OK, random fact: some people are not as skilled with wiki syntax as you. When the article has the source, but it's not in an infobox, should it be deleted, or should someone with the know-how simply insert the appropriate infobox? In the meantime, should i re-upload it? Sorry if i sound angry, it's just that there have been so many people adding a delete tag when the info is right in front if them. KyuubiSeal (talk) 00:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
[[:File:3D Chess Board.jpg]]
Is this better? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Knight_3D_Move2.jpg Hehe, I never knew the curly braces made tags. So much to learn. KyuubiSeal (talk) 01:25, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Forgot to invite you to WT:Record charts#Chart template formats. I'm desperate to get people actually talking about what they want to see, and don't want to wind up changing things and then finding out that 90% of people still don't like the output.—Kww(talk) 03:36, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello!
Can you please suggest me what can be done, if an AE (appeal) was archived by a bot, but it had not been finished yet? Thanks Aregakn (talk) 04:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
You deleted all those photo's and I had forwarded a confirmation email and no one bothered to check it out... Lazy. Zaps93 (talk) 12:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
How does taking unique letters from a copyrighted logo, then reducing the size of them, put them in public domain?--Vaypertrail (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
The article Prince Ea has been flagged for copy editing, but i'm not sure exactly how to work on it (i am a friend of the artist). If you are able to help clean the page, it would be really appreciated.
Besides that, I see you've mentioned you're a music producer (or practicing to be), if you have any samples or anything we would love to take a look! Check out the movement too, tell me if you're interested. Send me an email at <snip> if you are at all interested in any of the aforementioned :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.109.143.223 (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
See my question here. Thx, Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
I need your help, I found references that the album "One in a Million" sold 8 million copies. found on page "aaliyah" here in wikipedia, the reference belongs to a book and I do not know how to put on the page "aaliyah discography" page and "One in a Million (album)" you put to me?
data:
Simmonds, Jeremy (2008). The Encyclopedia of Dead Rock Stars. Chicago Review Press. ISBN 1556527543.
Please and thanx =D —Preceding unsigned comment added by OneInAMillion96 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
I just closed this. If you could replace the transclusions, I believe it can be safely deleted. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:38, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm here about http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2009RockEagle4-HCampCounselors.jpg. I have emailed the permission-en[at]wikipedia twice about this and have not heard a response yet. I have received permission from the photographer (if I were lying, I would not be here to see what's going on, trust me if you can) in a message and have forwarded that message inside of a formal written email to the email address above. I guess I will have to wait another week or so until I try to post the picture back up. This is one thing that drives me insane about Wikipedia, especially when I listened and did exactly as the admin said. I still get punished in a way. I'm sure you get these messages all the time. I'm sorry for posting and wasting your time. Tamer of hope (talk) 04:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
The file you deleted File:PrimeNews.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] was a file was in use, incorrectly deleted as the author was not notified, incorrect nomination deletion reasoning and closing, I'm requesting you undeleted the file as it is unreplaceable, didn't fail NFCC and the FfD was flawed. Bidgee (talk) 06:12, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey Explicit boy, can you take a look at the file above and see whether the licensing is correct? If not, what can I do to make it correct as the subject is long deceased? --Legolas (talk2me) 05:12, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Following your deletion of Vassula.jpg at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Vassula.jpg
with tag "F7:Violates non-free use policy"
I would like to request the following information.
1) How is it a violation of the non free use policy?
2) Why was no proper explanation given as to WHY it violated non-free use policy given after it was deleted?
3) Is there a procedure to follow for uploading images of a living person? If so what EXACTLY is that procedure?
I would like to also point out the following:
1) The wikipages of "why was my page deleted" are completely useless / irrelevant and do not contain the information I seek.
2) The person in the picture gave me permission to use that image; In fact she chose it.
3) Your prompt feedback is URGENTLY required; A group of us are working very hard on this page and this kind of arbitrary action on your part without any forewarning or ANY personalized communication is a serious setback. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkatakor (talk • contribs) 12:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
RE:
1) I have been given permission by Vassula to use that image that I uploaded. She is the one who chose it. I simply do not know under what category I need to upload it. It IS a free photo (there is no licensing). The only reason I uploaded it under "non free" is coz its the only section that had an appropriate description of a "picture of a living person".
2) Is there a procedure to follow for uploading images of a living person? If so what EXACTLY is that procedure? As requested in my previous communication to you, kindly give me a step by step procedure into where and how I can upload this image so it does not get automatically deleted.
When i stated that the wikipages of "why was my page deleted" are completely useless / irrelevant and do not contain the information I seek, I was not referring to any of your pages but the standard ones on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arkatakor (talk • contribs) 01:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
I have a new picture of Mannie Fresh and I found it on Flickr. Wayne Olajuwon (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
What would be the proper license for me to upload this file for this artist page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Choppercity (talk • contribs)
As a novice editor, who would like to be more than an novice, I have to say that I thought I had 48 hours to complete the rationale for an image. Unless I blacked out, which I guess is a possibility, it has been less than 48 hours since I uploaded the file you deleted. Now, I have to admit, the process for uploading an acceptable image perplexes me. I have, to date, unloaded about a dozen images. The images I've uploaded are all pretty similar in nature, and used for similar purposes. Some have been deleted, and some have not. Every time I have sought help in trying to understand this overwhelming and perplexing procedure, I have obtained less than satisfactory assistance. I am angry and frustrated and see no reason why the process has to be so complex, diverse and controversial. I really do not understand why you did not first seek to contact me, advise, assist or inform me before deleting that file. On the one hand, there is a request for the image to be there, and on the other hand the wonderful world of Wikipedia makes the process just this side of impossible. I would just like to understand where I went wrong when my time and effort gets wasted like this. Maybe, just maybe, if you would take a little time to assist me, you or others won't waste your time deleting my efforts. And maybe I would not just give up and figure it just isn't worth my time to try to up grade lousy articles!---Ishtar456 (talk) 00:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I believe you understand the discussion on the talk page, where such associated acts are not being allowed. I believe except Starlight and Space Cowboy, none other can stand upto being associated acts. If you feel that what I did was wrong, feel free to revert it. --Legolas (talk2me) 07:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I just found out that the following images are deleted:
Can you please explain the specific reason why. e.g. Did I forgot to specify the rationel for fair use ore something like that?
Regard NED33 (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Feel like closing this colossal nomination? You're about the only closer on CfD who hasn't weighed in on the nomination itself. If you do, and if you decide that the changes are warranted, please note User:Cyde's instructions in the middle of the discussion about what to do with this many categories. Or just ask Cyde to take care of it. Thanks! ("No" is also an acceptable answer.)--Mike Selinker (talk) 20:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
I would like the change of capitalisation from November 2009 undone. The artist website (See Archive.org) used the capitalisation as previous to your move and User:Aspects's edit. You can see this usage as well as album capitalisation undone by Aspects on other websites as well. For example, the now defunct Fluxeuropa is one of the few sites still up with contemporary reviews of MLH. (It's also on all the CDs I own.) - BalthCat (talk) 05:13, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
What can ya do. I say don't worry so much about the capitalization, it's not too big of a deal. I don't agree with 100% of things around here, but you have to make with what you're given. — ξxplicit 19:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I saw you were active on WP:FfD and wondered if you could help. I want to rename a file, not delete it. Do you know if this is possible, or is it done as delete and then re-upload with the correct file name? File:Chongqing grand hall at night.jpg is in Beijing, not Chongqing, so the file name is confusing.
It's a good photo, and should be linked to Great Hall of the People, but I don't want to link it before the name is changed. Please can you assist? – RossJ81 Talk/Cont 06:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I am working on a project for London film premieres for a summer sponser and see Mark had a page before though it was deleted for notability.
I would like to add a new page for Mark Boardman and citiate many missing articles regarding his TV, radio and other work which make me positive he should have a permanent page here. He would be a big asset to Wikipedia and a great resource.
Having researched, I have used sources and the below is the draft I would like to submit.
Mark Boardman (born 1980) in Essex is a entertainment & showbiz expert spending 6 years as a journalist. As a self [1] and [2] Since 2007 he has been most Notable for his numerous TV appearances and celeb based documentaries.
His first experienced a major TV role as a chat show host on Homemade for [3] which ran for 1 series where alongside his showbiz mate [4] modestly claims
Mark; as a celebrity hunter is really the star of the show and we are on the same level
[5]. His appearance on [6] lead to a big interview with [7] & co presenters. Mark has appeared on over a dozen TV programmes including [8] where he discussed ways to get A-listers on your side and the art of autograph collecting on " Collectors corner ".
In 2003, he appeared on the [9] where as a audience member was invited up on stage by [10] a fellow vegetarian to talk about his weekly experience of attending the show and meeting stars including [11]
For the [12] in 2007 he filmed a TV documentary regarding London film premieres and discussed why celebs are so in demand right now, he then went on to meet [13] when filming for [14]
and shared experiences of his lifestyle. Having met over 3500 celebrities in [15] on the [16] where only a [17] is worthy of shaking his hand. Mark was hired Mark as the celebrity roving reporter for [18]and his first broadcast was for the Brit awards 2007 [19]
Celebrity Quotes
[20] on Mark
one of Tv's rising stars
[21]
Mark is gonna be a stars
[22] quotes Mark as saying to [23]
Can you record a answerphone message for me
External links
His official website Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). Quotes Mark as saying to [24] "Can you record a answerphone message for me"<p? A regular of Local radio and a celeb pundit and star blogger, Mark is regarded by many and listed as a minor UK celebrity [25] Since 2004 Mark has run his own celebrity / London film premiere website and has nearly 3000 followers on [26]
<ref>
</ref>
The [27] online wrote a piece [28]
Mark Boardman is trying vainly to keep up appearances. He started going out of his way to meet celebrities 19 years ago, though he stretched the definition of celebrity somewhat with a snap of Russ Swift - the record holder for parking in narrow spaces, as if you didn't know. But Mark has now become a sage in the art and recently grabbed the autographs of Ewan McGregor - "he's partial to a choc Magnum" and pop "star" Lee Ryan - "who I watched on the backstage bouncy castle with Jodie Marsh" at Popbeach. Classy.
His blogging has earnt him status of a Minor celebrity on [29] & his insights in action on the red carpet in Leicester Square, London. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tvstarlondon (talk • contribs) 11:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'd like to ask for your help in copyediting and making relevant the huge "Politics" section on the article M.I.A., as it is violating WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE among other policies. I don't think it's particularly well cited, or related to her politics. Alot of it seems to be written like an essay, with redundant quotes with the word politics in, repeats from what's in the main section, info that adds nothing to the bio, or is violating WP:Original research by assuming a political connect (free speech demands, bridges connecting first and third world) etc. It doesn't seem encyclopaedic at all. I've had a go at it. But whilst assuming good faith, the User:Exander2009 who I assume created the section seems highly possessive of the section, and reverts most changes immediately. Would like a third opinion on the matter. I've also asked User:ChrisTheDude for input. I've had a go at it myself, but I feel more editors involved would be helpful to make the article as a whole much better. Thank you. Lifebonzza (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Thought I would drop a line because I noticed you were into music. Just wondering if I could ask you for any guidelines on my userpage layout and wondered if you could assist me on making mine look somewhat similar to yours. Thanks in advance and I will watch your page. Mr little irish(talk) 15:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
After seeing this CfD discussion, I feel that it should be relisted and made public (like via AN or ANI) as any place could be considered a "populated place" at any time. For example, Stephens City, Virginia was founded in 1758, was "populated" in the early 1730 by German settlers, but probably had an Indian population long before that. So calling a town a "populated place" is very confusing. Having things being categorized previously as "Settlements" or "Cities" or "Villages" is MUCH better and less confusing. An area can be "populated" at anytime. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 03:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I was wondering why you deleted the article "Discount tire company". You are well aware that the company is nationally stable and recognized throughout the U.S. and maybe you should think twice before deleting it. --Monterey Bay (talk) 01:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
You removed a prod tag [1] with the comment "Removed prod; contested on talk page". I see no entry by you on the talk page - did you forget? Thanks! jmcw (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
I have this book creator toolbar on the top of my screen, but I didn't create a book. How do I get rid of it without deleting someone else's work? Georgia Peachez (talk) 14:07, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Please expalin why you deleted this image?Rodolph (talk) 16:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
RE: OK. Dan56 (talk) 20:44, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
hi. on 29 may I think you deleted the above image re discussion at [2]
user Rodolph has asked for help re deletion of a number of images he has uploaded. I dont think he has quite got the hang of copyright tagging, but in this case I dont see why the image was deleted. User memphisto appears to be engaged in a vendetta with rodolpho over images and was in this case the only person requesting deletion. I gather this may apply to a whole swath of other images. It seems to me the proper course for a good faith editor would be to assist Rodolpho in properly tagging his images, rather then trying to get them deleted. It is my understanding that being orphaned is only grounds for deletion of an image is it is 'fair use'. Perhaps you can cast some light on this, and indeed undelete the image if there was nothing wrong with it?Sandpiper (talk) 21:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to address the issue of your deletion of my page by G11. The page itself was a work in progress, and definitely not a finished result. I had yet to post it to wikipedia (and if I had posted it, I am sorry, I did not realize it), and was still working on making it "unbaist." I was in the process of making it an informational page as more information about the company came to me. I had not yet recieved the full information required to continue the article. Is there any way to undo the delete and any way you would be willing to do so.
Thank you. HNewbold (talk) 13:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
A file which you previously commented on has been nominated for deletion [3] – ╟─TreasuryTag►Captain-Regent─╢ 08:21, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm 12 years old and what is this???
~Beegee7730 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC).
Hi, you have deleted the file Peace_activists_throwing_an_Israeli_soldier_over_board, I believe your deletion was incorrect. This is an image of unique historic significance and is not replaceable. Historic Images released but the IDF Spokesperson's Unit are allowed per the Wikipedia fair use policy. This image has been released to the public by IDF Spokesperson's Unit. It is an image of unique historic significance and is not replaceable. Non-replaceable Historic Images released but the IDF Spokesperson's Unit are allowed per the Wikipedia fair use policy. According to IDF Spokesperson's Unit terms of use, user is specifically allowed to make "fair use" of the protected material as set out under law. Notice that the article discusses this image/video frame itself. "The IDF released 20 videos of the incident.[97] One video shows how the first commandos to abseil down to the deck were attacked by a mob, and includes a soldier being thrown 30 feet (9.1 m) overboard as well as another being thrown to the lower deck." Thus this image is in full compliance of Wikipedia fair use policy. Marokwitz (talk) 11:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi! You deleted a page I spent a lot of time working on called YooHoo & Friends and I was not aware that it was proposed for deletion until it was too late (apparently you get 7 days), otherwise I would have made efforts to edit accordingly and request that it not be deleted...in fact I would like to officially request it be undeleted. I'm not sure who tagged the page for proposed deletion either and would also contact them directly to seek help in the matter. Forgive me for not understanding this as I'm fairly new to the process. I've read a lot of info on wikipedia and still don't quite understand the "why" part of the page not meeting notability criteria. At the least, I would like to start the process of editing so it meets the standards (I assume there were some fairly simple fixes since it was only "proposed for deletion") and can get it back up on this wonderful resource Wikipedia! Or it'd be nice to at least get the code/content back since I spent so much time on it! Thanks for any assistance you can provide. Cheers, Lambadical (talk) 21:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Ok thank you very much. Lambadical (talk) 21:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Curious, once I think the page in question is again satisfactory, what would the next step be to have that once deleted page considered for restoration? I should have the edited version in the next couple days. Thanks! Lambadical (talk) 21:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
This user page looks like unneccesary nonsense. Should I mark it for speedy deletion or are user pages allowed to be nonsense? Just wondering. Thanks. Ilikepieittastesgood 01:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Rovington has ignored the "You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license" statement at the bottom of the editing window and insists on placing a "This text is copied from my cc-by-sa-3.0 website" link, even though he's copied the text over himself. Because these links have been removed, he's placed a notice that the CC license has been revoked and has since been attempting to remove as much of his content as possible from Wikipedia. Some hours ago, you deleted a large number of his files for which he'd requested deletion; it's plain to me that he requested deletion in bad faith, so it's only right in my eyes that these images be restored. Would you mind if I restored them? I'm referring to all of Rovington's images that you've deleted since 00:00 on 15 June 2010. Nyttend (talk) 02:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, I've been off for some days and I didn't read the reply to my question in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 May 23#File:Juan_negrin.gif before you deleted the image. My understanding is that the image is valid as long as a proper fair-use rationale is provided and only for the Juan Negrín article. If my understanding is right, would you mind restoring the article? I commit to add the fair use rationale once you warn me about the restoration. Best regards and many thanks in advance --Ecemaml (talk) 09:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. A fair use rationale has been added. Best regards --Ecemaml (talk) 21:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
I see you removed the deletion notice I had added to File:Derrimut distribution centre.png after an anon IP, presumably the uploader, added a {{PD-self}} tag to the image, however, you probably did not notice that this image was virtually a duplicate of File:Mitre10 Derrimut Regional Distribution Centre.png, which was deleted today, with the copyright notice cropped from the bottom of the image, so it is actually a copyvio but without an actual source and any, false or otherwise, I could not nominate it under WP:F9. I cannot find a source for this one, though it could be a Google Earth or Bing image, but if you view at the deleted image you will no doubt agree this should be deleted. What to do? ww2censor (talk) 04:19, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed you deleted the two image I did upload on the page.
The artist , that I contacted, gave me authorization to publish those.
Can you please restore them ?
Best Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmarkowi (talk • contribs) 14:03, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Does not turn out to add an user to the category "Category:Wikipedians from Kyiv". Already tried everything. It is needed, that automatically added to the category at presence of {{User Kyiv}}. — Sodmy (talk) 13:56, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, Quick question re policy on Categories. A new user Satti007 (talk · contribs), added several lines of unsourced text to category page Category:Senior Members of the IEEE— DIFF. To me this seems unnecessary, perhaps more suited to an article on the subject? Is there a policy on this? ((talk page stalker)s are welcome to comment/reply.) You may have to 'ping' me as I (a mere IP) don't have a watchlist. Regards, --220.101 (talk) \Contribs 00:38, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, I had an article flagged for deletion and I noticed far to late, I was wondering if it would be possible to have this moved to a subpage on my userspace, so that I can continue to work on the article and make sure that it matches up to the credibility factor, thank you.
Toxigenicpoem (talk) 20:40, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi i just wondered if Buscaaweb (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is Brexx or Tremanshoe sock puppet. Its the ... (elipses) that's tipping me off? Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
I suspect that Bepanthenplus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is another Brexx sleeper sock. Very argumentative with myself and User:L-l-CLK-l-l also editing a lot of Brexx targets. Seems suspicious since the last Brexx sock left a message about the song "Grown Woman" being released on July 13 here and now they are edit warring over it at Grown Woman. Other contributions match typical Brexx targets. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I need help from an admin with a track list on this page, Pilot Talk. Someone is editing the page though I've provided sources that are viable. Can you help me with keeping this from being edited? Choppercity (talk) 30 June 2010 at 02:56 —Preceding undated comment added 02:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC).
Delete Talk:Hard Candy (Madonna album)/GA1, sockpuppet crap. Or you can review, ya know! --Legolas (talk2me) 03:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
You have just prematurely deleted two files that had the correct permission obtained for CC by SA. These files are "File:Skipper Stowe.jpg" and "File:Schooner Anne.jpg".
I have already had problems with the Permissions department for confirming licenses for pictures I have uploaded. "File:KDAQ facilities.jpg" is a case in point where I recently obtained permission by email and sent this on to the proper dept. See the discussion at User_talk:Fastily/Archive_4#Removal_of_File:KDAQ_facilities.jpg where it shows that even though I had sent the letter to [email protected] they did nothing about it until an administrator stepped in on my behalf and notified them about the letter.
Has this happened again? I went to all the trouble to immediately comply with your stiff regulations on copyright, and the permissions dept. has been sitting on my letters for the files "File:Skipper Stowe.jpg" and "File:Schooner Anne.jpg" since June 8, 2010. Could you please check what they have done with my letter of permission from the owner of these photos? Have they even looked at it? Thank you.
P.S. If you would like, I can email you a copy of the permission letter that I received for both these photos in question. It explicitly states that I have permission under the CC by SA ver. 3.0 (Creative Commons License) for both these photos. What else do they want? --Skol fir (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, could you link me to the discussion about deleting this picture [Skipper Stowe.jpg] please. Off2riorob (talk) 17:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
You recently deleted File:[email protected]. Two things:
Can you protect The Girlie Show World Tour for a few days. IP of a banned user is continuously adding non-free images to the article although same free image exists. I have reverted thrice (in two days) and hence won't do it further. --Legolas (talk2me) 03:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
I was considering nominating you for bureaucratship! Do you accept or decline - should I post the nomination or not? Ilikepieittastesgood 04:24, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
07:05, 2 July 2010 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Cache,associative-read.dia" (F10: Useless media file (not an image, audio or video))
Hi. Please, reverse your deletion, because the .dia files is actually a better source file than .svg. Svgs exported from dia are almost no editable. It is no useless, it is like .tex and .dvi. Anyone can publish .dvi or even convert it to .pdf, viewable from any computer. But almost noone can correct a small typo (or translate the text on image to other language) in .pdf or in .dvi, the original .tex is needed (the same is true for metapost sources and images). With your deleteion I need to spend 2 hours with recreating this .dia from raster file (.png)!!
The same for File:Cache,basic.dia: 07:06, 2 July 2010 Explicit (talk | contribs) deleted "File:Cache,basic.dia" (F10: Useless media file (not an image, audio or video)) `a5b (talk) 03:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
IF you (and midiawiki image converter) dont know that .DIA is an IMAGE, please, ask anybody who knows, but don't touch and delete this files. `a5b (talk) 03:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Do we think 86.96.227.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) might be brexx again? Lil-unique1 (talk) 13:48, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Ok this one I'm not sure about but CloversMallRat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is tenditiously editing main Brexx targets. Notably it seems they have edited several wildcard articles long enough to be autoconfirmed to edit Brexx targets. Clasic Brexx behaviour includes not responding to talk messages, leaving things several hours to cool off then editing again. I've left messages about on-going project discussions as well as guidelines but to no help. Needs a second opinion. I'm not saying this is Brexx but it certainly fits the bill and there are enough similarities to warrant second opinion. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:56, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
You deleted the file File:Lamont BlackWeds.jpg, which I had uploaded. I was not informed that it had been deleted: I was not aware of its deletion until I happened to come across an article in which it had been used and deleted. I recognise that the image is not in the public domain, but English-language wiki permits the uploading of fair-use images, and I went to some lengths to justify its fair use in the articles in question. It clearly did not fit the F7 criteria, such as obvious bad faith. Might I ask why it was deleted? If it was deleted mistakenly, might I ask if you kept a copy, since the original image is no longer accessible to me? The matter is further discussed at this talk page. Thanks, BartBassist (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Explicit. I was using twinkle to nominate No Love (Eminem song) for deletion but its created two reports and created two AfD discussions. How can it be corrected? One of the nom's and discussions should be deleted. Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Yep, Aaliyah went off pending changes trial on the 30th. Because it was mixed in with so many other changes, I thought it got accidentally removed. I guess I'm also used to the bots patrolling the protection tags; one of them would've removed the tag sometime in the past week. Sorry about that. —C.Fred (talk) 19:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:33, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Future elections in Australia. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Frickeg (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
this is my conclusion. I loved your idea of placing between 24 and 32 million albums (let's leave it at that?)
This case has consumed me long, and the article 'aaliyah' needs other 'improvements' (a natural evolution over time, and reliable sources)
I undid his review because you had taken my sources. I put them in the back and deizi 24000000-32000000 of albums (and more sources to download 32.)
is good?
=)
One in A Million , July 8. comment added by OneInAMillion96 (talk —Preceding undated comment added 01:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC).
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Regarding Alicia Keys, you called my source explanation a "story as believable as the tooth fairy" and yet when I offer to provide concrete support for it I am ignored. I guess that's a convenient way to keep my "story" unbelievable isn't it? Well done.Jcgordon7 (talk) 20:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I apologize, it seemed like you were consistently present and were just choosing not to acknowledge what I was saying because it might contradict a number of other sources. So where can I submit the snippet?Jcgordon7 (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
I see. So, you're telling me as long as a lie can be verified by more sources than a truth, the lie is controlling fact as far as Wikipedia is concerned? That's unfortunate! I don't know how much stock I'll be putting into figures I find here going forward. This isn't my website by any means, and I'm more than happy to abide with Wikipedia's policies. I just didn't appreciate being effectively called a liar right off the bat; that wasn't necessary at all and I was expecting at slightly higher degree of professionalism and courtesy from an admin. I was going to submit the snippet if anything to rebut your presumption that I'm telling tall tales. Is it that hard to believe that there are people out there who work with recording contracts? They don't write and edit themselves, you know. "Job working with recording contracts" and "the tooth fairy" are on completely different levels of plausibility, but thank you for the kind comparison.Jcgordon7 (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. I regret that I can't provide any more verifiable or citable source for this date (it's very disheartening especially when it's staring me in the face in her own handwriting! hehe), but I understand why this source cannot be used to counterclaim the 1981 date that's out there. I guess Alicia stays in her 20's for one more year! I'm sure she's not disappointed. Jcgordon7 (talk) 21:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
