User talk:Esevoke

Esevoke is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

I'm on vacation from Wikipedia (I need to study for college exams, ring theory, etc.)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sebastián Hurtado-Salazar has been accepted

Sebastián Hurtado-Salazar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GTrang (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Livingston (mathematician) (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CSMention269 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles Livingston (mathematician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:39, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Esevoke! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 04:39, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly fix the in-line citations before you submit. Read WP:ILC for more information. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 10:16, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The preview button, and freneticness

In several discussions on WT:WPM and Talk:Group that I happen to have noticed recently, you have adopted a somewhat frenetic commenting style, in which you make a very large number of edits in quick succession. Personally I would be grateful if you could avoid doing this; it swamps my watchlist and article edit-histories in a way that makes it difficult for me to tell at a glance what has happened. A useful tool in this regard (beyond patiently thinking through what you want to say more fully before hitting "publish") is the preview button, which gives you the opportunity to review your edits as they will appear, and continue working on any parts you are not fully happy with. Thanks, --JBL (talk) 22:01, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for that. Thank you for telling me. I'll try to improve in this aspect of wiki editing. Best, Esevoke (talk) 22:04, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate that. Also, so far the article work that you've done seems to be very good, so thank you for your contributions! --JBL (talk) 17:29, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Livingston (mathematician) has been accepted

Charles Livingston (mathematician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 14:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Please review WP:FIES. -- Rgdboer (talk) 22:19, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I did not know about that. I'll try to use edit summaries in all my edits from now on. Esevoke (talk) 22:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Euler-Arnold

Do you have Arnold's original account of this? I remember reading it a long time ago. Might be worth revisiting. Tito Omburo (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tito Omburo: Euler–Arnold equation mentions a paper in French as "The original source". Myst7001 (talk) 20:09, 18 June 2025 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Thank you, that's the one! It was listed in "Further reading", which combined with non-standard page structure, I missed. It surely should be a reference! Tito Omburo (talk) 20:19, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammed Abouzaid has been accepted

Mohammed Abouzaid, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 13:32, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]