User talk:Evilgohan2/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Evilgohan2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Evilgohan2. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #9. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know. --NBahn (talk) 04:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

• You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
• Planning — for the most part, anyway — is now finished (see here) for DC Meetup #9.

--NBahn (talk) 02:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Constantine Satan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

I noticed you tagged the article due to, in part, POV. Could you elaborate please? The Clawed One (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem, response posted on your talk page. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 04:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, didn't know that. Easy enough fix. Anything else? The Clawed One (talk) 06:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

• You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
  
• Please be advised that planning is now underway (see here) for DC Meetup #10. --NBahn (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, i have been debating re-adding the soundtrack listing for Tony Hawks Underground. I have some ideas on how to go about it, Separate page, Combing THUG 1 and 2, Drop down on the articles etc.. If you have any ideas or thoughts I would appreciate your feedback when you come back from your break. Thank you Magicianbink (talk) 08:05, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Constantine Midnite Chas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm not a "sock puppet" account. The person who submitted that, did it as a false accusation because they didn't like me editing their nonsense that doesn't belong in Astrolatry. Just because I happened to use another computer, doesn't mean I'm a "sock puppet." Secondly, "Prohibition in Abrahamic religions" does not belong in this section for Astrolatry, period. It's completely irrelevant. Stop supporting users with a deliberate agenda to dissuade others from this particular study. This user continues to add this, because, it is clearly obvious that the person is offended by the study. You call it vandalism? Vandalism, is the fact that you allow people to add completely nonsensical and irrelevant information to a particular section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigstroonz (talk • contribs) 03:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Direct all comments with regards to the suspected case of sockpuppetry to the appropriate section, please. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 03:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks for the article moderation. I saw that you're semi-retired and just wanted to say I appreciate the effort to cleanup the article. While I'm a relatively new editor (contributing user that is), I'm a LP fan and frequent the page, and noticed the speculation (which is probably in some respects correct) but obviously not suitable for WP yet, and wanted to say thanks for helping maintain one of the articles I visit more. Going to be doing some editing on it myself, I'd like to see it as a featured article one day. Wish ya the best, and hope to continue to see you around cstebila (talk) 01:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Evilgohan2. You have new messages at Blanchardb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

...How do you get it like that? QWERTY531 (talk) 01:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

I know that it's bubbletext and coloring, but how do you get it so it puts that instead of just your username? —Preceding unsigned comment added by QWERTY531 (talk • contribs) 10:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

As much as I appreciate fancy sigs, and yours in particular is pretty cool, anything over 2 lines of code in the edit window can be seen by some as being a little overkill and hard on the eyes, you might want to consider toning it down just a little. -- œ^™ 11:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

 Done I can see your point. Sorry for the delay. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 15:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• Hi! You reverted my edit. Why does an analog sentence in Death Magnetic exist? RoFra (talk) 14:32, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey, just in case you missed it, there is an oppurtunity to get a free dinner this Tuesday August 11 and a chance to meet and hang out talk about Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy and WP:GLAM/SI. Sorry that this is so late in the game, I was hoping the e-mail would be a better form of contact for active members (if you want to get on the e-mail list send me an User e-mail ). Hope that you can attend, User:Sadads (talk)11:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. I just mentioned the add to you so you would not think that I am doing the same thing the other users are doing by posting the promo with the release date of the video. Just to make sure that you would see my edit as something contributing ^^. RichV 23:02, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Have a look at Media Matters Talk, you'll see the issues have already been addressed.69.228.156.201 (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2010 (UTC)Mr Anon

An off-wiki discussion is taking place concerning DC Meetup #12. Watch this page for announcements.
—NBahn (talk) 04:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

P.S. You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. I saw that you had reported Josegmol on the AIV Noticeboard after he ignored yet another warning. While the administrator there didn't seem to agree that his behavior counts as vandalism, I've started a discussion here on the ANI Noticeboard concerning his edits. Your thoughts would be appreciated. Cheers. Friginator (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #12 on Saturday, October 23, 6pm at Bertucci's in Foggy Bottom. Special guests at this meetup will include Wikimedia CTO Danese Cooper, other Wikimedia technical staff and volunteer developers who will be in DC for Hack-A-Ton DC. Please RSVP on the meetup page.

You can remove your name from the Washington DC Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #13 on Wednesday, November 17, from 7 to 9 pm, location to be determined (but near a Metro station in DC).

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can join the mailing list.

You can remove your name from future notifications of Washington DC Meetups by editing this page: Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.
BrownBot (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

The tag says you can remove it if you disagree for any reason but I suspect you need to have some actual reason beyond just that you disagree. Did you take a look at the associated debate page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Robinson (referee) to see the reasons I gave for nominating? You'll probably want to post your own vote there with the reasons you disagree. Msnicki (talk) 04:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I did not notice that you'd made an AfD as a notice of such was not posted. Only a PROD. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 04:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm new at this. But yes, the link was in the tag you removed. I honestly don't know if removing the tag stops the AfD. Msnicki (talk) 04:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Ah, I see. Yes, a separate AfD tag does exist. Removal of the tag, however, does not stop the AfD but does lessen it's visiblity. Be careful not to do a PROD deletion where an AfD deletion is already in progress and vice versa. PROD's are generally used for non-controversial deletions where as AFD's are generally used for controversial deletions where there may be few-to-many opposing viewpoints. I suggest reading up on the etiquette of a proper AfD and getting TWINKLE. It has automated task which can make general day to day edits such as an AfD nomination rather painless. That said, I've gone ahead and mirrored it at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_Robinson_(referee) (2nd nomination) and redirected Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_Robinson_(referee) to that location while adding the tags and informing the initial contributor. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 04:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't know what went wrong. If you look at the history log for Charles Robinson (referee), you'll notice that I tried following the steps for AfD and expected it would give me a tag like you've put on there now. (And, yes, I do use TW, though I didn't the first time.) But it was supposed to have a link to the AfD debate page where I could fill in my vote and it wasn't there. So I undid that and tried again and it still didn't have the link. Then when I created the debate page, it really got messed up. I don't know what I did wrong. What can I say? I'm not very good at this! (Btw, no need for the talkback links. I'm watching your talk page, at least for now.) Msnicki (talk) 04:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, btw, for cleaning up after me. Sorry you had to do that. Msnicki (talk) 05:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

No problem at all. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 05:15, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

On reflection, I think I should tell you how impressed I was by the professionalism of your response. Here I am arguing for the deletion of an article you probably care about but I didn't detect a bit of defensiveness. You're a class act. I mean that from the heart. You're one of the good ones. Msnicki (talk) 16:18, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Not a problem. I try to be a pretty reasonable person and help where I can, even if I don't always agree with the opinion. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 05:41, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Good work with all the work of Constantine (film). Keep it up. ;) − Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 00:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm doing my best to try to get the article to at least B-class. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 02:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

I do not understand why you are deleting my posts. I understand why people shouldn't post WEEK BY WEEK EVENTS, but I am not posting this as a WEEK BY WEEK EVENT. I think this is worth noting as it is a crucial development in the Nexus storyline. I think the way I wrote it out is not speculation, and it doesn't say anything about CM Punk being the leader, or a member. I am sorry for posting it several times, I had trouble figuring out who was taking it down. If you still feel this does not belong up I will not post it again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.245.32.210 (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Here's the thing: Many of the edits have consisted of "CM Punk is the new leader of Nexus" and all other applicable variations. This has been clear speculation and so it has been rejected both by me and by others. Also, it has generally been accepted that week-by-week events not be added. Now, CM Punk being in Nexus, I have not blatantly blocked out. I'm not trying to censor anything nor control the flow of information. I'm merely trying to adhere to policy while at the same time recognizing that in some instances, common sense should be followed. If you look in the edit history of Nexus and CM Punk both, you'll see I accepted both revisions stating that he had joined Nexus. I believe that's pretty evident for everyone to see and all sources support this. This, however, is a week by week account:

On the December 27 episode of Raw, Nexus came out to offer a truce to John Cena stating they were under new management. Cena turned them down and was subsequently attacked by the Nexus. Following this CM Punk came out and put on a Nexus armband. All members of Nexus saluted CM Punk and Punk saluted the Nexus.

Henceforth, that edit was declined. However, this edit was not:

...currently signed to World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) on its Raw brand, where he is a member of Nexus....

On the December 27 edition of Raw, Punk joined Nexus.

For the record, your edit - as quoted above - was not reverted by me. It was reverted by another user as evidenced here. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 19:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I know you want to keep things in-step with the shows, but what was wrong posting info that is going to happen? I thought posting some form of spoilers was ok?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 23:17, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

As far as I know, other editors - those more experienced than myself - tend to revert edits posting spoilers. Typically the only exception to this would be if someone was injured during a taping / house-show. That's really the only reason. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 23:27, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, what about title changes, like last night with the WWE Intercontinental Championship, are they spoilers too?--Mikeymike2001 (talk) 23:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Because it hasn't aired yet, I would assume so. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② 00:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

You are invited to WikiXDC, a special meetup event and celebration on Saturday, January 22 hosted by the National Archives and Records Administration in downtown Washington, D.C.

• Date: January 22, 2011 (tentatively 9:30 AM - 5 PM)
• Location: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), downtown building, Pennsylvania Avenue & 7th St NW.
• Description: There will be a behind-the-scenes tour of the National Archives and you will learn more about what NARA does. We will also have a mini-film screening featuring FedFlix videos along with a special message from Jimmy Wales. In the afternoon, there will be lightning talks by Wikimedians (signup to speak), wiki-trivia, and cupcakes to celebrate!
• Details & RSVP: Details about the event are on our Washington, DC tenwiki page.

Please RSVP soon as possible, as there likely will be a cap on number of attendees that NARA can accommodate.

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List. BrownBot (talk) 02:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)