERT (talk) 00:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Professor,

This week I inserted an image in article Stinky tofu. There are much textual information and stinky tofu pictures from many places like Guangxi, Hunan, Sichuan, and Taiwan, and I find a picture about Stinky tofu in Beijing in Wiki picture database and insert it. I think that will make people get to know this food more.

The image link is: image change Stinky tofu

In assignment this week, I learned how to insert a picture in articles. The picture can make an article more attractive.--Yifeng Li (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, Please finish the training assignments through the dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 00:37, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, I finish the training modules right now. Thank you! --Yifeng Li (talk) 00:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, Nice add. Current. FULBERT (talk) 00:56, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Professor,

1. How did you decide what to add to your chosen article? (in Guiding question)

I usually choose the article I’m conducting the research and know much about, because in these articles I have enough knowledge and have read some literature. I believe my knowledge can help me contribute to these articles. If a sentence seems like an opinion, I will try to find related literature and add a citation. If an academic article has the visualization potential, I will go to Wikipedia image database to find pictures with high relevance and insert it.

A summary of my edits (in Guiding question): Ggplot2: comment, copyedit / ARIMA: citation / Buyer Decision Process: citation / Sentiment Analysis: citation / Tag cloud: citation, copyedit / Random permutation: citation, copyedit / Sticky tofu: insert an image

2. During these six weeks, my Wikipedia experience is splendid. After learning each module, I feel myself know more about Wikipedia little by little. Previously, I’m an information seeker when I look at Wikipedia. After the Wikipedia course assignments, I can see every word or sentence in Wikipedia from more different angles, thinking whether the reference is reliable and whether I can contribute to this topic article.

3. In this Wikipedia course assignment, I have learnt the method to edit the content, include copyediting and inserting an image. Also, I have learnt the difference between plagiarism and correct reference, which helps me avoid similar problems in my academic writing. Finally, I have learnt the method to cite a reference, which not only makes the article more academic, but also makes the encyclopedia Wikipedia more credible.

4. I think I should continue my Wikipedia editing afterwards, because this is a good opportunity to help me think about my research topic and look up the literature. I love Wikipedia!--Yifeng Li (talk) 18:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Yifeng Li, I so hope you take this energy and continue working with Wikipedia in this way . . . that is how I started 3+ years ago, and now thousands of edits and guidance later, I feel I am making a positive contribution toward open and accessible knowledge. FULBERT (talk) 00:59, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

1. Why verify The verification can help us to identify the reliable resources for the article we edit. The reliable resources include textbooks, literature reviews, books or publications written by professional people. 2. What your experience was like (overall) with this Wikipedia course assignment. At the beginning, I think that it is a boring work to do. However, I think that is very interest after I wrote something. I can fix something were wrong before and transfer the right answers to people who is looking for some answer. This work is meaningful for me. 3. What you learned. From this assignment, I learned how to add information to the article. In addition, I have learned what it is the right and reliable resource for the article. I also know how to evaluate an article, what is the standards of evaluation for the articles. 4. Why / why not you intend to continue editing on Wikipedia.  I think that I will continually edit on the Wikipedia if I have time. as I said before, what we do is meaningful. We can make the contribution to the information searcher. If we can provide the right information to them, they can save the cost and reduce the misunderstand.

Kevin Tian06 (talk) 22:01, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Kevin Tian06, I get what you mean, that it takes some time to understand what is happening. Glad you persevered and hope you continue with it! FULBERT (talk) 01:01, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Korean mythology on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Professor,

This week I inserted an image in article Master stock. In this article, it gives a brief textual introduction about the master stock, without a clear picture. I found a picture about Master stock in Wiki picture database and insert it. I think it would help people get to know more about master stock.

The image link is: image of Master stock

In this assignment , I learned how to insert a image in articles. The picture can make an article more clear and easy to know.--Cathy0602 (talk) 21:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Cathy0602, Interesting image and article overall. Current. FULBERT (talk) 22:12, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Professor, during the past six weeks, I evaluated more than seven articles in Wikipedia. I learned to add citations and revised the contents about each articles with the aims of improving its creditability and reliability. Also, I know that inserting a image in an article would help that article become more attractive and easily impressive.

Editing Wikipedia articles is a new experience for me, and I think it is help for me to go deeply of my research. For example, once I found an article, I would evaluate its contents and creditability. Furthermore, I know the importance of copyright and the way we cited the reference.

Hence, I will continue editing on Wikipedia after this course. I would keep revising the errors and improving the articles in Wikipedia. My overall experience with working on Wikipedia is quite good and useful, I learned a lot from it. Thank you so much!

--Cathy0602 (talk) 21:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Cathy0602, Glad you found this a useful activity, and hoping you continue with this in the future! FULBERT (talk) 22:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, professor. The six-week study on Wikipedia brings full of fun and knowledge to me. I have learned how to evaluate an article, how to cite resources for an article, and how to insert images into an article. I have assigned more than five articles during these weeks, which are linked to my research topic for this semester. Before this class, I knew very little about Wikipedia. I thought that it was just a place that we could search for information that we wanted to know. However, it is a place where everyone can improve or edit useful information if people have enough pieces of evidence. Before citing references, we must make sure that the resources are third-partied, reliable, and credible. I am glad to be a member of Wikipedia. I will keep working on that to acquire more knowledge.

Thank you.

Junwei Sheng (talk) 08:43, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Junwei Sheng, Thanks for sharing this closing thoughts on the assignment; I hope you found it useful enough to contribute again in the future as the need arises! FULBERT (talk) 22:15, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi professor, for the overall experience of using Wiki edit, I learned so many things from the article evaluation, choosing the article and how to add and cite the sentences. I realize some of the articles did not have high-quality references and the argument is not clear. From the article evaluation, I learned I should choose the article with high-quality references. If the article is lack of high quality, I will add the references to that.over 6 weeks edits, I choose most of the article is related to my research paper and my interests. I can use what I already know to view the article and also could add something need in the article. I did not receive anything from feedback, but someone deletes my edits once because the person said my edits repeats with other sections. I realize I need to review the whole article carefully before edits anything. Comparing to other assignments, this assignment is a different experience to regular assignments, I could get to learn the whole process of Wikipedia edits and understand why most professors said do not use Wikipedia when you want to search something. I will continue to edit on my interesting section because many sections need to updates and people can have their own thoughts on the talk page.Yuxin L- (talk) 13:14, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Yuxin L-, These are all helpful things to learn both about Wikipedia editing as well as working with credible and reliable sources overall. Great work, and I hope you continue with this into the future! FULBERT (talk) 22:17, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

For week 5, I have added citations and contexts on 2 articles, Macau_Grand_Prix and Nissan_GT-R.

Link to Diff: Grand Prix: Difference between revisions

Link to Diff: GT-R: Difference between revisions

For this week, besides adding context and sentence to the article, I have learned reorganized sentence structure for the articles.

ANTTONNY (talk) 05:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

ANTTONNY, Please assign yourself this article in the Wiki Edu Dashboard and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

FULBERT, I have emailed you regarding the situation. ANTTONNY (talk) 22:21, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

ANTTONNY, Got it, and good to follow-up. Current now. FULBERT (talk) 23:27, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi, professor. I decided to insert an image into the page of the Taihang Mountains, which is the best tourist attraction in my hometown. I hope you can go for a look in that nice place.

The different revisions: Taihang Mountains: Difference between revisions

In the process of inserting an image, I found that not all the pictures can be used in Wiki. CC search is the best way to search for images related to topics. Junwei Sheng (talk) 08:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Junwei Sheng, Please finish the assignment for this week and then ping me here. I will then take a look at it and reply. FULBERT (talk) 22:14, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

I am so sorry that I did not complete the assignment. I thought that I just need to learn the one I have chosen.

Junwei Sheng (talk) 22:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Junwei Sheng, Finish it and reping me here. FULBERT (talk) 23:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

 FULBERT, I have already finished the training modules. Thank you!

Junwei Sheng (talk) 23:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Junwei Sheng, Good to follow-up and get this in order. Good overall. Current. FULBERT (talk) 23:29, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

I noticed that you tagged Gary James Jason with {{prod blp}} for proposed deletion. I have removed the tag from the article because it does not meet the criteria specified. The placement requirements are (a) that subject is living, and (b) that the article contains no sources in any form (as references, external links, etc., reliable or otherwise) supporting any statements made about the person in the biography. Please fully read Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people before tagging articles for proposed deletion. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Adam9007, Good point, and thanks for clarifying. I just removed the single source there as it was self-referential and not credible. Hopefully somebody can find a reliable source for this article so it can be saved. FULBERT (talk) 23:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
9,750		2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries (talk)	Add sources
56		Arvin Vohra (talk)	Add sources
43		Minimal infective dose (talk)	Add sources
379		Pride in London (talk)	Add sources
116		History of street lighting in the United States (talk)	Add sources
310		Adam Kokesh (talk)	Add sources
444		Christian views on magic (talk)	Cleanup
139		Taylor Stanley (talk)	Cleanup
128		Secessionist movements of Canada (talk)	Cleanup
2,935		Obergefell v. Hodges (talk)	Expand
222		911 (Lady Gaga song) (talk)	Expand
111		Alfonso IX of León (talk)	Expand
434		Violence against LGBT people (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
10,298		Steven Spielberg (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
16,350		Republican Party (United States) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
140		Lists of banned books (talk)	Merge
227		Feast of the Most Precious Blood (talk)	Merge
55		Public information officer (talk)	Merge
32		2020 West Virginia elections (talk)	Wikify
5		Suzanne Gordon (talk)	Wikify
75		Lusitanian mythology (talk)	Wikify
391		Meena Harris (talk)	Orphan
4		Ines Donati (talk)	Orphan
26		Nelu Bulanin (talk)	Orphan
443		2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Michigan (talk)	Stub
4		Drug Effectiveness Review Project (talk)	Stub
118		Global Pride (talk)	Stub
10		Christopher Street (magazine) (talk)	Stub
30		Dave Doogan (talk)	Stub
639		Crystal LaBeija (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi professor @FULBERT:

Same as week4, I added two citations for two different articles. They are Free cash flow and Bond duration. The differences for these two articles are：Diff1 and diff2.

For this week, I'm more familiar with how to add citation to more different articles.

Jiayu Xu (talk) 03:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Jiayu Xu, Please be sure to provide a sentence or two to express your contribution in context and demonstrate how it adds to the knowledge in the article. Reping me when finished and I will review. FULBERT (talk) 23:22, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

@FULBERT: For the Free Cash Flow article, I added a citation for what does free cash flow measure, reader can understand why it is important for a company. For the Bond Duration article, I added a citation for Macaulay Duration, which means average repayment period of bonds. Reader can get the definition from the citation.

Jiayu Xu (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Jiayu Xu, You still did not add the explanatory text to the two articles, only the citations along. Make the additions and then reping me. FULBERT (talk) 00:44, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@FULBERT: I added explanatory text for Free cash flow diff1 and for Bond duration diff2

Jiayu Xu (talk) 11:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Jiayu Xu, Thanks for the add on this, though our course ended two days ago. FULBERT (talk) 14:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi professor @FULBERT:

Respond to something in the Guiding questions training (above)

I like these series of tutorial videos and short introduction, because they taught me a lot how to use Wikipedia, such as making evaluation, adding citations, using talk page etc. It is really great why to know the system in very short term.

What your experience was like (overall) with this Wikipedia course assignment.

I like this assignment very much! I feel like I was one of contributor for making the giant free encyclopedia. At least I did something for humanity.

What you learned.

I learned how to assign articles for myself, and continuously edit the article until it is perfect. Also, I can leave a message for others revising articles.

Why / why not you intend to continue editing on Wikipedia.

I would like to continue edit on Wikipedia, because I think it is a great job for me and even for everyone. So many people are watching and caring about the context for each article that I almost can get an unbiased context and more effectively reading.

Jiayu Xu (talk) 11:03, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Jiayu Xu, Thanks for your final reflections on this, though our course ended two days ago and that was when this as an assignment was due. FULBERT (talk) 14:44, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anthony Kohlmann on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Song of Dorang-seonbi and Cheongjeong-gaksi on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

• Events
  • Past: Wikidata Parliament of Ghana contest launch (replay)
  • Upcoming: Biohackathon 2020 Barcelona 2020 November 9th - 13th The accepted wikidata related proposal: Knowledge graphs and wikidata subsetting
  • Upcoming: Online Wikidata editathon in Swedish #20, July 12
  • Upcoming: Celtic Knot conference, July 9-10, including several sessions about Wikidata, a Wikidata helpdesk

• Press, articles, blog posts, videos
  • Why Ariadne uses Getty AAT over Wikidata
  • Video: LIVE Wikidata editing #10 - YouTube

• Tool of the week
  • Ptable displays the periodic table automatically extracted from information provided by Wikidata; it also provides a check that all the elements are there with some basic properties. Additional pages provide charts of the nuclides under different criteria such as half-life. Each element or nuclide is linked to its Wikidata item for more information or to edit if necessary.

• Other Noteworthy Stuff
  • Abstract Wikipedia was approved.
  • OpenRefine 3.4 beta 2 was released.

• Did you know?
  • Newest properties:
    • General datatypes: Open Data portal, theorised by, DOI formatter, set in environment, academic appointment
    • External identifiers: House Divided ID, thefreedictionary medical term ID, People's Representative Council of Indonesia ID, Grove Art Online ID, Supreme Court of Sweden case number, KBpedia ID, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency OBJECTID, Oxford Bibliographies ID, Swiss Timber Bridges ID
  • New property proposals to review:
    • General datatypes: taxon synonym string, PM20 subject code, PM20 geo code, number of downloads, Interactive element, course, Zoning symbol, vanDerWaalsConstant, has pattern
    • External identifiers: AlloCiné theater ID, Cistercian Biography Online ID, Pitchfork artist ID, Archive Of Our Own tag, Austrian encyclopedia of music online, Swiss Tunnel ID, ANZSRC 2020 FoR ID, CPJF ID, TripAdvisor ID 2, Wien Kulturgut: Kunstwerke im öffentlichen Raum ID, public transport stop, Homebrew formula name, Offizielle Deutsche Charts song ID, British Museum object ID, ToS;DR service numerical identifier, code EHESS d'une commune, IAPH code, ProtonDB video game ID
  • Query examples:
    • France has a new Prime Minister: see the list of all ministers in French history (very long scroll). If you want to know more, see this notebook
    • Open data portals in Wikidata (using the newly created property Open Data portal (P8402))
    • Objects that are named after people on Wikidata (Source)

• Development
  • More work on the consistent design system (Phabricator board)
  • More work on decoupling the different Wikibase extensions from each other
    • Proposal to stop registering WikibaseLib as a separate extension
  • Polishing the first step of Federation (using Wikidata's Properties in another Wikibase installation) (incl. preventing users from selecting a federated property with a non-supported data type (phab:T252012) and preventing users from accessing Special:NewProperty when federation is enabled (phab:T255576) and viewing a list of all properties when federation is enabled (phab:T246339))
  • Continuing research and interviews around the topic of making it easier to access Wikidata's data for programmers
  • Doing first testing of mockups and prototypes of the first version of the Query Builder - coding can start soon
  • Convert a few properties from string to external identifier: Linguasphere code (P1396), KOATUU identifier (P1077) and ISIN (P946)

You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.

• Monthly Tasks
  • Add labels, in your own language(s), for the new properties listed above.
  • Comment on property proposals: all open proposals
  • Contribute to a Showcase item.
  • Help translate or proofread the interface and documentation pages, in your own language!
  • Help merge identical items across Wikimedia projects.
  • Help write the next summary!

Read the full report · Unsubscribe · Mohammed Sadat (WMDE) 15:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lewis Ludington on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Nelson Ludington on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ludington family on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Naoum Mokarzel on a Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Veterans' affairs on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Proposed deletion on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:32, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps I've been misinformed. Can you clarify that W?F hasn't impinged on your work on the grants committee? Chris Troutman (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Chris troutman, I am not sure I am following what you are asking. I am a member of the Project Grants Committee, is that what you mean? FULBERT (talk) 19:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I had heard a dirty rumor months ago that all the community members of the committee were fired. Apparently that wasn't so. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Chris troutman, I certainly hope not, as I spent a lot of time working through the most recent set of grant applications. FULBERT (talk) 13:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 9 July 2020 (UTC)