User talk:Everedux/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Everedux. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi Everedux! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 03:11, Friday, October 5, 2018 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Strong work. I've seen you with increasing frequency, fighting vandalism. Just a warning, it can be addictive! Ifnord (talk) 13:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux (talk) 13:45, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Everedux

We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey: https://mit.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXJcEhLKioNHuJv

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 05:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi i am user Him8watup i accedently deleted parts of the page while experimenting the page strathclyde partnership for transport hope you can fix it thanks! (Him8watup (talk) 23:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC))

I’ve already reverted the edits in question, but thanks for the explanation! Everedux (talk) 23:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Everedux. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Nakon 05:53, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux (talk) 06:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Everedux, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Hello who are you and how do you use twinkle Bravensnapy (talk) 04:41, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi! Twinkle is a tool that I use to revert vandalism. You can read more about it here. Everedux (talk) 04:50, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Oh ok please don't ban me I also messed around with the edit me page please don't ban me I won't do anything else please thanks in advance for your time and consideration. Bravensnapy (talk) 04:53, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

You won’t be blocked unless you vandalize again, but please be more careful in the future. I recommend you read through Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, as well as this page about contributing here. Everedux (talk) 13:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi! I'm really bored of vandalising sites and wanted to help you guys now. Are there any ways I can help on my free time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.124.177.245 (talk) 21:48, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi! Here are some pages that may help you:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Welcome to Wikipedia
• Getting started
• Maintenance

Everedux (talk) 22:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Everedux, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks, and all the same to you! Everedux (talk) 14:48, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Everedux! Hope this time of year finds you well. Red Director (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

You're quite welcome, and I hope the same for you. :) Everedux (talk) 20:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

And may the festive season be joyous to you and your family, Everedux! SAaphIrEblUE (talk) 16:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Same to you! Everedux (talk) 16:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Everedux, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, @Boothsift 01:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks, same to you! Everedux (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Even though it's not the sunniest of times to be choosing such a beverage, here's to you and yours! Thanks for the kind/festive message on my talkpage, happy 2019 from Portugal :) Quite A Character (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, and happy 2019 to you as well. :) Everedux (talk) 21:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

I am too dumb to find a fancy template (or perhaps just lazy?). Anyway, hope your 2019 is fantastic!! S0091 (talk) 00:24, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, and I hope the same for you! Everedux (talk) 01:54, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, how does it feel being a liberal idiot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.75.45.210 (talk) 16:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quite nice, thank you! ;) Everedux (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Everedux because you reverted user YogurtYogurtYogurtTops edits, his desktop fell on his foot and he spilled hot ramen noodles all over his face.--24.117.102.31 (talk) 02:07, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

That edit was blatant vandalism, but okay... Everedux (talk) 02:19, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I am a personal friend of Valkyrie Weather and I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate your ceaseless efforts to fix transphobic vandalism on Rob Cohen’s page. It means the world to Val and all of the friends supporting her right now.

I’d like to donate $20 to a charity of your choice to pay it forwards for you being such an awesome human being. Let me know! Clambake90 (talk) 02:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words, they’re very much appreciated. I don’t know if this is a serious offer or not, but if so then I would probably prefer the money go to PetSmart Charities. From what I’ve seen, they do good work and are consistently rated well by outside groups. Here’s the link to their website. Everedux (talk) 03:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

I am wondering how my edit was not constructive. It was just as factual as the preceding three sentences in the article, and it utilized the exact same level of reference validation as the previous three sentences. - 2601:58B:4200:4B81:BC8D:5986:363:5F5D (talk) 03:16, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Seeing no response, I will restore my edit, then. - 2601:58B:4200:4B81:BC8D:5986:363:5F5D (talk) 03:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

First of all, the message you received was from a template, so I apologize if it seemed overly harsh. However, if you think a topic does not deserve a page, it's best to follow the notability guidelines, usually by placing a {{notability}} template on the page. More guidelines are on the linked page, but you should also keep these points in mind. Everedux (talk) 03:33, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Just because you do not like an edit does not mean it is disruptive. I explained the sentence better; did you even read it?75.111.203.5 (talk) 02:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

You're right, that was a mistake on my part. Sorry. Everedux (talk) 02:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

How to become like you everudux SivaNithish (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi! If you're looking to contribute constructively, then start by checking out these pages:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Welcome to Wikipedia
• Getting started
• Maintenance

Everedux (talk) 01:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

I would like to thank you for added the message to my page however, i would like to inform you that many people confuse "rule 34" with nissan Skyline GT-R 34, thanks once again - Rusty shovel974 (talk) 01:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Do you have a reliable source for that? Everedux (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the message -- unfortunately it didn't reach the previous user of this IP who made the edit. From what I can see, the edit action was meant to correct a typo rather than being a test, even though it didn't quite do the job (prefabicrated -> prefabicated, when it should've been "prefabricated"). I've made what I think is the right correction on the page now. Thanks for making wikipedia a great community! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.190.9.146 (talk) 16:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

I know "editing tests" may not always be 100 percent accurate, but it's probably the closest descriptor in those scenarios. Thanks for your comment though, I really appreciate it! Everedux (talk) 00:35, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for thanking me. It is very appreciated. Mynamemeansnothing (talk) 00:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thank you for your constructive editing! Everedux (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello Everedux,

Unregistered editors cannot create articles on Wikipedia, but they can use the articles for creation process to submit drafts that registered editors can either accept and publish or decline. WikiProject Articles for creation is looking for experienced editors who want to partake in this peer review process. If you have what it takes to get involved, then please take a look at the reviewing instructions. To discuss specific AfC reviews, do so freely on the designated talk page.

There is currently a backlog of over 2600 drafts (17 very old).

If you know an editor who may be willing to help out, please use the template you are currently reading {{subst:WPAFCInvite}} to draw attention to this WikiProject. Many hands make light work!

The One and Only Boothsift 04:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm not interested in becoming an AfC reviewer right now, but thanks anyway for the invite. Everedux (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

@Everedux: It's okay. Feel free to join anytime you wish :). Cheers--The One and Only Boothsift 01:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Everedux in keeping Wiki clean ;)~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux (talk) 00:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux (talk) 20:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Everedux. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 19:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mz7 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	I've noticed you have been working like a machine, keeping Wikipedia free from vandalism and other nonsense. Strong work! Ifnord (talk) 21:49, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 21:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

If you had looked at my edit, you would have seen it was correction of a typo, not "sandbox" editing. 75.111.203.5 (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes, that was an error on my part. Your edit appeared to match some typical test edit criteria, so I misclassified it as such. I do try to check the context of each edit that I revert, but I'm usually dealing with a lot of vandalism and sometimes mistakes are made. Sorry for the confusion. Everedux ^(talk) 00:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

~~Our apologies, I am a front desk agent for a hotel and someone may have used our guest IP address as per the message you left with us. Sorry about that, thanks for your hard work. 198.212.148.254 (talk) A sympathetic FD employee

No worries - that's what usually happens with shared IPs, unfortunately. Thanks for your support though, I appreciate it! Everedux ^(talk) 01:00, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi you made a change to my post on Deutsche Bank, about it not being a bulge bracket, however I believe it fell out of the BB criteria earlier last year.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.132.188 (talk)

It looks like you may be right about that, so I restored your edit. Sorry for the inconvenience. Everedux ^(talk) 21:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You're so quick at reverting vandalism, that when I find and try to revert some, I find that you have already reverted it! Rlin8 (☎·✎·📧) 01:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 01:43, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Holy cow Lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Username Goes Here 062805 (talk • contribs)

Thanks! Huggle helps a lot with that. :) Everedux ^(talk) 01:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

I have to agree with User:Username Goes Here 062805 wow! Nithin Danday! (talk) 01:14, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! You're pretty fast at it yourself, keep up the good work! Everedux ^(talk) 01:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I've also got to thank you for mentioning Huggle, I installed it and now I am applying for Rollback privileges, wish me luck! Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback#User:Nithin.danday Nithin Danday! (talk) 03:48, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I see your request has already been granted, so congratulations on that. Everedux ^(talk) 21:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

I was attempting to revert the edit made on the page 2019 Townsville flood (The death count was claimed as "6969", which we both agree is vandalism), but while trying to help out, I somehow got rid of your fix and brought it back to the original. This wasn't the first time that this happened, as you have been beating me to fixing many pages, including but not limited to Laura Prepon and Lorenzo Snow, both which you just got before me. Because of this...

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		You are extremely efficient at tackling vandalism and other malicious edits, seemingly right before I had time to do anything about it. For your persistence at cleaning the wiki, you deserve another Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! UtopianPoyzin (talk) 03:46, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you, that's very much appreciated! Everedux ^(talk) 03:54, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Can you explain how I can reference articles? Fredrick bukus (talk) 03:15, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Here are some pages that might help you reference sources:

• Verifiability
• Citing sources
• Referencing for beginners
• References dos and don'ts

Everedux ^(talk) 20:12, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

You've beaten me to the rollback at least a dozen times on vandals already. Thank you sooooo much! Orville1974 (talk) 01:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! :) Everedux ^(talk) 01:31, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Mixedmartialartsfan1, Greetings. Thank you for your message above. Do take on the advice to leave a brief Help:Edit Summary on all your edits as this will not only remove the misunderstanding and receive warning when you remove content of an article but more importantly it is a way to communicate to other editors the nature of your edits for articles' content is the collaboration works from many editors.

Hi Everedux Greetings. Thank you for being part of counter vandalism in Wikipedia. I am one of the Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Academy (CVUA) trainers and also an active MMA editor in Wikipedia. Mixedmartialartsfan1 reached out to me as I would be familiar of the nature of your wrong revert and warnings place on their talk page. Mixedmartialartsfan1 had placed 4 different messages on your talk page explaining your revert and warnings were not correct which you deleted them each time when you received the message without replying. For such Mixeodmartialartsfan1 sought help from me of the situation on my talk page.

As all of us know communication is one of the most important aspect among the editors in Wikipedia, not replying an editor and deleted their messages is not a right thing to do especially you had reverted and wrongly place the warning messages on the their talk page for you didnt want to look into the matter until you were being complaint of your conduct. Secondly, as a vandal fighter, we do mistakes from time to time, including I, but we have to take responsibility of our edits and learnt from them if we have done wrong for CVUA motto is civility, responsibility, maturity, and not replying an editor of the your edits and deleted them did not show you care of your actions and trying to hide the complains. You have the right to delete the messages on your talk page, but they will still show on the history page. Admin will check your edits including your talk page when you request certain user rights or if you are involved any noticeboard incidents next time, so deleting the messages would only raise more questions by the admin. Lastly, If we are not sure about certain deletion or changes in an edits especially a sportsman, such as they have just been transfer to another club, result overturn due to some doping incidents, their wins/lost records, and etc, then we, as the vandal fighters, would just leave the edits as they are for other vandal fighters who are familiar with the sport to verify the info or editors who are involved in the sport to take action if necessary (just as in this case, Mixedmartialartsfan1 knows about the the bout between Tony Ferguson and Khabib Nurmagomedov or Donald Cerrone have not been taken place before or being scheduled at the moment - see HERE).

You done the right thing to remove the warnings message and apologies to Mixedmartialartsfan1 finally and I thank you for that. In CVUA, the program addresses more than vandalism subject, it also cover username, threats, CSD and etc., if you want to enroll, just let me know. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:11, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello CASSIOPEIA. I understand that communication is very important on Wikipedia, and I also realize that removing talk page messages is not advisable in most cases. In the past, I've only removed messages from my talk page that appeared to be clearly sent in bad faith, such as these: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Similar messages have been removed by other users, such as these: [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11].

As I said before, I incorrectly assumed that Mixedmartialartsfan1's edits were vandalism (the tone of this message [12] didn't help with that), and as such I removed the messages that were sent. I was not trying to avoid responsibility, however, as I've been fully willing to explain my edits or acknowledge mistakes in the past - see here: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].

That being said, I recognize that my actions in this case were wrong, and for that I apologize. I should have both checked the edits in question closer before deciding to revert them and responded to Mixedmartialartsfan1's messages right away. I will do my best not to repeat either of these mistakes in the future, while also being more careful about reverting edits on topics I'm not very familiar with.

Hi Everedux, Greetings. Thank you for your message. I had already noted and thanked your acknowledgment on my last message. I do understand the message from the editor might not be what you were expected or might not consider civil for your standard but there was no personal or legal thread made. We, the vandal fighters, often receive unpleasant messages, and sometimes down right disgusting comments. It is not easy to keep cool at times, me included, and what we could do is to take a few minutes break, make a cup of coffee to chill it off. You have been helping Wikipedia especially in C-V area and I thank you for that. We all do mistakes and all we would do is to minimize them. Thanks again for your message and your effort made. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:35, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi again, CASSIOPEIA, I wanted to thank you for your help and attention, it is good to know that with any problem you can ask any Wikipedian and they will try to solve the trouble, thank you very much. Hey Everux, I know the tone of the first message wasn’t the best and was kinda disrespectful, I am sorry for that, I was a little bit pissed and confused, in the next messages I sent I tried to be more peaceful, as you can see in my last message, I apologize for that. I aprecciate your apologies, crap happens, I also made a mistake in being aggressive in my messages! Have a great day both of you! (I don’t know how to reply correctly from mobile phone).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mixedmartialartsfan1 (talk • contribs) 03:44, May 25, 2019 (UTC)

Mixedmartialartsfan1 Hi, thank you for your message. Appreciate. So, things goes well and problem solved just with some civil communication. thank you for both (MMAfan1 and Everedux) of your effort to fight vandalism and MMAfan1, pls remember to leave edit summary from now on. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 17:53, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your understanding - I'm glad this has been resolved. Everedux ^(talk) 00:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Abby Wambach is on record saying: "The way that [Jurgen Klinsmann] has brought in a bunch of these foreign guys is not something I believe in wholeheartedly. I don't believe in it. I don't believe in it in my heart."

The players on the USMNT are not foreign. They aren't immigrants. They are Americans, born into citizenship abroad, as John McCain and Ted Cruz were, for example. We would not label them as "foreigners." The sentiment she is expressing, therefore, is at best, ignorant. (In reality, labeling her sentiment as ignorant is giving her pass.) I propose that this section of her page be renamed "Ignorance regarding the USMNT".

Or, to be even more tame to the issue, this section should be called "Controversy regarding comments she made of the USMNT", and not "criticism" because criticism of an issue would have to be based on an informed opinion. Merriam-Webster defines criticize as: "to consider the merits and demerits of and judge accordingly." Abby Wambach's comments reflect a lack of awareness of the merits of what she is opining on, and therefore, calling this section "Criticism of the USMNT" is inaccurate.

Her comments were reacted to on a variety of platforms, including social media, sport networks like ESPN and Fox, and even national news networks like CNN. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9FF0:BA10:936:89D6:F679:9BD2 (talk)

That may be true, but renaming a section heading to "Xenophobia" without discussion is still a violation of the neutral point of view policy. Everedux ^(talk) 01:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Very well, then would "Controversy regarding comments she made of the USMNT" be in accordance with the neutral point of view policy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9FF0:BA10:936:89D6:F679:9BD2 (talk)

Something like that would be better, yes. Everedux ^(talk) 01:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Ok, sounds good.

Just my two cents: As it currently stands, labeling the section as "Criticism of the USMNT" violates the neutral point of view policy principle of: Indicate the relative prominence of opposing views. The current label of this section suggest that her feelings toward the USMNT carry expert, substantive weight because she is a prominent, fellow professional soccer player. While words from a pro soccer player should ordinarily carry credible weight, the substance of her comments are not based on fact. Her comments don't weigh the merits of a certain style of play, for example; her comments are factually inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:9FF0:BA10:936:89D6:F679:9BD2 (talk)

Yeah, for this case I suppose that could be true. Everedux ^(talk) 01:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting that arbitrary edit some guy did. Now, could you contribute to the page by adding the many creatures that lived in Pleistocene Africa?

Sorry, but I don't really know much about that topic. You'd probably have better luck asking someone who added content there in the past. Everedux ^(talk) 00:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Okay. Sarsath3 (talk) 22:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Everedux is attacking me and threatening me Wafa10 (talk) 01:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't see how I'm doing either of things, could you please explain? Everedux ^(talk) 01:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Why You are attacking me Wafa10 (talk) 01:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Everedux is attacking me Wafa10 (talk) 01:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

You were repeatedly adding an unsourced name meaning to Jaber, which is why I deemed your edits unconstructive. I wasn't trying to "attack" you - remember, original research isn't permitted here. Everedux ^(talk) 01:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Ian Arebian and my son name is Jaber. I do know what this name means..and Jaber is not the same like Habit or Habit or Faber. Please understand me. Thank You. Wafa10 (talk) 01:48, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I ment Jabir not Habit. Sorry typing with out glasses Wafa10 (talk) 01:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

And I ment Gaber not Faber. Sorry Wafa10 (talk) 01:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that qualifies as original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. Everedux ^(talk) 01:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

May You Please tell me how I need to feel when I reed name Jaber and I don't see the correct meaning. Wafa10 (talk) 01:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I understand that you're frustrated, but I recommend that you take this conversation to the article's talk page - you can raise your concerns there and someone else may be able to address them more appropriately. Everedux ^(talk) 01:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

From which sources will be accaptable? May You Please tell me. Wafa10 (talk) 01:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

See here. Everedux ^(talk) 02:00, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Everedux Thank You for talking to me. Thank You for Your time. Wafa10 (talk) 02:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Sure, no worries! Everedux ^(talk) 20:55, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for keeping recent changes nice and sparkly! Curdigirl (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 20:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

sorry about the vandalism, is there anywhere i could like create a joke wikipedia article or something? tbh i really just want to make an article that makes literally no sense. how could i do this?

thanks, 69.114.207.26 (talk) 00:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)bean sandwich that doesnt have an account

I'm not entirely sure what you're asking for, but the sandbox might work. Here's some general information on it, and these are the things you can't do there. Everedux ^(talk) 01:05, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Everedux: I see that at 21:50 June 5, you reverted a change made at 21:49 ("Projects" -> "porn collection"). However, when I bring up the article, it still (June 6 08:52 PDT) shows "porn collection" instead of "Projects". Are you able to complete the reversion so that "Projects" appears? Thanks. Khb pg bc 0591 (talk) 15:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

09:08 -- I see it's fixed now -- Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khb pg bc 0591 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Everedux,

There were some very serious allegations made against these artists and, for Sadistik the only sources were other Wikipedia articles and for Tonedeff, there were no sources at all! Wikipedia is not a reliable sources because, as you know, anyone can edit Wikipedia. This information in the edit might very well be true but we can't publish serious charges like this against a living person without better sourcing. If you see someone remove badly sourced accusations against a living person, please don't revert them. If you believe they are true, find some good sources for these claims. Otherwise, I encourage you also to remove poorly sourced allegations when you see them, too. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I must have missed the context of those edits. I'll make sure to check which sources are cited when evaluating content removal in the future. Thanks! Everedux ^(talk) 00:38, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 16:45, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 20:43, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

What do you mean unconstructive and unsubstantiated? Go look up ultimate fighting championship and do some research, all that is true. Fredrick bukus (talk) 19:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey look up Orlando weit before you question what I have added in to a PREVIOUSLY ABSENT bio! Fredrick bukus (talk) 19:23, 12 June 2019 (UTC) biographies of living

If the information you were adding was correct, you should have provided a reliable source to demonstrate verifiability. This is especiallly important on biographies of living persons like Orlando Wiet. Everedux ^(talk) 20:58, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

i didn't change anything whilst i may have read the book i didnt even know that there was a bronze bow page on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.204.215 (talk) 03:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Someone else using your IP address made unconstructive edits to that page, which is why you received those notices. This is hard to avoid when using a shared IP address, but if you create an account you won’t receive any more irrelevant warnings. Everedux ^(talk) 20:56, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello Everedux.

I give on the talk page of Aesop, the reasons of the removing of the section about his origins. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.164.53.42 (talk) 21:21, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay, but you should note that in your edit summary next time. It’s also a good idea to seek consensus before removing an entire section of a page. Everedux ^(talk) 21:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Everedux! I did that minor change from "Garota de Berlin" to "Garota de Berlim" because that's the name of the song. The city's name is written with an "m" at the end in Portuguese instead of an "n", hence "Garota de Berlin" is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.243.48.253 (talk) 22:26, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for providing an explanation - I restored your edit on Nina Hagen discography. My apologies for the misunderstanding. Everedux ^(talk) 22:42, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

I took something from Facebook and added it to the Facebook section. It's the groups that are in the event, for the page I posted it on. So your deletion of my addition makes zero sense Brontej (talk) 00:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

The information you added was unnecessary and did not adhere with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. The "Facebook event and Internet meme" section of the page already explains the event well enough - listing all of that information isn't really helpful. Everedux ^(talk) 01:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User talk:49.150.124.235 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Railfan23 (talk) 05:43, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Everedux, I’m a vandal. Thank you for correcting me. I will make more constructive edits in the future. 183.178.181.29 (talk) 01:41, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

It's a neutral point of view that he sentenced a terrorist to 20 years, because it's a verifiable fact, but i hope you are more satisfied by my current edit.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Towels4days (talk • contribs)

Yes, that looks much better. Thanks! Everedux ^(talk) 00:57, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I'm a Philippine historian and I am well aware about the realities here on the philippines. I clearly know that the ill-gotten wealth of the Marcoses is still unproven. Also, the most of sources that are cited was from rappler which is know for spreading malicious news and recently got their license revoked. Please allow me to to correct the page of one of oyr honorable president. If I have more time, I will correct everthing on his page and otger PH presidents.

Even if that’s true, I reverted your edit because referring to someone as “the best” is not permitted under Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy. Everedux ^(talk) 20:37, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for enlightening me. I will take note of that. -JLanzxc

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 00:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 01:13, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

	Thanks
	~ It's not a toy ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 01:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Indeed it's not, thanks! Everedux ^(talk) 01:35, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Heyyy I was wondering if you can do a page for me I’m a track star Malcolm beckford (talk) 15:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

I’m not interested in doing that right now, especially since you don’t appear to meet the notability guidelines. Everedux ^(talk) 21:23, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You caught me to it way too many times. Here's your barnstar Dibbydib (talk) 03:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 03:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi ! Actually I don't how to edit (professionaly) I just want to change the logo about Identity and Democracy Party as it is from June 2019 but the logo file wasn't form for a wiki subject !! Deadpan1920 (talk) 21:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi. To add a new image on an article, you first have to upload the file to Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons. Here is a tutorial that might help you with that. Everedux ^(talk) 21:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		This is for your valuable efforts on countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 16:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 20:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Linda fiorentino page and the Pellicano section. all of the support media cited does not claim that Pellicano was Fiorentino's "boyfriend". prior relationship does not mean romantic and to extrapolate that from unverfied media sources is sexist and libelous. you can keep prior relationship as a quote from the del quentin wilbur washingtomn post article but it must be in quotes and not stated as a fact. Until Fiorentino makes a public statement which she has not to date none of the media regarding Pellicano you cite can be considered reliable. No articles have statements from Fiorentino. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Linda Fiorentino Really (talk • contribs) 14:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi. It looks like your concerns have already been addressed on the article's talk page. I would recommend continuing the discussion there if you have any further questions. Everedux ^(talk) 21:53, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to [email protected], so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at [email protected].

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I gave that user two big fat warnings, I hope he gets forever blocked.LoganTheWatermelon (talk) 01:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays! S0091 (talk) 21:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, same to you! Everedux ^(talk) 22:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help with fighting vandalism! Happy holidays & happy editing! Snowycats (talk) 01:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 02:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 01:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Hello Everedux:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Donner60 (talk) 23:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks (static)}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Thanks, and all the same to you! Everedux ^(talk) 01:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

You have removed the additional information I have added. I am one of his birth children and have every right to have this added. What I had added is FACTUAL. V5kag (talk) 10:13, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Without a reliable source, that information qualifies as original research and is not allowed. Everedux ^(talk) 01:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Everedux.

Actually, I made that change on the Freddy vs. Jason article because I noticed a mistake. Robert Englund's last name was misspelled "England."

I'll change it back again.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.2.192.50 (talk) 02:47, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Thanks - sorry for the misunderstanding. Everedux ^(talk) 21:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your awesome work fighting vandalism with Huggle. I revert conflicted with you more than five times! L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Everedux ^(talk) 01:43, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

City and district is spelled with TWO n's as in Hannover - not to be confused with the American 'Hanover - I am from germany and know — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.215.37 (talk) 22:36, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Hanover has traditionally been the more common English name and is preferred here for that reason. If you think this should be changed you may bring it up on the main talk page, but be aware that previous move requests did not succeed. Everedux ^(talk) 01:27, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Everedux,

I'm running into your anti-vandalism work and I just wanted to say thank you. It can be endless work but it's important to catch it early. Your work is appreciated! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

That means a lot, thanks! Everedux ^(talk) 02:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Removed was incorrect info- WHEN it was written for over a decade ago it might have been, but it is no longer accurate - AT the same time I put new content and also refs for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.115.204.102 (talk) 12:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I must not have seen those previous edits. I'll restore your revision for now. Everedux ^(talk) 15:15, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

I am not the same guy who edited the Kentucky page that is someone else--107.77.194.34 (talk) 14:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Last year, someone else using your IP address made unconstructive edits to that page, which is why you received a warning. The easiest way to avoid these irrelevant notices is to create an account. Everedux ^(talk) 21:52, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

I'm sure you've had a lot more experience with the anti-vandalism stuff than I have, but it's looking nice! Keep up the good work mate. NomadicNom (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! You're off to a great start yourself, keep it up! Everedux ^(talk) 01:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)