User talk:Ericorbit/Archive30

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Thanks for your input. Although I think that the "Other artists earning two number ones during 2008 are" sentence by having artist, two citations, artist, two citations, artist, two citations, etc is a bit jarring and annoying to read. Perhaps include fewer and list the songs to lengthen out the prose of that sentence without so many interruptions of citations making it less apparent. AARON• ^TALK 14:43, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, if you want to flesh out that sentence, go for it. Just figured that it would be best to mention ALL two-number-ones artists instead of highlighting just a few. - eo (talk) 15:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so you have won me over on updating the Foo Fighters 'Studio Albums' table and keeping it to 10 charts. Can I just ask, will this be done for other tables on the Foo Fighters discography ? Some time ago I narrowed down the 'Singles' table to 12 charts but then someone added the Canadian Alternative chart, which I am not sure if it is even an official chart so maybe that should go. Somewhere in Wiki guidlines it states to use charts that are relative to the band's success. So for the Foo Fighter's singles table I think it is important to keep the US Hot 100, US Airplay, US Alternative, U Maintstream Rock, Australian Singles Chart, Canadian Singles Chart, Irish Singles Chart, Netherlands Singles Chart, New Zealand Singles Chart, Swedish Singles Chart and UK Singles Chart. That is 12 charts, I know but they are all relative. If two have to go to bring it down to 10 then maybe the Irish and Swedish singles charts, but I think they are both relative. I am not bothered if you take away the Canadian Alternative Chart as it seems to be unofficial anyway.mjgm84 (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would either discuss on the article's talk page, or you may want to check in with User:Igordebraga. Looks like Igordebraga started the tables change and put the tag at the top of the article... perhaps he had planned specific charts to keep and can contribute to the discussion also. - eo (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be on a plane when my full protection of Foo Fighters discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) expires on Sept. 19. Both QuintusPetillius and Cathartica have been warned against resuming the edit war, and QuintusPetillius has made good-faith efforts to discuss it. Cathartica has not. If Cathartica reverts shortly after the protection expires without doing any discussion, I plan on blocking him. Please keep an eye on it, and take care of it for me if a shooting war starts while I am in the air.—Kww(talk) 17:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will do... have a safe flight! - eo (talk) 17:21, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HeartWhatAboutLove.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you have time would you create a page for the new Pet Shop Boys single "Leaving"? I thank you.◦◦derekbd◦◦my talk◦◦ 11:54, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:18, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi Eric, I see you're an administrator and you contribute to the Record chart WikiProject so I was hoping you could give me some advice on a problem regarding an IP user (184.58.18.72). To try and keep it short, Taylor Swift's song "Begin Again" was released last month as a promo single from Red, and Oct. 1 it was sent to country radio as an official single. This user refuses to accept this and continues to change the single to "promotional" on several pages and a template, even though sources have been provided as proof it is an official single. On Talk:Begin Again (Taylor Swift song) he provides 9 sources to support himself, but they don't actually say what he is claiming. He engaged in edit warring resulting in the page being protected twice, personally attacked me on my talk page, falsely is warning me on my talk page, and is threatening to "shut Wikipedia down" on the admin's talk page who protected "Begin Again". Is any of this enough to warrant a block or something? Thank you if you read this far. :) NYSMtalk page 07:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've left warnings on his talk page - this is good. I'm checking thru his edits to see what else is going on; it looks to me as if he does not have a source to show that it is still a promotional-only song. And obviously it doesn't matter what "Tay" thinks it is (we're very close, I can call her that). For now I have re-semi-protected the article. - eo (talk) 12:21, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop stopping my son from posting correct information on that page, the person above has called him names cause my son proved him wrong and he didn't like it and so resorted to calling my son names and not listening and is the one who is constantly reverting his edits and for you to support this person and his behavior is wrong and I should write you up to Wikipedia because you support people who name call and my son is only 15 years old and is smarter then you and I personally do not find it appropriate what you have said here about him and you both should not be editing on this site if you are going to sit there and be rude cause he is right and you guys don't like it. Now it is your choice allow him to post the correct information or have me write you up for ganging up and name calling a 15 year old child. Your choice. So you can see what this man has said here is quotes of his inappropriate bahviour: "your comments are just laughable", "you might be a few bricks shy of a full load." and "you're hopeless" and your are supporting this action that are inappropriate and are a result of my son proving him wrong and he didn't like it. Also I do not appreciate our personal IP address posted on this site you really need to set up an anonymous account for people who do not have an account with your website as posting someone's personal IP address on any site is illegal and opens their computers to be hacked.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.18.72 (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want "your son" leaving your IP address on pages then either create an account or don't edit Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 17:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They did change them. How do we handle them in discographies? Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Country_charts Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep all past chart peaks, and going forward use the "main" chart. No need to make it more complicated than it needs to be. - eo (talk) 10:58, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If his current edit war continues or escalates (likey, I'm afraid), then please note he has "history":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_25#Passive_smoking.2C_Smoking_ban_in_England

Same technique as he's using now both with you: changing words in the lede, moving pages, endless edit- and move-wars. He's also battling over "railway station" vs "train station" at the moment, as can be seen in his recent edits. Cross porpoises (talk) 09:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's since 11 August 2009 that i am forced to hold in my personal page the "Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppet" template, but since the first day, I clarified the issue ( http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Suspected_Wikipedia_sockpuppets_of_Simone_Jackson&action=history ) and since 2009, I was more careful don't forget the login. Now, after 3 years, I'd like to remove this template that I do not deserve at all. Simone Jackson (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As above. Simone Jackson (talk) 00:28, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - eo (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Simone Jackson (talk) 23:33, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you would like to leave comments which concern you or would cast a vote in support or opposition based on your findings, I would much appreciate it. The list has garnered several good (and resolved) reviews, but no votes have been cast. Thanks. AARON• ^TALK 12:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are are the tables for:

• List of number-one adult contemporary singles of 2008 (U.S.)
• List of number-one adult contemporary singles of 2009 (U.S.)
• List of number-one adult contemporary singles of 2010 (U.S.)
• List of number-one adult contemporary singles of 2011 (U.S.)
• List of number-one R&B/Hip-hop songs of 2008 (U.S.)
• List of number-one R&B/Hip-hop songs of 2009 (U.S.)
• List of number-one R&B/Hip-hop songs of 2010 (U.S.)
• List of number-one R&B/Hip-hop songs of 2011 (U.S.)

completely fucked up!?!? The tables are not how I formatted them, though they look the same when you click on edit?? AARON• ^TALK 23:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa...yeah, totally strange! And they look fine at first when the page loads, then after about 2 seconds all the columns go crazy. The same thing happens when I click on an earlier version of the page too. Some kind of technical thing? - eo (talk) 12:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Same thing is happening with the dance chart lists that you revamped, too. - eo (talk) 12:10, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thing if you actually go back to before I started making the changes, the tables are fine. They were fine when I looked a few days ago too. There's nothing wrong with the formatting when you click edit, it's exactly the same, and no one hasn't edited the lists since me. I'm really confused! It looks awful! The dance charts are less obvious though as it's 99% a different singer every week. AARON• ^TALK 12:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely odd, I'm thinking its a technical issue in wikipedia... can we find another article that has similar tables and see if it's occurring there too? - eo (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at the Hot 100 lists and they are but, but they haven't been edited like how I have improved them AARON• ^TALK 12:19, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has something to do with rowspans that equal more than 1. There's gotta be another article we can check (e.g. not any of the number-one lists) to see if it's happening elsewhere. - eo (talk) 12:24, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't doing it a few days ago, and the formatting is the same still. I don't know of any other lists :-/ AARON• ^TALK 12:28, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

←Well they still look fucked up 12 hours later, although I checked them out on my smartphone (using a Wikipedia app) and they look fine. This entire thing is weird and it makes me anxious... I don't like them looking weird! Did you by any chance see an example of this in any other articles? - eo (talk) 23:48, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No I haven't. AARON• ^TALK 12:27, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Worked it out yet? Lol. AARON• ^TALK 22:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting ridiculous. I am not trying to be rude or anything, but I had added reasonable and reliable sources for citations next to the songs (most of them were audio and news outlets; I mean what part do you not understand when it's fully documented & solid proof?) If you would like me to correctly cite it with the date and publisher (I am aware that I did not do so on most of them) please unblock the article so that I may go in and fix it. Some of those songs that are currently on the discography section are incorrect and she was not featured on them. A lot of the actual featured songs are missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.115.168.7 (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eric,

If you have chance could you please comment at the following rfc? Talk:Trouble_(Leona_Lewis_song) thanks. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1988, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Esposito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - eo (talk) 13:03, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Holidays!
	Hi, eo! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, --Discographer (talk) 19:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, you may wish to revisit Sugababes discography which was unprotected some time ago and has since been experiencing IP vandalism. Till 09:14, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Siouxsie Prudence.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think Hot Dance Club Songs should be renamed? Only problem is: Billboard.biz calls it Dance Club Songs while Billboard.com has it as Dance/Club Play Songs. My preference would be to Dance Club Songs with a redirect created for the other. Also, what about the lists of number-one dance songs. Billboard has so many dance charts that number-one dance hits or dance singles seems ambiguous. Maybe List of number-one dance hits (United States) could provide links to all the various lists (say, merge List of number one dance airplay hits (United States) into it) and the individual lists such as List of number-one dance singles of 2013 (U.S.) should be moved to something like List of number-one Dance Club Songs of 2013 or List of number-one Billboard Dance Club Songs of 2013. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:26, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if we need to rename it again. I do think perhaps the by-year number-one lists should be renamed. "Dance" seems a bit to vague at this point, especially since Billboard just unveiled a new "Dance" chart that combines sales, airplay and club play. - eo (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know Billboard.biz has started to publish the Brazilian chart positions. Can you talk a look and see which of these edits is correct?—Kww(talk) 00:12, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

the "43" is correct. The "brazil pop" chart I dont see at all. - eo (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ericorbit. I am here because I need a favor from you. Do you have an access to billboard.biz charts? If you have, can you please tell me did the Loud Tour Live at the O2 charted on the DVD chart? Thank you. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 18:44, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing I see is that it debuted on the "Music Video Sales" chart at #11 on January 5, 2013. It appears to have peaked there (it's at #13 for the week of Jan. 26). - eo (talk) 19:38, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, can you add that in the article? Thank you. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 23:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Siouxsie Prudence.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if it is okay to create a redirect to a category? I've never encountered this, but I didn't think I saw anything at WP:REDIRECT that said you can't. I'm thinking Disney songs to Category:Disney songs. NYSMy talk page 20:25, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know you are familiar with updating #1s every week, what has happened to the website? It's just symbols now, and all archives have gone.  — AARON • ^TALK 15:04, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They completely revamped .com and .biz and the print issue. Please don't tell me the archives have gone or I may cry. - eo (talk) 15:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the website, it's just... I don't even know. I'm so angry about it.  — AARON • ^TALK 16:25, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing for which we can hope as chart archives are the books, which published the main charts. But still, on the net are available only the ones until 2009. F u Billboard' ... — Tomíca^(T2ME) 16:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey what's up eo, long time lol need you to do me a favour, need you to put a semi-protection on the T.I. discography, those IP vandals won't go away, they've been messing with the albums and singles certifications as usual and I'm tired of it. Hometown Kid (talk) 22:39, 21 Feburary 2013 (UTC)

Howdy!  Done - eo (talk) 12:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there eo, hope you have a wonderful day, regards!

Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 15:30, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bot to repair the Billboard site revision catastrophe has undergone its initial test run (see Special:Contributions/Chartbot. I uncovered a few small bugs in the initial edits, but any that I didn't revert are, to the best of my knowledge, good. If you have any issues with it, Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Chartbot is the place to bring them up.—Kww(talk) 19:40, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Verve Unmixed.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Verve Unmixed 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Verve Unmixed 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ververemixed4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Verve Remixed 2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:52, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Verve Remixed 3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chartbot keeps whining about Bryan Adams, because it can't find him. Apparently, Allmusic and Billboard have both deleted him as an artist on their websites. I can find individual links (like http://www.billboard.com/charts/1994-02-19/adult-contemporary) but note that "Bryan Adams" isn't a clickable link even though every other artist on the chart is. Can you check and see if he's been deleted from billboard.biz as well?—Kww(talk) 16:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, very odd. I was able to find him in .biz's database. - eo (talk) 16:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After Chartbot has completed its first pass, I'll have a list of broken links that I couldn't repair. I could give them to you, and, if you will look up chart dates, I'll be able to create links to individual charts. This is bizarre, and, according to his article, done at his request.—Kww(talk) 17:02, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I checked for a "Brian" misspelling and I also looked to see if they put him under A and no luck. I searched for some of his songs and albums and they're just missing. - eo (talk) 17:03, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Live Here Now has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, notability concerns, kind of an advertisement

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. gwickwire^talk_editing 17:53, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live Here Now is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live Here Now (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gwickwire^talk_editing 17:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Best of Siouxsie and the Banshees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Best of Siouxsie and the Banshees until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley 09:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twice Upon a Time: The Singles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twice Upon a Time: The Singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley 09:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chartbot is choking a bit on links that I think are still available on billboard.biz, even though they've been dropped from billboard.com. An example is

• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/yearend_chart_display.jsp?f=Hot+Country+Songs&g=Year-end+Singles&year=1956

That should be a link to the Hot Country Songs chart for 1956. Billboard.com only goes back to 1985, so Chartbot can't just reformat the URL. Can you get me some links to older annual charts on billboard.biz? I want to see if I can repair the obsolete links by pointing at billboard.biz instead.—Kww(talk) 18:00, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does it matter that a login is needed? I don't think .biz is much better, I can only find stuff going back to 1985. Here are some links:

• http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/year-end/1985/hot-country-songs
• http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/year-end/1993/hot-r-and-and-b-hip-hop-songs
• http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/year-end/2006/hot-dance-club-play-songs (Dance Club only goes back to 2006..??!)
• http://www.billboard.com/biz/charts/year-end/1989/the-billboard-200

Hope these help. - eo (talk) 19:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it only goes back to 1985, it doesn't fix the problem. We have a lot of chart links from earlier years, and I can't repair them without a decent source. I might have to resort to Google Books.—Kww(talk) 20:10, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]