This is an archive of past discussions with User:Explicit. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi Explicit. Although I can somewhat understand your "no consensus" close with respect to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 February 26#File:ThomasNelson-Williams.jpg, there was some related discussion regarding these files and some other similar files uploaded by this user at User talk:Wikiaddict8962#Disputed non-free use rationale for File:TClaudeNelson-Williams.jpeg. It seems as if these should at least be verified by VRT, but it's not clear whether the uploader is willing to do so. The uploader is concerned that VRT verification might violatie their privacy. FWIW, the files actually were tagged with {{npd}} at first, but the uploader removed the tags. So, another user started the discussion about them at FFD. Are these, in your opinion, OK as licensed or do they need VRT verification? If it's a case of the latter, I'm not sure how to convince the uploader that VRT verification will not violate their privacy. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:22, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: To be honest, I think that this is a case which can't be resolved because the uploader is unwilling to reveal their identity even to the VRT team. Unless there's actual evidence to suggest the files are infringing on someone else's rights, the discussion just kind of hits a dead end. ✗plicit06:48, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
I sort of feel the same way too. At the same time, though, I'm not sure we should be keeping files just because the uploader is unwilling to resolve things by verifying their copyright ownership. File:Tolbertfamily1913.jpg is another file uploaded by the same user as own work, but it almost certainly is no longer eligible for copyright protection per c:COM:Liberia. The two files discussed at FFD might actually be PD per c:COM:Sierra Leone or c:Template:PD-heirs, but the uploader never really responded to those queries. FWIW, there are other files with similar issues uploaded by this user; for example, File:RAHenries.jpg, File:RomeoAHorton.jpg, File:JohnLCooper.jpg, File:ArthurStuart.jpg, File:WilliePriddy.jpg, File:Americo-Liberians.jpg and File:Tubmanfamily1917.jpg. The claims of "own work" and CC licensing seem questionable at best, but some probably can be converted to non-free and some might even be PD for some reason if more information was known about their provenance. These too should probably be moved to Commons if they're OK to keep, right? Would it be in appropriate to tag these for a move to Commons? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:01, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Deleted page - Sardar_Ridha_Singh
Hello, I had added this page and I see it's deleted. I understand that there was a lack of citations for the information. Somehow, I've not been getting alerts for subscribed page changes from Wikipedia. Maybe landing in my spam folder... I request you to reinstate the page and I will add some news citations to comply with Wikipedia requirements. Thanks! Here's the link for the deleted page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sardar_Ridha_Singh
Thanks! I added a citation. Can you please publish it now?
J S Pannu 10:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Request : Undeletion of Apna Jobs
I am reaching out regarding the deletion of the article Apna Jobs, which was removed following an Articles for Deletion (AfD) discussion concluding that it did not meet WP:NCORP and contained promotional content.
I respectfully request a reconsideration of this decision, or if possible, a temporary user-space restoration so that I can improve the article to better align with notability guidelines.
If permitted, I would like to address the concerns raised in the AfD discussion by revising the article to meet Wikipedia's verifiability and neutrality standards. Please let me know if there is a possibility of restoring the content in my user sandbox for further improvements before reconsidering its status in the main namespace.
Looking forward to your guidance on the best way to proceed.
@Marchjuly: Hi, I've deleted that user subpage in accordance with U5, and the Commons file in accordance with F10. The local file will likely end up in the abyss a week from now. ✗plicit11:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
I might have honked the request up, not sure, but basically the gist is that the proposer was banned, originally for having an undeclared COI, before arbcomm eventually assumed it. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:48, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm not sure that a category like this can accurately be described as "maintenance category", so I don't think C4 can apply. Is C1 a better fit? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:55, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi Explicit, I saw that you deleted the page "MapJack" on 23 March 2025 after an expired PROD (concern: Fails WP:NSOFT). At that point the website had been offline for several years, so I understand the reason. However, I just created a new version of it, so it is online again. Could you please reinstate that page again? Thanks! Björn Morén, co-founder of MapJack.
New user The Intersider started a page with an arbitrary title, L Franchise (film series). The makers has not said anywhere that the planned trilogy's title is "L". It is actually unnamed. Besides, title is also in incorrect format - the disambiguation "franchise" is followed by another disambiguation "film series". Secondly, L Franchise is used as a noun, taken from nowhere. Additionally, media franchise and series are technically different, this one only contain films, franchise will have films, TV series, books, merchandise etc. 2409:4073:2E81:F8BA:7C19:883A:1911:82AF (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Tommy Jonathan Sinaga born April 4, 1999 is an Indonesian writer. He made his debut in the publishing world in 2016 with "Paranormal Life: Those Who Understand Life" as his first novel. [1] Tommy Jonathan Sinaga was born on April 4, 1999, in Pematang Siantar, North Sumatra. Tommy completed his elementary to high school education in Pematang Siantar and Simalungun Regency. In 2021, he continued his studies at STIKOM Tunas Bangsa Pematang Siantar, pursuing a Bachelor's degree in Informatics Engineering.[2] While at home from college, he often designed website layouts offline using the Xampp and WordPress applications with his close friend Khairul Azhari. Tommy has been actively writing since 2016. He regularly writes on his blog, majalah-kemarin.blogspot.com. Tommy enjoys writing romantic stories.[3] In 2020, In addition, he also released the song "Tekno" and has published 16 songs on his YouTube channel.[4] Since then, he has been covered by various national news media such as RCTI, iNews, Pikiran-Rakyat, and other news outlets. Tommy also began to be interested in scientific research since early 2024, amidst his busy college life, because he felt he couldn't work a routine job like most people, and he is rarely active on social media.[5] In that year, he decided to conduct research and write various scientific works such as, Computer Science, Philosophy, and Law.[6]
Scientific work
(Id) Proses Penerapan Layanan Pemesanan dan Pengiriman Obat Apotek Berbasis Aplikasi Digital (The Process of Implementing a Digital Application-Based Pharmacy Medicine Ordering and Delivery Service) [7]
(Id) Penelitian Artificial Intelligence untuk Satelit Komunikasi menggunakan Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan (JST) (Artificial Intelligence Research for Communication Satellites using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs))[8]
Hello, how do I get this biography on en Wikipedia? I would appreciate guidance on whether the content of the article and the sources I have gathered are suitable. Thanks. ᘙ5 (talk) ᘙ5 (talk) 18:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am interested in seeing the history of Tom Patterson (cartographer) with the intent of cleaning up the page with information referenced from news and journal articles. Would you mind undeleting the page into the draft namespace? Thanks! QuincyMorgan (talk) 21:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm writing to you regarding FC Iberia 2010 that has been soft deleted based on a single vote. I'm wondering whether you could restore the page, which would enable me to add two more sections, the list of players and notable players. Currently, it is the only 4th division club with no Wikipedia page.
Thanks. Gorgin18 (talk) 06:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I was asked to write to you from my undelete request here. From the time since the article was deleted for not meeting notability guidelines, Wiesław Lewicki acquired the required 100,000 signatures to become an official candidate for the 2025 Polish presidential election, awaiting certification. So he will undoubtably be written about in the news during campaign season, and while the article might still not meet notability guidelines in the state it was in, it will certainly be possibly to greatly improve it with the incoming news, and the basic biographical information that was there is generally useful as a foundation. Thanks! Polish kurd (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I'm responding to your deletion of my page request. Appreciate you taking the time.
Augie K Fabela is a prominent American public figure, Co-Founder and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Nasdaq-listed VEON (previously Vimpelcom) and a serial entrepreneur and founder of multiple startupts in the technology sector. He is also a dedicated philanthropist and founder of the Fabela Family Foundation, as well as the author of two books, including a #1 Amazon bestseller. He is referred to briefly in the VEON entry, but it would be beneficial for Wikipedia readers to have his complete biography on the record. We are committed to only contributing factual information and Wiki-approved citations, and will do so with consensus from other Wikipedia editors.VEON.MNS (talk) 08:00, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
@Gene93k: I have restored the page history. For whatever reason, I keep running into a fatal exception error in trying to restore the most recent revision that redirected the article to Guul University. ✗plicit14:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Ugh, the "delete" close it was only four days after the requested relist -- I was expecting I'd have a week, and was planning on looking into it tomorrow. At the very least, it should be redirected with the history preserved for when coverage eventually surfaces. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
@BeanieFan11: Per WP:RELIST, A relisted discussion may be closed once consensus is determined, without necessarily waiting for another seven days. There was a pretty clear consensus to delete here. There was no suggestion to redirect the page in the discussion, so that's not an WP:ATD I could have taken, especially when the subject is listed in at least nine different competitions from 1986–2003. ✗plicit00:48, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Ugh, that's disappointing, given that I had an in-depth argument I was set to make tomorrow. Could it be restored to draftspace or something? I was in the process of contacting the Djibouti Post (the country's newspaper) to see if they knew anything about him, and I'm almost certain that coverage exists, so losing that page history would make things more difficult to return if its found. BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
This is regarding the recently deleted article: Vastav AI. The creator of the previous page was also found to be a WP:Socks that were making edits to this page. In lieu of that, the page has been recreated by [3] who has barely contributed to anything apart from his article. The other user involved was recently banned: [4] and [5]. I feel that these are a bunch of meat puppets and paid editors, as the current wiki article does clearly do read like an advert as well. I have nominated the page VastavX AI for speedy deletion. Thanks Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:02, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
I see this was closed as delete yet did not see anyone refuting the WP:HEY. Not asking you to overturn, but if you could restore the last version I did to draft I would appreciate it. Thanks. CNMall41 (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. The page for Johnny Contardo was restored in February 2025, but is gone again. When I search for it, it says the page does not exist. He is still an active musician, with many fans worldwide. I'm still learning the correct way to suggest edits, and had hoped to add a few lines to bring the page up to date. Can you please advise why the page does not exist, and what can be done to restore it? H2karen (talk) 18:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
@H2karen: Hi, you will need to discuss the matter with the closing admin for reconsideration. I am unable to revert their closure without consensus to do so. ✗plicit03:30, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Talk:Roosevelt dictatorship
I'm not sure what the rush was to delete Talk:Roosevelt dictatorship. Someone asked a question in good faith there on the fate of the deleted page. Even if you want to delete the talk page, you should at the bare minimum copy & paste the conversation to that user's talk page so they can see my response. I don't recall the name of the account but you should be able to see it in the history, but I don't see evidence of you doing such a thing in your recent contribs - apologies if I just missed it. SnowFire (talk) 01:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
I see you've been editing since. This is really not a hard request to process - if you've already done so (I can't easily check given the volume of your edits + me not remembering the account's name precisely), please verify so. Should be just view history of deleted page -> move content to the user's talk page with my reply.
For the general case, WP:BITE is a core guideline. If an infrequent editor asks a legitimate question in the wrong spot, the polite thing to do is just move it elsewhere - deleting it with no record it ever was made is pointlessly rude and drives away new contributors. I hope you do not casually delete all such talk pages without bothering to move the content for when said content isn't spam - something to consider for the future. SnowFire (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
That said, I notice you have not replied on the general case. This particular case was weird because I had that page on my watchlist still, so there was a regular editor to "notice". But most cases like this won't have that - it'll be just a newbie shooting in the darkness in the wrong spot. In those cases, it needs to be the admin doing the right thing, even when no one else sees it. Do you agree or disagree that this kind of courtesy takes 15 seconds and is a good idea before deleting such pages, if this were to happen again but with no one else noticing? SnowFire (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
@SnowFire: Yup, I should have moved it to begin with or copied the discussion to the user's talk page before or after originally deleting it. ✗plicit04:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Possible Countryhumans redirect?
Morning. Since you deleted the Countryhumans article last, I just wanted to check in with you. Now, I'm not saying I want to bring back the page, but I do want to make it redirect to Personification. Yay, or Nay?
@NorthTension: Please see WP:NFC#cite_note-4: The NFCI#2 allowance for logos only applies to the use of the logo on the infobox or lede for the stand-alone article about the entity, and should reflect its most current logo. The use of historical logos for an entity is not allowed, unless the historical logo itself is described in the context of critical commentary about that historical logo.✗plicit14:51, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
The emblem/patch is still very frequently used despite the one at the top of the infobox being the official legal symbol of Wagner ever since they became part of the Armed Forces. I can provide sources if needed showing the still constant usage of the skull emblem as it's basically their most famous trademark.
Personally I feel like that logo should be exempt from copyright because of it like all other Russian military emblems, but I don't exactly know where to argue that.
Also, if removing the flag version is a requirement to keep the skull emblem on the page then I'd be fine with that, it's literally a seal on a bedsheet. NorthTension (talk) 15:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
So....can we remove the flag that has the logo you deleted on it in exchange for putting that logo back on the page? It's still very explicitly in use even though it's not the official logo anymore. NorthTension (talk) 15:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
@NorthTension: As I stated above, "policy only allows the use of one non-free item". If the other logo is preferred to the current one, then changing it is an editorial decision. ✗plicit00:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I saw that you deleted this file under WP:F7. However, a discussion was recently had with no consensus to remove the fair use image. In fact, 3/4 of the comments agreed that a fair use image should be included in the page. Additionally, there is currently a second discussion ongoing about the use of a fair use file in the page. I think that speedily-deleting the file was premature and also circumvents the consensus-gaining process. I would like to request that the file be restored and re-added until a consensus is reached. Thanks, ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@ArtemisiaGentileschiFan: Hi, this image is credited to the Associated Press and was deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#F7 as being a photo from a press agency, which must be deleted on the spot. It had nothing to do with the arguments in the discussion you linked. ✗plicit00:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello. Perhaps due to ignorance, I didn't take the corrective action. I requested the removal of the Sarah Yarkin page because its content redirects to another page completely unrelated to the page's content. Sarah Yarkin is an actress, and Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2022 film) this is a film she starred in. It doesn't make much sense to redirect to one of her films. It's pointless. I hope I've explained myself well; my English is still very limited. Best regards :) 83.38.176.11 (talk) 05:40, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@Iljhgtn: "Soft deletion" refers to deletion that occurs when little to no participants take part of a deletion discussion. Such deletions are considered uncontroversial because they are uncontested. Pages which have previously been proposed for deletion, or otherwise failed to get a "delete" result in previous deletion discussions, are not eligible for soft deletion and must be subject to robust consensus to result in deletion of the page. ✗plicit14:13, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
Well that same one has now had a few more days pass and another !vote came in for a Merge support. I think it could be closed as a "Merge" at this stage in the game. Iljhgtn (talk) 00:29, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
This article was deleted due to PROD expiring today. However shortly after you deleted it was recreated by the original article creator (who suddenly decided to be active all of a sudden). Although the content is slightly changed compared to what's shown in the archives, there is still a lack of independent in-depth sources to meet notability. Is this article eligible for CSD or we will need to go to AFD on this?
Hi! I am actually personally disappointed (I wanted to find information about clubs) about the deletion over a lack of sources of the Tasmania Cricket League article. Is it possible that it could be started again (and moved to a draft space if needed) with real sources this time and not original research? If it can be restarted, I could be the one to provide the sources and not Original research. Thank you Servite et contribuere (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for joining us in celebrating the 10th year of Wikipedia Asian Month!
We truly appreciate your contributions, and we look forward to seeing more articles about Asia written in different languages.
We also hope you continue to participate each year!
Hi, hoping you're well. I saw today you replaced the infobox image for Sub-Zero with a screencapture from the character trailer. While I understand the video itself was released as free-use under a YouTube license, I do have some concerns about using it in this manner as the character in question is viable, as the character itself is trademarked and copyrighted separately; even the image on commons presents this warning in its file information. There's also some consensus that images that use official representations of copyrighted characters in them may be questionable despite the original image being free, as in the case of city photos that illustrate a character in advertising.
On a more practical level, while artwork for the MK series is...well...inconsistent to say the least, an argument can be made that the image is not the best representation of the character for the reader to understand who they are at a glance and the character's design; it shows too little of them. Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:59, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Because simply put we're using an image from a trailer without confirmation the character's imagery was released for the purposes we're using it for, not to mention the layers of copyright protection regarding the character (both Netherealm and Warner Bros. hold a copyright in this case). At the very least better clarification from the horse's mouth may be a good idea to obtain, no?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
@Kung Fu Man: The video was uploaded by the official Mortal Kombat YouTube channel, it's pretty difficult to argue that they did not intend to freely release this particular video. Not all depictions of this character are free, but this one is. A similar situation arose at c:Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:NickRewind videos, which resulted in keeping all the media files. These are becoming more frequent over time, so music videos, video game trailers, film trailers, and more are being licensed under Creative Commons. Trademarks are a separate issue, which does not restrict us from using the content as the Creative Commons License specifies. ✗plicit04:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
RfD closure of a redirect with history
Hi! I recently got the mop and am attempting to use it at RfD. I've got a couple questions about redirects with history, and am bugging you because you're one of the more active closers there, feel free to redirect me elsewhere. (For reference, I am specifically looking at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2025_April_16#Ruby-gnome2).
First, do we need to keep something with substantive history when that history isn't prserved anywhere in mainspace? (in this case, a merge and then all content deleted at the target page after the merge). Second, if we do, what's the recommended way to do that? Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Administrator instructions suggests that you should archive it into a talk namespace and then link on the old target's talk page, but I don't think I've ever seen this done. A histmerge seems contraindicated by WP:PVER, but was suggested elsewhere. Do we just need to keep the redirect, or at least relist while pointing out the history? Rusalkii (talk) 03:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
@Rusalkii: Hi, the content was removed as a result of this edit just eight days after it was merged, and seemingly not added back since. A redirect with a page history must be retained for attribution purposes only if the content exists there, which it doesn't anymore. In this particular case, I think you are free to go for either close the discussion or relist it if feel that the history is worth mentioning and may have been overlooked. ✗plicit04:00, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
@Rusalkii: If the assumption is that the merged material is still at the target, I would instead !vote and ping the prior participants, as they may not be aware of the circumstances. I think Jay does that more often than other admins who work at RFD. ✗plicit04:47, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
My list of deletion page of vandalism
So you don't agree about deleting many pages redirected to Bali United F.C. by AldiBh?? Have you looked at his contributions? He made that many pages that already separating Putra Samarinda and Bali United history? Wira rhea (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
@Wira rhea: I declined the deletion of these redirects because they did not meet any of the speedy deletion criterion. The relevant place to discuss these redirects is WP:RFD. However, this is currently an active sockpuppet investigation regarding the account at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwinug, so you may want to wait it out to not put in any unnecessary effort. If the user is blocked as a result, the pages they created will be deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#G5. ✗plicit05:37, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, as I know, the account was indeed sockpuppet. I already placed a tag for delete (db-r2) and I gave the reason, can you please check? TIA Wira rhea (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
The Gacy article is already exhaustive. It would add undue weight to the section in question. It was his first murder so youse could argue it is noteworthy as an independent article. Kieronoldham (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Well Butkowich one page seems less notable and worse made but yeah thing is they are both made by sock which is bad , o it could be since Timothy is Gacy first kill just taking some content and reference and just expending Timothy section on Gacy page and just straight up deleting Butkovich one DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
I didn"t find any expect there was brief merge req that everyone ignored. Page its still not notable enough unlike Timothy one could be argued. DarkHorseMayhem (talk) 22:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
I have over 600 pages on my watchlist - at least 100 of which I have worked on extensively and pay a particular focus to and as time goes by this particular group of focus expands in addition to almost always having one case to work on ongoingly. (I always like to labour/labor through my watchlist daily before addressing others' requests.) Just because I haven't done so yet doesn't mean I won't. Act., you could do so yourself too?--Kieronoldham (talk) 23:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
Removing non-free files instead of tagging them with di-disputed non-free use rationale
Hi Explicit. I get what you're saying regarding this and this; in the latter case, though, the file was only being used in the election article when I tagged it (someone added it to the biography article later) and removing the file would've been a de-facto deletion request per F5. I wasn't sure whether that would be OK.
Anyway, I've found a similar situation in List of Alexandrov Ensemble soloists while looking at some recently uploaded files. It seems that all the non-free files used in the article were just uploaded within the past few days; they all also seem to fail WP:NFLISTS. Two of the entries do seem to have have stand-alone articles about their subjects where other non-free images are being used; so, removing these two files isn't much of a hassle. The other ones (there's more than 50), though, don't have stand-alone articles where that could be moved; so, removing means they could end up being deleted per F5. These all appear to have been recently uploaded and added by the same account, a new account that's about a week old. Not sure what to do here; so, if you've got any ideas, please advise. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: Hi, first, {{di-disputed non-free use rationale}} is only intended for deletion of files, so it should not be used only for disputing the use of files from certain pages.
Regarding non-free files used in list articles, you can boldly just remove them citing NFLISTS. A lot of times, they simply will end up being deleted as F5. If your actions are reverted, you can always send the files to WP:FFD for removal or deletion. The new user may need a message explaining NFCC policy as well. ✗plicit06:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. Just for reference, the wording in the documentation for Template:Di-disputed non-free use rationale and the template itself seems to imply that it can be used in cases where a particular use of a file is being disputed (i.e. removal from certain articles is only being requested): This template notes that a non-free use rationale that is disputed. The image tagged can be deleted or removed from some uses 7 days after tagging unless resolved. It seems to have been worded that way for quite some time, but perhaps it should be changed if it now should only be used when requesting speedy deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:05, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Explicit, I saw that you recently deleted the Moundball page. Is it possible to reverse this? The stated concern was that there was no significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. I understand that the internet likely does not have many independent sources on Moundball. But as a baseball fan myself, I can assure you that Moundball is in fact a game that exists, and I have played it myself multiple times. It is something that almost any attendee of a baseball game is at least aware of. If you want an independent source for the existence of the game, here is a source from the official US Major League Baseball website. SCOTUS Operandi (talk) 09:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi, can you kindly help restore the deleted article on Isaiah Macwealth, this is a person of interest in my opinion. And I am happy to reedit it accordingly if you please assist.
Hello @Explicit, I saw that the page "Thae Su Nyein" was previously deleted/moved. I am working on a new draft with reliable sources and updated content that addresses the concerns from the previous deletion. Would you mind taking a look or advising if I can proceed with a new draft submission? Thank you very much! Yuzy Okkotsu1 (☎) 08:18, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Yuzy Okkotsu1 has posted this message to the talk pages of 6 people, all but one of them administrators, and has also opened a deletion review for the article. JBW (talk) 09:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
I understand now that my approach may have been inappropriate. I sincerely apologize if I caused disruption. My intention was only to ask for help and not to pressure anyone. I’ll follow the proper process from now on and will be more mindful in the future. Thank you for your understanding. Yuzy Okkotsu1 (☎) 09:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi please can you help me to restore djsky article and know what was the reason for you to made the delete thank you Oneworldd (talk) 18:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
My page was deleted. The oage has been established for years. Would you please comment on the reasons.
My page was deleted. It has been established for years. Would you please comment on the reasons. If you do not provide any reasons, how can we address the issues? Edward Y. Chang (talk) 06:16, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am attempting to create a page which was previously rejected. My new submission has more updated and reliable sources such as the MIT Technology Review. Hjqx234 (talk) 21:14, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Request regarding “High School Republican National Federation” article
Hello @Explicit, I saw that the page "High School Republican National Federation" was previously deleted/moved. We are a legally filed nonprofit in the United States and have been active for many years and have even earned the praise of our party's national leaders. What was the reasoning that led to the deletion of our article? Yosefherrera12 (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CNBLUE - Go Your Way.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:CNBLUE - Go Your Way.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
![[7]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_Canada.svg){kind=link}
